TY - JOUR A1 - Graeber, Daniel A1 - Kritikos, Alexander A1 - Seebauer, Johannes T1 - COVID-19 BT - a crisis of the female self-employed JF - Journal of population economics N2 - We investigate how the economic consequences of the pandemic and the government-mandated measures to contain its spread affect the self-employed — particularly women — in Germany. For our analysis, we use representative, real-time survey data in which respondents were asked about their situation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings indicate that among the self-employed, who generally face a higher likelihood of income losses due to COVID-19 than employees, women are about one-third more likely to experience income losses than their male counterparts. We do not find a comparable gender gap among employees. Our results further suggest that the gender gap among the self-employed is largely explained by the fact that women disproportionately work in industries that are more severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis of potential mechanisms reveals that women are significantly more likely to be impacted by government-imposed restrictions, e.g., the regulation of opening hours. We conclude that future policy measures intending to mitigate the consequences of such shocks should account for this considerable variation in economic hardship. KW - self-employed KW - COVID-19 KW - income KW - gender KW - representative real-time survey data KW - decomposition methods Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-021-00849-y SN - 0933-1433 SN - 1432-1475 VL - 34 IS - 4 SP - 1141 EP - 1187 PB - Springer CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Andres, Lesley A1 - Lauterbach, Wolfgang A1 - Jongbloed, Janine A1 - Hümme, Hartwig T1 - Gender, education, and labour market participation across the life course BT - a Canada/Germany comparison JF - International journal of lifelong education N2 - In this paper, we employ a comparative life course approach for Canada and Germany to unravel the relationships among general and vocational educational attainment and different life course activities, with a focus on labour market and income inequality by gender. Life course theory and related concepts of 'time,' 'normative patterns,' 'order and disorder,' and 'discontinuities' are used to inform the analyses. Data from the Paths on Life's Way (Paths) project in British Columbia, Canada and the German Pathways from Late Childhood to Adulthood (LifE) which span 28 and 33 years, respectively, are employed to examine life trajectories from leaving school to around age 45. Sequence analysis and cluster analyses portray both within and between country differences - and in particular gender differences - in educational attainment, employment, and other activities across the life course which has an impact on ultimate labour market participation and income levels. 'Normative' life courses that follow a traditional order correspond with higher levels of full-time work and higher incomes; in Germany more so than Canada, these clusters are male dominated. Clusters characterised by 'disordered' and 'discontinuous' life courses in both countries are female dominated and associated with lower income levels. KW - Comparative life course trajectories KW - education KW - gender KW - work KW - income KW - labour market inequality Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2021.1924302 SN - 0260-1370 SN - 1464-519X VL - 40 IS - 2 SP - 170 EP - 189 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group CY - Abingdon ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Brady, David A1 - Guerra, Christian A1 - Kohler, Ulrich A1 - Link, Bruce T1 - The long arm of prospective childhood income for mature adult health in the U.S. JF - Journal of health and social behavior N2 - Pioneering scholarship links retrospective childhood conditions to mature adult health. We distinctively provide critical evidence with prospective state-of-the-art measures of parent income observed multiple times during childhood in the 1970s to 1990s. Using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we analyze six health outcomes (self-rated health, heart attack, stroke, life-threatening chronic conditions, non-life-threatening chronic conditions, and psychological distress) among 40- to 65-year-olds. Parent relative income rank has statistically and substantively significant relationships with five of six outcomes. The relationships with heart attack, stroke, and life-threatening chronic conditions are particularly strong. Parent income rank performs