TY - CHAP A1 - Abendroth, Adrian A1 - Parry, Douglas A. A1 - Le Roux, Daniel B. A1 - Gundlach, Jana ED - Hattingh, Marié ED - Matthee, Machdel ED - Smuts, Hanlie ED - Pappas, Ilias ED - Dwivedi, Yogesh K. ED - Mäntymäki, Matti T1 - An analysis of problematic media use and technology use addiction scales BT - what are they actually assessing? T2 - Responsible design, implementation and use of information and communication technology N2 - Increasingly, research attention is being afforded to various forms of problematic media use. Despite ongoing conceptual, theoretical, and empirical debates, a large number of retrospective self-report scales have been produced to ostensibly measure various classes of such behaviour. These scales are typically based on a variety of theoretical and diagnostic frameworks. Given current conceptual ambiguities, building on previous studies, we evaluated the dimensional structure of 50 scales targeting the assessment of supposedly problematic behaviours in relation to four technologies: Internet, smartphones, video games, and social network sites. We find that two dimensions (‘compulsive use’ and ‘negative outcomes’) account for over 50% of all scale-items analysed. With a median of five dimensions, on average, scales have considered fewer dimensions than various proposed diagnostic criteria and models. No relationships were found between the number of items in a scale and the number of dimensions, or the technology category and the dimensional structure. The findings indicate, firstly, that a majority of scales place an inordinate emphasis on some dimensions over others and, secondly, that despite differences in the items presented, at a dimensional level, there exists a high degree of similarity between scales. These findings highlight shortcomings in existing scales and underscore the need to develop more sophisticated conceptions and empirical tools to understand possible problematic interactions with various digital technologies. KW - technology addiction KW - problematic media use KW - self report scales KW - systematic review Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-3-030-45001-4 SN - 978-3-030-45002-1 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_18 SP - 211 EP - 222 PB - Springer CY - Cham ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kansok-Dusche, Julia A1 - Ballaschk, Cindy A1 - Krause, Norman A1 - Zeissig, Anke A1 - Seemann-Herz, Lisanne A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - A systematic review on hate speech among children and adolescents BT - definitions, prevalence, and overlap with related phenomena JF - Trauma, violence & abuse : a review journal N2 - Little is known about the current state of research on the involvement of young people in hate speech. Thus, this systematic review presents findings on a) the prevalence of hate speech among children and adolescents and on hate speech definitions that guide prevalence assessments for this population; and b) the theoretical and empirical overlap of hate speech with related concepts. This review was guided by the Cochrane approach. To be included, publications were required to deal with real-life experiences of hate speech, to provide empirical data on prevalence for samples aged 5 to 21 years and they had to be published in academic formats. Included publications were full-text coded using two raters (kappa = .80) and their quality was assessed. The string-guided electronic search (ERIC, SocInfo, Psycinfo, Psyndex) yielded 1,850 publications. Eighteen publications based on 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and their findings were systematized. Twelve publications were of medium quality due to minor deficiencies in their theoretical or methodological foundations. All studies used samples of adolescents and none of younger children. Nine out of 10 studies applied quantitative methodologies. Eighteen publications based on 10 studies were included. Results showed that frequencies for hate speech exposure were higher than those related to victimization and perpetration. Definitions of hate speech and assessment instruments were heterogeneous. Empirical evidence for an often theorized overlap between hate speech and bullying was found. The paper concludes by presenting a definition of hate speech, including implications for practice, policy, and research. KW - hate speech KW - bullying KW - adolescents KW - children KW - youth KW - systematic review Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221108070 SN - 1524-8380 SN - 1552-8324 VL - 24 IS - 4 SP - 2598 EP - 2615 PB - Sage Publ. CY - Thousand Oaks ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Czakon, Wojciech A1 - Klimas, Patrycja A1 - Tiberius, Victor A1 - Ferreira, João A1 - Veiga, Pedro M. A1 - Kraus, Sascha T1 - Entrepreneurial failure BT - structuring a widely overlooked field of research JF - Entrepreneurship research journal N2 - Although entrepreneurial failure (EF) is a fairly recent topic in entrepreneurship literature, the number of publications has been growing dynamically and particularly rapidly. Our systematic review maps and integrates the research on EF based on a multi-method approach to give structure and consistency to this fragmented field of research. The results reveal that the field revolves around six thematic clusters of EF: 1) Soft underpinnings of EF, 2) Contextuality of EF, 