@article{Ganghof2019, author = {Ganghof, Steffen}, title = {Designing Democratic Constitutions}, series = {Politics and Governance}, volume = {7}, journal = {Politics and Governance}, number = {4}, publisher = {Cogitatio Press}, address = {Lisbon}, issn = {2183-2463}, doi = {10.17645/pag.v7i4.2239}, pages = {243 -- 253}, year = {2019}, abstract = {This article analyses salient trade-offs in the design of democracy. It grounds this analysis in a distinction between two basic models of democracy: simple and complex majoritarianism. These models differ not only in their electoral and party systems, but also in the style of coalition-building. Simple majoritarianism concentrates executive power in a single majority party; complex majoritarianism envisions the formation of shifting, issue-specific coalitions among multiple parties whose programs differ across multiple conflict dimensions. The latter pattern of coalition formation is very difficult to create and sustain under pure parliamentary government. A separation of powers between executive and legislature can facilitate such a pattern, while also achieving central goals of simple majoritarianism: identifiable cabinet alternatives before the election and stable cabinets afterward. The separation of powers can thus balance simple and complex majoritarianism in ways that are unavailable under parliamentarism. The article also compares the presidential and semi-parliamentary versions of the separation of powers. It argues that the latter has important advantages, e.g., when it comes to resolving inter-branch deadlock, as it avoids the concentration of executive power in a single human being.}, language = {en} } @article{Ganghof2016, author = {Ganghof, Steffen}, title = {Reconciling Representation and Accountability: Three Visions of Democracy Compared}, series = {Government \& opposition : an international journal of comparative politics}, volume = {51}, journal = {Government \& opposition : an international journal of comparative politics}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {0017-257X}, doi = {10.1017/gov.2015.15}, pages = {209 -- 233}, year = {2016}, abstract = {An egalitarian approach to the fair representation of voters specifies three main institutional requirements: proportional representation, legislative majority rule and a parliamentary system of government. This approach faces two challenges: the under-determination of the resulting democratic process and the idea of a trade-off between equal voter representation and government accountability. Linking conceptual with comparative analysis, the article argues that we can distinguish three ideal-typical varieties of the egalitarian vision of democracy, based on the stages at which majorities are formed. These varieties do not put different relative normative weight onto equality and accountability, but have different conceptions of both values and their reconciliation. The view that accountability is necessarily linked to 'clarity of responsibility', widespread in the comparative literature, is questioned - as is the idea of a general trade-off between representation and accountability. Depending on the vision of democracy, the two values need not be in conflict.}, language = {en} } @article{Ganghof2015, author = {Ganghof, Steffen}, title = {Four Visions of Democracy: Powell's Elections as Instruments of Democracy and beyond}, series = {Political studies review}, volume = {13}, journal = {Political studies review}, number = {1}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {1478-9299}, doi = {10.1111/1478-9302.12069}, pages = {69 -- 79}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The article critically reviews the conceptual ideas of G. Bingham Powell's Elections as Instruments of Democracy and explores ways to develop them further. Powell's conceptual alternative to the Westminster model - the 'proportional' vision of democracy - comes in two variants, one focusing on proportional representation ( PR) and the other on proportional legislative influence. If one focuses on the former, it is possible to distinguish four visions of parliamentary democracy based on the main stage at which majorities are formed. The four stages are: party, alliance, cabinet, and law formation. The corresponding normative visions can be placed on a conceptual continuum between 'simple' and 'complex' majoritarianism. This article discusses the goals and trade-offs associated with them as well as their underlying institutional designs. It also re-emphasises Powell's insight that the congruence between policy makers and the median voter in a unidimensional policy space is a more appropriate normative standard for some visions of democracy than for others.