TY - JOUR A1 - Zaruba, Nicole A1 - Westphal, Andrea A1 - Gutmann, Franziska A1 - Vock, Miriam T1 - Preservice teachers’ implicit and explicit attitudes towards teaching and learning JF - Frontiers in education N2 - When it comes to teacher attitudes towards teaching and learning, research relies heavily on explicit measures (e.g., questionnaires). These attitudes are generally conceptualized as constructivist and transmissive views on teaching and learning with constructivism often considered to be more desirable. In explicit measures, this can have drawbacks like socially desirable responding. It is for this reason that, in this study, we investigated implicit attitudes as well as explicit attitudes towards constructivism and transmission. N = 100 preservice teachers worked on a questionnaire and two Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT constructivism and ST-IAT transmission) before (T1) and after (T2) a single master’s semester. One group (n = 50) did student teaching while a second group (n = 50) took master’s courses. We evaluated preservice teachers’ views on teaching at the end of their masters’ studies. Participants agreed with transmission and constructivism (T1) on both an explicit and implicit level. Implicit measures seem to exceed explicit measures in differentially assessing constructivist and transmissive views on teaching and learning. After student teaching (T2), there was no overall effect of attitude development but changes in rank indicate that participants’ implicit attitudes towards constructivism and transmission developed differently for each individual. KW - preservice teacher KW - implicit attitude KW - student teaching KW - attitude KW - explicit attitude Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.619098 SN - 2504-284X VL - 6 PB - Frontiers Media CY - Lausanne ER - TY - GEN A1 - Zaruba, Nicole A1 - Westphal, Andrea A1 - Gutmann, Franziska A1 - Vock, Miriam T1 - Preservice Teachers’ Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Towards Teaching and Learning T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - When it comes to teacher attitudes towards teaching and learning, research relies heavily on explicit measures (e.g., questionnaires). These attitudes are generally conceptualized as constructivist and transmissive views on teaching and learning with constructivism often considered to be more desirable. In explicit measures, this can have drawbacks like socially desirable responding. It is for this reason that, in this study, we investigated implicit attitudes as well as explicit attitudes towards constructivism and transmission. N = 100 preservice teachers worked on a questionnaire and two Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT constructivism and ST-IAT transmission) before (T1) and after (T2) a single master’s semester. One group (n = 50) did student teaching while a second group (n = 50) took master’s courses. We evaluated preservice teachers’ views on teaching at the end of their masters’ studies. Participants agreed with transmission and constructivism (T1) on both an explicit and implicit level. Implicit measures seem to exceed explicit measures in differentially assessing constructivist and transmissive views on teaching and learning. After student teaching (T2), there was no overall effect of attitude development but changes in rank indicate that participants’ implicit attitudes towards constructivism and transmission developed differently for each individual. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 747 KW - preservice teacher KW - implicit attitude KW - student teaching KW - attitude KW - explicit attitude Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-542895 SN - 1866-8364 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Martens, Dörte T1 - Well-being and acceptance - contradictory aims in forest management? JF - Eco.mont : journal on protected mountain areas research N2 - Urban forests fulfil various functions, among them the restoration process and aesthetical needs of urban residents. This article reflects the attitudes towards different managed forests on the one hand and their influence on psychological well-being on the other. Results of empirical approaches from both fields show some inconsistency, suggesting that people have a more positive attitude towards wild forest areas, while the effect on well-being is more positive after a walk in tended forest areas. A discussion follows on the link between perception and the effect of urban forests. An outlook on necessary research reveals the need for longitudinal research. The article concludes by showing management implications. KW - urban forest KW - management KW - well-being KW - attitude KW - wilderness Y1 - 2011 SN - 2073-106X VL - 3 IS - 2 SP - 63 EP - 65 PB - Austrian Academy of Sciences Press CY - Wien ER - TY - THES A1 - Han, Sungju T1 - Perceptions of nature-based solutions in the context of floods T1 - Wahrnehmung von Naturbasierten Lösungen im