@masterthesis{Schulze2015,
  type      = {Bachelor Thesis},
  author    = {Schulze, Carsta},
  title     = {Der Gebrauch des Perfekts im Spanischen und Deutschen},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-394850},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {58},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {In dieser Bachelorarbeit werden die Bedeutung und die Gebrauchsweisen des Vergangenheitstempus Perfekt in der deutschen und spanischen Sprache kontrastiv untersucht. Aufgrund des Zusammenwirkens der funktional-semantischen Kategorien Temporalit{\"a}t, Aspektualit{\"a}t und Modalit{\"a}t wird der Perfektgebrauch hinsichtlich dieser Kategorien analysiert. Es wird angenommen, dass sich das Perfekt im Spanischen und Deutschen nicht nur in Bezug auf seine temporalen und aspektuellen Werte, sondern auch hinsichtlich seiner modal-evidentiellen Werte und Ausdrucksweisen unterscheidet. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, die spezifischen temporalen und aspektuellen Bedeutungen dieses Vergangenheitstempus in der jeweiligen Sprache herauszustellen, kontrastiv zu betrachten und zu zeigen, inwiefern Perfektformen als Evidentialit{\"a}tsmarker fungieren k{\"o}nnen. Der modal-evidentiellen Bedeutung des Perfekts kommt in dieser Arbeit eine zentrale Rolle zu, da insbesondere hinsichtlich der deutschen Perfekt-Konstruktionen noch wenige Forschungsans{\"a}tze vorliegen. Die modalen und evidentiellen Bedeutungen des Perfekts werden in beiden Sprachen in der Schriftsprache unter Einbezug der Erkenntnisse der RAE (2009), Wachtmeister-Berm{\´u}dez (2005) und Diewald (2011) diskutiert und anhand von Beispielen aus spanischen und deutschen Pressetexten des CREA sowie der Zeit Online und S{\"u}ddeutsche Zeitung belegt. Als Ergebnis dieser Untersuchung l{\"a}sst sich feststellen, dass das Perfekt in beiden Sprachen als Evidentialit{\"a}tsmarker dienen und verschiedene Arten von Evidenz markieren kann. Die Relevanz der kontrastiven Betrachtung kommt in zwei signifikanten Forschungsbereichen zum Tragen: zum Einen bei der {\"U}bersetzung, da die temporalen, aspektuellen und modal-evidentiellen Werte des Perfekts in der jeweiligen Sprache beachtet werden m{\"u}ssen und zum Anderen in der Fremdsprachendidaktik, da das Perfekt verschiedene Stellenwerte in den einzelnen Verbalsystemen einnimmt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SzagunSchramm2018,
  author    = {Szagun, Gisela and Schramm, Satyam Antonio},
  title     = {Lexically driven or early structure building?},
  series = {First language},
  volume    = {39},
  journal   = {First language},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0142-7237},
  doi       = {10.1177/0142723718761414},
  pages     = {61 -- 79},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {This study examines the role of the lexicon and grammatical structure building in early grammar. Parent-report data in CDI format from a sample of 1151 German-speaking children between 1;6 and 2;6 and longitudinal spontaneous speech data from 22 children between 1;8 and 2;5 were used. Regression analysis of the parent-report data indicates that grammatical words have a stronger influence on concurrent syntactic complexity than lexical words. Time-lagged correlations using the spontaneous speech data showed that lexical words at 1;8 predict subsequent MLU at 2;1 significantly; grammatical words do not. MLU at 2;5 is significantly predicted by grammatical words and no longer by lexical words. The influence of different grammatical subcategories on subsequent MLU varies. Use of articles and the copula at 2;1 most strongly predicts MLU at 2;5. Children use both types of articles and multiple determiners before a noun to the same extent as adults. The present results are suggestive of early grammatical structure building.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{VanHalVanLoonMercelisetal.2023,
  author    = {Van Hal, Toon and Van Loon, Zanna and Mercelis, Wouter and Steckley, John and Peetermans, Andy and Van Rooy, Raf and Dionne, Fannie},
  title     = {Anchored in ink},
  editor    = {Van Loon, Zanna and Steckley, John and Van Hal, Toon and Peetermans, Andy},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-516-3},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-51306},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-513062},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {448},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {This book serves as a gateway to the Elementa grammaticae Huronicae, an eighteenth-century grammar of the Wendat ('Huron') language by Jesuit Pierre-Philippe Potier (1708-1781). The volume falls into three main parts. The first part introduces the grammar and some of its contexts, offering information about the Huron-Wendat and Wyandot, the early modern Jesuit mission in New France and the Jesuits' linguistic output. The heart of the volume is made up by its second part, a text edition of the Elementa. The third part presents some avenues of research by way of specific case studies.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-10490,
