TY  - JOUR
A1  - Godess-Riccitelli, Moran
T1  - The final end of imagination
BT  - On the relationship between moral ideal and reflectivity in Immanuel Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment
JF  - Filosofia unisinos
N2  - One main quandary that emerges in the context of Immanuel Kant’s moral ideal, The Highest Good, is that on the one hand Kant sets it as a moral demand, that is, as a principle that must be comprehended as an attainable end for man in practice while, on the other hand, it is set as a moral ideal, i.e. as something that cannot be concretized and realized within the empirical world. The main goal of this paper is to argue for the realizability of the moral ideal by means of the principle of reflective judgment as a form of judgment that in fact clarifies human limitation. I assert that the very recognition of this limitation constitutes the possibility for hope in that ideal, or for striving towards it, and that this striving is the only way that the moral ideal can be concretized. I examine man’s recognition of self-limitation as a response to the moral demand to realize the moral ideal and the necessity of the power of imagination for this, used reflectively.
KW  - culture
KW  - final end
KW  - Highest Good
KW  - hope
KW  - imagination
KW  - Kant
KW  - moral ideal reflective judgment
KW  - ultimate end
Y1  - 2017
U6  - https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2017.182.05
SN  - 1519-5023
SN  - 1984-8234
VL  - 18
IS  - 2
SP  - 107
EP  - 115
PB  - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
CY  - São Leopoldo
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Haag, Johannes
T1  - Analytic Kantianism
BT  - Sellars and McDowell on Sensory Consciousness
JF  - Con-textos kantianos : international journal of philosophy
N2  - Wilfrid Sellars and John McDowell can both be read as proponents of Analytic Kantianism. However, their accounts differ in important detail. In particular, McDowell has criticized Sellars’s account of sensory consciousness in a number of papers (most notably in LFI and SC), both as a reading of Kant and on its systematic merits. The present paper offers a detailed analysis of this criticism and a defense of Sellars’s position against the background of a methodology of transcendental philosophy.
KW  - Kant
KW  - Sellars
KW  - McDowell
KW  - Transcendental Philosophy
KW  - perception
KW  - intuition
KW  - judgment
Y1  - 2017
U6  - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1092766
SN  - 2386-7655
SP  - 18
EP  - 41
PB  - Instituto de Filosofía del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
CY  - Madrid
ER  -