@article{FischerSiegelProelleretal.2022,
  author    = {Fischer, Caroline and Siegel, John and Proeller, Isabella and Drathschmidt, Nicolas},
  title     = {Resilience through digitalisation},
  series = {Public management review},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Public management review},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1471-9037},
  doi       = {10.1080/14719037.2022.2037014},
  pages     = {808 -- 835},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This article examines public service resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic and studies the switch to telework due to social distancing measures. We argue that the pandemic and related policies led to increasing demands on public organisations and their employees. Following the job demands-resources model, we argue that resilience only can arise in the presence of resources for buffering these demands. Survey data were collected from 1,189 German public employees, 380 participants were included for analysis. The results suggest that the public service was resilient against the crisis and that the shift to telework was not as demanding as expected.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BergstroemKuhlmannLaffinetal.2022,
  author    = {Bergstr{\"o}m, Tomas and Kuhlmann, Sabine and Laffin, Martin and Wayenberg, Ellen},
  title     = {Special issue on comparative intergovernmental relations and the pandemic},
  series = {Local government studies},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {Local government studies},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0300-3930},
  doi       = {10.1080/03003930.2022.2039636},
  pages     = {179 -- 190},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This introduction and the special issue are a contribution to comparative intergovernmental studies and public administration. This introduction provides an analytical overview of the intergovernmental relations policy responses to the Covid-19 pandemic across ten European countries, focussing on the early waves of the disease. These policy responses are analysed in terms of three types of IGR process: (1) a predominantly multi-layered policy process involving limited conflict, (2) a centralised policy process as the central government attempts to suppress conflict and (3) a conflicted policy process where such attempts are contested and tend to contribute to poor policy outcomes. The conclusion, then, reviews the difficulties and trade-offs involved in attaining a balanced multi-layered, intergovernmental process.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Leib2022,
  author    = {Leib, Julia},
  title     = {How justice becomes part of the deal},
  series = {International journal of transitional justice},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {International journal of transitional justice},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1752-7716},
  doi       = {10.1093/ijtj/ijac015},
  pages     = {439 -- 457},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {In which negotiation contexts are transitional justice provisions included in peace agreements? Today, many peace agreements include transitional justice provisions, but their inclusion differs based on conflict and negotiation characteristics. While context thus seems to be relevant for the choice of transitional justice provisions agreed on by the warring parties, very little is known about the context clusters that enable transitional justice. Using data on 58 full peace agreements signed between 1989 and 2018, a crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) investigates the combinations of conflict intensity, rebel group strength, type of conflict, third-party support and civil society participation that led to the inclusion of transitional justice provisions. The result of this exploratory study suggests four context settings that are identified as being empirically relevant for the inclusion of transitional justice provisions. Choices of justice are thus the result of an overall negotiation environment characterized by multiple interrelated context factors.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Grohmann2022,
  author    = {Grohmann, Nils-Hendrik},
  title     = {How to avoid politicised monitoring?},
  series = {V{\"o}lkerrechtsblog : Der Blog des Arbeitskreis junger V{\"o}lkerrechtswissenschaftler*innen},
  journal   = {V{\"o}lkerrechtsblog : Der Blog des Arbeitskreis junger V{\"o}lkerrechtswissenschaftler*innen},
  publisher = {M. Riegner c/o Humboldt-Univ},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2510-2567},
  doi       = {10.17176/20220623-153108-0},
  pages     = {4},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GonzalezHauckHerrmannHettihewaetal.2022,
  author    = {Gonz{\´a}lez Hauck, Su{\´e} and Herrmann, Franziska and Hettihewa, Julian A. and Kraft, Dariush and Milas, Max and Springer, Stephanie and Weckner, Franka},
  title     = {Jurisdiction},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r ausl{\"a}ndisches {\"o}ffentliches Recht und V{\"o}lkerrecht},
  volume    = {82},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r ausl{\"a}ndisches {\"o}ffentliches Recht und V{\"o}lkerrecht},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {C.H. Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {0044-2348},
  doi       = {10.17104/0044-2348-2022-2-289},
  pages     = {289 -- 298},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}