  title     = {Evidentiality revisited : Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives},
  editor    = {Haßler, Gerda and Mar{\´i}n Arese, Juana and Carretero, Marta},
  edition   = {1},
  publisher = {John Benjamins Publishing Company},
  address   = {Amsterdam, Philadelphia},
  isbn      = {978-90-272-5676-8},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {317},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{BacskaiAtkariBaudisch2018,
  author    = {Bacskai-Atkari, Julia and Baudisch, Lisa},
  title     = {Clause typing in Germanic},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-406810},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The questionnaire investigates the functional left periphery of various finite clauses in Germanic languages, with particular attention paid to clause-typing elements and the combinations thereof. The questionnaire is mostly concerned with clause typing in embedded clauses, but main clause counterparts are also considered for comparative purposes. The chief aim was to achieve comparable results across Germanic languages, though the standardised questionnaire may also be helpful in the study of other languages, too. Most questions examine the availability of various complementisers and clause-typing operators, and in some cases the movement of verbs to the left periphery is also taken into account. The questionnaire is split into seven major parts according to the types of clauses under scrutiny. All instructions were given in English and the individual questions either concern translations of given sentences from English into the target language, and/or they ask for specific details about the constructions in the target language. The present document contains the questionnaire itself (together with the instructions given at the beginning of the questionnaire and at the beginning of the individual sections, as well as the questions asking for personal data), the sociolinguistic data of the speakers, and the actual results for the individual languages. Five Germanic languages are included: Dutch, Danish, Icelandic, Norwegian and Swedish. For each language, two informants were recruited. Given the small number of informants, the present study serves as a qualitative investigation and as a basis for further, quantitative and experimental studies.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JędrzejowskiDemske2017,
  author    = {Jędrzejowski, Łukasz and Demske, Ulrike},
  title     = {Infinitival patterns and their diachronic dynamics: questions and challenges},
  series = {Infinitives at the Syntax-Semantics Interface: a Diachronic Perspective (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]; 306)},
  volume    = {2017},
  journal   = {Infinitives at the Syntax-Semantics Interface: a Diachronic Perspective (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]; 306)},
  editor    = {Jędrzejowski, Łukasz and Demske, Ulrike},
  publisher = {De Gruyter Mouton},
  address   = {Berlin, New York},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-052058-3},
  doi       = {10.1515/9783110520583},
  pages     = {1 -- 27},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The major aim of this volume is to investigate infinitival structures from a diachronic point of view and, simultaneously, to embed the diachronic findings into the ongoing theoretical discussion on non-finite clauses in general. All contributions subscribe to a dynamic approach to infinitival clauses by investigating their origin, development and loss in miscellaneous patterns and across different languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Demske2015,
  author    = {Demske, Ulrike},
  title     = {Sprachwandel},
  series = {Einf{\"u}hrung in die germanistische Linguistik},
  journal   = {Einf{\"u}hrung in die germanistische Linguistik},
  editor    = {Meibauer, J{\"o}rg and Demske, Ulrike and Geilfuß-Wolfgang, Jochen and Pafel, J{\"u}rgen and Ramers, Karl-Heinz and Rothweiler, Monika and Steinbach, Markus},
  edition   = {3},
  publisher = {Metzler},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  isbn      = {978-3-476-02566-1},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-476-05424-1_8},
