TY - JOUR A1 - Prill, Robert A1 - Walter, Marina A1 - Królikowska, Aleksandra A1 - Becker, Roland T1 - A systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and clinical applications of wearable movement sensors for knee joint rehabilitation JF - Sensors N2 - In clinical practice, only a few reliable measurement instruments are available for monitoring knee joint rehabilitation. Advances to replace motion capturing with sensor data measurement have been made in the last years. Thus, a systematic review of the literature was performed, focusing on the implementation, diagnostic accuracy, and facilitators and barriers of integrating wearable sensor technology in clinical practices based on a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. For critical appraisal, the COSMIN Risk of Bias tool for reliability and measurement of error was used. PUBMED, Prospero, Cochrane database, and EMBASE were searched for eligible studies. Six studies reporting reliability aspects in using wearable sensor technology at any point after knee surgery in humans were included. All studies reported excellent results with high reliability coefficients, high limits of agreement, or a few detectable errors. They used different or partly inappropriate methods for estimating reliability or missed reporting essential information. Therefore, a moderate risk of bias must be considered. Further quality criterion studies in clinical settings are needed to synthesize the evidence for providing transparent recommendations for the clinical use of wearable movement sensors in knee joint rehabilitation. KW - wearable movement sensor KW - IMU KW - motion capture KW - reliability KW - clinical KW - orthopedic Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248221 SN - 1424-8220 VL - 21 IS - 24 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Vaid, Akhil A1 - Somani, Sulaiman A1 - Russak, Adam J. A1 - De Freitas, Jessica K. A1 - Chaudhry, Fayzan F. A1 - Paranjpe, Ishan A1 - Johnson, Kipp W. A1 - Lee, Samuel J. A1 - Miotto, Riccardo A1 - Richter, Felix A1 - Zhao, Shan A1 - Beckmann, Noam D. A1 - Naik, Nidhi A1 - Kia, Arash A1 - Timsina, Prem A1 - Lala, Anuradha A1 - Paranjpe, Manish A1 - Golden, Eddye A1 - Danieletto, Matteo A1 - Singh, Manbir A1 - Meyer, Dara A1 - O'Reilly, Paul F. A1 - Huckins, Laura A1 - Kovatch, Patricia A1 - Finkelstein, Joseph A1 - Freeman, Robert M. A1 - Argulian, Edgar A1 - Kasarskis, Andrew A1 - Percha, Bethany A1 - Aberg, Judith A. A1 - Bagiella, Emilia A1 - Horowitz, Carol R. A1 - Murphy, Barbara A1 - Nestler, Eric J. A1 - Schadt, Eric E. A1 - Cho, Judy H. A1 - Cordon-Cardo, Carlos A1 - Fuster, Valentin A1 - Charney, Dennis S. A1 - Reich, David L. A1 - Böttinger, Erwin A1 - Levin, Matthew A. A1 - Narula, Jagat A1 - Fayad, Zahi A. A1 - Just, Allan C. A1 - Charney, Alexander W. A1 - Nadkarni, Girish N. A1 - Glicksberg, Benjamin S. T1 - Machine learning to predict mortality and critical events in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 in New York City: model development and validation JF - Journal of medical internet research : international scientific journal for medical research, information and communication on the internet ; JMIR N2 - Background: COVID-19 has infected millions of people worldwide and is responsible for several hundred thousand fatalities. The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated thoughtful resource allocation and early identification of high-risk patients. However, effective methods to meet these needs are lacking. Objective: The aims of this study were to analyze the electronic health records (EHRs) of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and were admitted to hospitals in the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City; to develop machine learning models for making predictions about the hospital course of the patients over clinically meaningful time horizons based on patient characteristics at admission; and to assess the performance of these models at multiple hospitals and time points. Methods: We used Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and baseline comparator models to predict in-hospital mortality and critical events at time windows of 3, 5, 7, and 10 days from admission. Our study population included harmonized EHR data from five hospitals in New York City for 4098 COVID-19-positive patients admitted from March 15 to May 22, 2020. The models were first trained on patients from a single hospital (n=1514) before or on May 1, externally validated on patients from four other hospitals (n=2201) before or on May 1, and prospectively validated on all patients after May 1 (n=383). Finally, we established model interpretability to identify and rank variables that drive model predictions. Results: Upon cross-validation, the XGBoost classifier outperformed baseline models, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) for mortality of 0.89 at 3 days, 0.85 at 5 and 7 days, and 0.84 at 10 days. XGBoost also performed well for critical event prediction, with an AUC-ROC of 0.80 at 3 days, 0.79 at 5 days, 0.80 at 7 days, and 0.81 at 10 days. In external validation, XGBoost achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.88 at 3 days, 0.86 at 5 days, 0.86 at 7 days, and 0.84 at 10 days for mortality prediction. Similarly, the unimputed XGBoost model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.78 at 3 days, 0.79 at 5 days, 0.80 at 7 days, and 0.81 at 10 days. Trends in performance on prospective validation sets were similar. At 7 days, acute kidney injury on admission, elevated LDH, tachypnea, and hyperglycemia were the strongest drivers of critical event prediction, while higher age, anion gap, and C-reactive protein were the strongest drivers of mortality prediction. Conclusions: We externally and prospectively trained and validated machine learning models for mortality and critical events for patients with COVID-19 at different time horizons. These models identified at-risk patients and uncovered underlying relationships that predicted outcomes. KW - machine learning KW - COVID-19 KW - electronic health record KW - TRIPOD KW - clinical KW - informatics KW - prediction KW - mortality KW - EHR KW - cohort KW - hospital KW - performance Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2196/24018 SN - 1439-4456 SN - 1438-8871 VL - 22 IS - 11 PB - Healthcare World CY - Richmond, Va. ER -