TY - JOUR A1 - Ansmann, Moritz A1 - Seyfried, Markus T1 - Zwischen Anspruch und Realität BT - evidenzbasierte Qualitätsentwicklung durch Integration von Qualitätsmanagement und Hochschuldidaktik JF - HDS.Journal N2 - Eine evidenzbasierte Gestaltung von Studium und Lehre, wie sie heute normativ eingefordert wird, bedarf des integrierten Zusammenwirkens von Qualitätsmanagement und Hochschuldidaktik – aber gibt es dieses in der Praxis? Mit Blick auf die allgemeine Befundlage, aber auch anhand einer eigenen empirischen Untersuchung zeigt der Beitrag diesbezüglich auf, dass Qualitätsmanagement und Hochschuldidaktik als weitgehend desintegrierte Funktionsbereiche wahrgenommen werden und Evidenzbasierung in der Praxis folglich keinen sehr hohen Stellenwert genießt. Ausgehend von einer Ursachenanalyse wird auf die dysfunktionalen, aber auch auf die funktionalen Auswirkungen dieser Separierung aufmerksam gemacht. KW - Qualitätsmanagement KW - Qualitätssicherung KW - Evidenzbasierung KW - Organisationsforschung KW - Zusammenarbeit KW - quality management KW - quality assurance KW - evidence-based research KW - organizational research KW - collaboration Y1 - 2020 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa2-725827 SN - 2195-0334 VL - 2020 IS - 1 SP - 6 EP - 11 PB - Hochschuldidaktisches Zentrum Sachsen (HDS) CY - Leipzig ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Roehrig, B. A1 - Nosper, M. A1 - Linck-Eleftheriadis, S. A1 - Strandt, G. A1 - Salzwedel, Annett A1 - Völler, Heinz T1 - Method of the assessment of patients Outcome in cardiac rehabilitation by means of quality indicators - a description of the method JF - Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift für Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation N2 - Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation is designed for patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases or functional disabilities. The aim of a cardiac rehabilitation is to improve overall physical health, psychological well-being, physical function, the ability to participate in social life and help patients to change their habits. Regarding the heterogeneity of these aims measuring of the effect of cardiac rehabilitation is still a challenge. This study recommends a concept to assess the effects of cardiac rehabilitation regarding the individual change of relevant quality indicators. Methods: With EVA-Reha; cardiac rehabilitation the Medical Advisory Service of Statutory Health Insurance Funds in Rhineland-Palatinate, Alzey (MDK Rheinland-Pfalz) developed a software to collect data set including sociodemographic and diagnostic data and also the results of specific assessments. The project was funded by the Techniker Krankenkasse, Hamburg, and supported by participating rehabilitation centers. From 01. July 2010 to 30. June 2011 1309 patients (age 71.5 years, 76.1% men) from 13 rehabilitation centers were consecutively enrolled. 13 quality indicators in 3 scales were developed for evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation: 1) cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides), 2) exercise capacity (resting heart rate, maximal exercise capacity, maximal walking distance, heart failure [NYHA classification], and angina pectoris [CCS classification]) and 3) subjective health (IRES-24: pain, somatic health, psychological wellbeing and depression as well as anxiety on the HADS). The study was prospective; data of patients were assessed at entry and discharge of rehabilitation. To measure the success of rehabilitation each parameter was graded in severity classes at entry and discharge. For each of the 13 quality indicators changes of severity class were rated in a rating matrix. For indicators without a requirement for medical care neither at entry nor at discharge no rating was performed. Results: The grading into severity classes as well as the minimal important differences were given for the 13 quality indicators. The result of rehabilitation can be demonstrated in suitable form by means of rating of the 13 quality indicators according to a clinical population. The rating model differs well between clinically changed and unchanged patients for the quality indicators. Conclusion: The result of cardiac rehabilitation can be assessed with 13 quality indicators measured at entry and discharge of the rehabilitation program. If a change into a more favorable category at the end of rehabilitation could be achieved it was counted as a success. The 13 quality indicators can be used to assess the individual result as well as the result of a population - e.g. all patients of a clinic in a specific time period. In addition, the assessment and rating of relevant quality indicators can be used for comparisons of rehabilitation centers. KW - cardiac rehabilitation KW - quality indicator KW - outcome KW - success KW - quality management Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1341457 SN - 0034-3536 SN - 1439-1309 VL - 53 IS - 1 SP - 31 EP - 37 PB - Thieme CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kleinert, Jens A1 - Brand, Ralf T1 - Quality management of sport psychology care in competitive sports - (no) effect without acceptance?! JF - Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie N2 - In the past decade quality management (QM) has grown to be one of the most important topics in the area of applied sport psychology. There we discuss structures, processes, and results concerning QM, considering the QM model of the European Foundation of Quality Management (EFQM). In terms of results, quality can be defined in three areas: the coaching process itself (e. g., satisfaction and well-being of coach and client), psychological skills (e. g., efficacy of techniques used by the client), and health, personality, as well as sport performance (e. g., client's motor behavior in training and competition). Measures and processes to improve and ensure quality in these three areas are discussed as being dependent on four types of determinants: associated institutions, sport psychologists (i.e., individual competence and valence of tasks), coaching character, and socio-economic factors. As key processes of QM in this complex structure, both orientation to stakeholders and communication about quality and QM measures are identified. KW - quality management KW - applied sport psychology KW - competitive sports KW - orientation to stakeholders Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010/a000041 SN - 1612-5010 VL - 18 IS - 2 SP - 60 EP - 72 PB - Hogrefe CY - Göttingen ER -