TY  - GEN
A1  - Anderson, Christopher J.
A1  - Bahnik, Stepan
A1  - Barnett-Cowan, Michael
A1  - Bosco, Frank A.
A1  - Chandler, Jesse
A1  - Chartier, Christopher R.
A1  - Cheung, Felix
A1  - Christopherson, Cody D.
A1  - Cordes, Andreas
A1  - Cremata, Edward J.
A1  - Della Penna, Nicolas
A1  - Estel, Vivien
A1  - Fedor, Anna
A1  - Fitneva, Stanka A.
A1  - Frank, Michael C.
A1  - Grange, James A.
A1  - Hartshorne, Joshua K.
A1  - Hasselman, Fred
A1  - Henninger, Felix
A1  - van der Hulst, Marije
A1  - Jonas, Kai J.
A1  - Lai, Calvin K.
A1  - Levitan, Carmel A.
A1  - Miller, Jeremy K.
A1  - Moore, Katherine S.
A1  - Meixner, Johannes M.
A1  - Munafo, Marcus R.
A1  - Neijenhuijs, Koen I.
A1  - Nilsonne, Gustav
A1  - Nosek, Brian A.
A1  - Plessow, Franziska
A1  - Prenoveau, Jason M.
A1  - Ricker, Ashley A.
A1  - Schmidt, Kathleen
A1  - Spies, Jeffrey R.
A1  - Stieger, Stefan
A1  - Strohminger, Nina
A1  - Sullivan, Gavin B.
A1  - van Aert, Robbie C. M.
A1  - van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
A1  - Vanpaemel, Wolf
A1  - Vianello, Michelangelo
A1  - Voracek, Martin
A1  - Zuni, Kellylynn
T1  - Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
T2  - Science
N2  - Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration’s Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.
Y1  - 2016
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9163
SN  - 0036-8075
SN  - 1095-9203
VL  - 351
SP  - 1162
EP  - 1165
PB  - American Assoc. for the Advancement of Science
CY  - Washington
ER  -