slightly better than alternative prospective and retrospective measures. At the same time, we provide novel validation on which retrospective measures (i.e., father’s education) perform almost as well as prospective measures. Furthermore, we inform several perennial debates about how relative versus absolute income and other measures of socioeconomic status and social class influence health. KW - health disparities KW - income KW - life course KW - social class Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465221081094 SN - 0022-1465 SN - 2150-6000 VL - 63 IS - 4 SP - 543 EP - 559 PB - Sage CY - Los Angeles ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Graeber, Daniel A1 - Kritikos, Alexander A1 - Seebauer, Johannes T1 - COVID-19: a crisis of the female self-employed T2 - CEPA Discussion Papers N2 - We investigate how the economic consequences of the pandemic, and of the government-mandated measures to contain its spread, affect the self-employed – particularly women – in Germany. For our analysis, we use representative, real-time survey data in which respondents were asked about their situation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings indicate that among the self-employed, who generally face a higher likelihood of income losses due to COVID-19 than employees, women are 35% more likely to experience income losses than their male counterparts. Conversely, we do not find a comparable gender gap among employees. Our results further suggest that the gender gap among the self-employed is largely explained by the fact that women disproportionately work in industries that are more severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis of potential mechanisms reveals that women are significantly more likely to be impacted by government-imposed restrictions, i.e. the regulation of opening hours. We conclude that future policy measures intending to mitigate the consequences of such shocks should account for this considerable variation in economic hardship. T3 - CEPA Discussion Papers - 27 KW - self-employed KW - COVID-19 KW - income KW - gender KW - representative real-time survey data KW - decomposition methods Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-498108 SN - 2628-653X IS - 27 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fliesser, Michael A1 - De Witt Huberts, Jessie A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria T1 - The choice that matters: the relative influence of socioeconomic status indicators on chronic back pain- a longitudinal study JF - BMC health services research N2 - Background: In health research, indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) are often used interchangeably and often lack theoretical foundation. This makes it difficult to compare results from different studies and to explore the relationship between SES and health outcomes. To aid researchers in choosing appropriate indicators of SES, this article proposes and tests a theory-based selection of SES indicators using chronic back pain as a health outcome. Results: Chronic back pain intensity was best predicted by the multidimensional index (beta = 0.31, p < 0.05), followed by job position (beta = 0.29, p < 0.05) and education (beta = -0.29, p < 0.05); whereas, income exerted no significant influence. Back pain disability was predicted strongest by education (beta = -0.30, p < 0.05) and job position (beta = 0. 29, p < 0.05). Here, multidimensional index and income had no significant influence. Conclusions: The choice of SES indicators influences predictive power on both back pain dimensions, suggesting SES predictors cannot be used interchangeably. Therefore, researchers should carefully consider prior to each study which SES indicator to use. The introduced framework can be valuable in supporting this decision because it allows for a stable prediction of SES indicator influence and their hierarchy on a specific health outcomes. KW - socioeconomic status KW - Indicators of socioeconomic status KW - health inequality KW - education KW - job position KW - income KW - chronic back pain Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2735-9 SN - 1472-6963 VL - 17 PB - BioMed Central CY - London ER - TY - THES A1 - Fließer, Michael T1 - Der Einfluss unterschiedlicher Indikatoren des sozioökonomischen Status auf Rückenschmerz T1 - The influence of different socioeconomic status indicators on back pain N2 - Obwohl der sozioökonomische Status (SES) eine in der Sozialepidemiologie häufig gebrauchte Variable darstellt, ist seine Verwendung mit methodischen Problemen verknüpft: Seine