@phdthesis{Ashouri2020, author = {Ashouri, Mohammadreza}, title = {TrainTrap}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {XIX, 103}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @article{BordihnMitrana2020, author = {Bordihn, Henning and Mitrana, Victor}, title = {On the degrees of non-regularity and non-context-freeness}, series = {Journal of computer and system sciences}, volume = {108}, journal = {Journal of computer and system sciences}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {San Diego, Calif. [u.a.]}, issn = {0022-0000}, doi = {10.1016/j.jcss.2019.09.003}, pages = {104 -- 117}, year = {2020}, abstract = {We study the derivational complexity of context-free and context-sensitive grammars by counting the maximal number of non-regular and non-context-free rules used in a derivation, respectively. The degree of non-regularity/non-context-freeness of a language is the minimum degree of non-regularity/non-context-freeness of context-free/context-sensitive grammars generating it. A language has finite degree of non-regularity iff it is regular. We give a condition for deciding whether the degree of non-regularity of a given unambiguous context-free grammar is finite. The problem becomes undecidable for arbitrary linear context-free grammars. The degree of non-regularity of unambiguous context-free grammars generating non-regular languages as well as that of grammars generating deterministic context-free languages that are not regular is of order Omega(n). Context-free non-regular languages of sublinear degree of non-regularity are presented. A language has finite degree of non-context-freeness if it is context-free. Context-sensitive grammars with a quadratic degree of non-context-freeness are more powerful than those of a linear degree.}, language = {en} } @article{BordihnMitranaPaunetal.2020, author = {Bordihn, Henning and Mitrana, Victor and Paun, Andrei and Paun, Mihaela}, title = {Hairpin completions and reductions}, series = {Natural computing : an innovative journal bridging biosciences and computer sciences ; an international journal}, volume = {20}, journal = {Natural computing : an innovative journal bridging biosciences and computer sciences ; an international journal}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V.}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {1572-9796}, doi = {10.1007/s11047-020-09797-0}, pages = {193 -- 203}, year = {2020}, abstract = {This paper is part of the investigation of some operations on words and languages with motivations coming from DNA biochemistry, namely three variants of hairpin completion and three variants of hairpin reduction. Since not all the hairpin completions or reductions of semilinear languages remain semilinear, we study sufficient conditions for semilinear languages to preserve their semilinearity property after applying the non-iterated hairpin completion or hairpin reduction. A similar approach is then applied to the iterated variants of these operations. Along these lines, we define the hairpin reduction root of a language and show that the hairpin reduction root of a semilinear language is not necessarily semilinear except the universal language. A few open problems are finally discussed.}, language = {en} } @article{BordihnVaszil2020, author = {Bordihn, Henning and Vaszil, Gy{\"o}rgy}, title = {Deterministic Lindenmayer systems with dynamic control of parallelism}, series = {International journal of foundations of computer science}, volume = {31}, journal = {International journal of foundations of computer science}, number = {1}, publisher = {World Scientific}, address = {Singapore}, issn = {0129-0541}, doi = {10.1142/S0129054120400031}, pages = {37 -- 51}, year = {2020}, abstract = {M-rate 0L systems are interactionless Lindenmayer systems together with a function assigning to every string a set of multisets of productions that may be applied simultaneously to the string. Some questions that have been left open in the forerunner papers are examined, and the computational power of deterministic M-rate 0L systems is investigated, where also tabled and extended variants are taken into consideration.}, language = {en} } @article{CabalarDieguezSchaubetal.2020, author = {Cabalar, Pedro and Dieguez, Martin and Schaub, Torsten H. and Schuhmann, Anna}, title = {Towards metric temporal answer set programming}, series = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, volume = {20}, journal = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, number = {5}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {Cambridge [u.a.]}, issn = {1471-0684}, doi = {10.1017/S1471068420000307}, pages = {783 -- 798}, year = {2020}, abstract = {We elaborate upon the theoretical foundations of a metric temporal extension of Answer Set Programming. In analogy to previous extensions of ASP with constructs from Linear Temporal and Dynamic Logic, we accomplish this in the setting of the logic of Here-and-There and its non-monotonic extension, called Equilibrium Logic. More precisely, we develop our logic on the same semantic underpinnings as its predecessors and thus use a simple time domain of bounded time steps. This allows us to compare all variants in a uniform framework and ultimately combine them in a common implementation.}, language = {en} } @article{CabalarFandinoGareaetal.2020, author = {Cabalar, Pedro and Fandi{\~n}o, Jorge and Garea, Javier and Romero, Javier and Schaub, Torsten H.