TY - BOOK A1 - Kuban, Robert A1 - Rotta, Randolf A1 - Nolte, Jörg A1 - Chromik, Jonas A1 - Beilharz, Jossekin Jakob A1 - Pirl, Lukas A1 - Friedrich, Tobias A1 - Lenzner, Pascal A1 - Weyand, Christopher A1 - Juiz, Carlos A1 - Bermejo, Belen A1 - Sauer, Joao A1 - Coelh, Leandro dos Santos A1 - Najafi, Pejman A1 - Pünter, Wenzel A1 - Cheng, Feng A1 - Meinel, Christoph A1 - Sidorova, Julia A1 - Lundberg, Lars A1 - Vogel, Thomas A1 - Tran, Chinh A1 - Moser, Irene A1 - Grunske, Lars A1 - Elsaid, Mohamed Esameldin Mohamed A1 - Abbas, Hazem M. A1 - Rula, Anisa A1 - Sejdiu, Gezim A1 - Maurino, Andrea A1 - Schmidt, Christopher A1 - Hügle, Johannes A1 - Uflacker, Matthias A1 - Nozza, Debora A1 - Messina, Enza A1 - Hoorn, André van A1 - Frank, Markus A1 - Schulz, Henning A1 - Alhosseini Almodarresi Yasin, Seyed Ali A1 - Nowicki, Marek A1 - Muite, Benson K. A1 - Boysan, Mehmet Can A1 - Bianchi, Federico A1 - Cremaschi, Marco A1 - Moussa, Rim A1 - Abdel-Karim, Benjamin M. A1 - Pfeuffer, Nicolas A1 - Hinz, Oliver A1 - Plauth, Max A1 - Polze, Andreas A1 - Huo, Da A1 - Melo, Gerard de A1 - Mendes Soares, Fábio A1 - Oliveira, Roberto Célio Limão de A1 - Benson, Lawrence A1 - Paul, Fabian A1 - Werling, Christian A1 - Windheuser, Fabian A1 - Stojanovic, Dragan A1 - Djordjevic, Igor A1 - Stojanovic, Natalija A1 - Stojnev Ilic, Aleksandra A1 - Weidmann, Vera A1 - Lowitzki, Leon A1 - Wagner, Markus A1 - Ifa, Abdessatar Ben A1 - Arlos, Patrik A1 - Megia, Ana A1 - Vendrell, Joan A1 - Pfitzner, Bjarne A1 - Redondo, Alberto A1 - Ríos Insua, David A1 - Albert, Justin Amadeus A1 - Zhou, Lin A1 - Arnrich, Bert A1 - Szabó, Ildikó A1 - Fodor, Szabina A1 - Ternai, Katalin A1 - Bhowmik, Rajarshi A1 - Campero Durand, Gabriel A1 - Shevchenko, Pavlo A1 - Malysheva, Milena A1 - Prymak, Ivan A1 - Saake, Gunter ED - Meinel, Christoph ED - Polze, Andreas ED - Beins, Karsten ED - Strotmann, Rolf ED - Seibold, Ulrich ED - Rödszus, Kurt ED - Müller, Jürgen T1 - HPI Future SOC Lab – Proceedings 2019 N2 - The “HPI Future SOC Lab” is a cooperation of the Hasso Plattner Institute (HPI) and industry partners. Its mission is to enable and promote exchange and interaction between the research community and the industry partners. The HPI Future SOC Lab provides researchers with free of charge access to a complete infrastructure of state of the art hard and software. This infrastructure includes components, which might be too expensive for an ordinary research environment, such as servers with up to 64 cores and 2 TB main memory. The offerings address researchers particularly from but not limited to the areas of computer science and business information systems. Main areas of research include cloud computing, parallelization, and In-Memory technologies. This technical report presents results of research projects executed in 2019. Selected projects have presented their results on April 9th and November 12th 2019 at the Future SOC Lab Day events. N2 - Das Future SOC Lab am HPI ist eine Kooperation des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts mit verschiedenen Industriepartnern. Seine Aufgabe ist die Ermöglichung und Förderung des Austausches zwischen Forschungsgemeinschaft und Industrie. Am Lab wird interessierten Wissenschaftlern eine Infrastruktur von neuester Hard- und Software kostenfrei für Forschungszwecke zur Verfügung gestellt. Dazu zählen teilweise noch nicht am Markt verfügbare Technologien, die im normalen Hochschulbereich in der Regel nicht zu finanzieren wären, bspw. Server mit bis zu 64 Cores und 2 TB Hauptspeicher. Diese Angebote richten sich insbesondere an Wissenschaftler in den Gebieten Informatik und Wirtschaftsinformatik. Einige der Schwerpunkte sind Cloud Computing, Parallelisierung und In-Memory Technologien. In diesem Technischen Bericht werden die Ergebnisse der Forschungsprojekte des Jahres 2019 vorgestellt. Ausgewählte Projekte stellten ihre Ergebnisse am 09. April und 12. November 2019 im Rahmen des Future SOC Lab Tags vor. T3 - Technische Berichte des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Digital Engineering an der Universität Potsdam - 158 KW - Future SOC Lab KW - research projects KW - multicore architectures KW - in-memory technology KW - cloud computing KW - machine learning KW - artifical intelligence KW - Future SOC Lab KW - Forschungsprojekte KW - Multicore Architekturen KW - In-Memory Technologie KW - Cloud Computing KW - maschinelles Lernen KW - künstliche Intelligenz Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-597915 SN - 978-3-86956-564-4 SN - 1613-5652 SN - 2191-1665 IS - 158 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - GEN A1 - Albert, Justin Amadeus A1 - Owolabi, Victor A1 - Gebel, Arnd A1 - Brahms, Clemens Markus A1 - Granacher, Urs A1 - Arnrich, Bert T1 - Evaluation of the Pose Tracking Performance of the Azure Kinect and Kinect v2 for Gait Analysis in Comparison with a Gold Standard BT - A Pilot Study T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Reihe der Digital Engineering Fakultät N2 - Gait analysis is an important tool for the early detection of neurological diseases and for the assessment of risk of falling in elderly people. The availability of low-cost camera hardware on the market today and recent advances in Machine Learning enable a wide range of clinical and health-related applications, such as patient monitoring or exercise recognition at home. In this study, we evaluated the motion tracking performance of the latest generation of the Microsoft Kinect camera, Azure Kinect, compared to its predecessor Kinect v2 in terms of treadmill walking using a gold standard Vicon multi-camera motion capturing system and the 39 marker Plug-in Gait model. Five young and healthy subjects walked on a treadmill at three different velocities while data were recorded simultaneously with all three camera systems. An easy-to-administer camera calibration method developed here was used to spatially align the 3D skeleton data from both Kinect cameras and the Vicon system. With this calibration, the spatial agreement of joint positions between the two Kinect cameras and the reference system was evaluated. In addition, we compared the accuracy of certain spatio-temporal gait parameters, i.e., step length, step time, step width, and stride time calculated from the Kinect data, with the gold standard system. Our results showed that the improved hardware and the motion tracking algorithm of the Azure Kinect camera led to a significantly higher accuracy of the spatial gait parameters than the predecessor Kinect v2, while no significant differences were found between the temporal parameters. Furthermore, we explain in detail how this experimental setup could be used to continuously monitor the progress during gait rehabilitation in older people. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Reihe der Digital Engineering Fakultät - 3 KW - motion capture KW - evaluation KW - human motion KW - RGB-D cameras KW - digital health Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-484130 IS - 3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Albert, Justin Amadeus A1 - Owolabi, Victor A1 - Gebel, Arnd A1 - Brahms, Clemens Markus A1 - Granacher, Urs A1 - Arnrich, Bert T1 - Evaluation of the Pose Tracking Performance of the Azure Kinect and Kinect v2 for Gait Analysis in Comparison with a Gold Standard BT - A Pilot Study JF - Sensors N2 - Gait analysis is an important tool for the early detection of neurological diseases and for the assessment of risk of falling in elderly people. The availability of low-cost camera hardware on the market today and recent advances in Machine Learning enable a wide range of clinical and health-related applications, such as patient monitoring or exercise recognition at home. In this study, we evaluated the motion tracking performance of the latest generation of the Microsoft Kinect camera, Azure Kinect, compared to its predecessor Kinect v2 in terms of treadmill walking using a gold standard Vicon multi-camera motion capturing system and the 39 marker Plug-in Gait model. Five young and healthy subjects walked on a treadmill at three different velocities while data were recorded simultaneously with all three camera systems. An easy-to-administer camera calibration method developed here was used to spatially align the 3D skeleton data from both Kinect cameras and the Vicon system. With this calibration, the spatial agreement of joint positions between the two Kinect cameras and the reference system was evaluated. In addition, we compared the accuracy of certain spatio-temporal gait parameters, i.e., step length, step time, step width, and stride time calculated from the Kinect data, with the gold standard system. Our results showed that the improved hardware and the motion tracking algorithm of the Azure Kinect camera led to a significantly higher accuracy of the spatial gait parameters than the predecessor Kinect v2, while no significant differences were found between the temporal parameters. Furthermore, we explain in detail how this experimental setup could be used to continuously monitor the progress during gait rehabilitation in older people. KW - motion capture KW - evaluation KW - human motion KW - RGB-D cameras KW - digital health Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185104 SN - 1424-8220 VL - 20 IS - 18 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER -