TY - CHAP A1 - Borowski, Andreas A1 - Glowinski, Ingrid A1 - Frister, Jonas A1 - Höttecke, Dietmar A1 - Buth, Katrin A1 - Koenen, Jenna A1 - Masanek, Nicole A1 - Reichwein, Wilko A1 - Scholten, Nina A1 - Sprenger, Sandra A1 - Stender, Peter A1 - Wöhlke, Carina A1 - Komorek, Michael A1 - Freckmann, Janine A1 - Hofmann, Josefine A1 - Niesel, Verena A1 - Richter, Chris A1 - Mehlmann, Nelli A1 - Bikner-Ahsbahs, Angelika A1 - Unverricht, Katja A1 - Schanze, Sascha A1 - Bittorf, Robert Marten A1 - Meier, Monique A1 - Grospietsch, Finja A1 - Mayer, Jürgen A1 - Gimbel, Katharina A1 - Ziepprecht, Kathrin A1 - Hofmann, Judith A1 - Kramer, Charlotte A1 - Müller, Britta-Kornelia A1 - Rohde, Andreas A1 - Zühlsdorf, Felix A1 - Winkler, Iris A1 - Laging, Ralf A1 - Peter, Carina A1 - Schween, Michael A1 - Härle, Gerhard A1 - Busse, Beatrix A1 - Mahner, Sebastian A1 - Köstler, Verena A1 - Kufner, Sabrina A1 - Mägdefrau, Jutta A1 - Müller, Christian A1 - Beck, Christina A1 - Kriehuber, Eva A1 - Boch, Florian A1 - Engl, Anna-Teresa A1 - Helzel, Andreas A1 - Pickert, Tina A1 - Reiter, Christian A1 - Blasini, Bettina A1 - Nerdel, Claudia A1 - Lewalter, Doris A1 - Schiffhauer, Silke A1 - Richter-Gebert, Jürgen A1 - Bannert, Maria A1 - Maahs, Mirjam A1 - Reißner, Maria A1 - Ungar, Patrizia A1 - von Wachter, Jana-Kristin A1 - Hellmann, Katharina A1 - Zaki, Katja A1 - Pohlenz, Philipp ED - Glowinski, Ingrid ED - Borowski, Andreas ED - Gillen, Julia ED - Schanze, Sascha ED - von Meien, Joachim T1 - Kohärenz in der universitären Lehrerbildung T1 - Coherence in teacher education at university BT - Vernetzung von Fachwissenschaft, Fachdidaktik und Bildungswissenschaften BT - linking studies in content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge in teacher education N2 - One area that is supported by the project “Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung” (funded by BMBF) is the improvement of collaboration and coordination between studies in the discipline, studies in pedagogical content knowledge, and studies in pedagogical knowledge during teacher education at university. Aiming a better coordination among these three parts of teacher education at university, many of the supported projects have designed and realized university-specific approaches. This conference proceedings volume comprises contributions by 15 of these projects. Seven of those were introduced and discussed in workshops on the occasion of two cross-regional project-conferences in Hannover and Potsdam. Overall, the contributions give a theoretically funded as well as a practice-oriented overview of current approaches and concepts to achieve a better connection between study units concerning studies in content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. The volume presents university projects, which take effect on different levels (at the level of curriculum and content, at a collegiate level, at the level of structural conditions of universities). The different approaches are described in a way that they can provide a basis for transfer to other subjects or further universities. The contributions are aimed at teacher educators as well as other actors working in the field of teaching- and quality development at universities. All of them can take transferable ideas and impulses from the described concepts and formats. N2 - Eine verbesserte Zusammenarbeit und Abstimmung von Fachwissenschaft, Fachdidaktik, Bildungswissenschaften und schulpraktischen Lernorten ist einer der Förderbereiche der „Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung“. Zahlreiche der geförderten Projekte haben für dieses Handlungsfeld im Bereich Vernetzung von Fachwissenschaft, Fachdidaktik und Bildungswissenschaften hochschulspezifische Maßnahmen konzipiert und umgesetzt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband beinhaltet Beiträge von 15 entsprechenden Projekten, von denen sieben anlässlich von zwei standortübergreifenden Projekt-Tagungen in Hannover und Potsdam vorgestellt und in Workshops diskutiert wurden. Insgesamt geben die Beiträge einen theoretisch fundierten und gleichzeitig praxisorientierten Überblick über aktuelle Ansätze und Konzepte zur besseren Vernetzung fachwissenschaftlicher, fachdidaktischer und bildungswissenschaftlicher Studienanteile im Lehramtsstudium. Dargestellt werden Projektarbeiten der Hochschulen, die auf verschiedenen Ebenen wirksam werden (curricular-inhaltliche Ebene, kollegiale Ebene, hochschul-strukturelle Ebene). Die Maßnahmen sind so beschrieben, dass sie als Grundlage für einen Transfer auf andere Fächer bzw. andere Standorte genutzt werden können. Die Beiträge richten sich an alle Lehrenden im Bereich der Lehramtsbildung sowie sonstige Akteure im Bereich der Lehr- und Qualitätsentwicklung an den Universitäten. Sie alle können den beschriebenen Konzepten und Umsetzungsformaten transferierbare Ideen und Impulse entnehmen. KW - Professionswissen KW - universitäre Lehrerbildung KW - Vernetzung Fachwissenschaft KW - Fachdidaktik KW - Bildungswissenschaft KW - Lehramtsstudium KW - teacher education KW - professional knowledge KW - content knowledge KW - pedagogical content knowledge Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414267 SN - 978-3-86956-438-8 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Beck, Christina A1 - Kriehuber, Eva A1 - Boch, Florian A1 - Engl, Anna-Teresa A1 - Helzel, Andreas A1 - Pickert, Tina A1 - Reiter, Christian A1 - Blasini, Bettina A1 - Nerdel, Claudia