TY - JOUR A1 - Jekauc, Darko A1 - Wagner, Matthias O. A1 - Kahlert, Daniela A1 - Woll, Alexander T1 - Reliability and validity of MoMo-Physical-Activity-Questionnaire for Adolescents (MoMo-AFB) JF - Diagnostica N2 - This paper presents the psychometric properties of the MoMo-AFB (Bos, Worth, Opper, Oberger & Woll, 2009), a questionnaire designed to measure the physical activity of children and adolescents. The MoMo-AFB consists of 28 items, covering the fields of everyday physical activity, sports within and outside of organised clubs, physical education as well as compliance with physical activity guidelines. A study was conducted with 109 boys and 87 girls aged between 9 and 17 years. The MoMo-AFB was given on two separate occasions to evaluate reliability and was compared with accelerometry data of ActiGraph GT1X to evaluate validity. The overall kappa/weighted kappa coefficient for the one-week testretest reliability was .66 (SD = .19) and the overall intraclass correlation (ICC) .68. Self-reported and accelerometer-measured average weekly time spent performing moderate to vigorous physical activity were significantly correlated (Spearman r = .29). Regarding reliability and validity, the MoMo-AFB is comparable with other international published physical activity questionnaires for adolescents. KW - physical activity KW - physical activity questionnaire KW - MoMo-AFB KW - adolescents Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000083 SN - 0012-1924 VL - 59 IS - 2 SP - 100 EP - 111 PB - Hogrefe CY - Göttingen ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kahlert, Daniela A1 - Brand, Ralf T1 - Questionnaires for assessing physical activity different response scale categories influence responses concerning health- and sport-related cognitions JF - Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie N2 - The present study examines whether the use of different frequency scales in questionnaires about physical activity influences respondents' own estimation of their activity, as well as subsequent measurements of health- und sport-related cognitions and evaluations. Using a randomized research design we recruited a sample of 118 participants. One group received a high frequency scale for assessing their exercise frequency with the response categories "never", "less often", "once a month", "once a week", or "most days." The other group answered with a medium frequency scale with the alternatives "never", "less often", " once every few months", "once a month", and " once a week or more often." As dependent variables all participants judged the subjective importance of physical activity and their health-related quality of life (WHO-QOL-bref). Results indicate the expected response errors, owing to the fact that using a high-frequency scale produces higher levels of self-reported physical activity (Cramer's V = .30). Corresponding to this the subjective importance of physical activity increased (d = .37) and the health-related quality of life was judged to be better (d = .36). Such artefacts might be eliminated by using standardized formulations such as "I exercise... times per week/month for... minutes." KW - physical activity KW - measurement KW - health-related cognition KW - response error Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149/a000044 SN - 0943-8149 VL - 19 IS - 2 SP - 96 EP - 100 PB - Hogrefe CY - Göttingen ER -