@incollection{Ette2014, author = {Ette, Ottmar}, title = {Angst und Katastrophe / Angst vor Katastrophen}, series = {Unf{\"a}lle der Sprache : literarische und philologische Erkundungen der Katastrophe}, booktitle = {Unf{\"a}lle der Sprache : literarische und philologische Erkundungen der Katastrophe}, publisher = {Turia + Kant}, address = {Wien}, pages = {233 -- 269}, year = {2014}, language = {de} } @article{Crane2019, author = {Crane, Kylie Ann}, title = {Anthropocene Presences and the Limits of Deferral}, series = {Open library of humanities}, volume = {5}, journal = {Open library of humanities}, number = {1}, publisher = {Open library of humanities}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {2056-6700}, doi = {10.16995/olh.348}, pages = {24}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Literary criticism, particularly ecocriticism, occupies an uneasy position with regard to activism: reading books (or plays, or poems) seems like a rather leisurely activity to be undertaking if our environment—our planet—is in crisis. And yet, critiquing the narratives that structure worlds and discourses is key to the activities of the (literary) critic in this time of crisis. If this crisis manifests as a 'crisis of imagination' (e.g. Ghosh), I argue that this not so much a crisis of the absence of texts that address the environmental disaster, but rather a failure to comprehend the presences of the Anthropocene in the present. To interpret (literary) texts in this framework must entail acknowledging and scrutinising the extent of the incapacity of the privileged reader to comprehend the crisis as presence and present rather than spatially or temporally remote. The readings of the novels Carpentaria (2006) and The Swan Book (2013) by Waanyi writer Alexis Wright (Australia) trace the uneven presences of Anthropocenes in the present by way of bringing future worlds (The Swan Book) to the contemporary (Carpentaria). In both novels, protagonists must forge survival amongst ruins of the present and future: the depicted worlds, in particular the representations of the disenfranchisement of indigenous inhabitants of the far north of the Australian continent, emerge as a critique of the intersections of capitalist and colonial projects that define modernity and its impact on the global climate.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Mueller2017, author = {M{\"u}ller, Eduard Rudolf}, title = {Architektur und Kunst im lyrischen Werk Johannes Bobrowskis}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-461-6}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-42711}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-427113}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {538}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Bobrowski had expressed the intention to study art history after graduation, but war and captivity thwarted his plans: As a member of the German Armed Forces, he was only released from military service for a semester in winter 1941/1942. Bobrowski was particularly impressed by the lectures on German Art in the Age of Goethe by the departmental chair Wilhelm Pinder. However, despite this fundamental influence Pinder's ideological background never become manifest in Bobrowski's poems. After returning from Soviet captivity during Christmas 1949, university studies were out of the question for the thirty-two-year-old. However, his lifelong intermedial engagement with fine art in his work can be interpreted as an expression of his diverse cultural and historical interests and inclinations. The poet's life phases correlate with the thematic development of his poems on visual art: The inviolable aesthetics of significant works of art helped him to overcome the horror of the last years of the war and the privations of Soviet captivity. Didactic moral aims initially shaped the poems Bobrowski created in the years after his return home before he was able to distance himself in terms of content and form from this type of poetry and began to write poems that take up cultural-historical aspects and juxtapose historical, mythological, biblical and religious-philosophical themes spanning epochs. His poems about the artists Jawlensky and Calder also touch simultaneously on aspects of the cultural landscape. In the last decade of his life, Bobrowski became increasingly interested in twentieth-century art, while modern architecture was absent from his work. Bobrowski devoted himself in an entire series of poems to