3) Perception of EF, 4) Two-sided effects of EF, 5) Multi-stage EF effects, and 6) Institutional drivers of EF. An integrative framework of the positive and negative effects of entrepreneurial failure is proposed, and a research agenda is suggested. KW - entrepreneurial failure KW - entrepreneurship KW - failure outcomes KW - systematic review Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2021-0328 SN - 2157-5665 SP - 1 EP - 34 PB - De Gruyter CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Maaß, Ulrike A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Maas, Jana A1 - Unverdross, Maria A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Psychological interventions for health anxiety and somatic symptoms BT - a systematic review and meta-analysis JF - Zeitschrift für Psychologie = Journal of psychology N2 - This study examined the effectiveness of psychological interventions for severe health anxiety (SHA) regarding somatic symptoms (SS) and health anxiety (HA). The databases Web of Science, EBSCO, and CENTRAL were searched on May 15, 2019, May 16, 2019, and August 5, 2019, respectively. Eighteen randomized controlled trials (N = 2,050) met the inclusion criteria (i.e., hypochondriasis, illness anxiety disorder or somatic symptom disorder with elevated HA being assessed with validated interviews: use of standardized outcome measures). Two reviewers independently evaluated the studies' risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for randomized trials (RoB-2) tool. Overall, psychological interventions were significantly more effective than waitlist, treatment-as-usual, or placebo post-treatment (g(SS) = 0.70, g(HA) = 1.11) and at follow-up (g(SS) = 0.33, g(HA)= 0.70). CBT outperformed other psychological interventions or pharmacotherapy for HA post- treatment (Hedge's g(HA) = 0.81). The number of sessions did not significantly predict the effect sizes. In sum, psychological interventions were effective for SHA, but the generalizability of the results for SS is limited, because only two high-quatity trials contributed to the comparison. KW - health anxiety KW - hypochondriasis KW - systematic review KW - meta-analysis KW - psychotherapy Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000400 SN - 2190-8370 SN - 2151-2604 VL - 228 IS - 2 SP - 68 EP - 80 PB - Hogrefe CY - Göttingen ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Balbi, María Alejandra A1 - von Hagen, Alexa A1 - Cuadro, Ariel A1 - Ruiz, Carola T1 - A systematic review on early literacy interventions T1 - Revisión sistemática sobre intervenciones en alfabetización temprana BT - implications for interventions in Spanish BT - implicancias para intervenir en español JF - Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología N2 - An area of increasing interest amongst teachers and researchers is the availability of tools for the design and implementation of literacy interventions with Spanish speaking children. The present systematic literature review contributes to this need by summarizing available findings on evidence-based literacy interventions (EBI) for children from first to third year of primary school. Our results are based on 20 EBI that aimed at improving at least one of the critical components mentioned by the NRP (2000): phonological awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension. As 90% of the studies were completed with English-speaking children, we critically discussed the applicability of this evidence to the specific context of Spanish-speaking countries. Although many of the general characteristics of the EBI completed with English speaking children could also guide interventions in Spanish, it remains crucial to take into account structural differences between the orthographies of both languages. Moreover, we identified transversal strategies and implementation techniques that due to their universal character could also be useful for early literacy interventions in Spanish. (c) 2018 Fundacion Universitaria Konrad Lorenz. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/). N2 - Contar con herramientas para el diseño y la implementación de intervenciones en alfabetización con niños hispanohablantes reúne cada vez mayor interés entre docentes e investigadores. Para contribuir a esta demanda, realizamos una revisión sistemática con el objetivo de sintetizar la información disponible sobre intervenciones basadas en la evidencia (IBE) con niños de primero a tercer grado escolar. Nuestros resultados recogen información sobre 20 IBE, que buscaron mejorar al menos uno de los siguientes componentes críticos nombrados por el NRP (2000): conciencia fonológica, principio alfabético, fluidez, vocabulario y comprensión. Dado que el 90% de ellos fue realizado con niños angloparlantes nos dedicamos a discutir críticamente la aplicabilidad de esta evidencia al contexto particular de países hispanohablantes. Si bien muchas de las características generales de las IBE implementadas en inglés podrían servir de guía para intervenir en español, resulta imprescindible tener en cuenta las diferencias estructurales en la ortografía de ambas lenguas. A su vez, identificamos estrategias transversales y técnicas de implementación en las IBE, que por su carácter universal podrían ser de utilidad práctica también para intervenir en el desarrollo lector en español. KW - early literacy KW - evidence-based interventions (EBI) KW - reading KW - systematic review KW - superficial orthography Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2018.v50.n1.4 SN - 0120-0534 VL - 50 IS - 1 SP - 31 EP - 48 PB - Foundation advancement psychology CY - Bogota ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Hermann, Myriel A1 - Preisler, Martina A1 - Rohrmoser, Amy A1 - Letsch, Anne A1 - Goerling, Ute T1 - Prognostic Awareness in Advanced Disease BT - A Review Update and Concept Analysis JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - Purpose: Although subjective knowledge about the prognosis of an advanced disease is extremely important for coping and treatment planning, the concept of prognostic awareness (PA) remains inconsistently defined. The aims of the scoping review were to synthesize a definition of PA from the most recent literature, describe preconditions, correlates and consequences, and suggest a conceptual model. Methods: By using scoping review methodology, we searched the Web of Science and PubMed databases, and included publications, reviews, meta-analyses or guidelines on all physical diagnoses, as well as publications offering a conceptual or an operational definition of PA. The data were analyzed by means of content analysis techniques. Results: Of the 24 included publications, 21 referred exclusively to cancer, one to patients with hip fractures and two to palliative care in general. The deduced definition of PA comprised the following facets: adequate estimation of chances for recovery, knowledge of limited time to live, adequate estimation of life expectancy, knowledge of therapy goals, and knowledge of the course of the disease. Further content analysis results were mapped graphically and in a detailed table. Conclusion: There appears to be a lack of theoretical embedding of PA that in turn influences the methods used for empirical investigation. Drawing on a clear conceptual definition, longitudinal or experimental studies would be desirable. KW - prognosis KW - cancer KW - oncology KW - palliative care KW - patient-centered care KW - systematic review KW - advanced disease Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629050 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 12 PB - Frontiers Research Foundation CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Ryo, Masahiro A1 - Jeschke, Jonathan M. A1 - Rillig, Matthias C. A1 - Heger, Tina T1 - Machine learning with the hierarchy-of-hypotheses (HoH) approach discovers novel pattern in studies on biological invasions JF - Research synthesis methods N2 - Research synthesis on simple yet general hypotheses and ideas is challenging in scientific disciplines studying highly context-dependent systems such as medical, social, and biological sciences. This study shows that machine learning, equation-free statistical modeling of artificial intelligence, is a promising synthesis tool for discovering novel patterns and the source of controversy in a general hypothesis. We apply a decision tree algorithm, assuming that evidence from various contexts can be adequately integrated in a hierarchically nested structure. As a case study, we analyzed 163 articles that studied a prominent hypothesis in invasion biology, the enemy release hypothesis. We explored if any of the nine attributes that classify each study can differentiate conclusions as classification problem. Results corroborated that machine learning can be useful for research synthesis, as the algorithm could detect patterns that had been already focused in previous narrative reviews. Compared with the previous synthesis study that assessed the same evidence collection based on experts' judgement, the algorithm has newly proposed that the studies focusing on Asian regions mostly supported the hypothesis, suggesting that more detailed investigations in these regions can enhance our understanding of the hypothesis. We suggest that machine learning algorithms can be a promising synthesis tool especially where studies (a) reformulate a general hypothesis from different perspectives, (b) use different methods or variables, or (c) report insufficient information for conducting meta-analyses. KW - artificial intelligence KW - hierarchy-of-hypotheses approach KW - machine learning KW - meta-analysis KW - synthesis KW - systematic review Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1363 SN - 1759-2879 SN - 1759-2887 VL - 11 IS - 1 SP - 66 EP - 73 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Philipp, Rebecca A1 - Kriston, Levente A1 - Lanio, Jana A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Härter, Martin A1 - Moritz, Steffen A1 - Meister, Ramona T1 - Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults-A systematic review and meta-analysis (METACOG) JF - Clinical psychology & psychotherapy N2 - We evaluated the effectiveness and acceptability of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders. We searched electronic databases and included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing metacognitive interventions with other treatments in adults with mental disorders. Primary effectiveness and acceptability outcomes were symptom severity and dropout, respectively. We performed random-effects meta-analyses. We identified Metacognitive Training (MCTrain), Metacognitive Therapy (MCTherap), and Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). We included 49 trials with 