Kontext vom Hochwasser BT - understanding the complexity of people and places at risk BT - Erfassung der Komplexität von gefährdeten Menschen und Orten N2 - Traditional ways of reducing flood risk have encountered limitations in a climate-changing and rapidly urbanizing world. For instance, there has been a demanding requirement for massive investment in order to maintain a consistent level of security as well as increased flood exposure of people and property due to a false sense of security arising from the flood protection infrastructure. Against this background, nature-based solutions (NBS) have gained popularity as a sustainable and alternative way of dealing with diverse societal challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. In particular, their ability to reduce flood risks while also offering ecological benefits has recently received global attention. Diverse co-benefits of NBS that favor both humans and nature are viewed as promising a wide endorsement of NBS. However, people’s perceptions of NBS are not always positive. Local resistance to NBS projects as well as decision-makers’ and practitioners’ unwillingness to adopt NBS have been pointed out as a bottleneck to the successful realization and mainstreaming of NBS. In this regard, there has been a growing necessity to investigate people’s perceptions of NBS. Current research has lacked an integrative perspective of both attitudinal and contextual factors that guide perceptions of NBS; it not only lacks empirical evidence, but a few existing ones are rather conflicting without having underlying theories. This has led to the overarching research question of this dissertation, "What shapes people’s perceptions of NBS in the context of flooding?" The dissertation aims to answer the following sub-questions in the three papers that make up this dissertation: 1. What are the topics reflected in the previous literature influencing perceptions of NBS as a means to reduce hydro-meteorological risks? (Paper I) 2. What are the stimulating and hampering attitudinal and contextual factors for mainstreaming NBS for flood risk management? How are NBS conceptualized? (Paper II) 3. How are public attitudes toward the NBS projects shaped? How do risk-and place-related factors shape individual attitudes toward NBS? (Paper III) This dissertation follows an integrative approach of considering “place” and “risk”, as well as the surrounding context, by analyzing attitudinal (i.e., individual) and contextual (i.e., systemic) factors. “Place” is mainly concerned with affective elements (e.g., bond to locality and natural environment) whereas “risk” is related to cognitive elements (e.g., threat appraisal). The surrounding context provides systemic drivers and barriers with the possibility of interfering the influence of place and risk for perceptions of NBS. To empirically address the research questions, the current status of the knowledge about people’s perceptions of NBS for flood risks was investigated by conducting a systematic review (Paper I). Based on these insights, a case study of South Korea was used to demonstrate key contextual and attitudinal factors for mainstreaming NBS through the lens of experts (Paper II). Lastly, by conducting a citizen survey, it investigated the relationship between the previously discussed concepts in Papers I and II using structural equation modeling, focusing on the core concepts, namely risk and place (Paper III). As a result, Paper I identified the key topics relating to people’s perceptions, including the perceived value of co-benefits, perceived effectiveness of risk reduction effectiveness, participation of stakeholders, socio-economic and place-specific conditions, environmental attitude, and uncertainty of NBS. Paper II confirmed Paper I's findings regarding attitudinal factors. In addition, several contextual hampering or stimulating factors were found to be similar to those of any emerging technologies (i.e., path dependence, lack of operational and systemic capacity). Among all, one of the distinctive features in NBS contexts, at least in the South Korean case, is the politicization of NBS, which can lead to polarization of ideas and undermine the decision-making process. Finally, Paper III provides a framework with the core topics (i.e., place and risk) that were considered critical in Paper I and Paper II. This place-based risk appraisal model (PRAM) connects people at risk and places where hazards (i.e., floods) and interventions (i.e., NBS) take place. The empirical analysis shows that, among the place-related variables, nature bonding was a positive predictor of the perceived risk-reduction effectiveness of NBS, and place identity was a negative predictor of supportive attitude. Among the risk-related variables, threat appraisal had a negative effect on perceived risk reduction effectiveness and supportive attitude, while well-communicated information, trust in flood risk management, and perceived co-benefit were