@article{BuergerHeistermann2023, author = {B{\"u}rger, Gerd and Heistermann, Maik}, title = {Shallow and deep learning of extreme rainfall events from convective atmospheres}, series = {Natural hazards and earth system sciences : NHESS}, volume = {23}, journal = {Natural hazards and earth system sciences : NHESS}, number = {9}, publisher = {European Geophysical Society}, address = {Katlenburg-Lindau}, issn = {1561-8633}, doi = {10.5194/nhess-23-3065-2023}, pages = {3065 -- 3077}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Our subject is a new catalogue of radar-based heavy rainfall events (CatRaRE) over Germany and how it relates to the concurrent atmospheric circulation. We classify daily ERA5 fields of convective indices according to CatRaRE, using an array of 13 statistical methods, consisting of 4 conventional ("shallow") and 9 more recent deep machine learning (DL) algorithms; the classifiers are then applied to corresponding fields of simulated present and future atmospheres from the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) project. The inherent uncertainty of the DL results from the stochastic nature of their optimization is addressed by employing an ensemble approach using 20 runs for each network. The shallow random forest method performs best with an equitable threat score (ETS) around 0.52, followed by the DL networks ALL-CNN and ResNet with an ETS near 0.48. Their success can be understood as a result of conceptual simplicity and parametric parsimony, which obviously best fits the relatively simple classification task. It is found that, on summer days, CatRaRE convective atmospheres over Germany occur with a probability of about 0.5. This probability is projected to increase, regardless of method, both in ERA5-reanalyzed and CORDEX-simulated atmospheres: for the historical period we find a centennial increase of about 0.2 and for the future period one of slightly below 0.1.}, language = {en} } @article{WortmannGischBergmannetal.2023, author = {Wortmann, Hanna Rosalie and Gisch, Ulrike Alexandra and Bergmann, Manuela M. and Warschburger, Petra}, title = {Exploring the longitudinal stability of food neophilia and dietary quality and their prospective relationship in older adults}, series = {Nutrients}, volume = {15}, journal = {Nutrients}, number = {5}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2072-6643}, doi = {10.3390/nu15051248}, pages = {16}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Poor dietary quality is a major cause of morbidity, making the promotion of healthy eating a societal priority. Older adults are a critical target group for promoting healthy eating to enable healthy aging. One factor suggested to promote healthy eating is the willingness to try unfamiliar foods, referred to as food neophilia. This two-wave longitudinal study explored the stability of food neophilia and dietary quality and their prospective relationship over three years, analyzing self-reported data from N = 960 older adults (MT1 = 63.4, range = 50-84) participating in the NutriAct Family Study (NFS) in a cross-lagged panel design. Dietary quality was rated using the NutriAct diet score, based on the current evidence for chronic disease prevention. Food neophilia was measured using the Variety Seeking Tendency Scale. The analyses revealed high a longitudinal stability of both constructs and a small positive cross-sectional correlation between them. Food neophilia had no prospective effect on dietary quality, whereas a very small positive prospective effect of dietary quality on food neophilia was found. Our findings give initial insights into the positive relation of food neophilia and a health-promoting diet in aging and underscore the need for more in-depth research, e.g., on the constructs' developmental trajectories and potential critical windows of opportunity for promoting food neophilia.}, language = {en} } @techreport{HerloUllrichVladova2023, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Herlo, Bianca and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Sustainable digital sovereignty}, series = {Weizenbaum series}, volume = {32}, journal = {Weizenbaum series}, publisher = {Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society - the German Internet Institute}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2748-5587}, doi = {10.34669/WI.WS/32}, pages = {39}, year = {2023}, abstract = {This study is dedicated to the interdependencies between digital sovereignty and sustainable digitalization, which need to be explicitly linked to an increasing degree in political discourse, academia, and societal debates. Digital skills are the prerequisites for shaping digitalization in the interest of society and sustainable development.}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaUllrichSloaneetal.2023, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Sloane, Mona and Renz, Andr{\´e} and Tsui, Eric}, title = {Editorial: new teaching and learning worlds}, series = {Frontiers in education}, volume = {8}, journal = {Frontiers in education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2023.1175498}, pages = {1 -- 3}, year = {2023}, language = {en} } @incollection{Botsch2023, author = {Botsch, Gideon}, title = {Hundert Jahre Erziehung zu Gewalt und Hass}, series = {Jugendarbeit, Polizei und rechte Jugendliche in den 1990er Jahren}, booktitle = {Jugendarbeit, Polizei und rechte Jugendliche in den 1990er Jahren}, editor = {Bock, Vero and J{\"a}nicke, Christin and Kopke, Christoph and Lehnert, Esther and Mildenberger, Helene}, edition = {1. Auflage}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim ; Basel}, isbn = {978-3-7799-7294-5}, pages = {106 -- 117}, year = {2023}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{EsveldVriesBecchettietal.2023, author = {Esveld, Selma van and Vries, Nardo de and Becchetti, Sibilla and Dopper, Sofia and Valkenburg, Willem van and Carlon, May Kristine Jonson and Yokoi, Kensuke and Gayed, John Maurice and Suyama, Hiroshi and Cross, Jeffrey Scott and Jin, Tonje and Xue, Wei and Bruillard, {\´E}ric and Steinbeck, Hendrik and Meinel, Christoph and {\"O}zdemir, Paker Doğu and Can Bayer, Burak and Mercan, Duygu and Buyurucu, Gamze and Haugsbakken, Halvdan and Hagelia, Marianne and Ebner, Martin and Edelsbrunner, Sarah and Hohla-Sejkora, Katharina and Lipp, Silvia and Sch{\"o}n, Sandra and Xiaoxiao, Wang and Shuangshuang, Guo and Morales-Chan, Miguel and Amado-Salvatierra, H{\´e}ctor R. and Hern{\´a}ndez-Rizzardini, Rocael and Egloffstein, Marc and H{\"u}nemohr, Holger and Ifenthaler, Dirk and Dixon, Fred and Trabucchi, Stefania and Khaneboubi, Mehdi and Giannatelli, Ada and Tomasini, Alessandra and Staubitz, Thomas and Serth, Sebastian and Thomas, Max and Koschutnig-Ebner, Markus and Rampelt, Florian and Stetten, Alexander von and Wittke, Andreas and Theeraroungchaisri, Anuchai and Thammetar, Thapanee and Duangchinda, Vorasuang and Khlaisang, Jintavee and Mair, Bettina and Steinkellner, Iris and Stojcevic, Ivana and Zwiauer, Charlotte and Thirouard, Maria and Vill{\`e}sbrunne, Marie de la and Bernaert, Oliver and Nohr, Magnus and Alario Hoyos, Carlos and Delgado Kloos, Carlos and Kiendl, Doris and Terzieva, Liliya and Concia, Francesca and Distler, Petr and Law, Gareth and Macerata, Elena and Mariani, Mario and Mossini, Eros and Negrin, Maddalena and Štrok, Marko and Neub{\"o}ck, Kristina and Linschinger, Nadine and Lorenz, Anja and Bock, Stefanie and Schulte-Ostermann, Juleka and Moura Santos, Ana and Corti, Paola and Costa, Luis Felipe Coimbra and Utunen, Heini and Attias, Melissa and Tokar, Anna and Kennedy, Eileen and Laurillard, Diana and Zeitoun, Samar and Wasilewski, Julie and Shlaka, Souhad and Ouahib, Sara and Berrada, Khalid and Dietz, Michael and Roth, Dennis}, title = {EMOOCs 2023}, editor = {Meinel, Christoph and Schweiger, Stefanie and Staubitz, Thomas and Conrad, Robert and Alario Hoyos, Carlos and Ebner, Martin and Sancassani, Susanna and Żur, Agnieszka and Friedl, Christian and Halawa, Sherif and Gamage, Dilrukshi and Cross, Jeffrey and Jonson Carlon, May Kristine and Deville, Yves and Gaebel, Michael and Delgado Kloos, Carlos and von Schmieden, Karen}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-57645}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-576450}, year = {2023}, abstract = {From June 14 to June 16, 2023, Hasso Plattner Institute, Potsdam, hosted the eighth European MOOC Stakeholder Summit (EMOOCs 2023). The pandemic is fortunately over. It has once again shown how important digital education is. How well-prepared a country was could be seen in our schools, universities, and companies. In different countries, the problems manifested themselves differently. The measures and approaches to solving the problems varied accordingly. Digital education, whether micro-credentials, MOOCs, blended learning formats, or other e-learning tools, received a major boost. EMOOCs 2023 focusses on the effects of this emergency situation. How has