TY - JOUR A1 - Radchuk, Viktoriia A1 - Johst, Karin A1 - Groeneveld, Jürgen A1 - Turlure, Camille A1 - Grimm, Volker A1 - Schtickzelle, Nicolas T1 - Appropriate resolution in time and model structure for population viability analysis: Insights from a butterfly metapopulation JF - : an international journal N2 - The importance of a careful choice of the appropriate scale for studying ecological phenomena has been stressed repeatedly. However, issues of spatial scale in metapopulation dynamics received much more attention compared to temporal scale. Moreover, multiple calls were made to carefully choose the appropriate model structure for Population Viability Analysis (PVA). We assessed the effect of using coarser resolution in time and model structure on population dynamics. For this purpose, we compared outcomes of two PVA models differing in their time step: daily individual-based model (dIBM) and yearly stage-based model (ySBM), loaded with empirical data on a well-known metapopulation of the butterfly Boloria eunomia. Both models included the same environmental drivers of population dynamics that were previously identified as being the most important for this species. Under temperature change scenarios, both models yielded the same qualitative scenario ranking, but they quite substantially differed quantitatively with dIBM being more pessimistic in absolute viability measures. We showed that these differences stemmed from inter-individual heterogeneity in dIBM allowing for phenological shifts of individual appearance. We conclude that a finer temporal resolution and an individual-based model structure allow capturing the essential mechanisms necessary to go beyond mere PVA scenario ranking. We encourage researchers to carefully chose the temporal resolution and structure of their model aiming at (1) depicting the processes important for (meta)population dynamics of the species and (2) implementing the environmental change scenarios expected for their study system in the future, using the temporal resolution at which such changes are predicted to operate. KW - Temporal grain KW - Model complexity KW - Model comparison KW - Population dynamics KW - Individual-based model KW - Stage-based model Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.004 SN - 0006-3207 SN - 1873-2917 VL - 169 SP - 345 EP - 354 PB - Elsevier CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Meli, Mattia A1 - Palmqvist, Annemette A1 - Forbes, Valery E. A1 - Groeneveld, Jürgen A1 - Grimm, Volker T1 - Two pairs of eyes are better than one: Combining individual-based and matrix models for ecological risk assessment of chemicals JF - Ecological modelling : international journal on ecological modelling and engineering and systems ecolog N2 - Current chemical risk assessment procedures may result in imprecise estimates of risk due to sometimes arbitrary simplifying assumptions. As a way to incorporate ecological complexity and improve risk estimates, mechanistic effect models have been recommended. However, effect modeling has not yet been extensively used for regulatory purposes, one of the main reasons being uncertainty about which model type to use to answer specific regulatory questions. We took an individual-based model (IBM), which was developed for risk assessment of soil invertebrates and includes avoidance of highly contaminated areas, and contrasted it with a simpler, more standardized model, based on the generic metapopulation matrix model RAMAS. In the latter the individuals within a sub-population are not treated as separate entities anymore and the spatial resolution is lower. We explored consequences of model aggregation in terms of assessing population-level effects for different spatial distributions of a toxic chemical. For homogeneous contamination of the soil, we found good agreement between the two models, whereas for heterogeneous contamination, at different concentrations and percentages of contaminated area, RAMAS results were alternatively similar to IBM results with and without avoidance, and different food levels. This inconsistency is explained on the basis of behavioral responses that are included in the IBM but not in RAMAS. Overall, RAMAS was less sensitive than the IBM in detecting population-level effects of different spatial patterns of exposure. We conclude that choosing the right model type for risk assessment of chemicals depends on whether or not population-level effects of small-scale heterogeneity in exposure need to be detected. We recommend that if in doubt, both model types should be used and compared. Describing both models following the same standard format, the ODD protocol, makes them equally transparent and understandable. The simpler model helps to build up trust for the more complex model and can be used for more homogeneous exposure patterns. The more complex model helps detecting and understanding the limitations of the simpler model and is needed to ensure ecological realism for more complex exposure scenarios. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. KW - Ecotoxicology KW - Folsomia candida KW - Mechanistic effect models KW - Soil invertebrates Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.07.027 SN - 0304-3800 SN - 1872-7026 VL - 280 SP - 40 EP - 52 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER -