@techreport{PetersenKirchner2008,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Petersen, Hans-Georg and Kirchner, Markus},
  title     = {Education return and financing},
  issn      = {1864-1431},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-26969},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {The paper sheds some light on the education returns in Germany in the post war period. After describing higher education in Germany the current stand of higher education financing within the single states is presented. In six states tuition fees will be introduced in 2007/08 and discussions are going on in even some more. In the second part of the paper an empirical analysis is done using longitudinal data from the German social pension system. The analysis over the whole lifecycle renders results which proof that the higher education advantages are quite remarkable and might be a justification for more intensified financing by tuition fees. But all this has to be embedded into an encompassing strategy of tax and social policy, especially to prevent a strengthened process of social selection, which would be counterproductive for an increased and highly qualified human capital in Germany.},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{Petersen2008,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Petersen, Hans-Georg},
  title     = {Mobilisierung alternativer Finanzressourcen},
  series = {Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeitr{\"a}ge},
  journal   = {Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeitr{\"a}ge},
  number    = {58},
  issn      = {1864-1431},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-27374},
  pages     = {34},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Der vorgestellte Beitrag gibt einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber die gegenw{\"a}rtige Hochschulfinanzierung in Deutschland; k{\"u}rzlich haben einige Bundesl{\"a}nder Studiengeb{\"u}hren eingef{\"u}hrt, die zu einer teilweisen Finanzierung der Studienkosten beitragen sollen. Im II. Kapitel werden außerdem kurz die finanziellen Strukturen der terti{\"a}ren Ausbildung in den OECD-L{\"a}ndern beschrieben. Dabei geht es vor allem um die Kostenaufteilung zwischen {\"o}ffentlichem und privatem Sektor. Im III. Kapitel werden dann die Verteilungswirkungen des gegenw{\"a}rtigen Finanzierungssystems kritisch hinterfragt. Dabei wird auch auf den Lebenseinkommensvorteil einer Hochschulausbildung im Detail eingegangen, bevor dann m{\"o}gliche Auswirkungen einer Geb{\"u}hrenfinanzierung diskutiert werden. Es wird deutlich hervor gehoben, dass die Einf{\"u}hrung von Studiengeb{\"u}hren in eine umfassende hochschul- und bildungspolitische Strategie eingebettet sein muss, damit eine negative Selektionswirkung auf die Jugendlichen aus Haushalten mit prek{\"a}ren Einkommen vermieden wird.},
  language  = {de}
}
@techreport{Gohl2023,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Gohl, Niklas},
  title     = {Working Longer, Working Stronger?},
  series = {CEPA Discussion Papers},
  journal   = {CEPA Discussion Papers},
  number    = {63},
  issn      = {2628-653X},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-58527},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-585275},
  pages     = {62},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Leveraging two cohort-specific pension reforms, this paper estimates the forward-looking effects of an exogenous increase in the working horizon on (un)employment behaviour for individuals with a long remaining statutory working life. Using difference-in-differences and regression discontinuity approaches based on administrative and survey data, I show that a longer legal working horizon increases individuals' subjective expectations about the length of their work life, raises the probability of employment, decreases the probability of unemployment, and increases the intensity of job search among the unemployed. Heterogeneity analyses show that the demonstrated employment effects are strongest for women and in occupations with comparatively low physical intensity, i.e., occupations that can be performed at older ages.},
  language  = {en}
}