Classicist and Romanticist painting and thus to works that were written during the Age of Goethe and about which Wilhelm Pinder may have given lectures during his "German Art in the Age of Goethe" course attended by Bobrowski. Architecture is a leitmotif in Bobrowski's lyrical works. The significance conveyed of the particular sacred and profane buildings referred to in the poems as well as the urban and village ensembles and individual parts of buildings changes several times over the years. Starting from traditional, juxtaposed juvenile poems in iambic versification, in which architectural elements form part of an awareness that fades out everything outside of the aesthetic, the significance of the sacred and secular buildings in Bobrowski's lyrical works changes for the first time during the years he spent in Russia during the war as part of the German military. In the odes Bobrowski wrote at the time, the architectural relics testify to suffering, death and destruction. What is still absent, however, is the central idea of guilt, which later becomes the focus of poems he writes after his return from captivity until his early death. Towards the end of the war and during his years of captivity, Bobrowski reflects on the theme of his homeland again, and the architecture in his poems becomes an aesthetically charged projection for his yearning for East Prussia and the Memel area. The aspect of the sublime first appears in his poems, both in relation to painting and architecture, during his captivity. This idea is developed on the one hand after his return to Berlin in his poems on the architecture of Gothic cathedrals and the architectural heritage of Classicism, but the cultural heritage of Europe also represents historical injustice and a heavy, far-reaching guilt in the poems written during this period. Bobrowski turns away from his criticism of the entire continent of Europe in later years and in his "Sarmatic Divan" concentrates on the guilt Germans have towards the peoples of Eastern Europe. This also lends the architecture in his poems a new meaning. The relics of the castles of the Teutonic Order testify to the rule of medieval conquerors and merge with nature: The symbolism of the architecture becomes part of the landscape. In the last decade of his life, he increasingly writes poems related to parks and urban green spaces. The city, "filled with meaning", moves to the centre of his poetry. However he does not deal with the technical achievements and social phenomena of urban life in these poems but with urban structures and especially the green and open spaces as symbols of history. The poet relies not only on personal experiences, but sometimes also on image sources without ever having seen the original. The poems about Chagall and Gauguin are hardly accessible without the knowledge that they refer to image reproductions in narrow, popular books that Bobrowski acquired shortly before writing the respective poems. The situation is different with the Russian churches that find their way into his lyrical works. Bobrowski had seen them all during the war, and most of them still appear to exist today and can be identified with some certainty with the help in part of the poet's letters from that period.}, language = {de} } @periodical{OPUS4-28615, title = {Argonautenschiff : Jahrbuch der Anna-Seghers-Gesellschaft Berlin und Mainz e.V.}, editor = {Bircken, Margrid}, publisher = {Quintus Verlag}, address = {Berlin [u.a.]}, issn = {1430-9211}, year = {1992}, language = {de} } @article{OPUS4-57817, title = {Begr{\"a}bnis der Toten}, series = {Schreibheft : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Literatur und kulturelle Initiativen}, volume = {98}, journal = {Schreibheft : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Literatur und kulturelle Initiativen}, publisher = {Rigodon-Verl.}, address = {Essen}, issn = {0174-2132}, pages = {33 -- 34}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Es handelt sich um eine Neu{\"u}bersetzung des ersten Teils von T.S. Eliots "The Waste Land", erschienen als Teil eines Chors von Neu{\"u}bersetzungen im vom Schreibheft veranstalteten Dossier anl{\"a}sslich des Hundertj{\"a}hrigen Jubil{\"a}ums des Langgedichts.