positive predictors. This dissertation proves that the place and risk attributes of NBS shape people’s perceptions of NBS. In order to optimize the NBS implementation, it is necessary to consider the meanings and values held in place before project implementation and how these attributes interact with individual and/or community risk profiles and other contextual factors. With the increasing necessity of using NBS to lower flood risks, these results make important suggestions for the future NBS project strategy and NBS governance. N2 - Herkömmliche Methoden zur Verminderung des Hochwasserrisikos stoßen in Zeiten des Klimawandels und der Urbanisierung an ihre Grenzen. So sind beispielsweise massive Investitionen erforderlich, um ein gleichbleibendes Sicherheitsniveau aufrechtzuerhalten, und das Hochwasserrisiko für Menschen und Eigentum steigt, weil die Hochwasserschutzinfrastruktur ein falsches Sicherheitsgefühl vermittelt. Vor diesem Hintergrund haben naturbasierte Lösungen (engl. Nature-Based Solutions, kurz: NBS) als nachhaltiger und alternativer Weg zur Bewältigung verschiedener gesellschaftlicher Herausforderungen wie Klimawandel und Verlust der biologischen Vielfalt an Popularität gewonnen. Insbesondere ihre Eigenschaft, das Hochwasserrisiko zu verringern und gleichzeitig ökologische Vorteile zu bieten, hat zuletzt weltweit Aufmerksamkeit erregt. Die vielfältigen Vorteile der NBS, die sowohl den Menschen als auch der Natur zugutekommen, sind vielversprechende Gründe für eine breite Befürwortung der NBS. Die Wahrnehmung der NBS durch die Bevölkerung ist jedoch nicht immer positiv. Lokaler Widerstand gegen NBS-Projekte sowie die mangelnde Bereitschaft von Entscheidungsträgern und Praktikern, NBS zu übernehmen, wurden als Hürden für die erfolgreiche Umsetzung und langfristige Etablierung von NBS identifiziert. In diesem Zusammenhang hat sich die Notwendigkeit ergeben, die Wahrnehmung von NBS genauer zu untersuchen. In der aktuellen Forschung fehlt eine integrative Perspektive sowohl auf einstellungs- als auch auf kontextbezogene Faktoren, die die Wahrnehmung von NBS beeinflussen; es mangelt nicht nur an empirischen Belegen, sondern die wenigen vorhandenen Befunde sind eher widersprüchlich, ohne dass zugrunde liegende Theorien vorhanden sind. Daraus ergibt sich die übergeordnete Forschungsfrage dieser Dissertation: "Was beeinflusst die Wahrnehmung der Menschen von NBS im Kontext von Hochwasser?" Die Dissertation intendiert, die folgenden Unterfragen in den drei Publikationen zu beantworten, die diese Dissertation bilden: 1. Welche Themen spiegeln sich in der bisherigen Literatur wider und beeinflussen die Wahrnehmung von NBS als Mittel zur Verringerung hydrometeorologischer Risiken? (Publikation I) 2. Was sind die fördernden und hemmenden Einstellungs- und Kontextfaktoren für das Mainstreaming von NBS für das Hochwasserrisikomanagement? Wie werden NBS von Experten konzeptualisiert? (Publikation II) 3. Wie wird die Einstellung der Öffentlichkeit zu NBS-Projekten geprägt? Wie beeinflussen risiko- und ortsbezogene Faktoren die individuelle Einstellung zu NBS? (Publikation III) In dieser Dissertation wird ein integrativer Ansatz verfolgt, der Ort (Place) und Risiko (Risk) sowie den umgebenden Kontext berücksichtigt, indem einstellungsbezogene (d. h. individuelle) und kontextbezogene (d. h. systemische) Faktoren analysiert werden. "Ort" affektive Elemente betrifft (z. B. die Bindung an den Ort und die natürliche Umgebung), während "Risiko" bezieht sich auf kognitive Elemente (z. B. die Einschätzung der Bedrohung). Der umgebende Kontext bietet systemische Triebkräfte und Hindernisse, die den Einfluss von Ort und Risiko auf die Wahrnehmung der NBS beeinflussen können. Zur empirischen Beantwortung der Forschungsfragen wurde der aktuelle Stand der Forschung über die Wahrnehmung der NBS für Hochwasserrisiken durch eine systematische Literaturanalyse untersucht (Publikation I). Auf der Grundlage dieser Erkenntnisse wird eine Fallstudie aus Südkorea herangezogen, um die wichtigsten Kontext- und Einstellungsfaktoren für das Mainstreaming von NBS aus der Sicht von Experten aufzuzeigen (Publikation II). Schließlich wurde anhand einer Bürgerbefragung die Beziehung zwischen den zuvor in den Publikationen I und II erörterten Konzepten untersucht, mit Schwerpunkt auf den Kernkonzepten, nämlich Risiko und Ort. Die Analzse basiert auf einem Strukturgleichungsmodell (Publikation III). In Publikation I wurden die wichtigsten Themen im Zusammenhang mit der Wahrnehmung der Menschen identifiziert, darunter der wahrgenommene Wert von Zusatznutzen, die wahrgenommene Wirksamkeit der Risikominderung, die Beteiligung von Interessengruppen, sozioökonomische und ortsspezifische Bedingungen, die Einstellung zur Umwelt und die Unsicherheit der NBS. Publikation II bestätigte die Ergebnisse von Publikation I hinsichtlich der Einstellungsfaktoren (d.h. die Bereiche Ort und Risiko). Zusätzlich wurde festgestellt, dass mehrere hemmende und fördernde