it affected the development and delivery of MOOCs and other e-learning offerings all over Europe? Which projects can serve as models for successful digital learning and teaching? Which roles can MOOCs and micro-credentials bear in the current business transformation? Is there a backlash to the routine we knew from pre-Corona times? Or have many things become firmly established in the meantime, e.g. remote work, hybrid conferences, etc.? Furthermore, EMOOCs 2023 has a closer look at the development and formalization of digital learning. Micro-credentials are just the starting point. Further steps in this direction would be complete online study programs or full online universities. Another main topic is the networking of learning offers and the standardization of formats and metadata. Examples of fruitful cooperations are the MOOChub, the European MOOC Consortium, and the Common Micro-Credential Framework. The learnings, derived from practical experience and research, are explored in EMOOCs 2023 in four tracks and additional workshops, covering various aspects of this field. In this publication, we present papers from the conference's Research \& Experience Track, the Business Track and the International Track.}, language = {en} } @incollection{GonnermannBrandenburgerVladovaetal.2023, author = {Gonnermann, Jana and Brandenburger, Bonny and Vladova, Gergana and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {To what extent can individualisation in terms of different types of mode improve learning outcomes and learner satisfaction?}, series = {Proceedings of the 56th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences January 3-6, 2023}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 56th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences January 3-6, 2023}, editor = {Bui, Tung X.}, publisher = {Department of IT Management Shidler College of Business University of Hawaii}, address = {Honolulu, HI}, isbn = {978-0-9981331-6-4}, pages = {123 -- 132}, year = {2023}, abstract = {With the latest technological developments and associated new possibilities in teaching, the personalisation of learning is gaining more and more importance. It assumes that individual learning experiences and results could generally be improved when personal learning preferences are considered. To do justice to the complexity of the personalisation possibilities of teaching and learning processes, we illustrate the components of learning and teaching in the digital environment and their interdependencies in an initial model. Furthermore, in a pre-study, we investigate the relationships between the learner's ability to (digital) self-organise, the learner's prior- knowledge learning in different variants of mode and learning outcomes as one part of this model. With this pre-study, we are taking the first step towards a holistic model of teaching and learning in digital environments.}, language = {en} } @article{StoneNicenboimVasishthetal.2023, author = {Stone, Kate and Nicenboim, Bruno and Vasishth, Shravan and R{\"o}sler, Frank}, title = {Understanding the effects of constraint and predictability in ERP}, series = {Neurobiology of language}, volume = {4}, journal = {Neurobiology of language}, number = {2}, publisher = {MIT Press}, address = {Cambridge, MA, USA}, issn = {2641-4368}, doi = {10.1162/nol_a_00094}, pages = {221 -- 256}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Intuitively, strongly constraining contexts should lead to stronger probabilistic representations of sentences in memory. Encountering unexpected words could therefore be expected to trigger costlier shifts in these representations than expected words. However, psycholinguistic measures commonly used to study probabilistic processing, such as the N400 event-related potential (ERP) component, are sensitive to word predictability but not to contextual constraint. Some research suggests that constraint-related processing cost may be measurable via an ERP positivity following the N400, known as the anterior post-N400 positivity (PNP). The PNP is argued to reflect update of a sentence representation and to be distinct from the posterior P600, which reflects conflict detection and reanalysis. However, constraint-related PNP findings are inconsistent. We sought to conceptually replicate Federmeier et al. (2007) and Kuperberg et al. (2020), who observed that the PNP, but not the N400 or the P600, was affected by constraint at unexpected but plausible words. Using a pre-registered