@techreport{Berdefy2019,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Berdefy, Alina-Camille},
  title     = {Auftrag und M{\"o}glichkeiten der Kommission f{\"u}r Friedenskonsolidierung im System der Vereinten Nationen},
  series = {Staat, Recht und Politik - Forschungs- und Diskussionspapiere},
  journal   = {Staat, Recht und Politik - Forschungs- und Diskussionspapiere},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {2509-6974},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43947},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-439476},
  pages     = {25},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Vor dem Hintergrund der international steigenden Zahl an Konfliktr{\"u}ckf{\"a}llen insbesondere im Anschluss an bereits offiziell f{\"u}r beendet erkl{\"a}rte B{\"u}rgerkriege und die daraus folgende zunehmende Relevanz von Peacebuilding-Maßnahmen der internationalen Gemeinschaft, wird in diesem Beitrag die Arbeit der Kommission f{\"u}r Friedenskonsolidierung der Vereinten Nationen untersucht. Einerseits werden hierbei, nach einigen einf{\"u}hrenden Erl{\"a}uterungen zum Begriff der Friedenskonsolidierung an sich sowie der Zusammensetzung und Funktionsweise der Kommission, zun{\"a}chst ihre einzelnen Auftr{\"a}ge systematisch unter Einordnung in den Kontext des Peacebuilding-Systems der Vereinten Nationen herausgearbeitet und eine auswertende Bilanz unter ihre bisherige Erf{\"u}llung gezogen. Daran anschließend erfolgt eine Darstellung der zuk{\"u}nftigen M{\"o}glichkeiten der Kommission im Bereich der Friedenskonsolidierung unter besonderer Ber{\"u}cksichtigung ihres Potenzials innerhalb des Systems der Vereinten Nationen sowie der einschl{\"a}gigen v{\"o}lkerrechtlichen Aspekte.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kleemann2019,
  author    = {Kleemann, Steven},
  title     = {The Forgotten War: Yemen},
  series = {Staat, Recht und Politik - Forschungs- und Diskussionspapiere},
  journal   = {Staat, Recht und Politik - Forschungs- und Diskussionspapiere},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {2509-6974},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43071},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-430716},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The conflict in Yemen seems forgotten considering the worldwide severe humanitarian catastrophes. Nevertheless, since the conflict escalated around four years ago, it became one of the worst humanitarian crises in recent history and has no end in sight. Thousands of people were killed even more displaced and the country is facing tremendous food insecurity as well as the world's largest cholera outbreak. It is no longer just a civil war between the Houthi- and Hadi-Faction. International interests play a major role and made it a proxy war between Saudi Arabia (and its allies) on one side and Iran on the other. This all happens at the expense of the civilian population. Therefore, it is urgent to analyse the actors involved, their interests within the conflict and furthermore searching for possibilities to overcome it.},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{LetsiouHaeuslerBeckenkampRoethlisberger2019,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Letsiou H{\"a}usler, Anna and Beckenkamp, Nicolas and R{\"o}thlisberger, Livia},
  title     = {New Dimensions of an Old Dilemma},
  series = {Staat, Recht und Politik - Forschungs- und Diskussionspapiere},
  journal   = {Staat, Recht und Politik - Forschungs- und Diskussionspapiere},
  number    = {7},
  editor    = {Weiß, Norman},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {2509-6974},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42486},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-424869},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Unfolding the history of one of the oldest human val-ues, the freedom of expression, while defining its limits, is a complicated task. Does freedom stop where hate starts? This very old dilemma is -now more than ever before- revealing new dimensions. Politicians and new laws aim at regulating free expression, while disagree-ments over such regulation gradually become a source of endless conflict in newly formed multicultural, inter-connected, and digitized societies. The example of the Network Enforcement Act is used to understand the idea of restrictive legal practices in Germany, but also to enlighten the fact that law is a human construction which was created in order to regulate communication among individuals. Alternative practices, to straight legal ones, are summarized to show other dimensions of regulating hate speech without involving top-down approaches. The article proposes the approach of re-storative justice as a combination of legal and medita-tive practices in cases of hate speech. One advantage of the restorative justice approach elaborated in this arti-cle is the potential to remedy the inner hate and the pain, both of the victim and perpetrator. Finally, reveal-ing parts of history and new aspects of the 'hate speech-puzzle', leads to a questioning of contemporary social structures that possibly generate hate itself.},
  language  = {en}
}