TY - JOUR A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Answer set programming unleashed! JF - Künstliche Intelligenz N2 - Answer Set Programming faces an increasing popularity for problem solving in various domains. While its modeling language allows us to express many complex problems in an easy way, its solving technology enables their effective resolution. In what follows, we detail some of the key factors of its success. Answer Set Programming [ASP; Brewka et al. Commun ACM 54(12):92–103, (2011)] is seeing a rapid proliferation in academia and industry due to its easy and flexible way to model and solve knowledge-intense combinatorial (optimization) problems. To this end, ASP offers a high-level modeling language paired with high-performance solving technology. As a result, ASP systems provide out-off-the-box, general-purpose search engines that allow for enumerating (optimal) solutions. They are represented as answer sets, each being a set of atoms representing a solution. The declarative approach of ASP allows a user to concentrate on a problem’s specification rather than the computational means to solve it. This makes ASP a prime candidate for rapid prototyping and an attractive tool for teaching key AI techniques since complex problems can be expressed in a succinct and elaboration tolerant way. This is eased by the tuning of ASP’s modeling language to knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR). The resulting impact is nicely reflected by a growing range of successful applications of ASP [Erdem et al. AI Mag 37(3):53–68, 2016; Falkner et al. Industrial applications of answer set programming. K++nstliche Intelligenz (2018)] Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0550-z SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 105 EP - 108 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Brewka, Gerhard A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Interview with Gerhard Brewka T2 - Künstliche Intelligenz N2 - This interview with Gerhard Brewka was conducted by correspondance in May 2018. The question set was compiled by Torsten Schaub and Stefan Woltran. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0549-5 SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 219 EP - 221 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Special issue on answer set programming T2 - Künstliche Intelligenz Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0554-8 SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 101 EP - 103 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - THES A1 - Kaufmann, Benjamin T1 - High performance answer set solving Y1 - 2015 ER - TY - THES A1 - Videla, Santiago T1 - Reasoning on the response of logical signaling networks with answer set programming T1 - Modellierung Logischer Signalnetzwerke mittels Antwortmengenprogrammierung N2 - Deciphering the functioning of biological networks is one of the central tasks in systems biology. In particular, signal transduction networks are crucial for the understanding of the cellular response to external and internal perturbations. Importantly, in order to cope with the complexity of these networks, mathematical and computational modeling is required. We propose a computational modeling framework in order to achieve more robust discoveries in the context of logical signaling networks. More precisely, we focus on modeling the response of logical signaling networks by means of automated reasoning using Answer Set Programming (ASP). ASP provides a declarative language for modeling various knowledge representation and reasoning problems. Moreover, available ASP solvers provide several reasoning modes for assessing the multitude of answer sets. Therefore, leveraging its rich modeling language and its highly efficient solving capacities, we use ASP to address three challenging problems in the context of logical signaling networks: learning of (Boolean) logical networks, experimental design, and identification of intervention strategies. Overall, the contribution of this thesis is three-fold. Firstly, we introduce a mathematical framework for characterizing and reasoning on the response of logical signaling networks. Secondly, we contribute to a growing list of successful applications of ASP in systems biology. Thirdly, we present a software providing a complete pipeline for automated reasoning on the response of logical signaling networks. N2 - Deciphering the functioning of biological networks is one of the central tasks in systems biology. In particular, signal transduction networks are crucial for the understanding of the cellular response to external and internal perturbations. Importantly, in order to cope with the complexity of these networks, mathematical and computational modeling is required. We propose a computational modeling framework in order to achieve more robust discoveries in the context of logical signaling networks. More precisely, we focus on modeling the response of logical signaling networks by means of automated reasoning using Answer Set Programming (ASP). ASP provides a declarative language for modeling various knowledge representation and reasoning problems. Moreover, available ASP solvers provide several reasoning modes for assessing the multitude of answer sets. Therefore, leveraging its rich modeling language and its highly efficient solving capacities, we use ASP to address three challenging problems in the context of logical signaling networks: learning of (Boolean) logical networks, experimental design, and identification of intervention strategies. Overall, the contribution of this thesis is three-fold. Firstly, we introduce a mathematical framework for characterizing and reasoning on the response of logical signaling networks. Secondly, we contribute to a growing list of successful applications of ASP in systems biology. Thirdly, we present a software providing a complete pipeline for automated reasoning on the response of logical signaling networks. KW - Systembiologie KW - logische