@article{PrengelFriebertshaeuserLanger2013, author = {Prengel, Annedore and Friebertsh{\"a}user, Barbara and Langer, Antje}, title = {Perspektiven qualitativer Forschung in der Erziehungswissenschaft - eine Einfuhrung}, series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, journal = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, edition = {4., durchges. Aufl.}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-0799-2}, pages = {17 -- 42}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{UhlendotffPrengel2013, author = {Uhlendotff, Harald and Prengel, Annedore}, title = {Forschungsperspektiven quantitativer Methoden im Verh{\"a}ltnis zu qualitativen Methoden}, series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, journal = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, edition = {4., durchges. Aufl.}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-0799-2}, pages = {137 -- 149}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{Prengel2013, author = {Prengel, Annedore}, title = {Praxisforschung in professioneller P{\"a}dagogik}, series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, journal = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, edition = {4., durchgesehene Auflage}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-0799-2}, pages = {785 -- 802}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{Grell2013, author = {Grell, Petra}, title = {Forschende Lernwerkstatt}, series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, journal = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, edition = {4., durchgesehene Auflage}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-0799-2}, pages = {887 -- 896}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{Oswald2013, author = {Oswald, Hans}, title = {Was heißt qualitativ forschen? Warnungen, Fehlerquellen, M{\"o}glichkeiten}, series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, journal = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, edition = {4., durchgesehene Auflage}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-0799-2}, pages = {183 -- 204}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{SchruenderLenzen2013, author = {Schr{\"u}nder-Lenzen, Agi}, title = {Triangulation - ein Konzept zur Qualit{\"a}tssicherung von Forschung}, series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, journal = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, edition = {4., durchgesehene Auflage}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-0799-2}, pages = {149 -- 158}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @book{OPUS4-48342, title = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft}, editor = {Friebertsh{\"a}user, Barbara and Langer, Antje and Prengel, Annedore}, edition = {4., durchgesehene Auflage}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-0799-2}, pages = {1000}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Qualitative Forschung leistet mit einem differenzierten Methodenrepertoire einen zentralen Beitrag zur Empirie in der Erziehungswissenschaft. Das Handbuch f{\"u}hrt umfassend in das breite Spektrum qualitativer Forschungszug{\"a}nge ein. Der erste Teil bietet eine grundlegende Einf{\"u}hrung in qualitative Forschung, reflektiert ihre Bedeutung und Erkenntnispotentiale, zeichnet historische Entwicklungen nach und legt theoretische Grundlagen dar. Der zweite Teil stellt die wichtigsten methodischen Forschungskonzeptionen qualitativer erziehungswissenschaftlicher Forschung vor. Der dritte Teil f{\"u}hrt in Strategien f{\"u}r Erhebungen und Auswertungen ein. Die Aufs{\"a}tze des vierten Teils widmen sich dem forschenden Umgang mit visuellen Quellen und Medien. Der f{\"u}nfte Teil stellt eine Auswahl gegenstandsbezogener qualitativer Forschungsans{\"a}tze vor. Abschließend folgen Ans{\"a}tze der Praxis-, Aktions- und Handlungsforschung und n{\"u}tzliche Informationen und Hinweise f{\"u}r die Planung und Durchf{\"u}hrung von Forschungsvorhaben. Das Handbuch richtet sich an Promovierende, Forschende, Lehrende und Studierende in den Erziehungs- und Sozialwissenschaften. Es bietet P{\"a}dagoginnen und P{\"a}dagogen Informationen {\"u}ber Methoden systematischer Praxisforschung und tr{\"a}gt damit zur St{\"a}rkung und Innovation qualitativer Forschungszug{\"a}nge und zur Weiterentwicklung der methodischen Standards bei.}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Lambrecht2020, author = {Lambrecht, Jennifer}, title = {Warum machen wir nicht einfach Inklusion?}, series = {Perspektive Schule}, journal = {Perspektive Schule}, number = {1}, publisher = {W. Bertelsmann Verlag}, address = {Bielefeld}, isbn = {978-3-7639-6117-7}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {236}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Die Entwicklung einer Theorie zur schulischen Inklusion ist das zentrale Thema der Dissertation. Die Autorin nutzt empirische Analysen zur Umsetzung inklusiven Lernens sowie Daten zu sonderp{\"a}dagogischen F{\"o}rderschwerpunkten an inklusiven Grundschulen f{\"u}r die Erarbeitung von Bedingungen und Formen eines inklusiven Schulsystems. Empirische Daten zur Umsetzung inklusiver Bildung liegen aus vielen Bundesl{\"a}ndern vor, es fehlte jedoch eine forschungsleitende Theorie zur Einordnung und Analyse der Daten. Jennifer Lambrecht hat diese Theorie auf Grundlage der Systemtheorie Luhmanns entwickelt. Sie differenziert zwischen Schulsystemen und verortet unterschiedliche Inklusionsverst{\"a}ndnisse. Im Ergebnis entwickelt sie f{\"u}nf Thesen zur schulischen Inklusion im allgemeinen Schulsystem und im Sonderschulsystem. Die Dissertation, die ein hochaktuelles Thema der empirischen Bildungsforschung behandelt, regt zum Mit- und Nachdenken an und generiert neue, interessante Forschungsfragen.}, language = {de} } @article{SchuelerHartmannHilliger2020, author = {Sch{\"u}ler, Eliana and Hartmann, Anna and Hilliger, Dorothea}, title = {Multiperspektivische in Forschung und Tanz, Theater und Performance}, series = {Kulturelle Bildung : theoretische Perspektiven, methodologische Herausforderungen und empirische Befunde}, journal = {Kulturelle Bildung : theoretische Perspektiven, methodologische Herausforderungen und empirische Befunde}, publisher = {M{\"u}nster}, address = {Waxmann}, isbn = {978-3-8309-4150-7}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.31244/9783830991502}, pages = {163 -- 176}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{LudwigThomsen2020, author = {Ludwig, Joachim and Thomsen, Sarah}, title = {Bildungsprozesse von Teilnehmenden in Tanz-, Theater und Performance-Projekten}, series = {Kulturelle Bildung : theoretische Perspektiven, methodologische Herausforderungen und empirische}, journal = {Kulturelle Bildung : theoretische Perspektiven, methodologische Herausforderungen und empirische}, publisher = {Waxmann}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, isbn = {978-3-8309-4150-7}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.31244/9783830991502}, pages = {265 -- 278}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{Seyfried2019, author = {Seyfried, Markus}, title = {Undisclosed desires}, series = {Assessment \& Evaluation in Higher Education}, volume = {44}, journal = {Assessment \& Evaluation in Higher Education}, number = {7}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0260-2938}, doi = {10.1080/02602938.2019.1573970}, pages = {1106 -- 1119}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Following decades of quality management featuring in higher education settings, questions regarding its implementation, impact and outcomes remain. Indeed, leaving aside anecdotal case studies and value-laden documentaries of best practice, current research still knows very little about the implementation of quality management in teaching and learning within higher education institutions. Referring to data collected from German higher education institutions in which a quality management department or functional equivalent was present, this article theorises and provides evidence for the supposition that the implementation of quality management follows two implicit logics. Specifically, it tends either towards the logic of appropriateness or, contrastingly, towards the logic of consequentialism. This study's results also suggest that quality managers' socialisation is related to these logics and that it influences their views on quality management in teaching and learning.}, language = {en} } @article{LeibRuppel2019, author = {Leib, Julia and Ruppel, Samantha}, title = {Studentische Lerneffekte in Simulationen der Vereinten Nationen}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Friedens- und Konfliktforschung}, volume = {8}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Friedens- und Konfliktforschung}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {2524-6976}, doi = {10.1007/s42597-019-00007-y}, pages = {99 -- 111}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Verbessern Planspiele als aktive Lernmethode die Lernergebnisse von Student*innen der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (FuK)? Dieser Beitrag untersucht verschiedene UN-Simulationen, um deren Effektivit{\"a}t in Bezug auf drei Wissensbereichen (Fakten- und Verfahrenswissen, Soft Skills) nachzuweisen. Im Gegensatz zu theoretischen Aussagen {\"u}ber die positiven Auswirkungen aktiver Lernumgebungen auf die Lernergebnisse von Student*innen sind empirische Belege begrenzt. Mit diesem Beitrag sollen fr{\"u}here Behauptungen {\"u}ber die Lerneffekte von UN-Simulationen systematisch {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft und der Mehrwert f{\"u}r die FuK demonstriert werden. Um umfassende Daten zu erhalten, evaluieren wir drei Planspiele, die eine Reihe von Simulationseigenschaften abdecken: Eine kurze Simulation des UN-Sicherheitsrats, eine regionale UN-Simulation sowie die Teilnahme von zwei Delegationen am National Model United Nations. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Planspiele als Lehrmethode positive Auswirkungen auf die Lernergebnisse der Student*innen haben: Sie f{\"u}hren zu einem besseren Wissen {\"u}ber die UN, f{\"o}rdern Soft Skills sowie Reflexionsf{\"a}higkeit.}, language = {de} } @misc{Schubarth2021, author = {Schubarth, Wilfried}, title = {Rezension zu: May, Michael; Heinrich, Gudrun: Rechtsextremismus p{\"a}dagogisch begegnen: Handlungswissen f{\"u}r die Schule. - Bonn: Bundeszentrale f{\"u}r Politische Bildung, 2021. - ISBN 978-3-7425-0705-1 / Gansewig, Antje; Walsh, Maria: Biografiebasierte Maßnahmen in der schulischen Pr{\"a}ventions und Bildungsarbeit. Eine empirische Betrachtung des Einsatzes von Aussteigern aus extremistischen Szenen unter besonderer Ber{\"u}cksichtigung ehemaliger Rechtsextremer. - Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2020. - ISBN 978-3-8487-6317-7}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik}, volume = {67}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik}, number = {2}, publisher = {Beltz}, address = {Weinheim}, issn = {0044-3247}, pages = {307 -- 310}, year = {2021}, language = {de} } @book{BenderDreiackEngelsetal.2022, author = {Bender, Carsten and Dreiack, Stefanie and Engels, Victoria and Fisseler, Bj{\"o}rn and Gregory, Luisa and Gross, Monika and Kaffenberger, Jens and Kost{\"a}dt, Peter and Meyer zu Bexten, Erdmuthe and Rustemeier, Linda and Schwarz, Thorsten and Tannert, Benjamin and Velasquez, Estefania Cepeda and Weber, Gerhard}, title = {Leitfaden zur Digitalen Barrierefreiheit im Hochschulkontext}, series = {Arbeitspapier / Hochschulforum Digitalisierung (HFD) ; 66}, volume = {5}, journal = {Arbeitspapier / Hochschulforum Digitalisierung (HFD) ; 66}, publisher = {Stifterverband f{\"u}r die Deutsche Wissenschaft}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2365-7081}, doi = {10.5445/IR/1000153177}, pages = {43}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @incollection{GranzowEmden2022, author = {Granzow-Emden, Matthias}, title = {Grammatik}, series = {Basiswissen Lehrerbildung: Deutsch unterrichten}, booktitle = {Basiswissen Lehrerbildung: Deutsch unterrichten}, editor = {Kilian, J{\"o}rg and Ramm, Gesa and Sosna, Anette and Riecke-Baulecke, Thomas}, publisher = {Klett-Kallmeyer}, address = {Hannover}, isbn = {978-3-7727-1496-2}, pages = {204 -- 217}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{HermannsKeller2022, author = {Hermanns, Jolanda and Keller, David}, title = {The development, use, and evaluation of digital games and quizzes in an introductory course on organic chemistry for preservice chemistry teachers}, series = {Journal of chemical education / Division of Chemical Education, Inc., American Chemical Society}, volume = {99}, journal = {Journal of chemical education / Division of Chemical Education, Inc., American Chemical Society}, number = {4}, publisher = {American Chemical Society}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0021-9584}, doi = {10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00058}, pages = {1715 -- 1724}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Due to the COVID pandemic, the introductory course on organic chemistry was developed and conducted as anonline course. To ensure methodical variety in this course,educational games and quizzes have been developed, used, and evaluated. The attendance of the course, and therefore also the use of the quizzes and games, was voluntary. The quizzes'main goalwas to give the students the opportunity to check whether they had memorized the knowledge needed in the course. Another goal was to make transparent which knowledge the students shouldmemorize by rote. The evaluation shows that the students hadnot internalized all knowledge which they should apply in severaltasks on organic chemistry. They answered multiselect questions in general less well than single-select questions. The games shouldcombine fun with learning. The evaluation of the games shows that the students rated them very well. The students used thosegames again for their exam preparation, as the monitoring of accessing the games showed. Students'experiences with usingelectronic devices in general or for quizzes and games have also been evaluated, because their experience could influence thestudents'assessment of the quizzes and games used in our study. However, the students used electronic devices regularly and shouldtherefore be technically competent to use our quizzes and games. The evaluation showed that the use of digital games for learningpurposes is not very common, neither at school nor at university, although the students had worked with such tools before. Thestudents are also very interested in using and developing such digital games not only for their own study, but also for their future work at school}, language = {en} } @article{ClahsenJessen2021, author = {Clahsen, Harald and Jessen, Anna}, title = {Morphological generalization in bilingual language production}, series = {Language acquisition : a journal of developmental linguistics}, volume = {28}, journal = {Language acquisition : a journal of developmental linguistics}, number = {4}, publisher = {Psychology Press, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {London}, issn = {1048-9223}, doi = {10.1080/10489223.2021.1910267}, pages = {370 -- 386}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Morphological variability in bilingual language production is widely attested. Producing inflected words has been found to be less reliable and consistent in bilinguals than in first-language (functionally monolingual) L1 speakers, even for bilingual speakers at advanced proficiency levels. The sources for these differences are not well understood. The current study presents a detailed investigation of morphological generalization processes in bilingual speakers' language production. We examined past participle formation of German using an elicited-production experiment containing nonce verbs with varying degrees of similarity to existing verbs testing a large group of bilingual Turkish/German speakers relative to L1 German speakers. We compared similarity-based lexical extensions with generalizations of morphological rules. The results show that rule-based generalizations are used less often and more variably within the bilingual group than within the L1 group. Our results also show a selective effect of age of acquisition on the bilingual speakers' morphological generalizations.}, language = {en} } @article{KaiserBrenne2022, author = {Kaiser, Michaela and Brenne, Andreas}, title = {{\"A}sthetik - Normativit{\"a}t - Diversit{\"a}t}, series = {Individuelle F{\"o}rderung - Heterogenit{\"a}t und Handlungsperspektiven in der Schule}, journal = {Individuelle F{\"o}rderung - Heterogenit{\"a}t und Handlungsperspektiven in der Schule}, publisher = {Waxmann}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-8385-5919-3}, doi = {10.36198/9783838559193}, pages = {249 -- 259}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{GaertnerBrunner2018, author = {G{\"a}rtner, Holger and Brunner, Martin}, title = {Once good teaching, always good teaching?}, series = {Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability}, volume = {30}, journal = {Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {1874-8597}, doi = {10.1007/s11092-018-9277-5}, pages = {159 -- 182}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In many countries, students are asked about their perceptions of teaching in order to make decisions about the further development of teaching practices on the basis of this feedback. The stability of this measurement of teaching quality is a prerequisite for the ability to generalize the results to other teaching situations. The present study aims to expand the extant empirical body of knowledge on the effects of situational factors on the stability of students' perceptions of teaching quality. Therefore, we investigate whether the degree of stability is moderated by three situational factors: time between assessments, subjects taught by teachers, and students' grade levels. To this end, we analyzed data from a web-based student feedback system. The study involved 497 teachers, each of whom conducted two student surveys. We examined the differential stability of student perceptions of 16 teaching constructs that were operationalized as latent correlations between aggregated student perceptions of the same teacher's teaching. Testing metric invariance indicated that student ratings provided measures of teaching constructs that were invariant across time, subjects, and grade levels. Stability was moderated to some extent by grade level but not by subjects taught nor time spacing between surveys. The results provide evidence of the extent to which situational factors may affect the stability of student perceptions of teaching constructs. The generalizability of the students' feedback results to other teaching situations is discussed.}, language = {en} } @article{WilbertKrull2022, author = {Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Krull, Johanna}, title = {Die Bedeutung von Peers f{\"u}r die soziale Teilhabe von Lernenden mit Lern- und Verhaltensauff{\"a}lligkeiten in inklusiven Schulklassen}, series = {Aufwachsen mit Anderen : Peerbeziehungen als Bildungsfaktor}, journal = {Aufwachsen mit Anderen : Peerbeziehungen als Bildungsfaktor}, publisher = {Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-17-036680-0}, pages = {134 -- 149}, year = {2022}, language = {de} }