Kontextfaktoren denen aller neuen Technologien ähneln (d. h. Pfadabhängigkeit, fehlende operative und systemische Kapazitäten). Eines der besonderen Merkmale im Kontext der NBS, zumindest im Fall Südkoreas, ist die Politisierung der NBS, die möglicherweise zu einer Polarisierung der Ideen an sich führen und damit den Entscheidungsprozess untergraben kann. Schließlich bietet Publikation III einen Rahmen mit dem Fokus auf die Faktoren (d. h. Ort und Risiko), die in Papier I und Papier II als entscheidend angesehen wurden. Dieses ortsbezogene Risikobewertungsmodell (place-based risk appraisal model, PRAM) stellt eine Verbindung zwischen den gefährdeten Menschen und den Orten her, an denen Gefahren (z. B. Hochwasser) und Interventionen (z. B. NBS) stattfinden. Die empirische Analyse zeigt, dass bei den ortsbezogenen Konstrukten die Naturverbundenheit ein positiver Prädiktor für die wahrgenommene risikomindernde Wirksamkeit der NBS war und die Ortsidentität ein negativer Prädiktor für die unterstützende Einstellung. Bei den risikobezogenen Konstrukten wirkte sich die Einschätzung der Bedrohung negativ auf die wahrgenommene Wirksamkeit der Risikominderung und die unterstützende Einstellung aus, während gut kommunizierte Informationen, Vertrauen in das Hochwasserrisikomanagement und wahrgenommener Zusatznutzen positive Prädiktoren waren. Diese Dissertation zeigt, dass die verschiedenen Ebenen der Orts-, Risiko- und Landschaftsattribute der NBS die Wahrnehmung der NBS durch die Menschen beeinflussen. Um die Umsetzung der NBS zu optimieren, müssen die vor der Projektumsetzung bestehenden Vorstellungen und Werte der dort lebenden Menschen berücksichtigt und analysiert werden, wie diese Attribute mit dem Risikokontext und anderen systemischen und kontextuellen Faktoren interagieren. Angesichts der zunehmenden Notwendigkeit, naturbasierte Methoden zur Verringerung von Hochwasserrisiken einzusetzen, liefern diese Ergebnisse wichtige Anregungen für die künftige NBS-Projektstrategie und NBS-Governance. KW - nature-based solutions KW - flood risk management KW - dike relocation KW - risk perception KW - place attachment KW - acceptance KW - attitude KW - systematic review KW - semi-structured interview KW - structural equation modeling KW - Akzeptanz KW - Einstellung KW - Deichrückverlegung KW - Hochwasserrisikomanagement KW - naturbasierte Lösungen KW - Ortsbindung KW - Risikowahrnehmung KW - halbstrukturiertes Interview KW - Strukturgleichungsmodell KW - systematische Übersicht Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-579524 ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Gagrčin, Emilija A1 - Schaetz, Nadja A1 - Rakowski, Niklas A1 - Toth, Roland A1 - Renz, André A1 - Vladova, Gergana A1 - Emmer, Martin T1 - We and AI BT - living in a datafied world : experiences & attitudes of young Europeans KW - sociology & anthropology KW - technology (applied sciences) KW - sociology of science KW - sociology of technology KW - research on science and technology KW - technology assessment KW - artificial intelligence KW - digitalization KW - educational technology KW - decision making KW - data security KW - monitoring KW - data protection KW - automation KW - Europe KW - attitude KW - young adult KW - technological change KW - new technology Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.34669/wi/1 PB - Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society - the German Internet CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Brand, Ralf A1 - Koch, Helen T1 - Using Caffeine Pills for Performance Enhancement. An Experimental Study Neuroenhancements JF - Frontiers in psychology N2 - Recent research has indicated that university students sometimes use caffeine pills for neuroenhancement (NE; non-medical use of psychoactive substances or technology to produce a subjective enhancement in psychological functioning and experience), especially during exam preparation. In our factorial survey experiment, we manipulated the evidence participants were given about the prevalence of NE amongst peers and measured the resulting effects on the psychological predictors included in the Prototype-Willingness Model of risk behavior. Two hundred and thirty-one university students were randomized to a high prevalence condition (read faked research results overstating usage of caffeine pills amongst peers by a factor of 5; 50%), low prevalence condition (half the estimated prevalence; 5%) or control condition (no information about peer prevalence). Structural equation modeling confirmed that our participants’ willingness and intention to use caffeine pills in the next exam period could be explained by their past use of neuroenhancers, attitude to NE and subjective norm about use of caffeine pills whilst image of the typical user was a much less important factor. Provision of inaccurate information about prevalence reduced the predictive power of attitude with respect to willingness by 40-45%. This may be because receiving information about