@article{Angerer2020, author = {Angerer, Marie-Luise}, title = {No Stopping Points Anymore}, series = {Feministisches Spekulieren : Genealogien, Narrationen, Zeitlichkeiten}, journal = {Feministisches Spekulieren : Genealogien, Narrationen, Zeitlichkeiten}, publisher = {Kulturverlag Kadmos}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-86599-446-2}, pages = {96 -- 108}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @book{Angerer2020, author = {Angerer, Marie-Luise}, title = {Affective milieus, intensive couplings}, series = {Affective Transformations}, journal = {Affective Transformations}, editor = {Angerer, Marie-Luise}, publisher = {meson press}, address = {L{\"u}neburg}, isbn = {978-3-95796-165-5}, pages = {87 -- 100}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{Ungelenk2020, author = {Ungelenk, Johannes}, title = {Satyrs, Spirits and Dionysian Intemperance in Shakespeare's 'Tempest'}, series = {Cahiers {\´E}lisab{\´e}thains}, volume = {101}, journal = {Cahiers {\´E}lisab{\´e}thains}, number = {1}, publisher = {Sage Publications}, address = {London}, issn = {0184-7678}, doi = {10.1177/0184767819897082}, pages = {45 -- 64}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The article focuses on the rebellious subplot of William Shakespeare's The Tempest that forms around Caliban, Stephano, and Trinculo, and reads it as a satyr play. Demonstrated is how the Dionysian subplot stands in close analogical connection with the play's main action. It is also argued that the storyline emphasises a dimension of the play that is of high relevance to the analysis of its metatheatrical implications. The correspondences between the main action and the satyr play elements highlight the important role that intemperance, excess and the suspension of control play in the Shakespearean theatrical setting.}, language = {en} } @article{Ungelenk2020, author = {Ungelenk, Johannes}, title = {Feministisches Spekulieren}, series = {Feministisches Spekulieren : Genealogien, Narrationen, Zeitlichkeiten}, journal = {Feministisches Spekulieren : Genealogien, Narrationen, Zeitlichkeiten}, publisher = {Kulturverlag Kadmos}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-86599-446-2}, pages = {62 -- 79}, year = {2020}, abstract = {"Der Begriff der Spekulation erlebt seit einigen Jahren eine wirkungsm{\"a}chtige Renaissance. Maßgeblich an dieser Entwicklung beteiligt d{\"u}rfte die vielbeachtete Initiative einer Gruppe von Philosophen um Quentin Meillassoux sein, aus der das Label ‚Spekulativer Realismus' hervorgegangen ist. Im Gegensatz zu hegemonialen Str{\"o}mungen des philosophischen Diskurses wird innerhalb feministischer Forschung mit dem Begriff der Spekulation jedoch kein ‚vergessenes' oder abseitig gelegenes Konzept wiederbelebt: ‚Das Spekulieren' steht bereits im Mittelpunkt eines der wichtigsten Texte der feministischen Theoriebildung, es findet sich in Luce Irigarays umfassender Aufarbeitung dessen, was sie „sp{\´e}cula(risa)tion" nennt. Irigaray findet in Meilensteinen der abendl{\"a}ndischen Philosophiegeschichte ein konstitutiv wiederkehrendes Schema der Spekulation, das aufzeigt, dass die Produktion von stabiler Wahrheit auf den Ausschluss eines weiblichen Anderen angewiesen ist. Aus der aktuellen Konjunktur des Spekulationsbegriffs im Feld der feministischen und queeren Theoriebildung ergibt sich ein interessanter Interferenzeffekt: Meillassoux' Konzept des Spekulierens wechselwirkt mit Irigarays, wobei sich die Phasen von Affirmation und Kritik der Spekulation nicht schlicht ausl{\"o}schen, sondern, gewissermaßen aus dem schr{\"a}gen, que(e)ren Winkel zwischen beiden vielmehr ein komplexes Diffraktionsmuster erzeugen. ... "}, language = {de} } @article{Ungelenk2020, author = {Ungelenk, Johannes}, title = {The storm is up and all is on the hazard}, series = {Poetica}, volume = {51}, journal = {Poetica}, number = {1-2}, issn = {0303-4178}, doi = {10.30965/25890530-05101003}, pages = {119 -- 147}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The article is dedicated to the role of weather in Shakespeare's tragedies. It traces a dense net of weather instances - stage weather, narrated weather events, weather imagery - throughout his plays, and attempts to reconstruct the weather's structural implications for the tragedy genre. The way early modern humoral pathology understood the weather's influence on the humours of the human body - of which Shakespeare's plays themselves give evidence - provides the background for reconstructing the function of the weather as a source of tragic force. Its turbulence not only infects the characters in the play and thereby drives the plot, but also transgresses the boundaries of the fictional world and affects spectators in the auditorium.}, language = {de} } @article{Schneider2020, author = {Schneider, Ulrike}, title = {Verh{\"a}ltnis zum Judentum}, series = {Anna Seghers Handbuch}, journal = {Anna Seghers Handbuch}, editor = {Hilmes, Carola and Nagelschmidt, Ilse}, publisher = {Metzler Verlag}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-476-05664-1}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-476-05665-8}, pages = {322 -- 331}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Anna Seghers: Deutsche, J{\"u}din, Kommunistin, Schriftstellerin, Frau, Mutter. Jedem dieser Worte denke man nach. So viele einander widersprechende, scheinbar einander ausschließende Identit{\"a}ten, so viele tiefe, schmerzliche Bindungen, so viele Angriffsfl{\"a}chen, so viele Herausforderungen und Bew{\"a}hrungszw{\"a}nge, so viele M{\"o}glichkeiten, verletzt zu werden, ausgesetzt zu sein, bedroht bis zur Todesgefahr.}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Maerz2020, author = {M{\"a}rz, Moses}, title = {{\´E}douard Glissant's politics of relation}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-50948}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-509486}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {xv, 530}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The political legacy of the Martinican poet, novelist and philosopher {\´E}douard Glissant (1928-2011) is the subject of an ongoing debate among postcolonial literary scholars. Responding to an influential view shaping this debate, that Glissant's work can be categorised into an early political and late apolitical phase, this dissertation claims that this division is based on a narrow conception of 'engaged political writing' that prevents a more comprehensive view of the changing political strategies Glissant pursued throughout his life from emerging. Proceeding from this conceptual basis, the dissertation is concerned with re-reading the dimensions of Glissant's work that have hitherto been relegated as apolitical, literary or poetic, with the aim of conceptualising the politics of relation as an integral part of his overall poetic project. In methodological terms, the dissertation therefore proposes a relational reading of Glissant's life-work across literary genres, epochs, as well as the conventional divisions between political thought, writing and activism. This perspective is informed by Glissant's philosophy of relation, and draws on a conception of political practice that includes both explicit engagements with established political systems and institutions, as well as literary and cultural interventions geared towards their transformation and the creation of alternatives to them. Theoretically the work thus combines a poststructuralist lens on the conceptual difference between 'politics' and 'the political' with arguments for an inherent political quality of literature, and perspectives from the Afro-Caribbean radical tradition, in which writers and intellectuals have historically sought to combine discursive interventions with organisational actions. Applying this theoretical angle to the analysis of Glissant's politics of relation results in an interdisciplinary research framework designed to explore the synergies between postcolonial political and literary studies. In order to comprehensively describe Glissant's politics of relation without recourse to evolutionary or digressive models, the concept of an intellectual marronage is proposed as a framework to map the strategies making up Glissant's political archive. Drawing on a variety of historic, political theoretical and literary sources, intellectual marronage is understood as a mode of radical resistance to the neocolonial subjugation for which the plantation system stands historically and metaphorically, as an inherently innovative political practice invested in the creation of communities marked by relational ontologies, and as a commitment to fostering an imagination of the world and the human that differs fundamentally from the Enlightenment paradigm. This specific conception of intellectual marronage forms the basis on which three key strategies that consistently shape Glissant's political practice are identified and mapped. They revolve around Glissant's engagement with history (chapter 2), his commitment to fostering an imagination of the Tout-Monde (whole-world) as a political point of reference (chapter 3), and the continuous exploration of alternative forms of community on the levels of the island, the archipelago and the Tout-Monde (chapter 4). Together these strategies constitute Glissant's personal politics of relation. Its abstract characteristics can be put in a productive conversation with related theoretical traditions invested in exploring the political potentials of fugitivity (chapters 5), as well as with the work of other postcolonial actors whose holistic practice warrants to be described as a politics of relation (chapter 6).}, language = {en} } @article{Sorg2019, author = {Sorg, Bernhard}, title = {Zur Konstruktion eines transzendentalen {\"a}sthetischen Subjekts bei Bernhard und Jelinek}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-008}, pages = {89 -- 99}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{OPUS4-50491, title = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard}, series = {Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, 154}, journal = {Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, 154}, editor = {Reinert, Bastian and G{\"o}tze, Clemens}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675}, pages = {274}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Trotz unz{\"a}hliger Forschungsbeitr{\"a}ge zur Literaturnobelpreistr{\"a}gerin Elfriede Jelinek und dem „Verweigerungsk{\"u}nstler" Thomas Bernhard wurde den Verbindungslinien beider Autoren noch nie vergleichend nachgegangen. Der Band erschließt zum 30. Todestag Bernhards (u. 15 Jahre Nobelpreis f{\"u}r Jelinek) anschaulich ein breit gef{\"a}chertes Spektrum an Themen, Perspektiven und Werken beider Schriftsteller im Vergleich. Mit einem Essay von Elfriede Jelinek.}, language = {de} } @article{Goetze2019, author = {G{\"o}tze, Clemens}, title = {Dieses Interview hat mich v{\"o}llig dekonstruiert}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-010}, pages = {113 -- 129}, year = {2019}, language = {de} }