@article{HuangRichterKleickmannetal.2022, author = {Huang, Yizhen and Richter, Eric and Kleickmann, Thilo and Richter, Dirk}, title = {Comparing video and virtual reality as tools for fostering interest and self-efficacy in classroom management}, series = {British journal of educational technology / British Educational Communications and Technology Agency}, volume = {54}, journal = {British journal of educational technology / British Educational Communications and Technology Agency}, number = {2}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0007-1013}, doi = {10.1111/bjet.13254}, pages = {467 -- 488}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Video is a widely used medium in teacher training for situating student teachers in classroom scenarios. Although the emerging technology of virtual reality (VR) provides similar, and arguably more powerful, capabilities for immersing teachers in lifelike situations, its benefits and risks relative to video formats have received little attention in the research to date. The current study used a randomized pretest-posttest experimental design to examine the influence of a video- versus VR-based task on changing situational interest and self-efficacy in classroom management. Results from 49 student teachers revealed that the VR simulation led to higher increments in self-reported triggered interest and self-efficacy in classroom management, but also invoked higher extraneous cognitive load than a video viewing task. We discussed the implications of these results for pre-service teacher education and the design of VR environments for professional training purposes. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Video is a popular teacher training medium given its ability to display classroom situations. Virtual reality (VR) also immerses users in lifelike situations and has gained popularity in recent years. Situational interest and self-efficacy in classroom management is vital for student teachers' professional development. What this paper adds VR outperforms video in promoting student teachers' triggered interest in classroom management. Student teachers felt more efficacious in classroom management after participating in VR. VR also invoked higher extraneous cognitive load than the video. Implications for practice and/or policy VR provides an authentic teacher training environment for classroom management. The design of the VR training environment needs to ensure a low extraneous cognitive load.}, language = {en} } @article{AlLabanRegerLucke2022, author = {Al Laban, Firas and Reger, Martin and Lucke, Ulrike}, title = {Closing the Policy Gap in the Academic Bridge}, series = {Education sciences}, volume = {12}, journal = {Education sciences}, number = {12}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2227-7102}, doi = {10.3390/educsci12120930}, year = {2022}, abstract = {The highly structured nature of the educational sector demands effective policy mechanisms close to the needs of the field. That is why evidence-based policy making, endorsed by the European Commission under Erasmus+ Key Action 3, aims to make an alignment between the domains of policy and practice. Against this background, this article addresses two issues: First, that there is a vertical gap in the translation of higher-level policies to local strategies and regulations. Second, that there is a horizontal gap between educational domains regarding the policy awareness of individual players. This was analyzed in quantitative and qualitative studies with domain experts from the fields of virtual mobility and teacher training. From our findings, we argue that the combination of both gaps puts the academic bridge from secondary to tertiary education at risk, including the associated knowledge proficiency levels. We discuss the role of digitalization in the academic bridge by asking the question: which value does the involved stakeholders expect from educational policies? As a theoretical basis, we rely on the model of value co-creation for and by stakeholders. We describe the used instruments along with the obtained results and proposed benefits. Moreover, we reflect on the methodology applied, and we finally derive recommendations for future academic bridge policies.}, language = {en} } @article{FreitagHild2022, author = {Freitag-Hild, Britta}, title = {Child-friendly cities and communities}, series = {Bildung f{\"u}r nachhaltige Entwicklung im Englischunterricht. Grundlagen und Unterrichtsbeispiele}, journal = {Bildung f{\"u}r nachhaltige Entwicklung im Englischunterricht. Grundlagen und Unterrichtsbeispiele}, publisher = {Klett Kallmeyer}, address = {Hannover}, isbn = {978-3-7727-1660-7}, pages = {185 -- 193}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{WulffBuschhueterWestphaletal.2022, author = {Wulff, Peter and Buschh{\"u}ter, David and Westphal, Andrea and Mientus, Lukas and Nowak, Anna and Borowski, Andreas}, title = {Bridging the gap between qualitative and quantitative assessment in science education research with machine learning}, series = {Journal of science education and technology}, volume = {31}, journal = {Journal of science education and technology}, number = {4}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {1059-0145}, doi = {10.1007/s10956-022-09969-w}, pages = {490 -- 513}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Science education researchers typically face a trade-off between more quantitatively oriented confirmatory testing of hypotheses, or more qualitatively oriented exploration of novel hypotheses. More recently, open-ended, constructed response items were used to combine both approaches and advance assessment of complex science-related skills and competencies. For example, research in assessing science teachers' noticing and attention to classroom events benefitted from more open-ended response formats because teachers can present their own accounts. Then, open-ended responses are typically analyzed with some form of content analysis. However, language is noisy, ambiguous, and unsegmented and thus open-ended, constructed responses are complex to analyze. Uncovering patterns in these responses would benefit from more principled and systematic analysis tools. Consequently, computer-based methods with the help of machine learning and natural language processing were argued to be promising means to enhance assessment of noticing skills with constructed response formats. In particular, pretrained language models recently advanced the study of linguistic phenomena and thus could well advance assessment of complex constructs through constructed response items. This study examines potentials and challenges of a pretrained language model-based clustering approach to assess preservice physics teachers' attention to classroom events as elicited through open-ended written descriptions. It was examined to what extent the clustering approach could identify meaningful patterns in the constructed responses, and in what ways textual organization of the responses could be analyzed with the clusters. Preservice physics teachers (N = 75) were instructed to describe a standardized, video-recorded teaching situation in physics. The clustering approach was used to group related sentences. Results indicate that the pretrained language model-based clustering approach yields well-interpretable, specific, and robust clusters, which could be mapped to physics-specific and more general contents. Furthermore, the clusters facilitate advanced analysis of the textual organization of the constructed responses. Hence, we argue that machine learning and natural language processing provide science education researchers means to combine exploratory capabilities of qualitative research methods with the systematicity of quantitative methods.}, language = {en} } @article{VietzeSchwarzenthalMoffittetal.2022, author = {Vietze, Jana and Schwarzenthal, Miriam and Moffitt, Ursula and Civitillo, Sauro}, title = {Beyond 'migrant background': how to select relevant, social justice oriented, and feasible social categories in educational research}, series = {European journal of psychology of education}, volume = {38}, journal = {European journal of psychology of education}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York}, issn = {0256-2928}, doi = {10.1007/s10212-022-00611-2}, pages = {389 -- 408}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Across continental Europe, educational research samples are often divided by 'migrant background', a binary variable criticized for masking participant heterogeneity and reinforcing exclusionary norms of belonging. This study endorses more meaningful, representative, and precise research by offering four guiding questions for selecting relevant, social justice oriented, and feasible social categories for collecting and analysing data in psychological and educational research. Using a preregistered empirical example, we first compare selected social categories ('migrant background', family heritage, religion, citizenship, cultural identification, and generation status) in their potential to reveal participant heterogeneity. Second, we investigate differences in means and relations between variables (discrimination experiences, perceived societal Islamophobia, and national identity) and academic motivation among 1335 adolescents in Germany (48\% female, M-age = 14.69). Regression analyses and multigroup SEM revealed differential experiences with and implications of discrimination for academic motivation. Results highlight the need for a deliberate, transparent use of social categories to make discrimination visible and centre participants' subjective experiences.