TY - JOUR A1 - Zhu, Chuanbin A1 - Pilz, Marco A1 - Cotton, Fabrice T1 - Which is a better proxy, site period or depth to bedrock, in modelling linear site response in addition to the average shear-wave velocity? JF - Bulletin of earthquake engineering : official publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering N2 - This study aims to identify the best-performing site characterization proxy alternative and complementary to the conventional 30 m average shear-wave velocity V-S30, as well as the optimal combination of proxies in characterizing linear site response. Investigated proxies include T-0 (site fundamental period obtained from earthquake horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios), V-Sz (measured average shear-wave velocities to depth z, z = 5, 10, 20 and 30 m), Z(0.8) and Z(1.0) (measured site depths to layers having shear-wave velocity 0.8 and 1.0 km/s, respectively), as well as Z(x-infer) (inferred site depths from a regional velocity model, x = 0.8 and 1.0, 1.5 and 2.5 km/s). To evaluate the performance of a site proxy or a combination, a total of 1840 surface-borehole recordings is selected from KiK-net database. Site amplifications are derived using surface-to-borehole response-, Fourier- and cross-spectral ratio techniques and then are compared across approaches. Next, the efficacies of 7 single-proxies and 11 proxy-pairs are quantified based on the site-to-site standard deviation of amplification residuals of observation about prediction using the proxy or the pair. Our results show that T-0 is the best-performing single-proxy among T-0, Z(0.8), Z(1.0) and V-Sz. Meanwhile, T-0 is also the best-performing proxy among T-0, Z(0.8), Z(1.0) and Z(x-infer) complementary to V-S30 in accounting for the residual amplification after V-S30-correction. Besides, T-0 alone can capture most of the site effects and should be utilized as the primary site indicator. Though (T-0, V-S30) is the best-performing proxy pair among (V-S30, T-0), (V-S30, Z(0.8)), (V-S30, Z(1.0)), (V-S30, Z(x-infer)) and (T-0, V-Sz), it is only slightly better than (T-0, V-S20). Considering both efficacy and engineering utility, the combination of T-0 (primary) and V-S20 (secondary) is recommended. Further study is needed to test the performances of various proxies on sites in deep sedimentary basins. KW - Site effects KW - Amplification KW - Site proxy KW - Surface-to-borehole spectral ratios KW - KiK-net KW - Earthquake Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00738-6 SN - 1570-761X SN - 1573-1456 VL - 18 IS - 3 SP - 797 EP - 820 PB - Springer CY - Dordrecht ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lontsi, Agostiny Marrios A1 - Garcia-Jerez, Antonio A1 - Camilo Molina-Villegas, Juan A1 - Jose Sanchez-Sesma, Francisco A1 - Molkenthin, Christian A1 - Ohrnberger, Matthias A1 - Krüger, Frank A1 - Wang, Rongjiang A1 - Fah, Donat T1 - A generalized theory for full microtremor horizontal-to-vertical [H/V(z,f)] spectral ratio interpretation in offshore and onshore environments JF - Geophysical journal international N2 - Advances in the field of seismic interferometry have provided a basic theoretical interpretation to the full spectrum of the microtremor horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio [H/V(f)]. The interpretation has been applied to ambient seismic noise data recorded both at the surface and at depth. The new algorithm, based on the diffuse wavefield assumption, has been used in inversion schemes to estimate seismic wave velocity profiles that are useful input information for engineering and exploration seismology both for earthquake hazard estimation and to characterize surficial sediments. However, until now, the developed algorithms are only suitable for on land environments with no offshore consideration. Here, the microtremor H/V(z, f) modelling is extended for applications to marine sedimentary environments for a 1-D layered medium. The layer propagator matrix formulation is used for the computation of the required Green’s functions. Therefore, in the presence of a water layer on top, the propagator matrix for the uppermost layer is defined to account for the properties of the water column. As an application example we analyse eight simple canonical layered earth models. Frequencies ranging from 0.2 to 50 Hz are considered as they cover a broad wavelength interval and aid in practice to investigate subsurface structures in the depth range from a few meters to a few hundreds of meters. Results show a marginal variation of 8 per cent at most for the fundamental frequency when a water layer is present. The water layer leads to variations in H/V peak amplitude of up to 50 per cent atop the solid layers. KW - Numerical modelling KW - Earthquake hazards KW - Seismic interferometry KW - Site effects KW - Theoretical seismology KW - Wave propagation Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz223 SN - 0956-540X SN - 1365-246X VL - 218 IS - 2 SP - 1276 EP - 1297 PB - Oxford Univ. Press CY - Oxford ER -