@article{WilbertKrull2022, author = {Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Krull, Johanna}, title = {Die Bedeutung von Peers f{\"u}r die soziale Teilhabe von Lernenden mit Lern- und Verhaltensauff{\"a}lligkeiten in inklusiven Schulklassen}, series = {Aufwachsen mit Anderen : Peerbeziehungen als Bildungsfaktor}, journal = {Aufwachsen mit Anderen : Peerbeziehungen als Bildungsfaktor}, publisher = {Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-17-036680-0}, pages = {134 -- 149}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{Prengel2016, author = {Prengel, Annedore}, title = {Inklusive P{\"a}dagogik und ihre Bedeutung f{\"u}r relationale Prozesse}, publisher = {Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart}, pages = {30 -- 45}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @article{RichterKleinknechtGroeschner2019, author = {Richter, Dirk and Kleinknecht, Marc and Gr{\"o}schner, Alexander}, title = {What motivates teachers to participate in professional development? An empirical investigation of motivational orientations and the uptake of formal learning opportunities}, series = {Teaching and Teacher Education}, volume = {86}, journal = {Teaching and Teacher Education}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0742-051X}, doi = {10.1016/j.tate.2019.102929}, pages = {10}, year = {2019}, language = {en} } @article{DonatKniggeDalbert2017, author = {Donat, Matthias and Knigge, Michel and Dalbert, Claudia}, title = {Being a good or a just teacher}, series = {Aggressive behavior : a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the experimental and observational analysis of conflict in humans and animals}, volume = {44}, journal = {Aggressive behavior : a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the experimental and observational analysis of conflict in humans and animals}, number = {1}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0096-140X}, doi = {10.1002/ab.21721}, pages = {29 -- 39}, year = {2017}, abstract = {In two cross-sectional questionnaire studies with N = 2,931 German students, aged between 12 and 17 years (M = 14.1, SD = 0.5), we investigated the relation between students' bullying behavior and their personal belief in a just world (BJW). We considered students' personal experience of teacher justice as a possible mediator in this relation and investigated whether the students' experiences of their teachers' classroom management explained bullying behavior in addition to personal BJW and teacher justice, while statistically controlling for sex and school type. In both studies, multilevel modeling results showed that the more students endorsed personal BJW and the more they evaluated their teachers' behavior toward them personally as being just, the less likely they were to report that they bullied others. The students' personal experience of teacher justice mediated the association of personal BJW with bullying. Furthermore, the students' personal experience of classroom management significantly predicted bullying in addition to personal BJW and teacher justice. The observed relations were mainly significant at the individual level. The pattern of results persisted when we controlled for school type and when we considered student sex as a moderator. We discussed the adaptive functions of BJW and implications for future school research and practice.}, language = {en} } @article{VockGronostajKretschmannetal.2018, author = {Vock, Miriam and Gronostaj, Anna and Kretschmann, Julia and Westphal, Andrea}, title = {„Meine Lehrer m{\"o}gen mich" - Soziale Integration von Kindern mit sonderp{\"a}dagogischem F{\"o}rderbedarf im gemeinsamen Unterricht in der Grundschule}, series = {DDS - Die Deutsche Schule}, volume = {110}, journal = {DDS - Die Deutsche Schule}, number = {2}, publisher = {Waxmann}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, issn = {0012-0731}, doi = {10.31244/dds.2018.02.03}, pages = {124 -- 137}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Brandenburg startete im Schuljahr 2012/2013 das Pilotprojekt „Inklusive Grundschule" (PING). 35 dieser Pilot-Grundschulen wurden wissenschaftlich begleitet (vgl. Sp{\"o}rer, Schr{\"u}nder-Lenzen, Vock \& Maaz, 2015). In diesem Beitrag berichten wir Befunde zum sozialen Selbstkonzept, wie die Kinder das Klassenklima erleben und wie sie sich von ihrer Lehrkraft angenommen f{\"u}hlen. Untersucht wurden 1.435 Kinder in 61 inklusiven Klassen der Jahrgangsstufen 2 und 3. Es finden sich keine durchg{\"a}ngigen Nachteile bei Selbstkonzept und erlebtem Klassenklima f{\"u}r Kinder mit sonderp{\"a}dagogischem F{\"o}rderbedarf (SPF), jedoch f{\"u}hlen sich diese weniger von ihren Lehrkr{\"a}ften angenommen.}, language = {de} } @article{LenkeitSchwippertKnigge2018, author = {Lenkeit, Jenny and Schwippert, Knut and Knigge, Michel}, title = {Configurations of multiple disparities in reading performance}, series = {Assessment in education : principles, policy \& practice}, volume = {25}, journal = {Assessment in education : principles, policy \& practice}, number = {1}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0969-594X}, doi = {10.1080/0969594X.2017.1309352}, pages = {52 -- 86}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Research provides evidence that gender, immigrant background and socio-economic characteristics present multiple disadvantaging characteristics that change their relative importance and configurations over time. When evaluating inequalities researchers tend to focus on one particular aspect and often use composite measures when evaluating socio-economic characteristics. Neither can fully represent the complexity of students' various disadvantaging characteristics, which have autonomous associations with attainment and with each other. This paper investigates how the relative importance and configurations of different disadvantaging factors have changed over time to form educational inequalities and how these changes differ across countries. Data from five PISA cycles (2000-2012) for France, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom are used and configurations of gender, immigration background, parents' occupational and educational levels, and the number of books at home evaluated. Results enable us to relate changes (or lack thereof) in configurations of disadvantaging factors to recent reforms targeted at reducing educational inequality after the first PISA results.}, language = {en} } @article{HartmannEhlertFritz2019, author = {Hartmann, Julia and Ehlert, Antje and Fritz, Annemarie}, title = {Welche Rolle spielen sprachliche Parameter f{\"u}r die Entwicklung integrierter verbal-numerischer Konzepte im vierten Lebensjahr?}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung : interdisziplin{\"a}re Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung, Ausbildung und Praxis}, volume = {8}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung : interdisziplin{\"a}re Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung, Ausbildung und Praxis}, number = {1}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9186}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000410}, pages = {44 -- 52}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Der Beitrag untersucht, ob und zu welchen Anteilen fr{\"u}he sprachliche Kompetenzen numerische Kompetenzen vorhersagen. An 72 dreij{\"a}hrigen Kindern wurden numerische, verbal produktive und rezeptive sowie grammatische Leistungen zwei Mal im Abstand von drei Monaten erhoben. Mithilfe von Strukturgleichungsmodellen kann gezeigt werden, dass sprachliche und numerische Leistungen in diesem Alter noch wenig distinkt sind. F{\"u}r die numerischen Kompetenzen findet sich bereits in diesem Alter eine hohe interindividuelle Entwicklungsstabilit{\"a}t. Ein bedeutsamer Einfluss sprachlicher Kompetenz auf den Zuwachs mathematischer Kompetenz im vierten Lebensjahr konnte nicht nachgewiesen werden. Wir diskutieren die Ergebnisse vor dem Hintergrund der aktuellen Thesen zum Zusammenhang von Sprache und Numerik in der Entwicklung.}, language = {de} } @article{DuenkelKniggeWilbert2020, author = {D{\"u}nkel, Nora and Knigge, Michel and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Determinanten und Akkuratheit von Sch{\"u}lerurteilen {\"u}ber sprachliche F{\"a}higkeiten von Mitsch{\"u}ler(inne)n im Deutschen und den Herkunftssprachen T{\"u}rkisch und Russisch}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft : ZfE}, volume = {23}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft : ZfE}, number = {5}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {1434-663X}, doi = {10.1007/s11618-020-00972-8}, pages = {1019 -- 1052}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Models of language acquisition suggest that the development of language abilities is influenced by the language skills of relevant interaction partners (e.g. peers). Because objective measures of interaction partners' language skills are rarely available, third party ratings may be an alternative measure. Therefore, the present study investigates students' ratings of their fellow students' language skills as indicators of actual language performance in German and the heritage languages Turkish and Russian. Multilevel models were applied to address the following questions: Which factors influence students' ratings of peers' language skills? How accurate are these ratings and what influences the accuracy of ratings? In all languages, students' ratings were moderately related to peers' test performance and the accuracy of ratings was positively moderated if the students had class together, shared the same language background and with increasing relationship quality. The ratings for German language abilities further revealed negative performance related stereotypes towards peers with Turkish and Russian language backgrounds. The results are discussed with respect to possibilities and boundaries of assessing peers' language skills through student ratings and implications of negative performance related stereotypes.}, language = {de} } @article{BrenickSchachnerJugert2018, author = {Brenick, Alaina and Schachner, Maja Katharina and Jugert, Philipp}, title = {Help or hindrance?}, series = {Journal of applied developmental psychology : an internat. multidisciplinary lifespan journal}, volume = {59}, journal = {Journal of applied developmental psychology : an internat. multidisciplinary lifespan journal}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {New York}, issn = {0193-3973}, doi = {10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.006}, pages = {26 -- 35}, year = {2018}, abstract = {We examined the interplay between perceived ethnic discrimination (PED) as a risk factor, and cross-ethnic friendships as a protective factor in culturally diverse classrooms, and how they relate to the socioemotional adjustment of ethnic minority boys and girls. We conducted multi-level analyses of 327 Turkish-heritage ethnic minority early-adolescents in Germany (62 classrooms; M-age = 11.59 years, SDage = 0.76). Higher rates of PED were associated with more depressive symptoms and disruptive behaviors and lower general life satisfaction-though these effects differed by gender. Unexpectedly, cross-ethnic friendships with ethnic majority peers exacerbated the negative effects of PED on socioemotional adjustment. This effect was decreased, though, when adolescents perceived the classroom climate to be supportive of intergroup contact toward majority-minority cross-ethnic friendships. Supportive classroom climate also buffered the effects of PED for youth with minority cross-ethnic friends. Results indicate the need to differentiate types of cross-ethnic relationships and account for the intergroup climate.}, language = {en} } @article{SotardiBoschBrogt2020, author = {Sotardi, Valerie A. and Bosch, Jannis and Brogt, Erik}, title = {Multidimensional influences of anxiety and assessment type on task performance}, series = {Social psychology of education : an international journal}, volume = {23}, journal = {Social psychology of education : an international journal}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {1381-2890}, doi = {10.1007/s11218-019-09508-3}, pages = {499 -- 522}, year = {2020}, abstract = {We examined state evaluation anxiety, trait evaluation anxiety, and neuroticism in relation to New Zealand first-year university students' (n = 234) task performance on either a test or essay assessment. For both assessment types, the underlying components of state evaluation anxiety (cognitive worry, emotionality, and distraction) reflect linear-as opposed to nonlinear-associations with task performance. Results of several regression models show differential effects of both state evaluation anxiety and neuroticism on task performance depending on the assessment type. The multi-dimensionality of anxiety and its relative contribution on task performance across authentic types of assessment are discussed.}, language = {en} }