2,609 patients. In patients with schizophrenia, MCTrain was more effective than a psychological treatment (cognitive remediation, SMD = -0.39). It bordered significance when compared with standard or other psychological treatments. In a post hoc analysis, across all studies, the pooled effect was significant (SMD = -0.31). MCTrain was more effective than standard treatment in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (SMD = -0.40). MCTherap was more effective than a waitlist in patients with depression (SMD = -2.80), posttraumatic stress disorder (SMD = -2.36), and psychological treatments (cognitive-behavioural) in patients with anxiety (SMD = -0.46). In patients with depression, MCTherap was not superior to psychological treatment (cognitive-behavioural). For MERIT, the database was too small to allow solid conclusions. Acceptability of metacognitive interventions among patients was high on average. Methodological quality was mostly unclear or moderate. Metacognitive interventions are likely to be effective in alleviating symptom severity in mental disorders. Although their add-on value against existing psychological interventions awaits to be established, potential advantages are their low threshold and economy. KW - mental disorders KW - meta-analysis KW - metacognition KW - psychotherapy KW - systematic review Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2345 SN - 1063-3995 SN - 1099-0879 VL - 26 IS - 2 SP - 227 EP - 240 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Brütt, Anna Levke A1 - Meister, Ramona A1 - Bernges, Tabea A1 - Moritz, Steffen A1 - Härter, Martin A1 - Kriston, Levente A1 - Kühne, Franziska T1 - Patient involvement in a systematic review BT - Development and pilot evaluation of a patient workshop JF - Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen N2 - Patient involvement (PI) in research is increasingly required as a means to improve relevance and meaningfulness of research results. PI has been widely promoted by the National Institute for Health Research in England in the last years. In Germany, widespread involvement of patients in research is still missing. The methods used to realize PI have been developed mainly in English research contexts, and detailed information on how to involve patients in systematic reviews is rare. Therefore, the aim of the study was that patients contribute and prioritize clinically relevant outcomes to a systematic review on meta-cognitive interventions, and to evaluate a patient workshop as well as patients’ perceptions of research involvement. Seven patients with experience in psychiatric care participated in our workshop. They focused on outcomes pre-defined in the review protocol (e.g., meta-cognitive or cognitive changes, symptomatology, quality of life), neglected other outcomes (like satisfaction with treatment, acceptability), and added relevant new ones (e.g., scope of action/autonomy, applicability). Altogether, they valued the explicit workshop participation positively. However, some suggested to involve patients at an earlier stage and to adapt the amount of information given. Further systematic reviews would benefit from the involvement of patients in the definition of other components of the review question (like patients or interventions), in the interpretation of key findings or in drafting a lay summary. N2 - Die Beteiligung von Patientinnen und Patienten in der Forschung wird zunehmend gefordert, um die Relevanz und Aussagefähigkeit von Forschungsergebnissen zu verbessern. Während das National Institute for Health Research in England die Patientenbeteiligung seit Jahren fördert, fehlt es in Deutschland noch weitgehend an flächendeckender Forschungsbeteiligung. Zudem liegen Informationen über Methoden der Patientenbeteiligung hauptsächlich für englische Forschungskontexte vor, und detaillierte Informationen zur Patientenbeteiligung in systematischen Reviews sind lückenhaft. Das Ziel der Studie war es daher, dass Patienten klinisch relevante Zielgrößen zu einem systematischen Review zu metakognitiven Interventionen beitragen und priorisieren und dass sie einen Patientenworkshop und ihre wahrgenommene Forschungsbeteiligung bewerten. Sieben psychiatrieerfahrene Patienten nahmen an unserem Workshop teil. Sie benannten Zielgrößen, die im Reviewprotokoll schon vorgesehen waren (z.B. metakognitive und kognitive Veränderungen, Symptomatik, Lebensqualität), vernachlässigten andere Endpunkte (z.B. Zufriedenheit, Akzeptanz) und fügten neue Zielgrößen hinzu (z.B. Handlungsspielräume/Autonomie, Anwendbarkeit). Die Patienten würdigten die Workshopteilnahme insgesamt. Einige empfahlen jedoch eine frühere Beteiligung und eine Anpassung der gegebenen Informationen. Zukünftige systematische Reviews können von der Beteiligung von Patienten bei der Definition weiterer Bestandteile der Fragestellung (wie Population oder Interventionen), der Interpretation zentraler Ergebnisse oder der Formulierung einer allgemeinverständlichen Zusammenfassung profitieren. T2 - Beteiligung von Patienten an einem systematischen Review: Entwicklung und Pilotevaluation eines Patientenworkshops KW - patient involvement KW - patient participation KW - consumer participation KW - systematic review KW - meta-analysis Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2017.07.005 SN - 1865-9217 SN - 2212-0289 VL - 127-128 SP - 56 EP - 61 PB - Elsevier CY - Jena ER -