  pages     = {296 -- 340},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Unsere Sprache wandelt sich unabl{\"a}ssig. Beispiele daf{\"u}r lassen sich in der Alltagssprache t{\"a}glich aufs Neue entdecken. Meistens handelt es sich um F{\"a}lle lexikalischen Wandels, wie die Entlehnung von W{\"o}rtern aus einer anderen Sprache in das Deutsche. Eine besondere Rolle spielt hier in den letzten Jahren das Englische. Bekannte Beispiele solcher Entlehnungen sind W{\"o}rter aus der Computersprache wie scannen, e-mailen, chatten, aber auch Punk oder Hooligan sind aus dem Englischen entlehnt. Aus anderen Sprachen sind Lexeme wie Plateau (aus dem Franz{\"o}sischen), Cello (aus dem Italienischen) oder Fatzke (aus dem Polnischen) {\"u}bernommen worden. Informationen {\"u}ber die Geschichte einzelner W{\"o}rter lassen sich aus etymologischen W{\"o}rterb{\"u}chern beziehen. - Diese Einf{\"u}hrung informiert {\"u}ber die linguistischen Kerngebiete Lexikon und Morphologie, Phonologie, Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik . Sie erl{\"a}utert Grundbegriffe, illustriert sie an Beispielen aus dem Deutschen und gibt einen Einblick in die linguistische Theoriebildung. Kindlicher Spracherwerb und Sprachwandel - zwei Gebiete, die von großer Bedeutung f{\"u}r ein tieferes Verst{\"a}ndnis der menschlichen Sprache sind - werden in weiteren Kapiteln vorgestellt. Mit {\"U}bungen, einem Glossar der wichtigsten Fachtermini, einer weiterf{\"u}hrenden Schlussbibliographie und einem Sachregister. F{\"u}r die 3. Auflage wurde der Band umfassend {\"u}berarbeitet und aktualisiert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Demske2015,
  author    = {Demske, Ulrike},
  title     = {Towards coherent infinitival patterns in the history of German},
  series = {The Diachrony of Infinitival Patterns: Their origin, development and loss. In: Journal of Historical Linguistics},
  volume    = {2015},
  journal   = {The Diachrony of Infinitival Patterns: Their origin, development and loss. In: Journal of Historical Linguistics},
  number    = {5.1},
  editor    = {Demske, Ulrike and Jędrzejowski, Łukasz},
  publisher = {Benjamins},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {2210-2116 print},
  doi       = {10.1075/jhl.5.1.01dem},
  pages     = {6 -- 40},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {According to Haider (2010), we have to distinguish three types of infinitival complements in Present-Day German: (i) CP complements, (ii) VP complements and (iii) verbal clusters. While CP complements give rise to biclausal structures, VP complements and verbal clusters indicate a monoclausal structure. Non-finite verbs in verbal clusters build a syntactic unit with the governing verb. It is only the last infinitival pattern that we address as a so-called coherent infinitival pattern, a notion introduced in the influential work of Bech (1955/57). Verbal clusters are bound to languages with an OV grammar, hence the well-known differences regarding infinitival syntax in German and English (Haider 2003, Bobaljik 2004). On the widespread assumption that German has been an OV language throughout its history (Axel 2007), we expect all three types of infinitival complements to be present from the earliest attestions of German.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Demske2019,
  author    = {Demske, Ulrike},
  title     = {Zur Autonomie indirekter Redewiedergabe - eine diachrone Perspektive},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r germanistische Linguistik},
  volume    = {47},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r germanistische Linguistik},
  number    = {1},
  editor    = {{\´A}gel, Vilmos and Feilke, Helmuth and Linke, Angelika and L{\"u}deling, Anke and Tophinke, Doris},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin, New York},
  issn      = {0301-3294 print},
  doi       = {10.1515/zgl-2019-0003},
  pages     = {70 -- 101},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Regarding verbal mood and complementation patterns of reporting verbs, the distinction between direct and indirect reported speech is well established in present-day German. This paper looks into the history of German: Common knowledge has it that both the use of verbal mood as well as the quality of clause linkage undergo considerable changes giving rise to the question how these changes affect the manifestations of indirect reported speech in earlier stages of German. The historical record of the 16th century (with an outlook on the 17th century) shows that the distinction between direct and indirect reported speech is not yet grammaticalized in historical sources at the time. In particular with respect to dependent (in)direct reported speech, both types prefer V2-complements with only verbal mood differentiating between the types. Although present and past subjunctive have a much wider distribution in earlier stages of German, the occurrence of free indirect speech likewise testifies to its increasing use as a marker of indirect reported speech. The growing conventionalization of patterns of indirect reported speech in the course of Early Modern German may be considered as an example for an increase of subjectification in its development.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{OPUS4-44332,
  title     = {The Diachrony of Infinitival Patterns},
  series = {Journal of Historical Linguistics},
  volume    = {2015},
  journal   = {Journal of Historical Linguistics},
  number    = {5.1},
  editor    = {Demske, Ulrike and Jędrzejowski, Łukasz},
  publisher = {Benjamins},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {2210-2116 print},
  doi       = {10.1075/jhl.5.1},
  pages     = {174},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {According to Haider (2010), we have to distinguish three types of infinitival complements in Present-Day German: (i) CP complements, (ii) VP complements and (iii) verbal clusters. While CP complements give rise to biclausal structures, VP complements and verbal clusters indicate a monoclausal structure. Non-finite verbs in verbal clusters build a syntactic unit with the governing verb. It is only the last infinitival pattern that we address as a so-called coherent infinitival pattern, a notion introduced in the influential work of Bech (1955/57). Verbal clusters are bound to languages with an OV grammar, hence the well-known differences regarding infinitival syntax in German and English (Haider 2003, Bobaljik 2004). On the widespread assumption that German has been an OV language throughout its history (Axel 2007), we expect all three types of infinitival complements to be present from the earliest attestions of German.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{DemskeLogacevGoldschmidt2014,
  author    = {Demske, Ulrike and Logacev, Pavel and Goldschmidt, Katrin},
  title     = {POS-Tagging Historical Corpora: The Case of Early New High German},
  series = {Proceedings of the thirteenth workshop on treebanks and linguistic theories (TLT 13)},
  volume    = {2014},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the thirteenth workshop on treebanks and linguistic theories (TLT 13)},
  publisher = {TALAR - T{\"u}bingen Archive of Language Resources},
  address   = {T{\"u}bingen},
  pages     = {103 -- 112},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {A key problem in automatic annotation of historical corpora is inconsistent spelling. Because the spelling of some word forms can differ between texts, a language model trained on already annotated treebanks may fail to recognize known word forms due to differences in spelling. In the present work, we explore the feasibility of an unsupervised method for spelling-adjustment for the purpose of improved part of speech (POS) tagging. To this end, we present a method for spelling normalization based on weighted edit distances, which exploits within-text spelling variation. We then evaluate the improvement in taging accuracy resulting from between-texts spelling normalization in two tagging experiments on several Early New High German (ENHG) texts.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Demske2020,
  author    = {Demske, Ulrike},
  title     = {Zur Grammatikalisierung von 'gehen' im Deutschen},
  series = {Linguisten-Seminar: Forum japanisch-germanistischer Sprachforschung},
  journal   = {Linguisten-Seminar: Forum japanisch-germanistischer Sprachforschung},
  number    = {2},
  editor    = {Japanische Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Germanistik,},
  publisher = {Japanische Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Germanistik},
  address   = {Tokyo},
  issn      = {2434-5407 online},
  doi       = {10.11282/jggls.2.0_9},
  pages     = {9 -- 42},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Das Bewegungsverb gehen liegt im Gegenwartsdeutschen in zwei Auspr{\"a}gungen vor: Neben der Vollverbvariante gibt es eine semi-auxiliare Verwendung von gehen mit aspektueller Bedeutung. Diese Annahme ist in der Literatur zum Gegenwartsdeutschen durchaus umstritten. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird auf der Grundlage von Daten aus dem Gegenwartsdeutschen daf{\"u}r argumentiert, dass gehen in Verbindung mit einem Infinitiv tats{\"a}chlich als semi-auxiliares Verb mit aspektueller Bedeutung behandelt werden muss. Die Auswertung von Daten aus der deutschen Sprachgeschichte vom Althochdeutschen bis zum Gegenwartsdeutschen liefert die Grundlage f{\"u}r die Herausarbeitung von einzelnen Stadien in der Geschichte des semi-auxiliaren Verbs gehen, die unterschiedliche Grade seiner Auxiliarisierung anzeigen. Die noch im Mittelhochdeutschen zu beobachtende Alternation des infiniten Komplements zwischen Pr{\"a}senspartizip und Infinitiv l{\"a}sst sich auf die lautlich bedingte Mehrdeutigkeit infiniter Komplemente zur{\"u}ckf{\"u}hren, die im Deutschen letztendlich zum Verlust des Partizips als verbaler Kategorie f{\"u}hrt.},
  language  = {de}
}