latente Struktur führt dazu, dass sich verschiedene Möglichkeiten der Operationalisierung eröffnen. Diese reichen von klassischen Ungleichheitsindikatoren wie Bildung, Einkommen oder Berufsposition, über multidimensionale oder über Nachbarschaftsmerkmale konstruierte Indizes, bis hin zu subjektiven Statuseinschätzungen. Problematisch ist dies insofern, als verschiedene Indikatoren auf unterschiedlichen theoretischen Konstrukten beruhen und unterschiedliche Schlussfolgerungen erlauben. In dieser Arbeit wird deshalb in einem ersten Schritt anhand eines systematischen Reviews zum Zusammenhang von SES und Rückenschmerzen überprüft, welche Indikatoren in wissenschaftlichen Publikationen eingesetzt werden und wie die Auswahl begründet wird. Das Ergebnis zeigt eine klare Präferenz für klassische Indikatoren (Bildung, Einkommen und Berufsposition). Erläutert wurde die jeweilige Auswahl allerdings nur in einem geringen Prozentsatz der untersuchten Artikel, obwohl die unterschiedlichen Studienergebnisse nahelegen, dass der gewählte Indikator einen Einfluss auf den gefundenen Zusammenhang ausüben könnte. Deshalb wurde in einem weiteren Schritt überprüft, wie unterschiedliche SES-Indikatoren mit der Verbesserung von Rückenschmerzen nach einer Rehabilitation (Studie 1) und der Neuentstehung von Rückenschmerzen (Studie 2) zusammenhängen. Außerdem wurde untersucht, ob ein einfaches Modell den Zusammenhang von SES und Gesundheit so darstellen kann, dass a priori abzuschätzen ist, wie hoch der Einfluss unterschiedlicher Indikatoren auf einen bestimmten Gesundheitsoutput sein könnte. Es zeigt sich, dass sich der errechnete Zusammenhang zwischen den verschiedenen Indikatoren und chronischen Rückenschmerzen erheblich unterscheidet: Für Menschen, die bereits wegen Rückenschmerzen in Rehabilitation waren, erwiesen sich Bildung und Berufsposition als ähnlich einflussreiche Einflussfaktoren, während für das Einkommen kein bedeutender Zusammenhang festgestellt werden konnte. Für die Neuentstehung chronischer Rückenschmerzen zeigte sich die Berufsposition als wichtigster Indikator, gefolgt von Bildung, während für Einkommen kein signifikanter Zusammenhang gefunden werden konnte. Folglich bestimmt die Wahl des Indikators die Höhe des festgestellten Zusammenhangs stark mit. Unterschiedliche Indikatoren dürfen deshalb nicht als austauschbar betrachtet werden und es muss bei jeder Forschungsfrage genau überlegt werden, welcher Indikator für die jeweilige Fragestellung am besten verwendet werden kann. Das vorgeschlagene theoretische Modell kann dabei als Unterstützung dienen. N2 - Despite the fact that the socioeconomic status (SES) is a widely used variable in social epidemiology, its use is inflicted with methodological difficulties: Its latent structure allows different possibilities of operationalisation (for example education, income, job position, multidimensional indices, or subjective social status). This is problematical since different indicators are based on different theoretical considerations. In this doctoral thesis, it was first examined, which indicators of the SES are used in scientific publications investigating the relationship between SES and back pain. Results show a strong preference for classical indicators, especially education, income and job position. In a second step, it was examined how strong different indicators of SES are connected to the development of chronic back pain (study 1) and the onset of chronic back pain (study 2). Furthermore, it was tested if it is possible to use theoretical models to estimate a priori the indicator with the strongest influence on a given health outcome. Results show that the calculated association between the indicators and the outcomes differ considerably: The progress of chronic back pain was best predicted by education and job position, while income had no significant influence. New onset of back pain was best predicted by job position followed by education. Income, again, had no influence. This indicates that indeed the chosen indicator influences the association. Therefore different indicators should not be used interchangeably. Before starting a scientific survey, researchers should consider very carefully which indicator(s) they want to use. The suggested theoretical model can help them to do so. KW - sozioökonomischer Status KW - Rückenschmerzen KW - Bildung KW - Beruf KW - Einkommen KW - socioeconomic status KW - back pain KW - education KW - jobposition KW - income Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-423455 ER - TY - THES A1 - Kaliga, Sarah Ninette T1 - Eine Frage der