design and statistical approach maximising power, we demonstrated a dissociated effect of predictability and constraint: strong evidence for predictability but not constraint in the N400 window, and strong evidence for constraint but not predictability in the later window. However, the constraint effect was consistent with a P600 and not a PNP, suggesting increased conflict between a strong representation and unexpected input rather than greater update of the representation. We conclude that either a simple strong/weak constraint design is not always sufficient to elicit the PNP, or that previous PNP constraint findings could be an artifact of smaller sample size.}, language = {en} } @article{PollatosMoenkemoellerGroppeetal.2023, author = {Pollatos, Olga and M{\"o}nkem{\"o}ller, Karla and Groppe, Karoline and Elsner, Birgit}, title = {Interoceptive accuracy is associated with benefits in decision making in children}, series = {Frontiers in psychology}, volume = {13}, journal = {Frontiers in psychology}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1070037}, pages = {13}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Introduction: Decision making results not only from logical analyses, but seems to be further guided by the ability to perceive somatic information (interoceptive accuracy). Relations between interoceptive accuracy and decision making have been exclusively studied in adults and with regard to complex, uncertain situations (as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task, IGT). Methods: In the present study, 1454 children (6-11 years) were examined at two time points (approximately 1 year apart) using an IGT as well as a delay-of-gratification task for sweets-items and toy-items. Interoceptive accuracy was measured using a child-adapted version of the Heartbeat Perception Task. Results: The present results revealed that children with higher, as compared to lower, interoceptive accuracy showed more advantageous choices in the IGT and delayed more sweets-items, but not toy-items, in a delay-of-gratification task at time point 2 but not at time point 1. However, no longitudinal relation between interoceptive accuracy and decision making 1 year later could be shown. Discussion: Results indicate that interoceptive accuracy relates to decision-making abilities in situations of varying complexity already in middle childhood, and that this link might consolidate across the examined 1-year period. Furthermore, the association of interoceptive accuracy and the delay of sweets-items might have implications for the regulation of body weight at a later age.}, language = {en} } @article{Haenel2023, author = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje C.}, title = {(Moralisch) guter Sex}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praktische Philosophie}, volume = {9}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praktische Philosophie}, number = {2}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Salzburg}, address = {Salzburg}, issn = {2409-9961}, doi = {10.22613/zfpp/9.2.2}, pages = {49 -- 78}, year = {2023}, abstract = {In einem k{\"u}rzlich erschienenen Artikel argumentiert Almut v. Wedelstaedt {\"u}berzeugend, warum Zustimmung zwar „die Bedingung f{\"u}r die Legitimation von Sex" ist (2020, 127), dass die moralische G{\"u}te von Sex aber nur dann einzusch{\"a}tzen ist, wenn wir darauf achten, ob die Beteiligten der Handlung sich auf Augenh{\"o}he begegnen. Die Idee ist: Es gibt legitime sexuelle Handlungen, die moralisch gut sind, und es gibt legitime sexuelle Handlungen, die moralisch besser sind. Hier m{\"o}chte ich die Idee des besseren Sexes genauer ausloten. W{\"a}hrend v. Wedelstaedt von moralisch gelungenem Sex spricht und somit auf der Ebene der moralischen Bewertung von Sex bleibt, m{\"o}chte ich die Frage danach stellen, was Sex qualitativ gut macht. Tats{\"a}chlich wird in der Zustimmungsdebatte meist davon ausgegangen, dass diese zwei Fragen wenig gemeinsam haben; ob eine sexuelle Handlung legitim ist, hat zun{\"a}chst nichts damit zu tun, ob diese auch gut ist. Ich werde drei Argumente liefern, warum wir legitimen Sex und qualitativ guten Sex zusammen betrachten sollten - und es wird sich zeigen, dass die gegenw{\"a}rtige philosophische und rechtstheoretische Debatte Zustimmung verk{\"u}rzt diskutiert und daher alleingenommen wenig hilfreich ist, stattdessen ben{\"o}tigt die Zustimmungsdebatte auch eine Untersuchung von qualitativ gutem Sex.}, language = {de} }