@inproceedings{VinkBenagliaDaviesetal.2007,
  author    = {Vink, J. S. and Benaglia, P. and Davies, B. and de Koter, A. and Oudmaijer, R. D.},
  title     = {Advances in mass-loss predictions},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-17948},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {We present the results of Monte Carlo mass-loss predictions for massive stars covering a wide range of stellar parameters. We critically test our predictions against a range of observed massloss rates - in light of the recent discussions on wind clumping. We also present a model to compute the clumping-induced polarimetric variability of hot stars and we compare this with observations of Luminous Blue Variables, for which polarimetric variability is larger than for O and Wolf-Rayet stars. Luminous Blue Variables comprise an ideal testbed for studies of wind clumping and wind geometry, as well as for wind strength calculations, and we propose they may be direct supernova progenitors.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{deKoterVinkMuijres2007,
  author    = {de Koter, A. and Vink, J. S. and Muijres, L.},
  title     = {Constraints on wind clumping from the empirical mass-loss vs. metallicity relation for early-type stars},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-17736},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {We present the latest results on the observational dependence of the mass-loss rate in stellar winds of O and early-B stars on the metal content of their atmospheres, and compare these with predictions. Absolute empirical rates for the mass loss of stars brighter than 10\$^{5.2} L_{\odot}\$, based on H\$\alpha\$ and ultraviolet (UV) wind lines, are found to be about a factor of two higher than predictions. If this difference is attributed to inhomogeneities in the wind this would imply that luminous O and early-B stars have clumping factors in their H\$\alpha\$ and UV line forming regime of about a factor of 3--5. The investigated stars cover a metallicity range \$Z\$ from 0.2 to 1 \$Z_{\odot}\$. We find a hint towards smaller clumping factors for lower \$Z\$. The derived clumping factors, however, presuppose that clumping does not impact the predictions of the mass-loss rate. We discuss this assumption and explain how we intend to investigate its validity in more detail.},
  language  = {en}
}