@article{BeisheimLieseLorch2014,
  author    = {Beisheim, Marianne and Liese, Andrea Margit and Lorch, Jasmin},
  title     = {Introduction : transnationale partnerships for sustainable development},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35925-0},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeisheimLieseVosseler2014,
  author    = {Beisheim, Marianne and Liese, Andrea Margit and Vosseler, Christian},
  title     = {Who governs partnershis? on the role board, donors, partners and other stakeholders},
  isbn      = {978-1-137-35925-0},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BernhardSchmidtWellenburg2012,
  author    = {Bernhard, Stefan and Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian},
  title     = {Einleitung},
  isbn      = {978-3-531-17871-4},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BernhardSchmidtWellenburg2012,
  author    = {Bernhard, Stefan and Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian},
  title     = {Feldanalyse als Forschungsprogramm},
  editor    = {Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian},
  isbn      = {978-3-531-17871-4},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BernhardSchmidtWellenburg2012,
  author    = {Bernhard, Stefan and Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian},
  title     = {Einleitung},
  isbn      = {978-3-531-18018-2},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BobzienKalleitner2020,
  author    = {Bobzien, Licia and Kalleitner, Fabian},
  title     = {Attitudes towards European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic},
  series = {European societies},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {European societies},
  number    = {Sup. 1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1461-6696},
  doi       = {10.1080/14616696.2020.1836669},
  pages     = {S791 -- S804},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Whilst the Covid-19 pandemic affects all European countries, the ways in which these countries are prepared for the health and subsequent economic crisis varies considerably. Financial solidarity within the European Union (EU) could mitigate some of these inequalities but depends upon the support of the citizens of individual member states for such policies. This paper studies attitudes of the Austrian population - a net-contributor to the European budget - towards financial solidarity using two waves of the Austrian Corona Panel Project collected in May and June 2020. We find that individuals (i) who are less likely to consider the Covid-19 pandemic as a national economic threat, (ii) who believe that Austria benefits from supporting other countries, and (iii) who prefer the crisis to be organized more centrally at EU-level show higher support for European financial solidarity. Using fixed effects models, we further show that perceiving economic threats and preferring central crisis management also explain attitude dynamics within individuals over time. We conclude that cost-benefit perceptions are important determinants for individual support of European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BogumilKuhlmann2006,
  author    = {Bogumil, J{\"o}rg and Kuhlmann, Sabine},
  title     = {Wirkungen lokaler Verwaltungsreformen : M{\"o}glichkeiten und Probleme der Performanzevaluation},
  isbn      = {3-89404-776-3},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BonomiSavignonMeneguzzoKuhlmannetal.2021,
  author    = {Bonomi Savignon, Andrea and Meneguzzo, Marco and Kuhlmann, Sabine and Cepiku, Denita},
  title     = {Guest editorial: Interinstitutional performance management},
  series = {International journal of public sector management : IJPSM},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {International journal of public sector management : IJPSM},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {0951-3558},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJPSM-03-2021-0057},
  pages     = {241 -- 246},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BorckWimbersky2014,
  author    = {Borck, Rainald and Wimbersky, Martin},
  title     = {Political economics of higher education finance},
  series = {Oxford economic papers},
  volume    = {66},
  journal   = {Oxford economic papers},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0030-7653},
  doi       = {10.1093/oep/gps042},
  pages     = {115 -- 139},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Borgnaes2016,
  author    = {Borgn{\"a}s, Kajsa},
  title     = {The Policy Influence of Sustainability Indicators: Examining Use and Influence of Indicators in German Sustainability Policy Making},
  series = {German politics},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {German politics},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0964-4008},
  doi       = {10.1080/09644008.2016.1193160},
  pages     = {480 -- 499},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {In 2002 Germany adopted an ambitious national sustainability strategy, covering all three sustainability spheres and circling around 21 key indicators. The strategy stands out because of its relative stability over five consecutive government constellations, its high status and increasingly coercive nature. This article analyses the strategy's role in the policy process, focusing on the use and influence of indicators as a central steering tool. Contrasting rationalist and constructivist perspectives on the role of knowledge in policy, two factors, namely the level of consensus about policy goals and the institutional setting of the indicators, are found to explain differences in use and influence both across indicators and over time. Moreover, the study argues that the indicators have been part of a continuous process of 'structuring' in which conceptual and instrumental use together help structure the sustainability challenge in such a way that it becomes more manageable for government policy.},
  language  = {en}
}