@article{Wagner2020, author = {Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Vollstreckungsabwehrantrag vor deutschen Gerichten gegen Unterhaltstitel aus anderen Mitgliedstaaten der EU-Unterhaltsverordnung?}, series = {Neue Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Familienrecht}, volume = {7}, journal = {Neue Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Familienrecht}, number = {17}, publisher = {C.H. Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {2198-2333}, pages = {741 -- 746}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{Wagner2020, author = {Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Ehescheidung nach italienischem Recht}, series = {Neue Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Familienrecht}, volume = {7}, journal = {Neue Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Familienrecht}, number = {21}, publisher = {C.H. Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {2198-2333}, pages = {937 -- 943}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{Wagner2022, author = {Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Grundz{\"u}ge der EuGVVO}, series = {Juristische Ausbildung}, volume = {44}, journal = {Juristische Ausbildung}, number = {1}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0170-1452}, doi = {10.1515/jura-2021-2864}, pages = {1 -- 9}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{Wagner2021, author = {Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Grundz{\"u}ge der EuGVVO}, series = {Juristische Ausbildung}, volume = {43}, journal = {Juristische Ausbildung}, number = {12}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0170-1452}, doi = {10.1515/jura-2021-2863}, pages = {1409 -- 1417}, year = {2021}, language = {de} } @article{ManselThornWagner2022, author = {Mansel, Heinz-Peter and Thorn, Karsten and Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Europ{\"a}isches Kollisionsrecht 2021}, series = {Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts}, volume = {42}, journal = {Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts}, number = {2}, publisher = {Gieseking}, address = {Bielefeld}, issn = {0720-6585}, pages = {97 -- 140}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This article provides an overview of developments in Brussels in the field of judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters from January 2021 until December 2021. It gives information on newly adopted legal instruments and summarizes current projects that are presently making their way through the EU legislative process. It also refers to the laws enacted at the national level in Germany as a result of new European instruments. Furthermore, the authors look at areas of law where the EU has made use of its external competence. They discuss both important decisions and pending cases before the CJEU as well as important decisions from German courts pertaining to the subject matter of the article. In addition, the article also looks at current projects and the latest developments at the Hague Conference of Private International Law.}, language = {de} } @article{ManselThornWagner2021, author = {Mansel, Heinz-Peter and Thorn, Karsten and Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Europ{\"a}isches Kollisionsrecht 2020}, series = {Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts}, volume = {41}, journal = {Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts}, number = {2}, publisher = {Gieseking}, address = {Bielefeld}, issn = {0720-6585}, pages = {105 -- 139}, year = {2021}, abstract = {This article provides an overview of developments in Brussels in the field of judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters from December 2019 until December 2020. It provides an overview of newly adopted legal instruments and summarizes current projects that are presently making their way through the EU legislative process. It also refers to the laws enacted at the national level in Germany as a result of new European instruments. Furthermore, the authors look at areas of law where the EU has made use of its external competence. They discuss both important decisions and pending cases before the CJEU as well as important decisions from German courts pertaining to the subject matter of the article. In addition, the article also looks at current projects and the latest developments at the Hague Conference of Private International Law.}, language = {de} } @article{ManselThornWagner2023, author = {Mansel, Heinz-Peter and Thorn, Karsten and Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Europ{\"a}isches Kollisionsrecht 2022}, series = {Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts}, volume = {43}, journal = {Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts}, number = {2}, publisher = {Gieseking}, address = {Bielefeld}, issn = {0720-6585}, pages = {109 -- 145}, year = {2023}, abstract = {This article provides an overview of developments in Brussels in the field of judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters from January 2022 until December 2022. It presents newly adopted legal instruments and summarizes current projects that are making their way through the EU legislative process. It also refers to the laws enacted at the national level in Germany as a result of new European instruments. Furthermore, the authors look at areas of law where the EU has made use of its external competence. They discuss both important decisions and pending cases before the CJEU as well as important decisions from German courts pertaining to the subject matter of the article. In addition, the article also looks at current projects and the latest developments at the Hague Conference of Private International Law.