TY  - JOUR
A1  - Ansmann, Moritz
A1  - Seyfried, Markus
T1  - Zwischen Anspruch und Realität
BT  - evidenzbasierte Qualitätsentwicklung durch Integration von Qualitätsmanagement und Hochschuldidaktik
JF  - HDS.Journal
N2  - Eine evidenzbasierte Gestaltung von Studium und Lehre, wie sie heute normativ eingefordert wird, bedarf des integrierten Zusammenwirkens von Qualitätsmanagement und Hochschuldidaktik – aber gibt es dieses in der Praxis? Mit Blick auf die allgemeine Befundlage, aber auch anhand einer eigenen empirischen Untersuchung zeigt der Beitrag diesbezüglich auf, dass Qualitätsmanagement und Hochschuldidaktik als weitgehend desintegrierte Funktionsbereiche wahrgenommen werden und Evidenzbasierung in der Praxis folglich keinen sehr hohen Stellenwert genießt. Ausgehend von einer Ursachenanalyse wird auf die dysfunktionalen, aber auch auf die funktionalen Auswirkungen dieser Separierung aufmerksam gemacht.
KW  - Qualitätsmanagement
KW  - Qualitätssicherung
KW  - Evidenzbasierung
KW  - Organisationsforschung
KW  - Zusammenarbeit
KW  - quality management
KW  - quality assurance
KW  - evidence-based research
KW  - organizational research
KW  - collaboration
Y1  - 2020
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa2-725827
SN  - 2195-0334
VL  - 2020
IS  - 1
SP  - 6
EP  - 11
PB  - Hochschuldidaktisches Zentrum Sachsen (HDS)
CY  - Leipzig
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Chujfi-La-Roche, Salim
A1  - Meinel, Christoph
T1  - Matching cognitively sympathetic individual styles to develop collective intelligence in digital communities
JF  - AI & society : the journal of human-centred systems and machine intelligence
N2  - Creation, collection and retention of knowledge in digital communities is an activity that currently requires being explicitly targeted as a secure method of keeping intellectual capital growing in the digital era. In particular, we consider it relevant to analyze and evaluate the empathetic cognitive personalities and behaviors that individuals now have with the change from face-to-face communication (F2F) to computer-mediated communication (CMC) online. This document proposes a cyber-humanistic approach to enhance the traditional SECI knowledge management model. A cognitive perception is added to its cyclical process following design thinking interaction, exemplary for improvement of the method in which knowledge is continuously created, converted and shared. In building a cognitive-centered model, we specifically focus on the effective identification and response to cognitive stimulation of individuals, as they are the intellectual generators and multiplicators of knowledge in the online environment. Our target is to identify how geographically distributed-digital-organizations should align the individual's cognitive abilities to promote iteration and improve interaction as a reliable stimulant of collective intelligence. The new model focuses on analyzing the four different stages of knowledge processing, where individuals with sympathetic cognitive personalities can significantly boost knowledge creation in a virtual social system. For organizations, this means that multidisciplinary individuals can maximize their extensive potential, by externalizing their knowledge in the correct stage of the knowledge creation process, and by collaborating with their appropriate sympathetically cognitive remote peers.
KW  - argumentation research
KW  - cyber humanistic
KW  - cognition
KW  - collaboration
KW  - knowledge building
KW  - knowledge management
KW  - teamwork
KW  - virtual groups
Y1  - 2017
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0780-x
SN  - 0951-5666
SN  - 1435-5655
VL  - 35
IS  - 1
SP  - 5
EP  - 15
PB  - Springer
CY  - New York
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Fleischer, Julia
A1  - Carstens, Nora
T1  - Policy labs as arenas for boundary spanning
BT  - inside the digital transformation in Germany
JF  - Public Management Review
N2  - The recently adopted German Online Access Act triggered the creation of digitalization labs for designing digital services, bringing together federal, state, and local authorities; end-users; and private-sector actors. These labs provide opportunities for boundary spanning due to organizational field and lab features. Our comparative case studies on three digitalization labs show variations in boundary spanning and reveal lab members de-coupling from their parent organizations to a varying extent. We have concluded labs offer boundary spanning that supports safeguarding the legitimacy of innovative policy designs but also raise concerns over public accountability.
KW  - boundary spanning
KW  - collaboration
KW  - digitalization
KW  - inter-governmental relations
Y1  - 2021
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1893803
SN  - 1470-1065
SN  - 1461-667X
VL  - 24
IS  - 8
SP  - 1208
EP  - 1225
PB  - Routledge
CY  - London
ER  -