TY - THES A1 - Santos Bruss, Sara Morais dos T1 - Feminist solidarities after modulation N2 - Feminist Solidarities after Modulation produces an intersectional analysis of transnational feminist movements and their contemporary digital frameworks of identity and solidarity. Engaging media theory, critical race theory, and Black feminist theory, as well as contemporary feminist movements, this book argues that digital feminist interventions map themselves onto and make use of the multiplicity and ambiguity of digital spaces to question presentist and fixed notions of the internet as a white space and technologies in general as objective or universal. Understanding these frameworks as colonial constructions of the human, identity is traced to a socio-material condition that emerges with the modernity/colonialism binary. In the colonial moment, race and gender become the reasons for, as well as the effects of, technologies of identification, and thus need to be understood as and through technologies. What Deleuze has called modulation is not a present modality of control, but is placed into a longer genealogy of imperial division, which stands in opposition to feminist, queer, and anti-racist activism that insists on non-modular solidarities across seeming difference. At its heart, Feminist Solidarities after Modulation provides an analysis of contemporary digital feminist solidarities, which not only work at revealing the material histories and affective ""leakages"" of modular governance, but also challenges them to concentrate on forms of political togetherness that exceed a reductive or essentialist understanding of identity, solidarity, and difference. KW - social media KW - decolonial feminism KW - Germany KW - India KW - intersectionality KW - modulation KW - identity politics Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-1-68571-146-7 SN - 978-1-68571-147-4 U6 - https://doi.org/10.53288/0397.1.00 PB - punctum books CY - Brooklyn, NY ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Syed, Moin A1 - Santos, Carlos A1 - Yoo, Hyung Chol A1 - Juang, Linda P. T1 - Invisibility of racial/ethnic minorities in developmental science BT - Implications for Research and Institutional Practices JF - American Psychologist N2 - García Coll et al.’s (1996)integrative model was a landmark article for developmentalscience, and for psychology more broadly, in outlining the multitude of social and culturalfactors at play when seeking to understand the development of racial/ethnic minority children.The time is ripe to not only take stock of those advances but also evaluate the integrativemodel in the context of present-day research practice within developmental psychology, andpsychology more broadly. The purpose of this article is to bring a systemic perspective todevelopmental science through a discussion of current practices in the field. To do so, weexamineinvisibility, or how dominant practices serve to overlook, silence, or dismissknowledge produced by and for racial/ethnic minority populations. Guided by the interpretiveframework of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1991), we discuss three key questions: Fromwhose vantage point is research conducted? What types of questions are valued? And whogets left out? We then conclude with recommendations for changes in practices for individ-uals, institutions, and the field at large. Importantly, although our analysis is largely groundedin research and practices in developmental psychology, it is also highly relevant to psycho-logical science as a whole. KW - developmental psychology KW - race/ethnicity KW - intersectionality KW - invisibilities Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000294 SN - 0003-066X SN - 1935-990X VL - 73 IS - 6 SP - 812 EP - 826 PB - American Psychological Association CY - Washington ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Moffitt, Ursula Elinor A1 - Juang, Linda P. A1 - Syed, Moin T1 - Intersectionality and Youth Identity Development Research in Europe JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - The increasing application of intersectionality to the psychological study of identity development raises questions regarding how we as researchers construct and operationalize social identity categories, as well as how we best capture and address systems of oppression and privilege within our work. In the continental European context, the use of the intersectionality paradigm raises additional issues, since “race” was officially removed from the vernacular following the atrocities of WWII, yet racialized oppression continues to occur at every level of society. Within psychological research, participants are often divided into those with and without “migration background,” which can reiterate inequitable norms of national belonging while washing over salient lived experiences in relation to generation status, citizenship, religion, gender, and the intersection between these and other social locations. Although discrimination is increasingly examined in identity development research, rarely are the history and impact of colonialism and related socio-historical elements acknowledged. In the current paper, we aim to address these issues by reviewing previous research and discussing theoretical and practical possibilities for the future. In doing so, we delve into the problems of trading in one static social identity category (e.g., “race”) for another (e.g., “migration background/migrant”) without examining the power structures inherent in the creation of these top-down categories, or the lived experiences of those navigating what it means to be marked as a racialized Other. Focusing primarily on contextualized ethno-cultural identity development, we discuss relevant examples from the continental European context, highlighting research gaps, points for improvement, and best practices. KW - intersectionality KW - identity development KW - migration KW - ethnic-racial identity KW - youth identity KW - Europe KW - Islamophobia Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00078 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 11 PB - Frontiers Research Foundation CY - Lausanne ER - TY - GEN A1 - Moffitt, Ursula Elinor A1 - Juang, Linda P. A1 - Syed, Moin T1 - Intersectionality and Youth Identity Development Research in Europe T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - The increasing application of intersectionality to the psychological study of identity development raises questions regarding how we as researchers construct and operationalize social identity categories, as well as how we best capture and address systems of oppression and privilege within our work. In the continental European context, the use of the intersectionality paradigm raises additional issues, since “race” was officially removed from the vernacular following the atrocities of WWII, yet racialized oppression continues to occur at every level of society. Within psychological research, participants are often divided into those with and without “migration background,” which can reiterate inequitable norms of