}, language = {de} } @article{ManselThornWagner2020, author = {Mansel, Heinz-Peter and Thorn, Karsten and Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Europ{\"a}isches Kollisionsrecht 2019}, series = {Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts}, volume = {40}, journal = {Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts}, number = {2}, publisher = {Gieseking}, address = {Bielefeld}, issn = {0720-6585}, pages = {97 -- 126}, year = {2020}, abstract = {This article provides an overview of developments in Brussels in the field of judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters from January/February 2019 until November 2019. It provides an overview of newly adopted legal instruments and summarizes current projects that are presently making their way through the EU legislative process. It also refers to the laws enacted at the national level in Germany as a result of new European instruments. Furthermore, the authors look at areas of law where the EU has made use of its external competence. They discuss important decisions of the CJEU. In addition, the article looks at current projects and the latest developments at the Hague Conference of Private International Law.}, language = {de} } @article{Wagner2020, author = {Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Aktuelle deutsche Rechtsprechung zur EuErbVO}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erbrecht und Verm{\"o}gensnachfolge}, volume = {27}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erbrecht und Verm{\"o}gensnachfolge}, number = {4}, publisher = {C.H. Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {0945-4969}, pages = {204 -- 209}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Mit der Erbrechtsverordnung (EuErbVO) hat der Europ{\"a}ische Gesetzgeber in vielerlei Hinsicht juristisches Neuland betreten. Es ist daher nicht verwunderlich, dass die Instanzgerichte immer wieder mit der Auslegung dieser facettenreichen Verordnung befasst sind. Nachdem nunmehr bereits die erste Entscheidung des BGH zur EuErbVO vorliegt, gibt der folgende Beitrag einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber die aktuelle deutsche Rechtsprechung zu dieser Verordnung (einschließlich des IntErbRVG).}, language = {de} } @article{JanzenWagner2022, author = {Janzen, Ulrike and Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Die IntFamRVG-Novelle nach der Neufassung der EuEheVO}, series = {IPRax : Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts}, volume = {42}, journal = {IPRax : Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts}, number = {6}, publisher = {Gieseking}, address = {Bielefeld}, issn = {0720-6585}, pages = {545 -- 552}, year = {2022}, abstract = {When the original version of the Brussels II Regulation was adopted in 2000, it was not certain whether this regulation would be such a success. In the meantime, the regulation has become one of the most important legal instruments for judicial cooperation in civil matters. The regulation has recently been revised for the second time. The following article presents the German implementing rules for this recast.}, language = {de} } @article{Wagner2020, author = {Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der justiziellen Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen}, series = {Neue juristische Wochenschrift}, volume = {73}, journal = {Neue juristische Wochenschrift}, number = {26}, publisher = {C.H. Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {0341-1915}, pages = {1864 -- 1870}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Ankn{\"u}pfend an den letztj{\"a}hrigen Bericht des Autors (Wagner NJW 2019, NJW Jahr 2019 Seite 1782) informiert dieser Beitrag die Praxis {\"u}ber die j{\"u}ngsten rechtsvereinheitlichenden Arbeiten in Br{\"u}ssel in der justiziellen Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen sowie {\"u}ber den Stand der deutschen „Begleitgesetzgebung". Dar{\"u}ber hinaus wird die aktuelle Rechtsprechung des EuGH zur justiziellen Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen vorgestellt.}, language = {de} } @article{RuppertWoelfel2022, author = {Ruppert, Felix and W{\"o}lfel, Svenja}, title = {Der N{\"o}tigungsnotstand oder: Ich hatte doch keine Wahl}, series = {Juristische Arbeitsbl{\"a}tter}, volume = {54}, journal = {Juristische Arbeitsbl{\"a}tter}, number = {12}, publisher = {C.H. Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {0720-6356}, pages = {989 -- 993}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Wenn auch der Begriff ab und an anklingt, so fristet der N{\"o}tigungsnotstand doch weitgehend ein Schattendasein in der juristischen Ausbildung. Dabei wartet er in der Klausur mit zahlreichen Problemen auf, welche von der mittelbaren T{\"a}terschaft {\"u}ber eine Rechtfertigung oder Entschuldigung bis hin zu einem Erlaubnistatbestandsirrtum reichen k{\"o}nnen. Bereits deshalb d{\"u}rfte der N{\"o}tigungsnotstand viele Klausurersteller in Versuchung f{\"u}hren - und viele Studierende in die Verzweiflung treiben. Dieser Beitrag will daher die klausurrelevanten Problemkreise des N{\"o}tigungsnotstands darstellen, um so Sicherheit f{\"u}r die Klausurbearbeitung zu gewinnen.}, language = {de} } @article{Mitsch2020, author = {Mitsch, Wolfgang}, title = {Fortgeschrittenen- und Examensklausur: ein mitleidiger Einbrecher}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das juristische Studium}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das juristische Studium}, number = {6}, publisher = {T. Rotsch}, address = {Gießen}, issn = {1865-6331}, pages = {634 -- 639}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Der erste Teil der Aufgabe (Ausgangsfall) hat den Schwierigkeitsgrad einer anspruchsvollen Klausur in der Fortgeschrittenen-{\"U}bung im Strafrecht. Ihre erfolgreiche Bew{\"a}ltigung setzt neben soliden Rechtskenntnissen im thematischen Bereich des R{\"u}cktritts vom Versuch vor allem genaue Erfassung aller relevanten Sachverhaltsangaben und pr{\"a}zise Subsumtion voraus. Mit der Abwandlung hat die Aufgabe Umfang und Schwierigkeitsgrad einer mittelschweren Klausur in der ersten Juristischen Pr{\"u}fung.