TY - JOUR A1 - Grau, José Horacio A1 - Hackl, Thomas A1 - Koepfli, Klaus-Peter A1 - Hofreiter, Michael T1 - Improving draft genome contiguity with reference-derived in silico mate-pair libraries JF - GigaScience N2 - Background Contiguous genome assemblies are a highly valued biological resource because of the higher number of completely annotated genes and genomic elements that are usable compared to fragmented draft genomes. Nonetheless, contiguity is difficult to obtain if only low coverage data and/or only distantly related reference genome assemblies are available. Findings In order to improve genome contiguity, we have developed Cross-Species Scaffolding—a new pipeline that imports long-range distance information directly into the de novo assembly process by constructing mate-pair libraries in silico. Conclusions We show how genome assembly metrics and gene prediction dramatically improve with our pipeline by assembling two primate genomes solely based on ∼30x coverage of shotgun sequencing data. KW - genome assembly KW - mate-pairs KW - in silico KW - scaffolding KW - shotgun sequencing Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy029 SN - 2047-217X VL - 7 IS - 5 SP - 1 EP - 6 PB - Oxford University Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - GEN A1 - Grau, José Horacio A1 - Hackl, Thomas A1 - Koepfli, Klaus-Peter A1 - Hofreiter, Michael T1 - Improving draft genome contiguity with reference-derived in silico mate-pair libraries T2 - GigaScience N2 - Background Contiguous genome assemblies are a highly valued biological resource because of the higher number of completely annotated genes and genomic elements that are usable compared to fragmented draft genomes. Nonetheless, contiguity is difficult to obtain if only low coverage data and/or only distantly related reference genome assemblies are available. Findings In order to improve genome contiguity, we have developed Cross-Species Scaffolding—a new pipeline that imports long-range distance information directly into the de novo assembly process by constructing mate-pair libraries in silico. Conclusions We show how genome assembly metrics and gene prediction dramatically improve with our pipeline by assembling two primate genomes solely based on ∼30x coverage of shotgun sequencing data. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 477 KW - genome assembly KW - mate-pairs KW - in silico KW - scaffolding KW - shotgun sequencing Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-419225 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hermanns, Jolanda T1 - Scaffolding for chemistry students – which tools are assessed as being more helpful BT - Stepped supporting tools or task navigators? JF - Chemistry Teacher International N2 - In this paper the use of two different scaffolds in a seminar on the topic of heterocycles is discussed. The students first used both scaffolds (stepped supporting tools and a task navigator) on two tasks and could then choose for one other task the scaffold that suited them more. The scaffolds were evaluated in a mixedmethods study by the use of questionnaires and the conducting of a focus group interview. Both scaffolds were assessed as being helpful. However, students who thought they didn’t need different sorts of tips, as provided by the task navigator, chose the stepped supporting tools. All students reflected on their use of the scaffolds; their choices for one of both are therefore well-founded. As the reasons for choosing the scaffold are very individual, in future seminars both types of scaffolds will be provided. KW - organic chemistry KW - scaffolding KW - self-regulated learning KW - solving of tasks Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2020-0019 SN - 2569-3263 PB - De Gruyter CY - Berlin ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hermanns, Jolanda T1 - Scaffolding for chemistry students – which tools are assessed as being more helpful BT - Stepped supporting tools or task navigators? T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - In this paper the use of two different scaffolds in a seminar on the topic of heterocycles is discussed. The students first used both scaffolds (stepped supporting tools and a task navigator) on two tasks and could then choose for one other task the scaffold that suited them more. The scaffolds were evaluated in a mixedmethods study by the use of questionnaires and the conducting of a focus group interview. Both scaffolds were assessed as being helpful. However, students who thought they didn’t need different sorts of tips, as provided by the task navigator, chose the stepped supporting tools. All students reflected on their use of the scaffolds; their choices for one of both are therefore well-founded. As the reasons for choosing the scaffold are very individual, in future seminars both types of scaffolds will be provided. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 1108 KW - organic chemistry KW - scaffolding KW - self-regulated learning KW - solving of tasks Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-491001 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 1108 ER -