peer prevalence which does not fit with their perception of the social norm causes people to question their attitude. Prevalence information might exert a deterrent effect on NE via the attitude-willingness association. We argue that research into NE and deterrence of associated risk behaviors should be informed by psychological theory. KW - attitude KW - prevalence information KW - prototype-willingness-model KW - social reactivity KW - doping Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00101 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 7 PB - Frontiers Research Foundation CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Brand, Ralf A1 - Koch, Helen T1 - Using Caffeine Pills for Performance Enhancement BT - An Experimental Study on University Students’ Willingness and Their Intention to Try Neuroenhancements JF - Frontiers in psychology N2 - Recent research has indicated that university students sometimes use caffeine pills for neuroenhancement (NE; non-medical use of psychoactive substances or technology to produce a subjective enhancement in psychological functioning and experience), especially during exam preparation. In our factorial survey experiment, we manipulated the evidence participants were given about the prevalence of NE amongst peers and measured the resulting effects on the psychological predictors included in the Prototype-Willingness Model of risk behavior. Two hundred and thirty-one university students were randomized to a high prevalence condition (read faked research results overstating usage of caffeine pills amongst peers by a factor of 5; 50%), low prevalence condition (half the estimated prevalence; 5%) or control condition (no information about peer prevalence). Structural equation modeling confirmed that our participants’ willingness and intention to use caffeine pills in the next exam period could be explained by their past use of neuroenhancers, attitude to NE and subjective norm about use of caffeine pills whilst image of the typical user was a much less important factor. Provision of inaccurate information about prevalence reduced the predictive power of attitude with respect to willingness by 40-45%. This may be because receiving information about peer prevalence which does not fit with their perception of the social norm causes people to question their attitude. Prevalence information might exert a deterrent effect on NE via the attitude-willingness association. We argue that research into NE and deterrence of associated risk behaviors should be informed by psychological theory. KW - attitude KW - prevalence information KW - prototype-willingness-model KW - social reactivity KW - doping Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00101 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 7 SP - 1 EP - 11 PB - Frontiers Research Foundation CY - Lausanne ER - TY - GEN A1 - Brand, Ralf A1 - Koch, Helen T1 - Using Caffeine Pills for Performance Enhancement BT - An Experimental Study on University Students’ Willingness and Their Intention to Try Neuroenhancements N2 - Recent research has indicated that university students sometimes use caffeine pills for neuroenhancement (NE; non-medical use of psychoactive substances or technology to produce a subjective enhancement in psychological functioning and experience), especially during exam preparation. In our factorial survey experiment, we manipulated the evidence participants were given about the prevalence of NE amongst peers and measured the resulting effects on the psychological predictors included in the Prototype-Willingness Model of risk behavior. Two hundred and thirty-one university students were randomized to a high prevalence condition (read faked research results overstating usage of caffeine pills amongst peers by a factor of 5; 50%), low prevalence condition (half the estimated prevalence; 5%) or control condition (no information about peer prevalence). Structural equation modeling confirmed that our participants’ willingness and intention to use caffeine pills in the next exam period could be explained by their past use of neuroenhancers, attitude to NE and subjective norm about use of caffeine pills whilst image of the typical user was a much less important factor. Provision of inaccurate information about prevalence reduced the predictive power of attitude with respect to willingness by 40-45%. This may be because receiving information about peer prevalence which does not fit with their perception of the social norm causes people to question their attitude. Prevalence information might exert a deterrent effect on NE via the attitude-willingness association. We argue that research into NE and deterrence of associated risk behaviors should be informed by psychological theory. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 286 KW - attitude KW - doping KW - prevalence information KW - prototype-willingness-model KW - social reactivity Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-90506 ER -