}, language = {de} } @article{Mitsch2022, author = {Mitsch, Wolfgang}, title = {Der fehlgeschlagene Versuch der qualifizierten Straftat}, series = {Goltdammer's Archiv f{\"u}r Strafrecht}, volume = {169}, journal = {Goltdammer's Archiv f{\"u}r Strafrecht}, number = {11}, publisher = {C.F. M{\"u}ller}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {0017-1956}, pages = {618 -- 635}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{Gasser2020, author = {Gasser, Lucas}, title = {»Das Spiel mit den Ersatzteilen«}, series = {Juristische Ausbildung}, volume = {42}, journal = {Juristische Ausbildung}, number = {8}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0170-1452}, doi = {10.1515/jura-2019-2226}, pages = {835 -- 844}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{Drathschmidt2021, author = {Drathschmidt, Nicolas}, title = {Den Austausch f{\"o}rdern}, series = {Kommune 21 : e-Government, Internet und Informationstechnik}, volume = {21}, journal = {Kommune 21 : e-Government, Internet und Informationstechnik}, number = {3}, publisher = {K21 media GmbH}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, issn = {1618-2901}, pages = {12 -- 14}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Eine große Herausforderung f{\"u}r die {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung ist es, Wissen effektiv zu erhalten und untereinander auszutauschen. Eine Organisationsuntersuchung in einem brandenburgischen Landkreis zeigt, welche Chancen kommunales Wissensmanagement bereith{\"a}lt.}, language = {de} } @article{SiegelFischerDrathschmidtetal.2020, author = {Siegel, John and Fischer, Caroline and Drathschmidt, Nicolas and Gelep, Adrian and Kralinski, Thomas}, title = {Verwaltung im Lockdown}, series = {Verwaltung \& Management}, volume = {26}, journal = {Verwaltung \& Management}, number = {6}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {0947-9856}, doi = {10.5771/0947-9856-2020-6-279}, pages = {279 -- 287}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Die Corona-Pandemie hat im Fr{\"u}hjahr 2020 auch die {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung gezwungen, die Arbeit zu einem großen Teil ins Homeoffice zu verlagern. Dieser Beitrag stellt die Ergebnisse einer Studie vor, die mittels qualitativer Interviews und einer Online-Befragung (N=1.189) Besch{\"a}ftigte {\"o}ffentlicher Organisationen zum Umgang mit der Krise und den Erfahrungen mit dem Homeoffice befragt hat.}, language = {de} } @article{FischerSiegelProelleretal.2022, author = {Fischer, Caroline and Siegel, John and Proeller, Isabella and Drathschmidt, Nicolas}, title = {Resilience through digitalisation}, series = {Public management review}, volume = {25}, journal = {Public management review}, number = {4}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis}, address = {London}, issn = {1471-9037}, doi = {10.1080/14719037.2022.2037014}, pages = {808 -- 835}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This article examines public service resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic and studies the switch to telework due to social distancing measures. We argue that the pandemic and related policies led to increasing demands on public organisations and their employees. Following the job demands-resources model, we argue that resilience only can arise in the presence of resources for buffering these demands. Survey data were collected from 1,189 German public employees, 380 participants were included for analysis. The results suggest that the public service was resilient against the crisis and that the shift to telework was not as demanding as expected.}, language = {en} } @article{HickmannWiderbergLedereretal.2021, author = {Hickmann, Thomas and Widerberg, Oscar and Lederer, Markus and Pattberg, Philipp H.}, title = {The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policymaking}, series = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration}, volume = {87}, journal = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration}, number = {1}, publisher = {Sage}, address = {Los Angeles, Calif. [u.a.]}, issn = {0020-8523}, doi = {10.1177/0020852319840425}, pages = {21 -- 38}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Scholars have recently devoted increasing attention to the role and function of international bureaucracies in global policymaking. Some of them contend that international public officials have gained significant political influence in various policy fields. Compared to other international bureaucracies, the political leeway of the Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change has been considered rather limited. Due to the specific problem structure of the policy domain of climate change, national governments endowed this intergovernmental treaty secretariat with a relatively narrow mandate. However, this article argues that in the past few years, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat has gradually loosened its straitjacket and expanded its original spectrum of activity by engaging different sub-national and non-state actors into a policy dialogue using facilitative orchestration as a mode of governance. The present article explores the recent evolution of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat and investigates the way in which it initiates, guides, broadens and strengthens sub-national and non-state climate actions to achieve progress in the international climate negotiations.
Points for practitioners
The Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change has lately adopted new roles and functions in global climate policymaking. While previously seen as a rather technocratic body that, first and foremost, serves national governments, the Climate Secretariat increasingly interacts with sub-national governments, civil society organizations and private companies to push the global response to climate change forward. We contend that the Climate Secretariat can contribute to global climate policymaking by coordinating and steering the initiatives of non-nation-state actors towards coherence and good practice.}, language = {en} } @article{Lettl2020, author = {Lettl, Tobias}, title = {F{\"a}lle zum Gesellschaftsrecht}, series = {Juristische Fall-L{\"o}sungen}, journal = {Juristische Fall-L{\"o}sungen}, edition = {4., neu bearbeitete Auflage}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-74054-1}, pages = {XIIII, 217}, year = {2020}, language = {de} }