TY - BOOK A1 - Hermanns, Jolanda A1 - Böhme, Katrin A1 - Meyering, Meike A1 - Fuchs, Isabelle A1 - Wagner, Simon A1 - Krauskopf, Karsten A1 - Knigge, Michel A1 - Rother, Stefanie A1 - Tosch, Frank A1 - Wendland, Mirko A1 - Wulff, Peter A1 - Mientus, Lukas A1 - Nowak, Anna A1 - Borowski, Andreas A1 - Baer, Ella A1 - Bosch, Jannis A1 - Wilbert, Jürgen A1 - Bräsel, Tim A1 - Fenn, Monika A1 - Kortenkamp, Ulrich A1 - Kuzle, Ana A1 - Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen A1 - Burg, Paula A1 - Lampart, Fabian A1 - Leubner, Martin A1 - Freitag-Hild, Britta A1 - Bitmann, Anna A1 - Reinhardt, Susanne A1 - Roos, Jana A1 - Hußner, Isabell A1 - Börner, Dustin A1 - Lazarides, Rebecca A1 - Glowinski, Ingrid A1 - Autenrieth, Marijke A1 - Radke, Thea A1 - Ehlert, Antje A1 - Menke, Anne A1 - Haupenthal, Anna A1 - Schramm, Satyam Antonio A1 - Kruse, Julia A1 - Körner, Dorothea A1 - Fischer, Jakob Thomas A1 - Kayser, Daniela Niesta ED - Hermanns, Jolanda T1 - PSI-Potsdam BT - Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivitäten im Rahmen der Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) T3 - Potsdamer Beiträge für Lehrkräftebildung und Bildungsforschung N2 - An der Universität Potsdam wird seit 2015 im Rahmen der „Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung“ das Projekt „Professionalisierung – Schulpraktische Studien – Inklusion“ (PSI-Potsdam) durchgeführt und am Zentrum für Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB) koordiniert. Zur ersten Projektförderphase (2015-2018) erschien der Band „PSI-Potsdam – Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivitäten im Rahmen der Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2015-2018)“ zum Auftakt der Reihe „Potsdamer Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung“. Der vorliegende Band aus der gleichen Reihe gibt in den Kapiteln „Erhebungen“, „Lehrkonzepte“ und „Vernetzungen“ einen Überblick über alle Teilprojekte der zweiten Projektförderphase (2019-2023). Wissenschaftler:innen aus verschiedenen Fachdidaktiken, Fachwissenschaften sowie aus den Bildungswissenschaften und der Inklusionspädagogik haben im Rahmen des Projektes kooperiert. Sowohl praxisnahe Forschung als auch die Entwicklung neuer Lehrkonzepte sowie Strategien zur Vernetzung innerhalb der Lehrkräftebildung stehen im Fokus dieses Bandes. Die Praxisphasen, die im Rahmen des „Potsdamer Modells der Lehrerbildung“ eine zentrale Rolle spielen, wurden in einer großen Studie über alle Praxisphasen untersucht. Der Band gibt interessante Einblicke in die Ergebnisse der Teilprojekte und Anregungen sowohl für die eigene Forschung als auch für Entwicklungsarbeit wie zum Beispiel die Entwicklung neuer Lehrkonzepte. Herausgegeben wird dieser Band von PD Dr. Jolanda Hermanns (Gesamtkoordinatorin PSI-Potsdam und Chemiedidaktikerin). T3 - Potsdamer Beiträge zur Lehrkräftebildung und Bildungsforschung - 3 KW - Lehrerbildung KW - Evaluation KW - Testinstrumente KW - Konzepte KW - Vernetzung KW - teacher education KW - evaluation KW - test instruments KW - concepts KW - networking Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-601875 SN - 978-3-86956-568-2 SN - 2626-3556 SN - 2626-4722 IS - 3 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lohwaßer, Roswitha A1 - Wendland, Mirko A1 - Reinhardt, Felix A1 - Halibrand, Katharina A1 - Deiseroth, Laura A1 - Jennek, Julia A1 - Strobel, Anne A1 - Hackel, Manuela A1 - Krüger, Sophie A1 - Fischer, Tom A1 - Bosse, Stefanie A1 - Florian, Lena A1 - Fabian, Melina A1 - Israel, Franziska A1 - Iffert, Mathias A1 - Hintze, Ksenia A1 - Wendland, Mirko A1 - Egbert, Björn A1 - Heinz, Sarah A1 - Bock, Sophia A1 - Mutschler, Tanja A1 - Burchard, Daniel A1 - Musil, Andreas T1 - Kentron : Journal zur Lehrerbildung = AHA Moment T3 - Kentron : Journal zur Lehrerbildung - 35 Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-590429 SN - 1867-4720 SN - 1867-4747 IS - 35 PB - Universität Potsdam, Zentrum für Lehrerbildung CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hesse, Cornelia A1 - Krysanova, Valentina A1 - Vetter, Tobias A1 - Reinhardt, Julia T1 - Comparison of several approaches representing terrestrial and in-stream nutrient retention and decomposition in watershed modelling JF - Ecological modelling : international journal on ecological modelling and engineering and systems ecolog N2 - Retention and transformation of nutrients within a river catchment are important mechanisms influencing water quality measured at the watershed outlet. Nutrient storage and reduction can occur in soils as well as in the river and should be considered in water quality modelling. Consideration is possible using various methods at several points during modelling cascade. The study compares the effects of five different equation sets implemented into the Soil and Water Integrated Model (SWIM), one describing terrestrial and four in-stream retention with a rising complexity (including algal growth and death at the highest complexity level). The influences of the different methods alone and in combinations on water quality model outputs (NO3-N, NH4-N, PO4-P) were analyzed for the outlet of the large-scale Saale basin in Germany. Experiments revealed that nutrient forms coming primarily from diffuse sources are mostly influenced by retention processes in the soils of the catchment, and river processes are less important. Nutrients introduced to the river mainly by point sources are more subject to retention by in-stream processes, but both nutrient retention and transformation processes in soils and rivers have to be included. Although the best overall results could be achieved at the highest complexity level, the calibration efforts for this case are extremely high, and only minor improvements of overall model performance with the highest complexity were detected. Therefore, it could be reasoned that for some research questions also less complex model approaches would be sufficient, which could help to reduce unnecessary complexity and diminish high uncertainty in water quality modelling at the catchment scale. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. KW - Water quality modelling KW - Nutrients KW - Retention KW - River basin KW - Model complexity KW - SWIM Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.017 SN - 0304-3800 SN - 1872-7026 VL - 269 IS - 34 SP - 70 EP - 85 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - GEN A1 - Reinhardt, Julia A1 - Liersch, Stefan A1 - Abdeladhim, Mohamed Arbi A1 - Diallo, Mori A1 - Dickens, Chris A1 - Fournet, Samuel A1 - Hattermann, Fred A1 - Kabaseke, Clovis A1 - Muhumuza, Moses A1 - Mul, Marloes L. A1 - Pilz, Tobias A1 - Otto, Ilona M. A1 - Walz, Ariane T1 - Systematic evaluation of scenario assessments supporting sustainable integrated natural resources management BT - evidence from four case studies in Africa T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Scenarios have become a key tool for supporting sustainability research on regional and global change. In this study we evaluate four regional scenario assessments: first, to explore a number of research challenges related to sustainability science and, second, to contribute to sustainability research in the specific case studies. The four case studies used commonly applied scenario approaches that are (i) a story and simulation approach with stakeholder participation in the Oum Zessar watershed, Tunisia, (ii) a participatory scenario exploration in the Rwenzori region, Uganda, (iii) a model-based prepolicy study in the Inner Niger Delta, Mali, and (iv) a model coupling-based scenario analysis in upper Thukela basin, South Africa. The scenario assessments are evaluated against a set of known challenges in sustainability science, with each challenge represented by two indicators, complemented by a survey carried out on the perception of the scenario assessments within the case study regions. The results show that all types of scenario assessments address many sustainability challenges, but that the more complex ones based on story and simulation and model coupling are the most comprehensive. The study highlights the need to investigate abrupt system changes as well as governmental and political factors as important sources of uncertainty. For an in-depth analysis of these issues, the use of qualitative approaches and an active engagement of local stakeholders are suggested. Studying ecological thresholds for the regional scale is recommended to support research on regional sustainability. The evaluation of the scenario processes and outcomes by local researchers indicates the most transparent scenario assessments as the most useful. Focused, straightforward, yet iterative scenario assessments can be very relevant by contributing information to selected sustainability problems. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 930 KW - Africa KW - global and regional change KW - integrated assessments KW - participatory research KW - sustainability science Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-445784 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 930 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Reinhardt, Julia A1 - Liersch, Stefan A1 - Abdeladhim, Mohamed Arbi A1 - Diallo, Mori A1 - Dickens, Chris A1 - Fournet, Samuel A1 - Hattermann, Fred A1 - Kabaseke, Clovis A1 - Muhumuza, Moses A1 - Mul, Marloes L. A1 - Pilz, Tobias A1 - Otto, Ilona M. A1 - Walz, Ariane T1 - Systematic evaluation of scenario assessments supporting sustainable integrated natural resources management BT - evidence from four case studies in Africa JF - Ecology and society : a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability N2 - Scenarios have become a key tool for supporting sustainability research on regional and global change. In this study we evaluate four regional scenario assessments: first, to explore a number of research challenges related to sustainability science and, second, to contribute to sustainability research in the specific case studies. The four case studies used commonly applied scenario approaches that are (i) a story and simulation approach with stakeholder participation in the Oum Zessar watershed, Tunisia, (ii) a participatory scenario exploration in the Rwenzori region, Uganda, (iii) a model-based prepolicy study in the Inner Niger Delta, Mali, and (iv) a model coupling-based scenario analysis in upper Thukela basin, South Africa. The scenario assessments are evaluated against a set of known challenges in sustainability science, with each challenge represented by two indicators, complemented by a survey carried out on the perception of the scenario assessments within the case study regions. The results show that all types of scenario assessments address many sustainability challenges, but that the more complex ones based on story and simulation and model coupling are the most comprehensive. The study highlights the need to investigate abrupt system changes as well as governmental and political factors as important sources of uncertainty. For an in-depth analysis of these issues, the use of qualitative approaches and an active engagement of local stakeholders are suggested. Studying ecological thresholds for the regional scale is recommended to support research on regional sustainability. The evaluation of the scenario processes and outcomes by local researchers indicates the most transparent scenario assessments as the most useful. Focused, straightforward, yet iterative scenario assessments can be very relevant by contributing information to selected sustainability problems. KW - Africa KW - global and regional change KW - integrated assessments KW - participatory research KW - sustainability science Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09728-230105 SN - 1708-3087 VL - 23 IS - 1 PB - Resilience Alliance CY - Wolfville ER -