national belonging while washing over salient lived experiences in relation to generation status, citizenship, religion, gender, and the intersection between these and other social locations. Although discrimination is increasingly examined in identity development research, rarely are the history and impact of colonialism and related socio-historical elements acknowledged. In the current paper, we aim to address these issues by reviewing previous research and discussing theoretical and practical possibilities for the future. In doing so, we delve into the problems of trading in one static social identity category (e.g., “race”) for another (e.g., “migration background/migrant”) without examining the power structures inherent in the creation of these top-down categories, or the lived experiences of those navigating what it means to be marked as a racialized Other. Focusing primarily on contextualized ethno-cultural identity development, we discuss relevant examples from the continental European context, highlighting research gaps, points for improvement, and best practices. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 613 KW - intersectionality KW - identity development KW - migration KW - ethnic-racial identity KW - youth identity KW - Europe KW - Islamophobia Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-459790 SN - 1866-8364 IS - 613 ER - TY - THES A1 - Binder, Kristin T1 - Diskriminierungserfahrungen von Personen mit nicht-binärer Geschlechtsidentität T1 - Discrimination experience of non-binary people N2 - Sowohl in der intersektionalen Ungleichheitsforschung als auch in feministischer Geschlechterforschung bleibt der Fokus bezüglich Themen wie Geschlechterdiskriminierung der Geschlechtergerechtigkeit - trotz der jahrelangen Erkenntnis über die Vielzahl von Geschlechtsidentitäten - zumeist nur auf Lebenssituationen von Männern und Frauen. Dies erweist sich jedoch als höchst problematisch, da Personen mit nicht-binärer Geschlechtsidentität in einem hohen Maß von Diskriminierung und sozialer Ungleichheit betroffen sind. In der Abschlussarbeit wird deswegen mit Hilfe einer intersektionalen Perspektive auf diese Forschungslücke eingegangen. Es wird dabei die Frage gestellt, welche Möglichkeiten und Grenzen das Konzept der Intersektionalität in Bezug auf die Erforschung von Diskriminierungserfahrungen von Personen mit nicht-binärer Geschlechtsidentität bietet und worauf die soziale Ungleichheit dieser Personengruppe basiert. Hierfür wird zunächst nicht nur auf grundlegende geschlechtersoziologische Theorien eingegangen sowie das Konzept der Intersektionalität erläutert, sondern auch ausführlich der Wissenschaftsstand zu nicht-binären Personen nachgezeichnet. Bei der darauffolgenden Analyse der Diskriminierungserfahrungen werden vor allem die sprachliche Benachteiligung, die Invalidierung der Geschlechtsidentität sowie die durch Institutionen und systematische Strukturen hervorgerufene, besonders dramatische soziale Ungleichheit deutlich. Aus einer intersektionalen Perspektive zeigen sich zudem deutliche Unterschiede zwischen nicht-binären Personen, wobei sich vor allem der Einfluss von Rassismus als äußerst auffällig erweist. Die soziale Ungleichheit der nicht-binären Personen lässt sich dabei zu einem großen Teil durch die in der Gesellschaft vorherrschende Heteronormativität und dem Alltagswissen über eine vermeintliche Dualität der Geschlechter erklären. Im Hinblick auf die Fruchtbarkeit einer intersektionalen Perspektive auf Diskriminierungserfahrungen von nicht-binären Personen zeigen sich Grenzen des Konzepts vor allem bei der notwendigen Limitierung der Kategorienanzahl und bei einer Herangehensweise, welche den Begriff der Intersektionalität wörtlich nimmt. Möglichkeiten bei der Verwendung einer Mischung aus antikategorialen und interkategorialen Ansatzes sind hingegen, eine Kritik an Ausschlüssen in der Forschung zu sozialer Ungleichheit, die kritische Sichtbarhaltung der machtvollen Prozesse hinter Kategorisierungen und das Aufzeigen von Unterschieden innerhalb ansonsten als homogen behandelten sozialen Gruppen. Um das Ausmaß an Diskriminierung für nicht-binäre Personen zu reduzieren, werden deswegen abschließend sowohl strukturelle Veränderung als notwendig erachtet als auch ein aufgeklärter, respektvoller und einschließender Umgang mit nicht-binären Personen in der Wissenschaft und im Alltag. N2 - In intersectional inequality research as well as in feminist Gender Studies the focus towards gender based discrimination and justice is mostly only on the living situations of men and women even though there has been scientific knowledge about a wide variety of gender identities for years. This turns out to be highly problematic because non-binary people face a great amount of discrimination and social inequality. Hence this thesis aims to respond to that research gap by utilizing an intersectional perspective. The main question is, which possibilities and limits arise by using the concept of intersectionality in regard to researching experience of discrimination of non-binary people and whereupon the social inequality of this group is based. Therefore in the first chapter fundamental gender-sociological theories are pointed out and the concept of intersectionality is elucidated. The second chapter begins with an elaborate display of the scientific knowledge about non-binary people, which is followed by the analysis of their experiences of discrimination. The main findings there are linguistic discrimination, invalidation of their gender identity and dramatic social inequality through institutions and systematic structures. From an intersectional perspective significant divergences in the experience of discrimination appear as well inbetween the group of non-binary people whereby the influence of racism is especially prevalent. The social inequality of non-binary people can be explained by the societal predominant heteronormativity and the everyday knowledge about the presumed duality of gender. In regard to the fruitfulness of an intersectional perspective on experiences of discrimination of non-binary people, the analysis shows that the main limits of the concept are the necessity of restricting the amount of research categories. In contrast the possibilities of using a mix of the anticategorical and intercategorical approach is that criticising exclusions in the research of social inequality becomes possible, powerful processes of categorising can be made visible and differences inbetween social groups become apparent. To reduce the amount of discrimination that non-binary people have to face on a daily basis, structural change is necessary as well as a respectful, enlightened and inclusive contact with non-binary people in everyday life and science. KW - nicht-binäre Geschlechtsidentität KW - Intersektionalität KW - Diskriminierung KW - genderqueer KW - Dekonstruktion KW - Heteronormativität KW - Zweigeschlechtlichkeitssystem KW - Queerfeminismus KW - non-binary KW - intersectionality KW - discrimination KW - heteronormativity Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-441636 ER -