T1 - Vernetzung von Fachwissenschaft, Fachdidaktik, Erziehungswissenschaft und Schulpraxis JF - Kohärenz in der universitären Lehrerbildung Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-418670 SN - 978-3-86956-438-8 SP - 309 EP - 330 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kuhlicke, Christian A1 - Seebauer, Sebastian A1 - Hudson, Paul A1 - Begg, Chloe A1 - Bubeck, Philip A1 - Dittmer, Cordula A1 - Grothmann, Torsten A1 - Heidenreich, Anna A1 - Kreibich, Heidi A1 - Lorenz, Daniel F. A1 - Masson, Torsten A1 - Reiter, Jessica A1 - Thaler, Thomas A1 - Thieken, Annegret A1 - Bamberg, Sebastian T1 - The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications JF - WIREs Water N2 - Recent policy changes highlight the need for citizens to take adaptive actions to reduce flood-related impacts. Here, we argue that these changes represent a wider behavioral turn in flood risk management (FRM). The behavioral turn is based on three fundamental assumptions: first, that the motivations of citizens to take adaptive actions can be well understood so that these motivations can be targeted in the practice of FRM; second, that private adaptive measures and actions are effective in reducing flood risk; and third, that individuals have the capacities to implement such measures. We assess the extent to which the assumptions can be supported by empirical evidence. We do this by engaging with three intellectual catchments. We turn to research by psychologists and other behavioral scientists which focus on the sociopsychological factors which influence individual motivations (Assumption 1). We engage with economists, engineers, and quantitative risk analysts who explore the extent to which individuals can reduce flood related impacts by quantifying the effectiveness and efficiency of household-level adaptive measures (Assumption 2). We converse with human geographers and sociologists who explore the types of capacities households require to adapt to and cope with threatening events (Assumption 3). We believe that an investigation of the behavioral turn is important because if the outlined assumptions do not hold, there is a risk of creating and strengthening inequalities in FRM. Therefore, we outline the current intellectual and empirical knowledge as well as future research needs. Generally, we argue that more collaboration across intellectual catchments is needed, that future research should be more theoretically grounded and become methodologically more rigorous and at the same time focus more explicitly on the normative underpinnings of the behavioral turn. KW - capacities KW - effectiveness KW - motivation KW - resources KW - risk governance KW - vulnerability Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1418 SN - 2049-1948 VL - 7 IS - 3 SP - 1 EP - 22 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kuhlicke, Christian A1 - Seebauer, Sebastian A1 - Hudson, Paul A1 - Begg, Chloe A1 - Bubeck, Philip A1 - Dittmer, Cordula A1 - Grothmann, Torsten A1 - Heidenreich, Anna A1 - Kreibich, Heidi A1 - Lorenz, Daniel F. A1 - Masson, Torsten A1 - Reiter, Jessica A1 - Thaler, Thomas A1 - Thieken, Annegret A1 - Bamberg, Sebastian T1 - The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications T2 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Recent policy changes highlight the need for citizens to take adaptive actions to reduce flood-related impacts. Here, we argue that these changes represent a wider behavioral turn in flood risk management (FRM). The behavioral turn is based on three fundamental assumptions: first, that the motivations of citizens to take adaptive actions can be well understood so that these motivations can be targeted in the practice of FRM; second, that private adaptive measures and actions are effective in reducing flood risk; and third, that individuals have the capacities to implement such measures. We assess the extent to which the assumptions can be supported by empirical evidence. We do this by engaging with three intellectual catchments. We turn to research by psychologists and other behavioral scientists which focus on the sociopsychological factors which influence individual motivations (Assumption 1). We engage with economists, engineers, and quantitative risk analysts who explore the extent to which individuals can reduce flood related impacts by quantifying the effectiveness and efficiency of household-level adaptive measures (Assumption 2). We converse with human geographers and sociologists who explore the types of capacities households require to adapt to and cope with threatening events (Assumption 3). We believe that an investigation of the behavioral turn is important because if the outlined assumptions do not hold, there is a risk of creating and strengthening inequalities in FRM. Therefore, we outline the current intellectual and empirical knowledge as well as future research needs. Generally, we argue that more collaboration across intellectual catchments is needed, that future research should be more theoretically grounded and become methodologically more rigorous and at the same time focus more explicitly on the normative underpinnings of the behavioral turn. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 1440 KW - capacities KW - effectiveness KW - motivation KW - resources KW - risk governance KW - vulnerability Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-517696 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 3 ER -