}, language = {de} } @unpublished{Eckstein2005, author = {Eckstein, Lars}, title = {Belonging in music and the music of unbelonging in Richard Powers's The Time of Our Singing}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-85584}, pages = {10}, year = {2005}, language = {en} } @article{Ananka2016, author = {Ananka, Yaraslava}, title = {Berlin. Elektrische Fische. Metropolis und Atlantis}, series = {Grenzr{\"a}ume - Grenzbewegungen : Ergebnisse der Arbeitstreffen des Jungen Forums Slavistische Literaturwissenschaft in Basel 2013 und Frankfurt (Oder) und Słubice 2014 ; Bd. 2}, volume = {2}, journal = {Grenzr{\"a}ume - Grenzbewegungen : Ergebnisse der Arbeitstreffen des Jungen Forums Slavistische Literaturwissenschaft in Basel 2013 und Frankfurt (Oder) und Słubice 2014 ; Bd. 2}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-359-6}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-93011}, pages = {113 -- 125}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @book{Ungelenk2021, author = {Ungelenk, Johannes}, title = {Ber{\"u}hren Denken}, series = {LiteraturForschung}, journal = {LiteraturForschung}, number = {40}, editor = {Erwig, Andrea and Ungelenk, Johannes}, publisher = {Kadmos}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-86599-497-4}, pages = {314}, year = {2021}, abstract = {›Theorie‹ geht etymologisch auf ›Anschauen‹ zur{\"u}ck. Der Theoretiker gilt gemeinhin als distanzierter Zuschauer. Diese distanzierte Position wird hier hinterfragt. Die Beitr{\"a}ge st{\"u}tzen sich dabei auf eine theoretische Tradition, die sich am Tastsinn als Korrektiv des Sehsinns orientiert. Taktilen Erfahrungsdimensionen wie dem Ber{\"u}hren wird schon lange eine idealisierte ›unmittelbare Wahrnehmung‹ jenseits von begrifflicher Abstraktion zugeschrieben. Die Autorinnen und Autoren beleuchten dagegen die komplizierte Verwandtschaft von Ber{\"u}hren und Denken und die begrifflichen Verwicklungen und Potenziale des Ber{\"u}hrens. Es werden nicht nur unterschiedliche Konzepte von Ber{\"u}hrung in Philosophie und Kunst betrachtet, sondern auch theoretische Denk- und Schreibformen erkundet, die selbst ›Ber{\"u}hrungen‹ mit sich bringen.}, language = {de} } @book{OPUS4-53633, title = {Ber{\"u}hren Lesen}, editor = {Sohns, Hanna and Ungelenk, Johannes}, publisher = {August Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-941360-84-6}, pages = {248}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Ber{\"u}hren changiert zwischen Buchst{\"a}blichkeit und Metaphorik. Gegen{\"u}ber dem Distanzsinn des Sehens wird mit dem Ber{\"u}hren eine gr{\"o}ßere Unmittelbarkeit assoziiert. Doch die M{\"o}glichkeit des Kontaktes ist von Beginn an prek{\"a}r. Das Ber{\"u}hren kann sich selbst nicht ber{\"u}hren. In das Ber{\"u}hren schiebt sich ein Dazwischen, das den Entzug dieser ambivalenten Figur bedingt. Diese aporetische Bestimmung des Ber{\"u}hrens begr{\"u}ndet das Unternehmen des Bandes. Jeder Eintrag wiederholt eine Bewegung des Ber{\"u}hrens: In einzelnen Text- oder Bildlekt{\"u}ren werden Spuren verfolgt, die das Ber{\"u}hren im stetigen Sich-Entziehen in seinen mannigfaltigen Nachbarschaften hinterl{\"a}sst. Die einzelnen Eintr{\"a}ge generieren sich aus diesen Lekt{\"u}ren. Dabei spielt die Nachbarschaft der Eintr{\"a}ge selbst eine tragende Rolle. So wird das Ber{\"u}hren zum produktiven Prinzip von Philologie als einer kollektiven Lekt{\"u}re- und Schreibform.}, language = {de} } @misc{Ungelenk2019, author = {Ungelenk, Johannes}, title = {Ber{\"u}hrung ber{\"u}hren - Begreifen verboten}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe}, number = {171}, issn = {1866-8380}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-47231}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-472313}, pages = {23}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Der Artikel arbeitet an Platons Gastmahl ein semantisches Netz rund um das Konzept des ‚Ber{\"u}hrens' heraus. Dabei bildet das Verb ἅπτομαι ein zentrales Relais, das zwischen dem vieldiskutierten ‚philosophischen Gehalt' des Textes und der in ihrem performativen Beitrag meist untersch{\"a}tzten Rahmenhandlung vermittelt. Im Nachvollzug der Konstellationen des Ber{\"u}hrens zeigt sich, dass dem Ber{\"u}hren, als Ber{\"u}hren, nicht begrifflich beizukommen ist - es entzieht sich dem aneignenden Zugriff. Ber{\"u}hren ist eben nicht Begriff. Deshalb muss sich das Gastmahl der Ber{\"u}hrung auf andere Weise n{\"a}hern, n{\"a}mlich ber{\"u}hrend - wof{\"u}r die narratologische Konstruktion des Textes von entscheidender Wichtigkeit ist. Er praktiziert Philo-Logie, d.h. nutzt die Macht der Worte, die genau daraus entsteht, dass sie in einer sehr pr{\"a}zisen Weise zwischen den Beteiligten aus einer konstitutiven Distanz heraus wirken.}, language = {de} }