}, language = {en} } @article{Ganghof2023, author = {Ganghof, Steffen}, title = {Justifying types of representative democracy}, series = {Critical review of international social and political philosophy}, journal = {Critical review of international social and political philosophy}, publisher = {Routledge}, address = {London}, issn = {1369-8230}, doi = {10.1080/13698230.2022.2159665}, pages = {1 -- 12}, year = {2023}, abstract = {This article responds to critical reflections on my Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism by Sarah Birch, Kevin J. Elliott, Claudia Landwehr and James L. Wilson. It discusses how different types of representative democracy, especially different forms of government (presidential, parliamentary or hybrid), can be justified. It clarifies, among other things, the distinction between procedural and process equality, the strengths of semi-parliamentary government, the potential instability of constitutional designs, and the difference that theories can make in actual processes of constitutional reform.}, language = {en} } @article{GanghofEppnerPoerschke2018, author = {Ganghof, Steffen and Eppner, Sebastian and P{\"o}rschke, Alexander}, title = {Australian bicameralism as semi-parliamentarism}, series = {Australian Journal of Political Science}, volume = {53}, journal = {Australian Journal of Political Science}, number = {2}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {1036-1146}, doi = {10.1080/10361146.2018.1451487}, pages = {211 -- 233}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The article analyses the type of bicameralism we find in Australia as a distinct executive-legislative system - a hybrid between parliamentary and presidential government - which we call 'semi-parliamentary government'. We argue that this hybrid presents an important and underappreciated alternative to pure parliamentary government as well as presidential forms of the power-separation, and that it can achieve a certain balance between competing models or visions of democracy. We specify theoretically how the semi-parliamentary separation of powers contributes to the balancing of democratic visions and propose a conceptual framework for comparing democratic visions. We use this framework to locate the Australian Commonwealth, all Australian states and 22 advanced democratic nation-states on a two-dimensional empirical map of democratic patterns for the period from 1995 to 2015.}, language = {en} } @article{GanghofEppnerPoerschke2018, author = {Ganghof, Steffen and Eppner, Sebastian and P{\"o}rschke, Alexander}, title = {Semi-parliamentary government in perspective}, series = {Australian Journal of Political Science}, volume = {53}, journal = {Australian Journal of Political Science}, number = {2}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {1036-1146}, doi = {10.1080/10361146.2018.1451488}, pages = {264 -- 269}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The article responds to four commentaries on the concept of semi-parliamentary government and its application to Australian bicameralism. It highlights four main points: (1) Our preferred typology is not more 'normative' than existing approaches, but applies the criterion of 'direct election' equally to executive and legislature; (2) While the evolution of semi-parliamentary government had contingent elements, it plausibly also reflects the 'equilibrium' nature of certain institutional configurations; (3) The idea that a pure parliamentary system with pure proportional representation has absolute normative priority over 'instrumentalist' concerns about cabinet stability, identifiability and responsibility is questionable; and (4) The reforms we discuss may be unlikely to occur in Australia, but deserve consideration by scholars and institutional reformers in other democratic systems.}, language = {en} } @article{GarciaWobbe2011, author = {Garcia, Anne-Laure and Wobbe, Theresa}, title = {Maternite, Mutterschaft, M{\"u}tterlichkeit : Familienpolitische Codierung im deutschen und franz{\"o}sischen Kontext}, isbn = {978-3-593-39526-5}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @article{Genschel2001, author = {Genschel, Corinna}, title = {Streitbare Subjektivitaet : Diskurse der Transsexualit{\"a}t}, year = {2001}, language = {de} } @article{GenschelBegerFrantzen2002, author = {Genschel, Corinna and Beger, Nico and Frantzen, Jannik}, title = {Differente Bewegungen : ein Gespr{\"a}ch {\"u}ber politische Aspekte von Transgender und anderen Bewegungen}, isbn = {3-89656-084-0}, year = {2002}, language = {de} } @article{GenschelHark2003, author = {Genschel, Corinna and Hark, Sabine}, title = {Die ambivalente Politik von Citizenship und ihre sexualpolitische Herausforderung}, isbn = {3-89691-216- X}, year = {2003}, language = {de} } @article{GenschelLayWagenknechtetal.2001, author = {Genschel, Corinna and Lay, Caren and Wagenknecht, Peter and Woltersdorff, Volker}, title = {Anschl{\"u}sse : [Nachwort der deutschen Ausg.]