Signalnetzwerke KW - Antwortmengenprogrammierung KW - systems biology KW - logical signaling networks KW - answer set programming Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-71890 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dimopoulos, Yannis A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Lühne, Patrick A1 - Romero Davila, Javier A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - plasp 3 BT - Towards Effective ASP Planning JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - We describe the new version of the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL)-to-Answer Set Programming (ASP) translator plasp. First, it widens the range of accepted PDDL features. Second, it contains novel planning encodings, some inspired by Satisfiability Testing (SAT) planning and others exploiting ASP features such as well-foundedness. All of them are designed for handling multivalued fluents in order to capture both PDDL as well as SAS planning formats. Third, enabled by multishot ASP solving, it offers advanced planning algorithms also borrowed from SAT planning. As a result, plasp provides us with an ASP-based framework for studying a variety of planning techniques in a uniform setting. Finally, we demonstrate in an empirical analysis that these techniques have a significant impact on the performance of ASP planning. KW - knowledge representation and nonmonotonic reasoning KW - technical notes and rapid communications KW - answer set programming KW - automated planning KW - action and change Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068418000583 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 19 IS - 3 SP - 477 EP - 504 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - THES A1 - Konczak, Kathrin T1 - Preferences in answer set programming T1 - Präferenzen in der Antwortmengenprogrammierung N2 - Answer Set Programming (ASP) emerged in the late 1990s as a new logic programming paradigm, having its roots in nonmonotonic reasoning, deductive databases, and logic programming with negation as failure. The basic idea of ASP is to represent a computational problem as a logic program whose answer sets correspond to solutions, and then to use an answer set solver for finding answer sets of the program. ASP is particularly suited for solving NP-complete search problems. Among these, we find applications to product configuration, diagnosis, and graph-theoretical problems, e.g. finding Hamiltonian cycles. On different lines of ASP research, many extensions of the basic formalism have been proposed. The most intensively studied one is the modelling of preferences in ASP. They constitute a natural and effective way of selecting preferred solutions among a plethora of solutions for a problem. For example, preferences have been successfully used for timetabling, auctioning, and product configuration. In this thesis, we concentrate on preferences within answer set programming. Among several formalisms and semantics for preference handling in ASP, we concentrate on ordered logic programs with the underlying D-, W-, and B-semantics. In this setting, preferences are defined among rules of a logic program. They select preferred answer sets among (standard) answer sets of the underlying logic program. Up to now, those preferred answer sets have been computed either via a compilation method or by meta-interpretation. Hence, the question comes up, whether and how preferences can be integrated into an existing ASP solver. To solve this question, we develop an operational graph-based framework for the computation of answer sets of logic programs. Then, we integrate preferences into this operational approach. We empirically observe that our integrative approach performs in most cases better than the compilation method or meta-interpretation. Another research issue in ASP are optimization methods that remove redundancies, as also found in database query optimizers. For these purposes, the rather recently suggested notion of strong equivalence for ASP can be used. If a program is strongly equivalent to a subprogram of itself, then one can always use the subprogram instead of the original program, a technique which serves as an effective optimization method. Up to now, strong equivalence has not been considered for logic programs with preferences. In this thesis, we tackle this issue and generalize the notion of strong equivalence to ordered logic programs. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the strong equivalence of two ordered logic programs. Furthermore, we provide program transformations for ordered logic programs and show in how far preferences can be simplified. Finally, we present two new applications for preferences within answer set programming. First, we define new procedures for group decision making, which we apply to the problem of scheduling a group meeting. As a second new application, we reconstruct a linguistic problem appearing in German dialects within ASP. Regarding linguistic studies, there is an ongoing debate about how unique the rule systems of language are in human cognition. The reconstruction of grammatical regularities with tools from computer science has consequences for this debate: if grammars can be modelled this way, then they share core properties with other non-linguistic rule systems. N2 - Die Antwortmengenprogrammierung entwickelte sich in den späten 90er Jahren als neues Paradigma der logischen Programmierung und ist in den Gebieten des nicht-monotonen Schließens und der deduktiven Datenbanken verwurzelt. Dabei wird eine Problemstellung als logisches Programm repräsentiert, dessen Lösungen, die so genannten Antwortmengen, genau den Lösungen des ursprünglichen Problems entsprechen. Die Antwortmengenprogrammierung bildet ein geeignetes Fundament zur Repräsentation und zum Lösen von Entscheidungs- und Suchproblemen in der Komplexitätsklasse NP. Anwendungen finden wir unter anderem in der Produktkonfiguration, Diagnose und bei graphen-theoretischen Problemen, z.B. der Suche nach