TY - JOUR A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit T1 - The power of human rights decade after: from euphoria to contestation? Y1 - 2013 SN - 978-1-10-760936-5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Beisheim, Marianne A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit T1 - Summing up : key findings and avenues for future research Y1 - 2014 SN - 978-1-137-35925-0 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit A1 - Reiners, Nina T1 - The Eye of the Beholder? BT - The Contestation of Values and International Law ; Comment on Tiyanjana Maluwa JF - The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline? Y1 - 2019 SN - 0191879398 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843603.003.0021 SP - 335 EP - 343 PB - Oxford University Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Busch, Per-Olof A1 - Feil, Hauke A1 - Heinzel, Mirko Noa A1 - Herold, Jana A1 - Kempken, Mathies A1 - Liese, Andrea T1 - Policy recommendations of international bureaucracies BT - the importance of country-specificity JF - International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration N2 - Many international bureaucracies give policy advice to national administrative units. Why is the advice given by some international bureaucracies more influential than the recommendations of others? We argue that targeting advice to member states through national embeddedness and country-tailored research increases the influence of policy advice. Subsequently, we test how these characteristics shape the relative influence of 15 international bureaucracies' advice in four financial policy areas through a global survey of national administrations from more than 80 countries. Our findings support arguments that global blueprints need to be adapted and translated to become meaningful for country-level work.
Points for practitioners
National administrations are advised by an increasing number of international bureaucracies, and they cannot listen to all of this advice. Whereas some international bureaucracies give 'one-size-fits-all' recommendations to rather diverse countries, others cater their recommendations to the national audience. Investigating financial policy recommendations, we find that national embeddedness and country-tailored advice render international bureaucracies more influential. KW - financial policy KW - international administration KW - international KW - organizations KW - multi-level government KW - regime complexity Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211013385 SN - 0020-8523 SN - 1461-7226 VL - 87 IS - 4 SP - 775 EP - 793 PB - Sage Publ. CY - Los Angeles, Calif. ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Liese, Andrea T1 - Rezension zu: The power of global performance indicators / Hrsg.: Judith G. Kelley ; Beth A. Simmons. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. - 450 p. JF - Perspectives on politics / American Political Science Association Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-1-108-48720-7 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721003716 SN - 1537-5927 SN - 1541-0986 VL - 20 IS - 1 SP - 380 EP - 382 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - Cambridge ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Busch, Per-Olof A1 - Liese, Andrea T1 - The authority of international public administrations JF - International Bureaucracy: Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research N2 - This chapter takes stock with the research on the authority of international organizations (IOs) and international public administrations (IPAs) in the fields of International Relations (IR) and Public Administration (PA). It combines arguments from conceptual and theoretical debates with empirical findings to explore under which conditions IPAs are likely to enjoy authority. Based on a review of the literature and on conceptual clarifications, we define authority as a social relationship between holders and granters of authority. We distinguish two types of authority, namely, political and expert authority, and two forms of recognition, namely, in practice (de facto) and by formal delegation (de jure). Given that the de facto expert authority of IPAs has received least attention in the literature, while the PA literature reminds us that knowledge lies at the heart of bureaucratic power, we develop propositions on how de facto expert authority could be measured and how the anticipated variation of expert authority among IPAs could be explained. We illustrate our argument with reference to empirical findings in the IR and PA literature. We conclude by highlighting the implications of our discussion for future research on the authority of national and IPAs. Y1 - 2016 SN - 978-1-349-94977-9 SN - 978-1-349-94976-2 SN - 978-1-349-95692-0 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94977-9_5 SP - 97 EP - 122 PB - Palgrave Macmillan, London CY - Basingstoke ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Krieger, Heike A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit T1 - A Metamorphosis of International Law? BT - Value changes in the international legal order from the perspectives of legal and political science T2 - KFG Working Paper