}, isbn = {3-89656-062-X}, year = {2001}, language = {de} } @article{GerhardsSawertKohler2019, author = {Gerhards, J{\"u}rgen and Sawert, Tim and Kohler, Ulrich}, title = {Des Kaisers alte Kleider: Fiktion und Wirklichkeit des Nutzens von Lateinkenntnissen}, series = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie}, volume = {71}, journal = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {0023-2653}, doi = {10.1007/s11577-019-00624-8}, pages = {309 -- 326}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Obwohl Latein eine nicht mehr gesprochene Sprache ist und ihr deswegen kein kommunikativer Nutzen zukommt, ist die Anzahl der Latein als Schulfach w{\"a}hlenden Sch{\"u}ler im Zeitverlauf angestiegen. Mehrere Studien haben zudem gezeigt, dass Lateinkenntnisse weder das logische Denken, noch den Erwerb anderer Sprachen, noch das Gesp{\"u}r f{\"u}r die grammatikalische Struktur der Muttersprache verbessern. Auch wenn sich empirisch keine Vorteile des Erwerbs alter Sprachen nachweisen lassen, k{\"o}nnen Menschen subjektiv an solche Vorteile glauben und ihr Verhalten an ihrer Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit ausrichten. Auf der Basis einer unter Eltern von Gymnasialsch{\"u}lern durchgef{\"u}hrten Befragung zeigen wir, dass Latein umfassende Transfereffekte zugeschrieben und Personen mit Lateinkenntnissen positiver bewertet werden als Personen mit Kenntnissen moderner Sprachen. Weiterhin zeigt sich, dass die „Illusio" der Vorteile von Latein zwar in allen Bildungsgruppen wirksam ist, doch besonders von den Hochgebildeten vertreten wird. Sie arbeiten damit an der Konstruktion einer Realit{\"a}t, von der sie selbst die gr{\"o}ßten Nutznießer sind, indem sie Latein als symbolisches Kapital verwenden.}, language = {de} } @article{Girnus2019, author = {Girnus, Luisa}, title = {Anforderungen an politische Legitimation im gesellschaftlichen Wandel und dessen Verh{\"a}ltnis zum politischen Lernen}, series = {Gesellschaft im Wandel : neue Aufgaben f{\"u}r die politische Bildung und ihre Didaktik}, journal = {Gesellschaft im Wandel : neue Aufgaben f{\"u}r die politische Bildung und ihre Didaktik}, publisher = {Wochenschau Verlag}, address = {Frankfurt}, isbn = {978-3-7344-0827-4}, pages = {77 -- 85}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{GirnusNeuhof2018, author = {Girnus, Luisa and Neuhof, Julia}, title = {Der Wandel von Staatlichkeit als Ziel- und Ausgangspunkt politischen Lernens in der Praxis}, series = {Gesellschaft im Wandel : neue Aufgaben f{\"u}r die politische Bildung und ihre Didaktik}, journal = {Gesellschaft im Wandel : neue Aufgaben f{\"u}r die politische Bildung und ihre Didaktik}, publisher = {Wochenschau Verlag}, address = {Frankfurt}, isbn = {978-3-7344-0827-4}, pages = {69 -- 76}, year = {2018}, language = {de} } @article{Graf2011, author = {Graf, Patricia}, title = {Erkl{\"a}rungsans{\"a}tze der außerhochschulischen Forschungseinrichtungen zur Unterrepr{\"a}sentation von Frauen}, isbn = {978-3-531-183252-7}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @article{GrafDautzenbergBuettneretal.2011, author = {Graf, Patricia and Dautzenberg, Kristi and B{\"u}ttner, Nadja and Schmid, Sylvia}, title = {Frauenkarriere in der Wissenschaft : eine vergleichende Analyse des Status quo}, isbn = {978-3-531-183252-7}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @article{GrafSchmid2011, author = {Graf, Patricia and Schmid, Sylvia}, title = {Organisationsstrukturen und ihr Einfluss auf die Karriereentwicklung von Wissenschaftlerinnen}, isbn = {978-3-531-183252-7}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @article{Grammes1996, author = {Grammes, Tilmann}, title = {Staatsb{\"u}rgerkunde zwischen Katechetik und Dialektik}, year = {1996}, language = {de} } @article{GrossmannHuth1995, author = {Großmann, Heidrun and Huth, Sabine}, title = {Sozialhilfeabh{\"a}ngigkeit Alleinerziehender als Folge des gesellschaftlichen Umbruchs}, year = {1995}, language = {de} } @article{GrossmannReinmuth2007, author = {Großmann, Heidrun and Reinmuth, S.}, title = {Freizeitangebote}, isbn = {978-3-8258-0621-7}, year = {2007}, language = {de} } @article{GrundmannWelskopfSturzbecher2001, author = {Grundmann, Matthias and Welskopf, R. and Sturzbecher, Dietmar}, title = {Wozu braucht man kindliche Ensch{\"a}tzungen von Betreuungskontexten?}, isbn = {3-8017-1391-1}, year = {2001}, language = {de} } @article{Goerl1997, author = {G{\"o}rl, Tilo}, title = {Kein freiwilliger R{\"u}ckzug ostdeutscher Frauen vom Arbeitsmarkt}, year = {1997}, language = {de} } @article{Goerl2001, author = {G{\"o}rl, Tilo}, title = {Regionalisierung der politischen Landschaft in den neuen L{\"a}ndern am Beispiel der Landtagswahlen 1999 in Brandenburg, Th{\"u}ringen und Sachsen}, year = {2001}, language = {de} } @article{GoerlBuchheisterMutzetal.2007, author = {G{\"o}rl, Tilo and Buchheister, Claudia and Mutz, Michael and Buchheister, Claudia and G{\"o}rl, Tilo}, title = {Die Sozialstrukturanalyse der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich}, editor = {Holtmann, Dieter}, publisher = {Univ.-Verl.}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-939469-86-5}, pages = {288 S.}, year = {2007}, language = {de} } @article{GoerlHoltmann2007, author = {G{\"o}rl, Tilo and Holtmann, Dieter}, title = {Politische Einstellungen und Beteiligung am politischen Leben}, isbn = {978-3-8258-0621-7}, year = {2007}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2005, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Queer Studies}, isbn = {3-852-2584-4}, year = {2005}, language = {en} } @article{Hark2004, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Lesbenforschung und Queer Theorie : theoretische Konzepte, Entwicklungen und Korrespondenzen}, year = {2004}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2004, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Queering oder passing : queer theory eine normale Disziplin?