Hamiltonschen Kreisen. In den letzten Jahren wurden viele Erweiterungen der Antwortmengenprogrammierung betrachtet. Die am meisten untersuchte Erweiterung ist die Modellierung von Präferenzen. Diese bilden eine natürliche und effektive Möglichkeit, unter einer Vielzahl von Lösungen eines Problems bevorzugte Lösungen zu selektieren. Präferenzen finden beispielsweise in der Stundenplanung, bei Auktionen und bei Produktkonfigurationen ihre Anwendung. Der Schwerpunkt dieser Arbeit liegt in der Modellierung, Implementierung und Anwendung von Präferenzen in der Antwortmengenprogrammierung. Da es verschiedene Ansätze gibt, um Präferenzen darzustellen, konzentrieren wir uns auf geordnete logische Programme, wobei Präferenzen als partielle Ordnung der Regeln eines logischen Programms ausgedrückt werden. Dabei betrachten wir drei verschiedene Semantiken zur Interpretation dieser Präferenzen. Im Vorfeld wurden für diese Semantiken die bevorzugten Antwortmengen durch einen Compiler oder durch Meta-Interpretation berechnet. Da Präferenzen Lösungen selektieren, stellt sich die Frage, ob es möglich ist, diese direkt in den Berechnungsprozeß von präferenzierten Antwortmengen zu integrieren, so dass die bevorzugten Antwortmengen ohne Zwischenschritte berechnet werden können. Dazu entwickeln wir zuerst ein auf Graphen basierendes Gerüst zur Berechnung von Antwortmengen. Anschließend werden wir darin Präferenzen integrieren, so dass bevorzugte Antwortmengen ohne Compiler oder Meta-Interpretation berechnet werden. Es stellt sich heraus, dass die integrative Methode auf den meisten betrachteten Problemklassen wesentlich leistungsfähiger ist als der Compiler oder Meta-Interpretation. Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt dieser Arbeit liegt in der Frage, inwieweit sich geordnete logische Programme vereinfachen lassen. Dazu steht die Methodik der strengen Äquivalenz von logischen Programmen zur Verfügung. Wenn ein logisches Programm streng äquivalent zu einem seiner Teilprogramme ist, so kann man dieses durch das entsprechende Teilprogramm ersetzen, ohne dass sich die zugrunde liegende Semantik ändert. Bisher wurden strenge Äquivalenzen nicht für logische Programme mit Präferenzen untersucht. In dieser Arbeit definieren wir erstmalig strenge Äquivalenzen für geordnete logische Programme. Wir geben notwendige und hinreichende Bedingungen für die strenge Äquivalenz zweier geordneter logischer Programme an. Des Weiteren werden wir auch die Frage beantworten, inwieweit geordnete logische Programme und deren Präferenzstrukturen vereinfacht werden können. Abschließend präsentieren wir zwei neue Anwendungsbereiche von Präferenzen in der Antwortmengenprogrammierung. Zuerst definieren wir neue Prozeduren zur Entscheidungsfindung innerhalb von Gruppenprozessen. Diese integrieren wir anschließend in das Problem der Planung eines Treffens für eine Gruppe. Als zweite neue Anwendung rekonstruieren wir mit Hilfe der Antwortmengenprogrammierung eine linguistische Problemstellung, die in deutschen Dialekten auftritt. Momentan wird im Bereich der Linguistik darüber diskutiert, ob Regelsysteme von (menschlichen) Sprachen einzigartig sind oder nicht. Die Rekonstruktion von grammatikalischen Regularitäten mit Werkzeugen aus der Informatik erlaubt die Unterstützung der These, dass linguistische Regelsysteme Gemeinsamkeiten zu anderen nicht-linguistischen Regelsystemen besitzen. KW - Präferenzen KW - Antwortmengenprogrammierung KW - logische Programmierung KW - Künstliche Intelligenz KW - preferences KW - priorities KW - answer set programming KW - logic programming KW - artificial intelligence Y1 - 2007 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-12058 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Lifschitz, Vladimir A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Interview with Vladimir Lifschitz T2 - Künstliche Intelligenz N2 - This interview with Vladimir Lifschitz was conducted by Torsten Schaub at the University of Texas at Austin in August 2017. The question set was compiled by Torsten Schaub and Stefan Woltran. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0552-x SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 213 EP - 218 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Kaminski, Roland A1 - Kaufmann, Benjamin A1 - Lühne, Patrick A1 - Obermeier, Philipp A1 - Ostrowski, Max A1 - Romero Davila, Javier A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Schellhorn, Sebastian A1 - Wanko, Philipp T1 - The Potsdam Answer Set Solving Collection 5.0 JF - Künstliche Intelligenz N2 - The Potsdam answer set solving collection, or Potassco for short, bundles various tools implementing and/or applying answer set programming. The article at hand succeeds an earlier description of the Potassco project published in Gebser et al. (AI Commun 24(2):107-124, 2011). Hence, we concentrate in what follows on the major features of the most recent, fifth generation of the ASP system clingo and highlight some recent resulting application systems. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0528-x SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 181 EP - 182 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haubelt, Christian A1 - Neubauer, Kai A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Wanko, Philipp T1 - Design space exploration with answer set programming JF - Künstliche Intelligenz N2 - The aim of our project design space exploration with answer set programming is to develop a general framework based on Answer Set Programming (ASP) that finds valid solutions to the system design problem and simultaneously performs Design Space Exploration (DSE) to find the most favorable alternatives. We leverage recent developments in ASP solving that allow for tight integration of background theories to create a holistic framework for effective DSE. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0530-3 SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 205 EP - 206 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER -