TY - JOUR A1 - Muhl, Rika M. W. A1 - Roelke, Daniel L. A1 - Zohary, Tamar A1 - Moustaka-Gouni, Maria A1 - Sommer, Ulrich A1 - Borics, Gabor A1 - Gaedke, Ursula A1 - Withrow, Frances G. A1 - Bhattacharyya, Joydeb T1 - Resisting annihilation BT - relationships between functional trait dissimilarity, assemblage competitive power and allelopathy JF - Ecology letters N2 - Allelopathic species can alter biodiversity. Using simulated assemblages that are characterised by neutrality, lumpy coexistence and intransitivity, we explore relationships between within-assemblage competitive dissimilarities and resistance to allelopathic species. An emergent behaviour from our models is that assemblages are more resistant to allelopathy when members strongly compete exploitatively (high competitive power). We found that neutral assemblages were the most vulnerable to allelopathic species, followed by lumpy and then by intransitive assemblages. We find support for our modeling in real-world time-series data from eight lakes of varied morphometry and trophic state. Our analysis of this data shows that a lake's history of allelopathic phytoplankton species biovolume density and dominance is related to the number of species clusters occurring in the plankton assemblages of those lakes, an emergent trend similar to that of our modeling. We suggest that an assemblage's competitive power determines its allelopathy resistance. KW - Allelopathy KW - exploitative competition KW - interference competition KW - intransitivity KW - lumpy coexistence KW - neutrality KW - species supersaturated assemblages Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13109 SN - 1461-023X SN - 1461-0248 VL - 21 IS - 9 SP - 1390 EP - 1400 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Ehrlich, Elias A1 - Becks, Lutz A1 - Gaedke, Ursula T1 - Trait-fitness relationships determine how trade-off shapes affect species coexistence JF - Ecology : a publication of the Ecological Society of America N2 - Trade-offs between functional traits are ubiquitous in nature and can promote species coexistence depending on their shape. Classic theory predicts that convex trade-offs facilitate coexistence of specialized species with extreme trait values (extreme species) while concave trade-offs promote species with intermediate trait values (intermediate species). We show here that this prediction becomes insufficient when the traits translate non-linearly into fitness which frequently occurs in nature, e.g., an increasing length of spines reduces grazing losses only up to a certain threshold resulting in a saturating or sigmoid trait-fitness function. We present a novel, general approach to evaluate the effect of different trade-off shapes on species coexistence. We compare the trade-off curve to the invasion boundary of an intermediate species invading the two extreme species. At this boundary, the invasion fitness is zero. Thus, it separates trait combinations where invasion is or is not possible. The invasion boundary is calculated based on measurable trait-fitness relationships. If at least one of these relationships is not linear, the invasion boundary becomes non-linear, implying that convex and concave trade-offs not necessarily lead to different coexistence patterns. Therefore, we suggest a new ecological classification of trade-offs into extreme-favoring and intermediate-favoring which differs from a purely mathematical description of their shape. We apply our approach to a well-established model of an empirical predator-prey system with competing prey types facing a trade-off between edibility and half-saturation constant for nutrient uptake. We show that the survival of the intermediate prey depends on the convexity of the trade-off. Overall, our approach provides a general tool to make a priori predictions on the outcome of competition among species facing a common trade-off in dependence of the shape of the trade-off and the shape of the trait-fitness relationships. KW - coexistence KW - competition KW - fitness KW - functional traits KW - invasion boundary KW - neutrality KW - predator-prey model KW - shape KW - trade-offs Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2047 SN - 0012-9658 SN - 1939-9170 VL - 98 SP - 3188 EP - 3198 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER -