@article{NeuendorfJansenKuhletal.2022, author = {Neuendorf, Claudia and Jansen, Matte and Kuhl, Poldi and Vock, Miriam}, title = {Wer ist leistungsstark?}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie.}, volume = {37}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie.}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {Bern}, issn = {1010-0652}, doi = {10.1024/1010-0652/a000343}, pages = {1 -- 19}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Who is a high achiever? Operationalisation of high achievement in empirical educational research since the year 2000 Abstract. In recent years, high-achieving students have received increased attention by researchers, policymakers and practitioners. However, the question of what exactly constitutes high academic achievement is not yet agreed upon by the research community. This paper provides a systematic review of how researchers studying high-achieving students since 2000 have operationalized high academic achievement in their research. In particular, we examined which performance indicators were used, whether achievement was conceived of as subject-specific or general, and which cut-off values and comparison standards were applied. The systematic database search yielded N = 309 articles, n = 55 of which were finally included in the analysis. The present study observed a diversity in the operationalization of performance. The most commonly used indicators of performance were grades and test scores, with cross-domain and subject-specific definitions both being common. Some of the studies' cut-off values were difficult to compare, but in instances where a population norm could be derived, the median proportion of high achievers was 10 percent. The study discusses that constraints on generalizability and comparability between different studies on high achievers can arise due to methodological differences. This paper concludes with recommendations for the operationalization of high achievement.}, language = {de} } @article{KagerJurczokBollietal.2022, author = {Kager, Klara and Jurczok, Anne and Bolli, Swantje and Vock, Miriam}, title = {We were thinking too much like adults}, series = {Teaching and teacher education : an international journal of research and studies}, volume = {113}, journal = {Teaching and teacher education : an international journal of research and studies}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0742-051X}, doi = {10.1016/j.tate.2022.103683}, pages = {13}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This mixed-method study addresses the need for a clear conceptualization of the professional reflection element of Lesson Study (LS), a popular collaborative approach to the professional development of teachers. Grounding and re-framing LS's post-lesson discussion in a theoretical framework of critical and collaborative reflection, we analyze the transcripts of four LS groups at German primary schools, focusing on depth of reflection and teachers' trajectories through their reflective practice. The findings show that LS groups differed significantly in the depth and the trajectories of their reflection processes. We consider implications for post-lesson discussions and critical reflection as a LS core skill.}, language = {en} } @article{JennekGronostajVock2022, author = {Jennek, Julia and Gronostaj, Anna and Vock, Miriam}, title = {Was und in welchen Situationen lernen Lehramtsstudierende im Praxissemester?}, series = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)}, journal = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)}, number = {2}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-508-8}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-57081}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570816}, pages = {195 -- 214}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Das Praxissemester, in dem die Studierenden mehrere Monate am Schulleben teilhaben, ist ein wichtiger Bestandteil schulpraktischer Ausbildung geworden. Die vielf{\"a}ltigen Ziele schließen den Kompetenzerwerb entsprechend den KMK-Vorgaben sowie die Berufswahl{\"u}berpr{\"u}fung ein. Forschungsbefunde deuten jedoch darauf hin, dass nicht alle erhoff ten Ziele in Schulpraktika auch tats{\"a}chlich erreicht werden. Die konkreten Lernsituationen im Praxissemester standen hingegen bisher wenig im Fokus. Um dies aufzugreifen, interviewten wir f{\"u}r die vorliegende Studie N = 7 Lehramtsstudierende unmittelbar nach Abschluss ihres Praxissemesters zu den von Ihnen wahrgenommenen Lernerfolgen und den Lerngelegenheiten, in denen sie diese erzielten. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Studierenden glauben, vor allem ihre Unterrichts-Kompetenzen weiterentwickelt und sich als Lehrkraft sowie ihre Lehrer:innenpers{\"o}nlichkeit kennengelernt zu haben. Als zentrale Lerngelegenheit benennen sie insbesondere den Austausch mit den Mentorinnen und Mentoren.}, language = {de} } @article{Juchler2022, author = {Juchler, Ingo}, title = {Vor Ort lernen}, series = {Handbuch politische Bildung}, journal = {Handbuch politische Bildung}, publisher = {Wochenschau Verlag}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, isbn = {978-3-7344-1362-9}, issn = {1435-7526}, doi = {10.46499/1694}, pages = {515 -- 523}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{ScherreiksKuhrWilbert2022, author = {Scherreiks, Lynn and Kuhr, Linda and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Ver{\"a}nderung der selbsteingesch{\"a}tzten Kompetenz zur Diagnostik psychischer Auff{\"a}lligkeiten im Psychodiagnostischen Praktikum}, series = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)}, journal = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)}, number = {2}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-508-8}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-57077}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570779}, pages = {171 -- 193}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Dieser Beitrag diskutiert die diagnostischen Kompetenzen Lehramtsstudierender vor allem in Bezug auf internalisierende Verhaltensbesonderheiten. Da diese h{\"a}ufig weniger Einfluss auf den Verlauf des Schulalltags von Lehrpersonen haben als externalisierendes Erleben und Verhalten von Kindern, werden internalisierende Verhaltensbesonderheiten von Kindern h{\"a}ufig seltener wahrgenommen und seltener als p{\"a}dagogisch relevant eingestuft. Daher erfahren diese Kinder oft weniger f{\"o}rderdiagnostische Unterst{\"u}tzung. Mit dem Ziel der Entwicklung diesbez{\"u}glicher diagnostischer Kompetenzen der Studierenden wird das Psychodiagnostische Praktikum (PDP) mit praktischen Abschnitten und begleitenden Seminarsitzungen zeitgleich zum Praxissemester durchgef{\"u}hrt. Um Ver{\"a}nderungen in der Selbstwahrnehmung der Studierenden in Bezug auf ihre diagnostischen Kompetenzen im Rahmen des PDP abzubilden und damit das Gesamtkonzept zu evaluieren, wird ein selbstentwickelter Fragebogen verwendet. Der Beitrag stellt die konzeptuellen Gedanken des Fragebogens sowie die Ergebnisse einer ersten Pilotstudie vor.}, language = {de} } @article{KuehlFehringerMuenzer2022, author = {K{\"u}hl, Tim and Fehringer, Benedict C. O. F. and M{\"u}nzer, Stefan}, title = {Unifying the ability-as-compensator and ability-as-enhancer hypotheses}, series = {Educational psychology review}, volume = {34}, journal = {Educational psychology review}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York}, issn = {1040-726X}, doi = {10.1007/s10648-021-09650-5}, pages = {1063 -- 1095}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Spatial abilities have been found to interact with the design of visualizations in educational materials in different forms: (1) spatial abilities enhanced learning with optimized visual design (ability-as-enhancer) or (2) spatial abilities compensated for suboptimal visual design (ability-as-compensator). A brief review of pertinent studies suggests that these two forms are viewed as mutually exclusive. We propose a novel unifying conceptualization. This conceptualization suggests that the ability-as enhancer interaction will be found in the low-medium range of a broad ability continuum whereas the ability-as-compensator interaction will be found in the medium-high range. The largest difference in learning outcomes between visual design variations is expected for medium ability. A corresponding analytical approach is suggested that includes nonlinear quadratic interactions. The unifying conceptualization was confirmed in an experiment with a consistent visual-spatial task. In addition, the conceptualization was investigated with a reanalysis of pooled data from four multimedia learning experiments. Consistent with the conceptualization, quadratic interactions were found, meaning that interactions depended on ability range. The largest difference between visual design variations was obtained for medium ability, as expected. It is concluded that the unifying conceptualization is a useful theoretical and methodological approach to analyze and interpret aptitude-treatment interactions that go beyond linear interactions.}, language = {en} } @article{DominiqueFuhrmannGoedeletal.2022, author = {Dominique, Last and Fuhrmann, Michaela and G{\"o}del, Corinna and Klages, Benjamin and Klinnert, Anne and Wagner, Nelli}, title = {T{\"a}tigkeitsorientierung in Lehre und Studium - Perspektiven und Implementation}, series = {Handbuch Qualit{\"a}t in Studium, Lehre und Forschung}, journal = {Handbuch Qualit{\"a}t in Studium, Lehre und Forschung}, number = {81}, publisher = {DUZ Verlags- und Medienhaus GmbH}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1614-0451}, pages = {37 -- 58}, year = {2022}, abstract = {T{\"a}tigkeitsorientierung als Maßgabe und Element der Gestaltung von Lehre und Studium ist mehr als die Integration eines Praktikums in das Curriculum. Die Diskussionen an den Hochschulen darum haben in den vergangenen Jahren an Komplexit{\"a}t gewonnen, insbesondere veranlasst durch den Fokus auf „Employability" im Rahmen des Bologna-Prozesses. So wird mittlerweile verst{\"a}rkt theorie- und evidenzbasiert auf die verschiedenen Perspektiven des Begriffs eingegangen, was sich auch in den Strategien der Hochschulen wiederfindet. Entsprechend wird in diesem Beitrag zun{\"a}chst eine Einordnung der T{\"a}tigkeitsorientierung in den gr{\"o}ßeren hochschulpolitischen Rahmen sowie in die Konstrukte studienerfolgsf{\"o}rdernder Faktoren vorgenommen, bevor in einem zweiten Schritt auf die Notwendigkeit und M{\"o}glichkeiten verwiesen wird, wie sich der Stand der jeweilig hochschulspezifischen T{\"a}tigkeitsorientierung erfassen l{\"a}sst. Abschließend soll beispielgebend gezeigt werden, wie Studieninhalte erg{\"a}nzende Beratungen von Studierenden zur Berufsorientierung ausgestaltet werden k{\"o}nnen. Damit wird das Thema der T{\"a}tigkeitsorientierung aus unterschiedlichen Handlungsfeldern in den Blick genommen, um dem Anspruch an ein multiperspektivisches Vorgehen bei der Leitbild-entwicklung Rechnung zu tragen.