@misc{Doelling1999, author = {D{\"o}lling, Irene}, title = {Clemens, P., Die aus der Tuchbude, Alltag und Lebensgeschichten Forster Textilarbeiterinnen; M{\"u}nster [u.a.], Waxmann, 1998}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @misc{Doelling1999, author = {D{\"o}lling, Irene}, title = {Walter, T., Unkeuschheit und Werk der Liebe, Diskurse {\"u}ber Sexualit{\"a}t am Beginn der Neuzeit in Deutschland; Berlin [u.a.], de Gruyter, 1988}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @misc{Dietzsch1999, author = {Dietzsch, Ina}, title = {Breidenstein, G., Kelle, H., Geschlechteralltag in der Schulklasse, ethnographische Studien zur Gleichaltrigenkultur; Weinheim, Juventa, 1998}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @misc{Albrecht1999, author = {Albrecht, Clemens}, title = {H{\"u}binger, G. (Hrsg.), Kultur und Kulturwissenschaften um 1900, Band 2: Idealismus und Positivismus; Stuttgart, Steiner-Verl., 1997}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @misc{Behrmann1999, author = {Behrmann, G{\"u}nter C.}, title = {Wissenschaftstheorien}, isbn = {3-87920-043-2}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @misc{Behrmann1999, author = {Behrmann, G{\"u}nter C.}, title = {Verfassungspatriotismus}, isbn = {3-87920-043-2}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @misc{Behrmann1999, author = {Behrmann, G{\"u}nter C.}, title = {Wirksamkeit}, isbn = {3-87920-043-2}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @misc{Behrmann1999, author = {Behrmann, G{\"u}nter C.}, title = {Nationalerziehung}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @misc{Behrmann1999, author = {Behrmann, G{\"u}nter C.}, title = {Vorurteil}, isbn = {3-87920-043-2}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @misc{Jann1999, author = {Jann, Werner}, title = {Kraus, H. S., Privatisierung {\"o}ffentlicher Aufgaben, Perspektiven zur Gestaltung innovativer Organisationsformen; Wiesbaden, Dt. Univ.-Verl., 1997}, year = {1999}, language = {de} } @misc{Stehle2021, author = {Stehle, Fee}, title = {Rezension zu: Jordan, Andrew; Huitema, Dave; Asselt Harro van; Foster, Johanna (eds.): Governing climate change: polycentricity in action? - Cambridge ; New York, NY ; Port Melbourne : Cambridge University Press, 2018. - xv, 389 S. - ISBN 978-1-108-41812-6}, series = {Global environmental politics}, volume = {21}, journal = {Global environmental politics}, number = {1}, publisher = {MIT Press}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {1536-0091}, doi = {10.1162/glep_r_00596}, pages = {157 -- 159}, year = {2021}, language = {en} } @misc{Juchler2021, author = {Juchler, Ingo}, title = {Rezension zu: Pelluchon, Corine: Manifest f{\"u}r die Tiere. - M{\"u}nchen: C.H. Beck Verlag, 2020. - 125 S. - ISBN: 978-3-406-75709-9}, series = {Forum Politikunterricht}, journal = {Forum Politikunterricht}, number = {1-2}, publisher = {Deutsche Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politische Bildung, Landesverband Bayern}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {0941-5874}, pages = {2}, year = {2021}, language = {de} } @misc{Juchler2022, author = {Juchler, Ingo}, title = {Rezension zu: Massing, Peter: Politische Bildung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland : Grundlagen - Kontroversen - Perspektiven. - Frankfurt am Main : Wochenschau Verlag, 2021. - 141 S. - ISBN: 978-3-8252-5720-0}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Didaktik der Gesellschaftswissenschaften}, volume = {13}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Didaktik der Gesellschaftswissenschaften}, number = {2}, publisher = {Wochenschau Verlag}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, issn = {2191-0766}, pages = {146 -- 148}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @misc{Turner2021, author = {Turner, Bryan S.}, title = {Book review: Populism in the civil sphere / edited: Jeffrey C. Alexander, Peter Kivisto, Giuseppe Sciortino. - Cambridge ; Medford : Polity, 2021. - ISBN 978-1-5095-4474-5 ; 978-1-5095-4473-8}, series = {Journal of classical sociology : JCS}, volume = {21}, journal = {Journal of classical sociology : JCS}, number = {3-4}, publisher = {Sage Publ.}, address = {London}, issn = {1468-795X}, doi = {10.1177/1468795X21996104}, pages = {357 -- 360}, year = {2021}, language = {en} } @misc{Botsch2011, author = {Botsch, Gideon}, title = {Elections in Europe a data Handbook}, series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Geschichtswissenschaft}, volume = {59}, journal = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Geschichtswissenschaft}, number = {10}, publisher = {Metropol-Verl.