}, language = {en} } @misc{GerickeSoemerSchiefele2022, author = {Gericke, Christian and Soemer, Alexander and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Benefits of Mind Wandering for Learning in School Through Its Positive Effects on Creativity}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {835}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-58873}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-588731}, pages = {11}, year = {2022}, abstract = {There is broad agreement among researchers to view mind wandering as an obstacle to learning because it draws attention away from learning tasks. Accordingly, empirical findings revealed negative correlations between the frequency of mind wandering during learning and various kinds of learning outcomes (e.g., text retention). However, a few studies have indicated positive effects of mind wandering on creativity in real-world learning environments. The present article reviews these studies and highlights potential benefits of mind wandering for learning mediated through creative processes. Furthermore, we propose various ways to promote useful mind wandering and, at the same time, minimize its negative impact on learning.}, language = {en} } @article{GerickeSoemerSchiefele2022, author = {Gericke, Christian and Soemer, Alexander and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Benefits of Mind Wandering for Learning in School Through Its Positive Effects on Creativity}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {7}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media SA}, address = {Lausanne, Schweiz}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2022.774731}, pages = {11}, year = {2022}, abstract = {There is broad agreement among researchers to view mind wandering as an obstacle to learning because it draws attention away from learning tasks. Accordingly, empirical findings revealed negative correlations between the frequency of mind wandering during learning and various kinds of learning outcomes (e.g., text retention). However, a few studies have indicated positive effects of mind wandering on creativity in real-world learning environments. The present article reviews these studies and highlights potential benefits of mind wandering for learning mediated through creative processes. Furthermore, we propose various ways to promote useful mind wandering and, at the same time, minimize its negative impact on learning.}, language = {en} } @article{GüntherReitzKoncebovskiKlöpping2022, author = {G{\"u}nther, Claudia-Susanne and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and Klöpping, Peter M.}, title = {Begegnungen mit Mathematik}, series = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)}, journal = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)}, number = {2}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-508-8}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-57075}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570755}, pages = {123 -- 143}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Die Reflexion der eigenen mathematischen Bildungsbiografie angehender Mathematiklehrkr{\"a}fte bietet eine bisher wenig beachtete, aber lohnende Perspektive auf ihre zuk{\"u}nftige Lehrt{\"a}tigkeit. Insbesondere bei negativen Vorerfahrungen mit Mathematik bietet die biografische Reflexion eine Gelegenheit zur Aufarbeitung. An der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam wurde deshalb f{\"u}r Studierende des Mathematiklehramts f{\"u}r die Primar- und die Sekundarstufe ein freiwilliges Angebot zur Besch{\"a}ftigung mit der mathematischen Bildungsbiografie geschaffen. Seit dem Wintersemester 2018/19 ist dieses Angebot in das Fachdidaktische Tagespraktikum integriert. Dieser Artikel stellt den theoretischen und methodischen Hintergrund des Workshops dar. Zudem werden erste Ergebnisse einer begleitenden Untersuchung unter den Workshopteilnehmenden vorgestellt.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Apelojg2022, author = {Apelojg, Benjamin}, title = {Bed{\"u}rfnisorientierte Lehre in Krisenzeiten?!}, series = {In Krisen aus Krisen lernen}, booktitle = {In Krisen aus Krisen lernen}, editor = {Schr{\"o}der, Lisa-Marie and Hantke, Harald and Steffestun, Theresa and Hedtke, Reinhold}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-37779-3}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-37780-9_11}, pages = {173 -- 188}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Krisen werden nicht nur als Herausforderungen, sondern auch als Chance f{\"u}r Ver{\"a}nderungen, Neuerungen oder Innovationen betrachtet. Die Covid-19-Pandemie hat die Lehre an Deutschlands Universit{\"a}ten mit einem Schlag in die digitale Welt verbannt. Von dieser Digitalisierung ist eine sozio{\"o}konomische Bildung genauso wie jede andere universit{\"a}re Bildung betroffen. Was es bedeutet, Lehre ausschließlich in digitaler Form zu gestalten, wird exemplarisch an einer digitalen Blockveranstaltung zur „Nachhaltigen Berufsbildungsforschung" an der Leuphana Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg skizziert und insbesondere unter dem Aspekt der Bed{\"u}rfnisorientierung kritisch reflektiert.}, language = {de} } @article{TetzlaffHartmannDumontetal.2022, author = {Tetzlaff, Leonard and Hartmann, Ulrike and Dumont, Hanna and Brod, Garvin}, title = {Assessing individualized instruction in the classroom}, series = {Learning and instruction : the journal of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI)}, volume = {82}, journal = {Learning and instruction : the journal of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI)}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0959-4752}, doi = {10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101655}, pages = {10}, year = {2022}, abstract = {In this article, we address the measurement of individualized instruction in the context of regular classroom instruction. Our study assessed instructional practices geared towards individualization in German third grade reading lessons by combining self-report data from 621 students, from their teachers (n = 57), and live obser-vations. We then investigated the reliability of these different approaches to measuring individualization as well as the agreement between them. All three approaches yielded reliable indicators of individualized practices, but not all of them corresponded with each other. We found considerable agreement between students and observers, but neither agreed with teachers' self-reports. Upon closer examination, we found that students' ratings only correlated with teacher ratings that were provided close to the timepoint of interest. This correlation increased when teacher measures were corrected for response tendencies. We conclude with some recommendations for future studies that aim to measure individualized instruction in the classroom.}, language = {en} } @article{Krochmalnik2022, author = {Krochmalnik, Daniel}, title = {Am Anfang war...}, series = {Judentum (Themen im Religionsunterricht (Sekundarstufe 1+2))}, volume = {19}, journal = {Judentum (Themen im Religionsunterricht (Sekundarstufe 1+2))}, publisher = {Institut f{\"u}r Religionsp{\"a}dagogik der Erzdi{\"o}zese Freiburg}, address = {Freiburg}, isbn = {978-3-96003-198-7}, pages = {26 -- 31}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @techreport{MeyerRichterRichter2022, author = {Meyer, Andr{\´e} and Richter, Eric and Richter, Dirk}, title = {Abschlussbericht zur wissenschaftlichen Evaluation der Werkstatt "Schule leiten"}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-54886}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-548869}, pages = {75}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Der vorliegende Abschlussbericht umfasst die Ergebnisse der wissenschaftlichen Evaluation der Werkstatt „Schule leiten". Bei dieser Werkstatt handelt es sich um ein 18-monatiges Fortbildungsangebot f{\"u}r Schulleitungen, das durch die Deutsche Schulakademie konzipiert und in Kooperation mit dem saarl{\"a}ndischen Kultusministerium f{\"u}r Bildung und Kultur sowie dem saarl{\"a}ndischen Landesinstitut f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik und Medien durchgef{\"u}hrt wurde. Im Zeitraum 2016-2020 absolvierten jeweils zwei Personen des Schulleitungsteams allgemeinbildender Schulen erstmalig in insgesamt drei Durchg{\"a}ngen verschiedene Angebote der Werkstatt. Weiterhin erhielten die Teilnehmenden die Aufgaben, im Zuge ihres Fortbildungsbesuches ein individuelles Schulentwicklungsprojekt zu planen, zu entwickeln und unter Anleitung der Werkstatt in der Schule zu implementieren. Zur {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung der wahrgenommenen Qualit{\"a}t sowie der Wirksamkeit des Fortbildungsangebotes wurde die Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Arbeitsbereich Prof. Dr. Dirk Richter, beauftragt. Der vorliegende Bericht pr{\"a}sentiert die Evaluationsergebnisse der Durchg{\"a}nge 2 und 3. Im Zentrum der Evaluation stehen die folgenden Forschungsfragen: (1) Wie beurteilen die Teilnehmenden die Qualit{\"a}t der Werkstatt „Schule leiten"? (2) Inwiefern hat die Werkstatt „Schule leiten" dazu beigetragen, die Leitungskompetenzen (u.a. Einstellungen und F{\"u}hrungshandeln) der Teilnehmenden zu st{\"a}rken? sowie (3) Wie haben sich schulische Strukturen und Prozesse zur F{\"o}rderung von Schulentwicklung in den teilnehmenden Schulen durch die Werkstatt „Schule leiten" ver{\"a}ndert? Zur Beantwortung der Fragestellungen wurden eine Reihe schriftlicher Befragungen mit den teilnehmenden Schulleitungen sowie den Lehrkr{\"a}ften der teilnehmenden Schulen durchgef{\"u}hrt. Diese Befragungen erfolgten sowohl begleitend zum Fortbildungsprogramm (nach Absolvieren der einzelnen Angebote) sowie in einem Pr{\"a}-Post-Follow-Up-Design. Weiterhin wurden im Rahmen einer qualitativen Begleitstudie verschiedene Personen (Schulleitung, Mitglieder des Schulleitungsteams, Lehrkr{\"a}fte) von insgesamt f{\"u}nf Schulen {\"u}ber drei Zeitpunkte dazu befragt, wie die Planung, Entwicklung und Implementation der Schulentwicklungsprojekte erfolgten. Die Befunde der Evaluation deuten insgesamt darauf hin, dass die Qualit{\"a}t der Werkstatt „Schule leiten" als Gesamtprogramm sowie die einzelnen Angebote der Werkstatt sehr positiv bewertet werden. Dabei nehmen die Teilnehmenden von Durchgang 2 die Werkstatt in einer Reihe von Merkmalen positiver wahr als die Teilnehmenden von Durchgang 3. Weiterhin deuten die Ergebnisse darauf hin, dass sich bestimmte Facetten des F{\"u}hrungshandelns der Teilnehmenden im zeitlichen Verlauf positiv ver{\"a}ndert haben. Hierf{\"u}r existieren Hinweise sowohl aus Perspektive der Teilnehmenden selbst als auch aus Perspektive der Lehrkr{\"a}fte ihrer Schulen. Motivationale Merkmale der Teilnehmenden sowie Aspekte des F{\"u}hrungshandelns, die sich auf T{\"a}tigkeiten zur Unterst{\"u}tzung der innerschulischen Kooperation beziehen, bleiben aus Perspektive der Teilnehmenden hingegen weitestgehend konstant. Hinsichtlich der Ver{\"a}nderungen schulischer Strukturen zur Schulentwicklung deuten die Ergebnisse auf eine positive Entwicklung der wahrgenommenen Offenheit gegen{\"u}ber Kooperation im Kollegium aus Perspektive der Lehrkr{\"a}fte hin. Die Befunde der qualitativen Begleitstudie liefern weitere Informationen {\"u}ber die wahrgenommene Qualit{\"a}t der Werkstatt sowie {\"u}ber Ver{\"a}nderungen aufseiten der Teilnehmenden und der schulischen Strukturen.}, language = {de} } @techreport{MeyerKleinknechtRichter2022, author = {Meyer, Andr{\´e} and Kleinknecht, Marc and Richter, Dirk}, title = {Abschlussbericht im BMBF-Projekt "Verbundprojekt E-LANE: E-Learning in der Lehrerfortbildung: Angebote, Nutzung und Ertr{\"a}ge" (F{\"o}rderkennzeichen: 01JD1825A-B)}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-56742}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-567428}, pages = {16}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Der vorliegende Abschlussbericht pr{\"a}sentiert die Ergebnisse des BMBF-gef{\"o}rderten Verbundprojektes "E-LANE: E-Learning in der Lehrerfortbildung: Angebote, Nutzung und Ertr{\"a}ge", das gemeinsam durch die Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Prof. Dr. Dirk Richter) und der Leuphana Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg (Prof. Dr. Marc Kleinknecht) durchgef{\"u}hrt wurde. Ziel des Projektes war die Untersuchung des Angebotes von digitalen bzw. digital-gest{\"u}tzten Fortbildungen f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}fte in den Bundesl{\"a}ndern Berlin, Brandenburg und Schleswig-Holstein. Im Rahmen von vier Teilstudien wurden Datenbankanalysen der Fortbildungsangebote in den jeweiligen L{\"a}ndern sowie schriftliche Befragungen mit Fortbildner*innen sowie Teilnehmer*innen von Online-Fortbildungen durchgef{\"u}hrt. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus wurde eine Online-Fortbildung f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}fte zum Thema Feedback eigens konzipiert und durchgef{\"u}hrt.}, language = {de} } @article{Brandenburger2022, author = {Brandenburger, Bonny}, title = {A multidimensional and analytical perspective on Open Educational Practices in the 21st century}, series = {Frontiers in education}, volume = {7}, journal = {Frontiers in education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2022.990675}, pages = {17}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Participatory approaches to teaching and learning are experiencing a new lease on life in the 21st century as a result of the rapid technology development. Knowledge, practices, and tools can be shared across spatial and temporal boundaries in higher education by means of Open Educational Resources, Massive Open Online Courses, and open-source technologies. In this context, the Open Education Movement calls for new didactic approaches that encourage greater learner participation in formal higher education. Based on a representative literature review and focus group research, in this study an analytical framework was developed that enables researchers and practitioners to assess the form of participation in formal, collaborative teaching and learning practices. The analytical framework is focused on the micro-level of higher education, in particular on the interaction between students and lecturers when organizing the curriculum. For this purpose, the research reflects anew on the concept of participation, taking into account existing stage models for participation in the educational context. These are then brought together with the dimensions of teaching and learning processes, such as methods, objectives and content, etc. This paper aims to make a valuable contribution to the opening up of learning and teaching, and expands the discourse around possibilities for interpreting Open Educational Practices.