TY  - THES
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Laegreid, Per
A1  - Verhoest, Koen
T1  - The Governance, Autonomy and Coordination of Public Sector Organizations
Y1  - 2008
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
T1  - Public administration under pressure : the search for new forms of public governance
Y1  - 2007
UR  - http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN028493.pdf
SN  - 978-92-1-123175-5
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Laegreid, Per
A1  - Verhoest, Koen
T1  - Introduction
Y1  - 2007
UR  - http://ras.sagepub.com/
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307081143
SN  - 0020-8523
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
T1  - State, administration and governance in Germany: competing traditions and dominant narratives
Y1  - 2003
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Reichard, Christoph
T1  - Evaluating best practice in central government modernization
Y1  - 2003
SN  - 1-8437-6160-2
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Döhler, Marian
T1  - Germany
Y1  - 2002
UR  - http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00021000/M00021217.pdf
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Wegrich, Kai
T1  - Generalists and specialists in executive politics: Why ambitious meta-policies so often fail
JF  - Public administration
N2  - This article contributes to the politics of policy‐making in executive government. It introduces the analytical distinction between generalists and specialists as antagonistic players in executive politics and develops the claim that policy specialists are in a structurally advantaged position to succeed in executive politics and to fend off attempts by generalists to influence policy choices through cross‐cutting reform measures. Contrary to traditional textbook public administration, we explain the views of generalists and specialists not through their training but their positions within an organization. We combine established approaches from public policy and organization theory to substantiate this claim and to define the dilemma that generalists face when developing government‐wide reform policies (‘meta‐policies’) as well as strategies to address this problem. The article suggests that the conceptual distinction between generalists and specialists allows for a more precise analysis of the challenges for policy‐making across government organizations than established approaches.
Y1  - 2019
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12614
SN  - 0033-3298
SN  - 1467-9299
VL  - 97
IS  - 4
SP  - 845
EP  - 860
PB  - Wiley
CY  - Hoboken
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Jantz, Bastian
A1  - Kuehne, Alexander
A1  - Schulze-Gabrechten, Lena
T1  - The Flood Crisis in Germany 2013
JF  - Societal Security and Crisis Management
N2  - In 2013, large floods affected Germany heavily. The natural disaster transcended jurisdictional and organisational boundaries, necessitating a coordinative effort by disaster relief forces and their administrative and political leadership. In the aftermath, politicians and experts praised the improvement of the German system of crisis management, also in direct comparison with the response to the last German “flood of the century” of 2002. This chapter takes a public policy and organisational perspective to analyse the German disaster relief governance throughout all four crisis management phases. By highlighting the central features of the German governance arrangements and the main organisational changes implemented in reaction to the previous flood in 2002, we find that Whole-of-Government approaches are increasingly used by the federal and Länder government.
Y1  - 2018
SN  - 978-3-319-92303-1
SN  - 978-3-319-92302-4
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92303-1_4
SP  - 75
EP  - 93
PB  - Palgrave Macmillan
CY  - Cham
ER  - 
TY  - BOOK
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Bach, Tobias
A1  - Fleischer, Julia
A1  - Jantz, Bastian
A1  - Hustedt, Thurid
T1  - Opportunity and feasibility of establishing common support services for EU agencies
Y1  - 2008
UR  - http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/dv/2009_powerpoint_agencies_/ 2009_powerpoint_agencies_en.pdf
PB  - Europäisches Parlament
CY  - Brüssel
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Fleischer, Julia
T1  - Shefting discourses, steady learning and sedimentation : the German reform trajectory in the long run
Y1  - 2011
SN  - 978-0-415-55721-4
ER  - 
TY  - BOOK
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Bach, Tobias
A1  - Fleischer, Julia
A1  - Hustedt, Thurid
T1  - Best practice in governance of agencies : a comparative study in view of identifying best practice for governing agencies carrying out activities on behalf of the European Union
Y1  - 2008
PB  - Europäisches Parlament
CY  - Brüssel
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
T1  - Common security in the Baltic Sea region : the view from the German Länder
Y1  - 1994
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
T1  - Cooperation in nothern Europe for an active society
Y1  - 1994
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Seyfried, Markus
T1  - Does executive governance matter? executives an policy performance
Y1  - 2009
SN  - 978-3-86793-013-0
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Bach, Tobias
T1  - Structure and governance of agencies in Germany : a lot of continuity and little change
Y1  - 2009
SN  - 978-82-450-0754-1
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Jantz, Bastian
T1  - A better performance and performance management?
Y1  - 2008
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
A1  - Jantz, Bastian
T1  - Mapping accountability changes in labour market administration : from concentrated to shared accountability?
Y1  - 2013
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jantz, Bastian
A1  - Jann, Werner
T1  - Mapping accountability changes in labour market administrations from concentrated to shared accountability?
JF  - International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration
N2  - The article explores how recent changes in the governance of employment services in three European countries (Denmark, Germany and Norway) have influenced accountability relationships. The overall assumption in the growing literature about accountability is that the number of actors involved in accountability arrangements is rising, that accountability relationships are becoming more numerous and complex, and that these changes may lead to contradictory accountability relationships, and finally to multi accountability disorder'. The article tries to explore these assumptions by analysing the different actors involved and the information requested in the new governance arrangements in all three countries. It concludes that the considerable changes in organizational arrangements and more managerial information demanded and provided have led to more shared forms of accountability. Nevertheless, a clear development towards less political or administrative accountability could not be observed.
KW  - accountability
KW  - Denmark
KW  - Germany
KW  - labour market administration
KW  - Norway
KW  - public employment service
KW  - welfare state reform
Y1  - 2013
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313477764
SN  - 0020-8523
VL  - 79
IS  - 2
SP  - 227
EP  - 248
PB  - Sage Publ.
CY  - London
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
T1  - Public management in Germany : a revolution without a theory?
Y1  - 1996
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jann, Werner
T1  - Report of the working group on transparency, openness and service to the public
Y1  - 1998
ER  -