TY - JOUR A1 - Bricker, Jeremy D. A1 - Schwanghart, Wolfgang A1 - Adhikari, Basanta Raj A1 - Moriguchi, Shuji A1 - Roeber, Volker A1 - Giri, Sanjay T1 - Performance of Models for Flash Flood Warning and Hazard Assessment BT - the 2015 Kali Gandaki Landslide Dam Breach in Nepal JF - Mountain research and development N2 - The 2015 magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake and its aftershocks weakened mountain slopes in Nepal. Co- and postseismic landsliding and the formation of landslide-dammed lakes along steeply dissected valleys were widespread, among them a landslide that dammed the Kali Gandaki River. Overtopping of the landslide dam resulted in a flash flood downstream, though casualties were prevented because of timely evacuation of low-lying areas. We hindcast the flood using the BREACH physically based dam-break model for upstream hydrograph generation, and compared the resulting maximum flow rate with those resulting from various empirical formulas and a simplified hydrograph based on published observations. Subsequent modeling of downstream flood propagation was compromised by a coarse-resolution digital elevation model with several artifacts. Thus, we used a digital-elevation-model preprocessing technique that combined carving and smoothing to derive topographic data. We then applied the 1-dimensional HEC-RAS model for downstream flood routing, and compared it to the 2-dimensional Delft-FLOW model. Simulations were validated using rectified frames of a video recorded by a resident during the flood in the village of Beni, allowing estimation of maximum flow depth and speed. Results show that hydrological smoothing is necessary when using coarse topographic data (such as SRTM or ASTER), as using raw topography underestimates flow depth and speed and overestimates flood wave arrival lag time. Results also show that the 2-dimensional model produces more accurate results than the 1-dimensional model but the 1-dimensional model generates a more conservative result and can be run in a much shorter time. Therefore, a 2-dimensional model is recommended for hazard assessment and planning, whereas a 1-dimensional model would facilitate real-time warning declaration. KW - Nepal KW - earthquake KW - landslide dam breach KW - flood KW - HEC-RAS KW - Delft-FLOW KW - steep mountain stream Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-16-00043.1 SN - 0276-4741 SN - 1994-7151 VL - 37 IS - 1 SP - 5 EP - 15 PB - International Mountain Society CY - Lawrence ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Korup, Oliver A1 - Mohr, Christian Heinrich A1 - Manga, Michael M. T1 - Bayesian detection of streamflow response to earthquakes JF - Water resources research : an AGU journal N2 - Detecting whether and how river discharge responds to strong earthquake shaking can be time-consuming and prone to operator bias when checking hydrographs from hundreds of gauging stations. We use Bayesian piecewise regression models to show that up to a fifth of all gauging stations across Chile had their largest change in daily streamflow trend on the day of the M-w 8.8 Maule earthquake in 2010. These stations cluster distinctly in the near field though the number of detected streamflow changes varies with model complexity and length of time window considered. Credible seismic streamflow changes at several stations were the highest detectable in eight months, with an increased variance of discharge surpassing the variance of discharge following rainstorms. We conclude that Bayesian piecewise regression sheds new and unbiased insights on the duration, trend, and variance of streamflow response to strong earthquakes, and on how this response compares to that following rainstorms. KW - Bayesian analysis KW - Chile KW - discharge KW - earthquake KW - streamflow changes Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028874 SN - 0043-1397 SN - 1944-7973 VL - 57 IS - 7 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken, NJ ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Zhu, Chuanbin A1 - Cotton, Fabrice A1 - Kawase, Hiroshi A1 - Händel, Annabel A1 - Pilz, Marco A1 - Nakano, Kenichi T1 - How well can we predict earthquake site response so far? BT - site-specific approaches JF - Earthquake spectra : the professional journal of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute N2 - Earthquake site responses or site effects are the modifications of surface geology to seismic waves. How well can we predict the site effects (average over many earthquakes) at individual sites so far? To address this question, we tested and compared the effectiveness of different estimation techniques in predicting the outcrop Fourier site responses separated using the general inversion technique (GIT) from recordings. Techniques being evaluated are (a) the empirical correction to the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio of earthquakes (c-HVSR), (b) one-dimensional ground response analysis (GRA), and (c) the square-root-impedance (SRI) method (also called the quarter-wavelength approach). Our results show that c-HVSR can capture significantly more site-specific features in site responses than both GRA and SRI in the aggregate, especially at relatively high frequencies. c-HVSR achieves a "good match" in spectral shape at similar to 80%-90% of 145 testing sites, whereas GRA and SRI fail at most sites. GRA and SRI results have a high level of parametric and/or modeling errors which can be constrained, to some extent, by collecting on-site recordings. KW - Site response KW - site effects KW - HVSR KW - ground response analysis KW - square-root-impedance KW - earthquake Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211060859 SN - 8755-2930 SN - 1944-8201 VL - 38 IS - 2 SP - 1047 EP - 1075 PB - Sage Publ. CY - Thousand Oaks ER -