TY - INPR A1 - Prasse, Paul A1 - Gruben, Gerrit A1 - Machlika, Lukas A1 - Pevny, Tomas A1 - Sofka, Michal A1 - Scheffer, Tobias T1 - Malware Detection by HTTPS Traffic Analysis N2 - In order to evade detection by network-traffic analysis, a growing proportion of malware uses the encrypted HTTPS protocol. We explore the problem of detecting malware on client computers based on HTTPS traffic analysis. In this setting, malware has to be detected based on the host IP address, ports, timestamp, and data volume information of TCP/IP packets that are sent and received by all the applications on the client. We develop a scalable protocol that allows us to collect network flows of known malicious and benign applications as training data and derive a malware-detection method based on a neural networks and sequence classification. We study the method's ability to detect known and new, unknown malware in a large-scale empirical study. KW - machine learning KW - computer security Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-100942 ER - TY - INPR A1 - Arnold, Holger T1 - A linearized DPLL calculus with clause learning (2nd, revised version) N2 - Many formal descriptions of DPLL-based SAT algorithms either do not include all essential proof techniques applied by modern SAT solvers or are bound to particular heuristics or data structures. This makes it difficult to analyze proof-theoretic properties or the search complexity of these algorithms. In this paper we try to improve this situation by developing a nondeterministic proof calculus that models the functioning of SAT algorithms based on the DPLL calculus with clause learning. This calculus is independent of implementation details yet precise enough to enable a formal analysis of realistic DPLL-based SAT algorithms. N2 - Viele formale Beschreibungen DPLL-basierter SAT-Algorithmen enthalten entweder nicht alle wesentlichen Beweistechniken, die in modernen SAT-Solvern implementiert sind, oder sind an bestimmte Heuristiken oder Datenstrukturen gebunden. Dies erschwert die Analyse beweistheoretischer Eigenschaften oder der Suchkomplexität derartiger Algorithmen. Mit diesem Artikel versuchen wir, diese Situation durch die Entwicklung eines nichtdeterministischen Beweiskalküls zu verbessern, der die Arbeitsweise von auf dem DPLL-Kalkül basierenden SAT-Algorithmen mit Klausellernen modelliert. Dieser Kalkül ist unabhängig von Implementierungsdetails, aber dennoch präzise genug, um eine formale Analyse realistischer DPLL-basierter SAT-Algorithmen zu ermöglichen. KW - Automatisches Beweisen KW - Logikkalkül KW - SAT KW - DPLL KW - Klausellernen KW - automated theorem proving KW - logical calculus KW - SAT KW - DPLL KW - clause learning Y1 - 2009 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-29080 ER -