}, language = {en} } @misc{Brandenburger2022, author = {Brandenburger, Bonny}, title = {A multidimensional and analytical perspective on Open Educational Practices in the 21st century}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschaft- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschaft- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {157}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-58777}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-587770}, pages = {17}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Participatory approaches to teaching and learning are experiencing a new lease on life in the 21st century as a result of the rapid technology development. Knowledge, practices, and tools can be shared across spatial and temporal boundaries in higher education by means of Open Educational Resources, Massive Open Online Courses, and open-source technologies. In this context, the Open Education Movement calls for new didactic approaches that encourage greater learner participation in formal higher education. Based on a representative literature review and focus group research, in this study an analytical framework was developed that enables researchers and practitioners to assess the form of participation in formal, collaborative teaching and learning practices. The analytical framework is focused on the micro-level of higher education, in particular on the interaction between students and lecturers when organizing the curriculum. For this purpose, the research reflects anew on the concept of participation, taking into account existing stage models for participation in the educational context. These are then brought together with the dimensions of teaching and learning processes, such as methods, objectives and content, etc. This paper aims to make a valuable contribution to the opening up of learning and teaching, and expands the discourse around possibilities for interpreting Open Educational Practices.}, language = {en} } @article{HaslVoelkleKretschmannetal.2022, author = {Hasl, Andrea and Voelkle, Manuel and Kretschmann, Julia and Richter, Dirk and Brunner, Martin}, title = {A dynamic structural equation approach to modeling wage dynamics and cumulative advantage across the lifespan}, series = {Multivariate Behavioral Research}, volume = {58}, journal = {Multivariate Behavioral Research}, number = {3}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0027-3171}, doi = {10.1080/00273171.2022.2029339}, pages = {504 -- 525}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Wages and wage dynamics directly affect individuals' and families' daily lives. In this article, we show how major theoretical branches of research on wages and inequality-that is, cumulative advantage (CA), human capital theory, and the lifespan perspective-can be integrated into a coherent statistical framework and analyzed with multilevel dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM). This opens up a new way to empirically investigate the mechanisms that drive growing inequality over time. We demonstrate the new approach by making use of longitudinal, representative U.S. data (NLSY-79). Analyses revealed fundamental between-person differences in both initial wages and autoregressive wage growth rates across the lifespan. Only 0.5\% of the sample experienced a "strict" CA and unbounded wage growth, whereas most individuals revealed logarithmic wage growth over time. Adolescent intelligence and adult educational levels explained substantial heterogeneity in both parameters. We discuss how DSEM may help researchers study CA processes and related developmental dynamics, and we highlight the extensions and limitations of the DSEM framework.}, language = {en} } @book{GaenzHinzHuhnetal.2022, author = {G{\"a}nz, Victoria and Hinz, Carsten and Huhn, Nicola and Klitsch, Constantin and L{\"o}ffler, Robert and Meis, Robin and Penning, Isabelle and Richter, Christin and Schellen, Ricarda and Schr{\"o}dter, Ayla and Schulz, Oliver and Simon, Veronika and Trojecka, Anetta and Verwohlt, Peter and Vogler, Christin and Vogt, Birgit}, title = {\#Gesellschaftslehre 7/8}, volume = {[Sch{\"u}lerband]}, publisher = {C.C. Buchner}, address = {Bamberg}, isbn = {978-3-661-70052-6}, pages = {400}, year = {2022}, language = {de} }