}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{Hark2004, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {We{\"i} re here, we{\"i} re queer, and we{\"i} re not going shopping! : queering space : Interventionen im Raum}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{Hark2004, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Die zweite Schicht : begrenzte M{\"o}glichkeiten inter- und transdisziplin{\"a}rer Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung}, year = {2004}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2003, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Material Conditions : Begrenzte M{\"o}glichkeiten transdisziplin{\"a}rer Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung}, year = {2003}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2003, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Das Maskenspiel der F{\"a}cher : Transdisziplinarit{\"a}t als geschlechterpolitische Intervention?}, year = {2003}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2003, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Kartographien von W{\"u}ste und K{\"o}rper : der englische Patient}, year = {2003}, language = {de} } @article{Hark1998, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Parodistischer Ernst und politisches Spiel : zur Politik in der Geschlechterparodie}, isbn = {3-531-13184-2}, year = {1998}, language = {de} } @article{Hark1998, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Umstrittene Wissensterritorien : Feminismus und Queer Theory ; Reflexivit{\"a}t als Programm}, isbn = {3-8258-4049-2}, year = {1998}, language = {de} } @article{Hark1998, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Technologien - Subjektivierung - Disziplinierung : Politik der K{\"o}rperbilder}, issn = {0938-1945}, year = {1998}, language = {de} } @article{Hark1997, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Institutionalisierung eines Magister-Nebenfachstudiengangs "Frauen- und Geschlechterstudien an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam"}, year = {1997}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2002, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Junge Lesben und Schwule : zwischen Heteronormativit{\"a}t und posttraditionaler Vergesellschaftung}, year = {2002}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2001, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Was wir zeigen, sind wir, nicht umgekehrt : Hannah Arendt und die Dekonstruktion von Identit{\"a}tspolitik}, isbn = {3-89741-078-8}, year = {2001}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2001, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Normalisierte Wissenschaft? : zum herrschaftskritischen Potential von Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung}, isbn = {3-89691-214-3}, year = {2001}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2001, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Feministische Theorie - Diskurs - Dekonstruktion : Produktive Verkn{\"u}pfungen}, isbn = {3-8100-2851-7}, year = {2001}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2001, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Diszipliniertes Geschlecht : Konturen von Disziplinarit{\"a}t un der Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung}, year = {2001}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2001, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Disputed territory : feminist studies in Germany and its queer discontents}, year = {2001}, language = {en} } @article{Hark2001, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Women's studies in germany and its queer discontents}, year = {2001}, language = {en} } @article{Hark2000, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Utopische H{\"o}henfl{\"u}ge mit bleiernen Gewichten : Paradoxien der Institutionalisierung feministischer Wissenschaft in der BRD}, year = {2000}, language = {de} } @article{Hark2000, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {She who speaks shadows speaks truth : transdisciplinarity in women's and gender studies}, year = {2000}, language = {en} } @article{Hark2000, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {She who speaks shadows speaks truth : transdisciplinarity in women`s and gender studies}, isbn = {0-22601-444-4}, year = {2000}, language = {en} } @article{Hark2000, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Vor dem Gesetz : K{\"a}mpfe um die Homo-Ehe ; BRD und USA}, year = {2000}, language = {de} } @article{Hark1999, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Deviante Subjekte : Normalisierung und Subjektformierung}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @article{Hark1999, author = {Hark, Sabine}, title = {Ohne Gel{\"a}nder handeln : Paradoxien einer Politik der Rechte}, issn = {0157-4467}, year = {1999}, language = {de} }