}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0044-2828}, pages = {869 -- 871}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @misc{MielkeVermassenEllenbecketal.2016, author = {Mielke, Jahel and Vermassen, Hannah and Ellenbeck, Saskia and Milan, Blanca Fernandez and Jaeger, Carlo}, title = {Stakeholder involvement in sustainability science-A critical view}, series = {Global biogeochemical cycles}, volume = {17}, journal = {Global biogeochemical cycles}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {2214-6296}, doi = {10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.001}, pages = {71 -- 81}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Discussions about the opening of science to society have led to the emergence of new fields such as sustainability science and transformative science. At the same time, the megatrend of stakeholder participation reached the academic world and thus scientific research processes. This challenges the way science is conducted and the tools, methods and theories perceived appropriate. Although researchers involve stakeholders, the scientific community still lacks comprehensive theoretical analysis of the practical processes behind their integration - for example what kind of perceptions scientists have about their roles, their objectives, the knowledge to gather, their understanding of science or the science-policy interface. Our paper addresses this research gap by developing four ideal types of stakeholder involvement in science - the technocratic, the functionalist, the neoliberal-rational and the democratic type. In applying the typology, which is based on literature review, interviews and practical experiences, we identify and discuss three major criticisms raised towards stakeholder involvement in science: the legitimacy of stakeholder claims, the question whether bargaining or deliberation are part of the stakeholder involvement process and the question of the autonomy of science. Thus, the typology helps scientists to better understand the major critical questions that stakeholder involvement raises and enables them to position themselves when conducting their research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} } @misc{Juchler2023, author = {Juchler, Ingo}, title = {Rezension zu: May, Michael ; Partetzke, Marc: Einf{\"u}hrung in die Politikdidaktik. Band 1: Geschichte, Essentials, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsfelder. - Frankfurt am Main: Wochenschau Verlag, 2023. - 223 S. - (utb; 6045). - ISBN: 978-3-8385-6045-8}, series = {Polis}, volume = {27}, journal = {Polis}, number = {3}, publisher = {Wochenschau Verlag}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, issn = {1611-373X}, doi = {10.46499/2243.2834}, pages = {32 -- 32}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Gelungene Orientierung f{\"u}r die fachliche Ausbildung. Man ist gespannt auf den zweiten Band.}, language = {de} } @misc{Edeling1995, author = {Edeling, Thomas}, title = {Der Plan als Befehl und Fiktion : Wirtschaftsf{\"u}hrung der DDR ; Gespr{\"a}che und Analysen ; Westdeutscher Verl., Opladen, 1995}, year = {1995}, language = {de} } @misc{Edeling1996, author = {Edeling, Thomas}, title = {Uske, H. (Hrsg.), Personalentwicklung und Sozialwissenschaften; Duisburg, Sokoop, 1995}, year = {1996}, language = {de} } @misc{vanHeldenReichard2018, author = {van Helden, Jan and Reichard, Christoph}, title = {Management control and public sector performance management}, series = {Baltic Journal of Management}, volume = {14}, journal = {Baltic Journal of Management}, number = {1}, publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited}, address = {Bingley}, issn = {1746-5265}, doi = {10.1108/BJM-01-2018-0021}, pages = {158 -- 176}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether and how evolving ideas about management control (MC) emerge in research about public sector performance management (PSPM). Design/methodology/approach This is a literature review on PSPM research through using a set of key terms derived from a review of recent developments in MC. Findings MC research, originating in the management accounting discipline, is largely disconnected from PSPM research as part of public administration and public management disciplines. Overlaps between MC and PSPM research are visible in a cybernetic control approach, control variety and contingency-based reasoning. Both academic communities share an understanding of certain issues, although under diverging labels, especially enabling controls or, in a more general sense, usable performance controls, horizontal controls and control packaging. Specific MC concepts are valuable for future PSPM research, i.e. trust as a complement of performance-based controls in complex settings, and strategy as a variable in contingency-based studies. Research limitations/implications Breaking the boundaries between two currently remote research disciplines, on the one hand, might dismantle "would-be" innovations in one of these disciplines, and, on the other hand, may provide a fertile soil for mutual transfer of knowledge. A limitation of the authors' review of PSPM research is that it may insufficiently cover research published in the public sector accounting journals, which could be an outlet for MC-inspired PSPM research. Originality/value The paper unravels the "apparent" and "real" differences between MC and PSPM research, and, in doing so, takes the detected "real" differences as a starting point for discussing in what ways PSPM research can benefit from MC achievements.}, language = {en} }