}, language = {de} } @article{MathiasAndraeSchwageretal.2022, author = {Mathias, Brian and Andr{\"a}, Christian and Schwager, Anika and Macedonia, Manuela and von Kriegstein, Katharina}, title = {Twelve- and fourteen-year-old school children differentially benefit from sensorimotor- and multisensory-enriched vocabulary training}, series = {Educational psychology review}, volume = {34}, journal = {Educational psychology review}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York}, issn = {1040-726X}, doi = {10.1007/s10648-021-09648-z}, pages = {1739 -- 1770}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Both children and adults have been shown to benefit from the integration of multisensory and sensorimotor enrichment into pedagogy. For example, integrating pictures or gestures into foreign language (L2) vocabulary learning can improve learning outcomes relative to unisensory learning. However, whereas adults seem to benefit to a greater extent from sensorimotor enrichment such as the performance of gestures in contrast to multisensory enrichment with pictures, this is not the case in elementary school children. Here, we compared multisensory- and sensorimotor-enriched learning in an intermediate age group that falls between the age groups tested in previous studies (elementary school children and young adults), in an attempt to determine the developmental time point at which children's responses to enrichment mature from a child-like pattern into an adult-like pattern. Twelve-year-old and fourteen-year-old German children were trained over 5 consecutive days on auditorily presented, concrete and abstract, Spanish vocabulary. The vocabulary was learned under picture-enriched, gesture-enriched, and non-enriched (auditory-only) conditions. The children performed vocabulary recall and translation tests at 3 days, 2 months, and 6 months post-learning. Both picture and gesture enrichment interventions were found to benefit children's L2 learning relative to non-enriched learning up to 6 months post-training. Interestingly, gesture-enriched learning was even more beneficial than picture-enriched learning for the 14-year-olds, while the 12-year-olds benefitted equivalently from learning enriched with pictures and gestures. These findings provide evidence for opting to integrate gestures rather than pictures into L2 pedagogy starting at 14 years of age.}, language = {en} } @article{MilosevicBhroinOlafssonetal.2022, author = {Milosevic, Tijana and Bhroin, Niamh Ni and Olafsson, Kjartan and Staksrud, Elisabeth and Wachs, Sebastian}, title = {Time spent online and children's self-reported life satisfaction in Norway}, series = {New media \& society}, journal = {New media \& society}, publisher = {Sage Publ.}, address = {London}, issn = {1461-4448}, doi = {10.1177/14614448221082651}, pages = {22}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Despite public discourses highlighting the negative consequences of time spent online (TSO) for children's well-being, Norwegian children (aged 9-16 years) use the Internet more than other European children and score higher on self-reported life satisfaction (SRLS). To explore the possibility that TSO might contribute to high life satisfaction or other underlying explanatory factors, we investigate the relationship between TSO and SRLS in Norway while also accounting for how individual, family, school, and broader social circumstances influence this relationship. Countering prevailing discourses, we find a positive relationship between TSO and SRLS, which remains positive and significant even after a wider range of variables are accounted for. By explaining the circumstances under which TSO has a positive effect on SRLS, this article provides evidence of the complex role that digital technology plays in the lives of children. It also provides a critique of the often simplistic arguments found in public discourses around children's digital media use.}, language = {en} } @article{KobsEhlertLenkeitetal.2022, author = {Kobs, Scarlett and Ehlert, Antje and Lenkeit, Jenny and Hartmann, Anne Therese and Sporer, Nadine and Knigge, Michel}, title = {The influence of individual and situational factors on teachers' justice ratings of classroom interactions}, series = {Frontiers in psychology}, volume = {13}, journal = {Frontiers in psychology}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.789110}, pages = {18}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Teachers, as role models, are crucial in promoting inclusion in society through their actions. Being perceived as fair by their students is linked to students' feelings of belonging in school. In addition, their decisions of resource allocations also affect students' academic success. Both aspects underpin the importance of teachers' views on justice. This article aims to investigate what teachers consider to be just and how teacher characteristics and situational factors affect justice ratings of hypothetical student-teacher-interactions. In an experimental design, we randomly varied the description of the interacting student in text vignettes regarding his/her special educational need (SEN) (situational factor). We also collected data on teachers' attitudes toward inclusion and experiences with persons with disabilities (individual factors). A sample of in-service teachers in Germany (N = 2,254) rated randomized versions of two text vignettes. To also consider the effect of professional status, a sample of pre-service teachers (N = 275) did the same. Linear mixed effect models point to a negative effect of the SEN on justice ratings, meaning situations in which the interacting student is described with a SEN were rated less just compared to the control condition. As the interacting student in the situations was treated worse than the rest, this was indicative for the application of the need principle. Teachers with more positive attitudes toward inclusion rated the vignettes as significantly less just. Professional status also had a negative effect on justice ratings, with in-service teachers rating the interactions significantly lower than the pre-service teachers. Our results suggest that the teachers applied the principle of need in their ratings. Implications for inclusive teaching practices and future research are discussed further.}, language = {en} }