TY - JOUR A1 - Zhang, Zhuodong A1 - Wieland, Ralf A1 - Reiche, Matthias A1 - Funk, Roger A1 - Hoffmann, Carsten A1 - Li, Yong A1 - Sommer, Michael T1 - Identifying sensitive areas to wind erosion in the xilingele grassland by computational fluid dynamics modelling JF - Ecological informatics : an international journal on ecoinformatics and computational ecolog N2 - In order to identify the areas in the Xilingele grassland which are sensitive to wind erosion, a computational fluid dynamics model (CFD-WEM) was used to simulate the wind fields over a region of 37 km(2) which contains different topography and land use types. Previous studies revealed the important influences of topography and land use on wind erosion in the Xilingele grassland. Topography influences wind fields at large scale, and land use influences wind fields near the ground. Two steps were designed to implement the CFD wind simulation, and they were respectively to simulate the influence of topography and surface roughness on the wind. Digital elevation model (DEM) and surface roughness length were the key inputs for the CFD simulation. The wind simulation by CFD-WEM was validated by a wind data set which was measured simultaneously at six positions in the field. Three scenarios with different wind velocities were designed based on observed dust storm events, and wind fields were simulated according to these scenarios to predict the sensitive areas to wind erosion. General assumptions that cropland is the most sensitive area to wind erosion and heavily and moderately grazed grasslands are both sensitive etc. can be refined by the modelling of CFD-WEM. Aided by the results of this study, the land use planning and protection measures against wind erosion can be more efficient. Based on the case study in the Xilingele grassland, a method of regional wind erosion assessment aided by CFD wind simulation is summarized. The essence of this method is a combination of CFD wind simulation and determination of threshold wind velocity for wind erosion. Because of the physically-based simulation and the flexibility of the method, it can be generalised to other regions. KW - Sensitive areas KW - Wind erosion KW - Computational fluid dynamics KW - Grassland KW - Surface roughness Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.12.002 SN - 1574-9541 VL - 8 IS - 5 SP - 37 EP - 47 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Cheng, Chaojie A1 - Milsch, Harald T1 - Hydromechanical investigations on the self-propping potential of fractures in tight sandstones JF - Rock mechanics and rock engineering N2 - The hydromechanical properties of single self-propping fractures under stress are of fundamental interest for fractured-rock hydrology and a large number of geotechnical applications. This experimental study investigates fracture closure and hydraulic aperture changes of displaced tensile fractures, aligned tensile fractures, and saw-cut fractures for two types of sandstone (i.e., Flechtinger and Fontainebleau) with contrasting mechanical properties, cycling confining pressure between 5 and 30 MPa. Emphasis is placed on how surface roughness, fracture wall offset, and the mechanical properties of the contact asperities affect the self-propping potential of these fractures under normal stress. A relative fracture wall displacement can significantly increase fracture aperture and hydraulic conductivity, but the degree of increase strongly depends on the fracture surface roughness. For smooth fractures, surface roughness remains scale-independent as long as the fracture area is larger than a roll-off wavelength and thus any further displacement does not affect fracture aperture. For rough tensile fractures, these are self-affine over a larger scale so that an incremental fracture wall offset likely leads to an increase in fracture aperture. X-ray microtomography of the fractures indicates that the contact area ratio of the tensile fractures after the confining pressure cycle inversely correlates with the fracture wall offset yielding values in the range of about 3-25%, depending, first, on the respective surface roughness and, second, on the strength of the asperities in contact. Moreover, the contact asperities mainly occur isolated and tend to be preferentially oriented in the direction perpendicular to the fracture wall displacement which, in turn, may induce flow anisotropy. This, overall, implies that relatively harder sedimentary rocks have a higher self-propping potential for sustainable fluid flow through fractures in comparison to relatively soft rocks when specific conditions regarding surface roughness and fracture wall offset are met. KW - Self-propping fracture KW - Mechanical aperture KW - Hydraulic aperture KW - Normal KW - stress KW - Fracture wall offset KW - Surface roughness Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02500-4 SN - 0723-2632 SN - 1434-453X VL - 54 IS - 10 SP - 5407 EP - 5432 PB - Springer CY - Wien ER -