Zeit. Wie Einflüsse individueller Merkmale auf Einkommen bei Frauen über ihre familiären Verpflichtungen vermittelt werden T1 - A question of time. How the influence of individual characteristics on women’s income is conveyed through their family responsibilities BT - eine Untersuchung mit Daten der LifE-Studie BT - an analysis with data from the LifE study N2 - Die vorliegende Arbeit mit dem Titel „Eine Frage der Zeit. Wie Einflüsse individueller Merkmale auf Einkommen bei Frauen über ihre familiären Verpflichtungen vermittelt werden“ geht der Frage der Heterogenität bei weiblichen Einkommensergebnissen nach. Dabei steht die Thematik der individuellen Investitionen in die familiäre Arbeit als erklärender Faktor im Vordergrund und es wird der Frage nachgegangen, warum die einen Frauen viele und andere weniger häusliche Verpflichtungen übernehmen. Hierfür werden das individuelle Humankapital der Frauen, ihre Werteorientierungen und individuelle berufliche Motivationen aus der Jugendzeit und im Erwachsenenalter herangezogen. Die analysierten Daten (Daten der LifE-Studie) repräsentieren eine Langzeitperspektive vom 16. bis zum 45. Lebensjahr der befragten Frauen. Zusammenfassend kann im Ergebnis gezeigt werden, dass ein Effekt familiärer Verpflichtungen auf Einkommensergebnisse bei Frauen im frühen und mittleren Erwachsenenalter als Zeiteffekt über die investierte Erwerbsarbeitszeit vermittelt wird. Die Relevanz privater Routinearbeiten für Berufserfolge von Frauen und insbesondere Müttern stellt somit eine Frage der Zeit dar. Weiterhin kann für individuelle Einflüsse auf Einkommen bei Frauen gezeigt werden, dass höhere zeitliche Investitionen in den Beruf von Frauen mit hohem Bildungsniveau als indirect-only-Mediation nur über die Umverteilung häuslicher Arbeiten erklärbar werden. Frauen sind demnach zwar Gewinnerinnen der Bildungsexpansion. Die Bildungsexpansion stellt jedoch auch die Geschichte der Entstehung eines Vereinbarkeitskonflikts für eben diese Frauen dar, weil die bis heute virulenten Beharrungskräfte hinsichtlich der Frauen zugeschriebenen familiären Verpflichtungen mit ihren gestiegenen beruflichen Erwartungen und Chancen kollidieren. Die Arbeit leistet in ihren Analyseresultaten einen wichtigen Beitrag zur Erklärung heterogener Investitionen von Frauen in den Beruf und ihrer Einkommensergebnisse aus dem Privaten heraus. N2 - The present work entitled „A question of time. How the influence of individual characteristics on women’s income is conveyed through their family responsibilities“ examines the question of the heterogenity of female income results. The topic of individual investment in family work is at the forefront as an explanatory factor and the question is why some women assume many and other less domestic obligations. For this purpose, the individual human capital of women, their value orientations and individual professional motivations from adolescence and adulthood are used. The analysed data (data from the LifE-Study) represent a long-term perspective from the 16th to the 45th year of life of the women surveyed. In summary, it can be shown that an effect of family responsibilities on income outcomes for women in early and middle adulthood is conveyed as a time effect over imvested working time. The relevance of private routine work for the professional success of women and especially mothers is therefore a question of time. Furthermore, it can be shown for individual influences on women’s income, that higher investments in the occupation of women with a high educational level can only be explained by the redistribution of domestic work as an indirect-only-mediation. According to this, women are winners in the expansion of education, however, the expansion of education also represents the history of emergence of a conflict of reconciliation for precisely these women, because the family obligations ascribed to women, which are still virulent today, conflict with their increased professional expectations and opportunities. The analysis results of this work make an important contribution to explaining women’s heterogeneous investments in the profession and their income results from the private sphere. KW - Einkommen KW - income KW - Frauen KW - women KW - domestic work KW - Hausarbeit KW - family work KW - Familienarbeit KW - mediation analysis KW - Mediationsanalyse KW - occupational career KW - Berufskarriere KW - human capital KW - Humankapital KW - educational expansion KW - Bildungsexpansion KW - Arbeitsteilung KW - division of labour Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-407353 ER -