TY - GEN A1 - Felser, Claudia A1 - Phillips, Colin A1 - Wagers, Matthew T1 - Editorial: Encoding and Navigating Linguistic Representations in Memory T2 - Frontiers in psychology KW - sentence comprehension KW - encoding KW - memory retrieval KW - interference KW - anaphor resolution KW - agreement processing KW - filler-gap dependencies Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00164 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 8 PB - Frontiers Research Foundation CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fyndanis, Valantis A1 - Arcara, Giorgio A1 - Capasso, Rita A1 - Christidou, Paraskevi A1 - De Pellegrin, Serena A1 - Gandolfi, Marialuisa A1 - Messinis, Lambros A1 - Panagea, Evgenia A1 - Papathanasopoulos, Panagiotis A1 - Smania, Nicola A1 - Semenza, Carlo A1 - Miceli, Gabriele T1 - Time reference in nonfluent and fluent aphasia BT - a cross-linguistic test of the PAst Discourse Linking Hypothesis JF - Clinical linguistics & phonetics N2 - Recent studies by Bastiaanse and colleagues found that time reference is selectively impaired in people with nonfluent agrammatic aphasia, with reference to the past being more difficult to process than reference to the present or to the future. To account for this dissociation, they formulated the PAst DIscourse LInking Hypothesis (PADILIH), which posits that past reference is more demanding than present/future reference because it involves discourse linking. There is some evidence that this hypothesis can be applied to people with fluent aphasia as well. However, the existing evidence for the PADILIH is contradictory, and most of it has been provided by employing a test that predominantly taps retrieval processes, leaving largely unexplored the underlying ability to encode time reference-related prephonological features. Within a cross-linguistic approach, this study tests the PADILIH by means of a sentence completion task that 'equally' taps encoding and retrieval abilities. This study also investigates if the PADILIH’s scope can be extended to fluent aphasia. Greek- and Italian-speaking individuals with aphasia participated in the study. The Greek group consisted of both individuals with nonfluent agrammatic aphasia and individuals with fluent aphasia, who also presented signs of agrammatism. The Italian group consisted of individuals with agrammatic nonfluent aphasia only. The two Greek subgroups performed similarly. Neither language group of participants with aphasia exhibited a pattern of performance consistent with the predictions of the PADILIH. However, a double dissociation observed within the Greek group suggests a hypothesis that may reconcile the present results with the PADILIH. KW - Time reference KW - past reference KW - future reference KW - encoding KW - retrieval Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2018.1445291 SN - 0269-9206 SN - 1464-5076 VL - 32 IS - 9 SP - 823 EP - 843 PB - Taylor & Francis Group CY - Philadelphia ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hofmeister, Philip A1 - Vasishth, Shravan T1 - Distinctiveness and encoding effects in online sentence comprehension JF - Frontiers in psychology N2 - In explicit memory recall and recognition tasks, elaboration and contextual isolation both facilitate memory performance. Here, we investigate these effects in the context of sentence processing: targets for retrieval during online sentence processing of English object relative clause constructions differ in the amount of elaboration associated with the target noun phrase, or the homogeneity of superficial features (text color). Experiment 1 shows that greater elaboration for targets during the encoding phase reduces reading times at retrieval sites, but elaboration of non-targets has considerably weaker effects. Experiment 2 illustrates that processing isolated superficial features of target noun phrases-here, a green word in a sentence with words colored white-does not lead to enhanced memory performance, despite triggering longer encoding times. These results are interpreted in the light of the memory models of Nairne, 1990, 2001, 2006, which state that encoding remnants contribute to the set of retrieval cues that provide the basis for similarity-based interference effects. KW - encoding KW - retrieval KW - similarity KW - distinctiveness KW - sentence processing Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01237 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 5 PB - Frontiers Research Foundation CY - Lausanne ER -