TY - GEN A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Maas, Jana A1 - Wiesenthal, Sophia A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Empirical research in clinical supervision BT - a systematic review and suggestions for future studies T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Background: Although clinical supervision is considered to be a major component of the development and maintenance of psychotherapeutic competencies, and despite an increase in supervision research, the empirical evidence on the topic remains sparse. Methods: Because most previous reviews lack methodological rigor, we aimed to review the status and quality of the empirical literature on clinical supervision, and to provide suggestions for future research. MEDLINE, PsycInfo and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched and the review was conducted according to current guidelines. From the review results, we derived suggestions for future research on clinical supervision. Results: The systematic literature search identified 19 publications from 15 empirical studies. Taking into account the review results, the following suggestions for further research emerged: Supervision research would benefit from proper descriptions of how studies are conducted according to current guidelines, more methodologically rigorous empirical studies, the investigation of active supervision interventions, from taking diverse outcome domains into account, and from investigating supervision from a meta-theoretical perspective. Conclusions: In all, the systematic review supported the notion that supervision research often lags behind psychotherapy research in general. Still, the results offer detailed starting points for further supervision research. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 580 KW - Supervision KW - Clinical supervision KW - Systematic review KW - Evidence-based psychotherapy Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-438721 SN - 1866-8364 IS - 580 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lorenz, Robert C. A1 - Matthias, Katja A1 - Pieper, Dawid A1 - Wegewitz, Uta Elke A1 - Morche, Johannes A1 - Nocon, Marc A1 - Rissling, Olesja A1 - Schirm, Jaqueline A1 - Jacobs, Anja T1 - A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology N2 - Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine the interrater reliability (IRR) of assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) 2 for reviews of pharmacological or psychological interventions for the treatment of major depression, to compare it to that of AMSTAR and risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS), and to assess the convergent validity between the appraisal tools. Results: The median kappa values as a measure of IRR indicated a moderate agreement for AMSTAR 2 (median = 0.51), a substantial agreement for AMSTAR (median = 0.62), and a fair agreement for ROBIS (median = 0.27). Validity results showed a positive association for AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2 (r = 0.91) as well as ROBIS and AMSTAR 2 (r = 0.84). For the overall rating, AMSTAR 2 showed a high concordance with ROBIS and a lower concordance with AMSTAR. Conclusion: The IRR of AMSTAR 2 was found to be slightly lower than the IRR of AMSTAR and higher than the IRR of ROBIS. Validity measurements indicate that AMSTAR 2 is closely related to both ROBIS and AMSTAR. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. KW - AMSTAR 2 KW - AMSTAR KW - ROBIS KW - Methodological quality KW - Risk of bias KW - Systematic review Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.028 SN - 0895-4356 SN - 1878-5921 VL - 114 SP - 133 EP - 140 PB - Elsevier CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Maas, Jana A1 - Wiesenthal, Sophia A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Empirical research in clinical supervision BT - a systematic review and suggestions for future studies JF - BMC Psychology N2 - Background: Although clinical supervision is considered to be a major component of the development and maintenance of psychotherapeutic competencies, and despite an increase in supervision research, the empirical evidence on the topic remains sparse. Methods: Because most previous reviews lack methodological rigor, we aimed to review the status and quality of the empirical literature on clinical supervision, and to provide suggestions for future research. MEDLINE, PsycInfo and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched and the review was conducted according to current guidelines. From the review results, we derived suggestions for future research on clinical supervision. Results: The systematic literature search identified 19 publications from 15 empirical studies. Taking into account the review results, the following suggestions for further research emerged: Supervision research would benefit from proper descriptions of how studies are conducted according to current guidelines, more methodologically rigorous empirical studies, the investigation of active supervision interventions, from taking diverse outcome domains into account, and from investigating supervision from a meta-theoretical perspective. Conclusions: In all, the systematic review supported the notion that supervision research often lags behind psychotherapy research in general. Still, the results offer detailed starting points for further supervision research. KW - Supervision KW - Clinical supervision KW - Systematic review KW - Evidence-based psychotherapy Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0327-7 SN - 2050-7283 VL - 7 PB - BioMed Central CY - London ER -