Series N2 - The paper aims to lay out a framework for evaluating value shifts in the international legal order for the purposes of a forthcoming book. In view of current contestations it asks whether we are observing yet another period of norm change (Wandel) or even a more fundamental transformation of international law – a metamorphosis (Verwandlung). For this purpose it suggests to look into the mechanisms of how norms change from the perspective of legal and political science and also to approximate a reference point where change turns into metamorphosis. It submits that such a point may be reached where specific legally protected values are indeed changing (change of legal values) or where the very idea of protecting certain values through law is renounced (delegalizing of values). The paper discusses the benefits of such an interdisciplinary exchange and tries to identify differences and commonalities among both disciplinary perspectives. T3 - KFG Working Paper Series - 27 Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426088 IS - 27 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Liese, Andrea A1 - Herold, Jana A1 - Feil, Hauke A1 - Busch, Per-Olof T1 - The heart of bureaucratic power BT - Explaining international bureaucracies’ expert authority JF - Review of international studies : RIS N2 - Expert authority is regarded as the heart of international bureaucracies' power. To measure whether international bureaucracies' expert authority is indeed recognised and deferred to, we draw on novel data from a survey of a key audience: officials in the policy units of national ministries in 121 countries. Respondents were asked to what extent they recognised the expert authority of nine international bureaucracies in various thematic areas of agricultural and financial policy. The results show wide variance. To explain this variation, we test well-established assumptions on the sources of de facto expert authority. Specifically, we look at ministry officials' perceptions of these sources and, thus, focus on a less-studied aspect of the authority relationship. We examine the role of international bureaucracies' perceived impartiality, objectivity, global impact, and the role of knowledge asymmetries. Contrary to common assumptions, we find that de facto expert authority does not rest on impartiality perceptions, and that perceived objectivity plays the smallest role of all factors considered. We find some indications that knowledge asymmetries are associated with more expert authority. Still, and robust to various alternative specifications, the perception that international bureaucracies are effectively addressing global challenges is the most important factor. KW - Expert Authority KW - International Bureaucracies KW - International KW - Organisations KW - Neutrality KW - Performance KW - Survey Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021052100005X SN - 0260-2105 SN - 1469-9044 VL - 47 IS - 3 SP - 353 EP - 376 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - Cambridge ER - TY - GEN A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit ED - Woyke, Wichard ED - Varwick, Johannes T1 - Transnationale Akteure/Nichtregierungsorganisationen T2 - Handwörterbuch Internationale Politik Y1 - 2015 SN - 978-3-8252-4518-4 SN - 978-3-8385-4518-9 SN - 978-3-8385-0702-6 U6 - https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838545189 SP - 480 EP - 489 PB - Budrich CY - Opladen ET - 13. vollst. überarb. u. aktual. Aufl. ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Heinzel, Mirko Noa A1 - Liese, Andrea T1 - Expert authority and support for COVID-19 measures in Germany and the UK BT - a survey experiment JF - West European politics N2 - During COVID-19, various public institutions tried to shape citizens’ behaviour to slow the spread of the pandemic. How did their authority affect citizens’ support of public measures taken to combat the spread of COVID-19? The article makes two contributions. First, it presents a novel conceptualisation of authority as a source heuristic. Second, it analyses the authority of four types of public institutions (health ministries, universities, public health agencies, the WHO) in two countries (Germany and the UK), drawing on novel data from a survey experiment conducted in May 2020. On average, institutional endorsements seem to have mattered little. However, there is an observable polarisation effect where citizens who ascribe much expertise to public institutions support COVID-19 measures more than the control group. Furthermore, those who ascribe little expertise support them less than the control group. Finally, neither perception of biases nor exposure to institutions in public debates seems consistently to affect their authority. KW - COVID-19 KW - expertise KW - authority KW - survey experiment KW - institutions KW - crises KW - governance Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1873630 SN - 0140-2382 SN - 1743-9655 SP - 1258 EP - 1282 PB - Taylor & Francis CY - Abingdon ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bührer, Torben A1 - Fastenrath, Ulrich A1 - Haußig, Hans-Michael A1 - Hoffmann, Jan Martin A1 - Kashgar, Maral A1 - Ladwig, Bernd A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit A1 - Löhr, Tillmann A1 - Schäfer, Bernhard A1 - Scharlau, Maria A1 - Teichmann, Michael ED - Gunnarsson, Logi ED - Klein, Eckart ED - Zimmermann, Andreas T1 - MenschenRechtsMagazin : Informationen | Meinungen | Analysen N2 - Aus dem Inhalt: - Neue Entwicklungen im regionalen Menschenrechtsschutz: eine politikwissenschaftliche Betrachtung des institutionellen Designs und der Dynamik des derzeitigen menschenrechtlichen Regionalismus - Das menschenrechtliche Diskriminierungsverbot und seine Grenzen - Die Individualbeschwerde zur Kinderrechtskonvention - BVerfG: Fraport – Urteil vom 22. Februar 2011 T3 - MenschenRechtsMagazin : MRM ; Informationen, Meinungen, Analysen - 16.2011/2 Y1 - 2011 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-55522 SN - 1434-2820 VL - 16 IS - 2 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Herold, Jana A1 - Liese, Andrea A1 - Busch, Per-Olof A1 - Feil, Hauke T1 - Why national ministries consider the policy advice of international bureaucracies BT - survey evidence from 106 countries JF - International studies quarterly : the journal of the International Studies Association N2 - Scholars of international relations and public administration widely assume that international bureaucracies, in their role as policy advisors, directly influence countries' domestic policies. Yet, this is not true across the board. Why do some countries closely consider the advice of international bureaucracies while others do not? This article argues that international bureaucracies' standing as sources of expertise is crucial. We tested this argument using data from a unique survey that measured prevalent practices of advice utilization in thematically specialized policy units of national ministries in a representative sample of more than a hundred countries. Our findings show that ministries' perceptions of international bureaucracies' expertise, that is, specialized and reliable knowledge, are the key factor. International bureaucracies influence national ministries directly and without the support of other actors that may also have an interest in the international bureaucracies' policy advice. Our analysis also demonstrates that the effects of alternative means of influence, such as third-party pressure and coercion, are themselves partly dependent on international bureaucracies' reputation as experts. The findings presented in this article reinforce the emphasis on expertise as a source of international bureaucracies' influence, and provide a crucial test of its importance. Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab044 SN - 0020-8833 SN - 1468-2478 VL - 65 IS - 3 SP - 669 EP - 682 PB - Oxford Univ. Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Beisheim, Marianne A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit A1 - Lorch, Jasmin T1 - Introduction : transnationale partnerships for sustainable development Y1 - 2014 SN - 978-1-137-35925-0 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit A1 - Beisheim, Marianne T1 - Research design : measuring and explaning the effectiveness of PPPs Y1 - 2014 SN - 978-1-137-35925-0 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Beisheim, Marianne A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit A1 - Vosseler, Christian T1 - Who governs partnershis? on the role board, donors, partners and other stakeholders Y1 - 2014 SN - 978-1-137-35925-0 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit A1 - Jeanetschek, Hannah A1 - Sarre, Johanna T1 - Can PPPs make it anywhere? how limited statehood and other area factors influence PPP effectiveness Y1 - 2014 SN - 978-1-137-35925-0 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Beisheim, Marianne A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit A1 - Janetschek, Hannah A1 - Sarre, Johanna T1 - Transnational partnerships: conditions for successful service provision in areas of limited statehood JF - Governance : an international journal of policy and administration and institutions Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12070 SN - 0952-1895 SN - 1468-0491 VL - 27 IS - 4 SP - 655 EP - 673 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - INPR A1 - da Conceicao-Heldt, Eugenia A1 - Koch, Martin A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit T1 - International organizations autonomy, politicization, interorganizational relations and change foreword T2 - Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft Y1 - 2014 SN - 0032-3470 SN - 1862-2860 SP - 3 EP - 3 PB - Nomos CY - Hannover ER - TY - INPR A1 - da Conceicao-Heldt, Eugenia A1 - Koch, Martin A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit T1 - International organisations as research subject. Or: "About Blind and the Shape of the Elephant" T2 - Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft Y1 - 2014 SN - 0032-3470 SN - 1862-2860 SP - 4 EP - 27 PB - Nomos CY - Hannover ER - TY - JOUR A1 - da Conceicao-Heldt, Eugenia A1 - Koch, Martin A1 - Liese, Andrea Margit T1 - International organizations in a complex world- borders and Aadded value of a pluralistic research JF - Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft Y1 - 2014 SN - 0032-3470 SN - 1862-2860 SP - 478 EP - 493 PB - Nomos CY - Hannover ER -