TY  - JOUR
A1  - Lederer, Markus
T1  - From CDM to REDD+ - what do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance?
JF  - Ecological economics
N2  - This article compares two carbon governance instruments - the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) - to assess lessons from the former for the latter regarding effectiveness and legitimacy of such instruments. The article argues that the CDM has a relatively high degree of output-oriented legitimacy resulting in effectiveness and some input-oriented legitimacy, with few discernible tradeoffs between them. In contrasting this to REDD+, the hypotheses are advanced that (i) output-oriented legitimacy/effectiveness can again be achieved but that (ii) a higher degree of input-oriented legitimacy is necessary for REDD+ and thus also a certain trade-off between the two forms of legitimacy can be expected. This is shown through comparing the technologies and methodologies, economic rationales, political support, regulatory structures, and environmental impacts of both instruments.
KW  - Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD plus )
KW  - Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)
KW  - Effectiveness
KW  - Legitimacy
Y1  - 2011
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.003
SN  - 0921-8009
VL  - 70
IS  - 11
SP  - 1900
EP  - 1907
PB  - Elsevier
CY  - Amsterdam
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Lederer, Markus
T1  - Practicing agrifood governance
JF  - Food policy : economics planning and politics of food and agriculture
N2  - The conclusion to the special section has three objectives: First, it argues that a focus on "practice" implicitly connects all the articles in the special section and thereby reinforces the core points of the analytical framework introduced by Fuchs and Glaab. Second, the paper summarizes the main messages of the articles by identifying three red threads that are dominant in all four contributions. These are the strong focus of all authors on ideational forces, an emphasis on the role of academics and the description of complexities of local-global interdependencies. Third, some common blind spots are identified that merit future research.
KW  - Agrifood governance
KW  - India
KW  - Ideational power
KW  - Role of science
KW  - Practice turn
Y1  - 2011
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.07.009
SN  - 0306-9192
VL  - 36
IS  - 6
SP  - 756
EP  - 759
PB  - Elsevier
CY  - Oxford
ER  -