}, title = {Eclingo}, series = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, volume = {20}, journal = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, number = {6}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {New York}, issn = {1471-0684}, doi = {10.1017/S1471068420000228}, pages = {834 -- 847}, year = {2020}, abstract = {We describe eclingo, a solver for epistemic logic programs under Gelfond 1991 semantics built upon the Answer Set Programming system clingo. The input language of eclingo uses the syntax extension capabilities of clingo to define subjective literals that, as usual in epistemic logic programs, allow for checking the truth of a regular literal in all or in some of the answer sets of a program. The eclingo solving process follows a guess and check strategy. It first generates potential truth values for subjective literals and, in a second step, it checks the obtained result with respect to the cautious and brave consequences of the program. This process is implemented using the multi-shot functionalities of clingo. We have also implemented some optimisations, aiming at reducing the search space and, therefore, increasing eclingo 's efficiency in some scenarios. Finally, we compare the efficiency of eclingo with two state-of-the-art solvers for epistemic logic programs on a pair of benchmark scenarios and show that eclingo generally outperforms their obtained results.}, language = {en} } @article{DugWeidlingSogomonyanetal.2020, author = {Dug, Mehmed and Weidling, Stefan and Sogomonyan, Egor and Jokic, Dejan and Krstić, Miloš}, title = {Full error detection and correction method applied on pipelined structure using two approaches}, series = {Journal of circuits, systems and computers}, volume = {29}, journal = {Journal of circuits, systems and computers}, number = {13}, publisher = {World Scientific}, address = {Singapore}, issn = {0218-1266}, doi = {10.1142/S0218126620502187}, pages = {15}, year = {2020}, abstract = {In this paper, two approaches are evaluated using the Full Error Detection and Correction (FEDC) method for a pipelined structure. The approaches are referred to as Full Duplication with Comparison (FDC) and Concurrent Checking with Parity Prediction (CCPP). Aforementioned approaches are focused on the borderline cases of FEDC method which implement Error Detection Circuit (EDC) in two manners for the purpose of protection of combinational logic to address the soft errors of unspecified duration. The FDC approach implements a full duplication of the combinational circuit, as the most complex and expensive implementation of the FEDC method, and the CCPP approach implements only the parity prediction bit, being the simplest and cheapest technique, for soft error detection. Both approaches are capable of detecting soft errors in the combinational logic, with single faults being injected into the design. On the one hand, the FDC approach managed to detect and correct all injected faults while the CCPP approach could not detect multiple faults created at the output of combinational circuit. On the other hand, the FDC approach leads to higher power consumption and area increase compared to the CCPP approach.}, language = {en} } @article{EverardoPerezOsorio2020, author = {Everardo P{\´e}rez, Flavio Omar and Osorio, Mauricio}, title = {Towards an answer set programming methodology for constructing programs following a semi-automatic approach}, series = {Electronic notes in theoretical computer science}, volume = {354}, journal = {Electronic notes in theoretical computer science}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]}, issn = {1571-0661}, doi = {10.1016/j.entcs.2020.10.004}, pages = {29 -- 44}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a successful rule-based formalism for modeling and solving knowledge-intense combinatorial (optimization) problems. Despite its success in both academic and industry, open challenges like automatic source code optimization, and software engineering remains. This is because a problem encoded into an ASP might not have the desired solving performance compared to an equivalent representation. Motivated by these two challenges, this paper has three main contributions. First, we propose a developing process towards a methodology to implement ASP programs, being faithful to existing methods. Second, we present ASP encodings that serve as the basis from the developing process. Third, we demonstrate the use of ASP to reverse the standard solving process. That is, knowing answer sets in advance, and desired strong equivalent properties, "we" exhaustively reconstruct ASP programs if they exist. This paper was originally motivated by the search of propositional formulas (if they exist) that represent the semantics of a new aggregate operator. Particularly, a parity aggregate. This aggregate comes as an improvement from the already existing parity (xor) constraints from xorro, where lacks expressiveness, even though these constraints fit perfectly for reasoning modes like sampling or model counting. To this end, this extended version covers the fundaments from parity constraints as well as the xorro system. Hence, we delve a little more in the examples and the proposed methodology over parity constraints. Finally, we discuss our results by showing the only representation available, that satisfies different properties from the classical logic xor operator, which is also consistent with the semantics of parity constraints from xorro.}, language = {en} } @article{FandinoLifschitzLuehneetal.2020, author = {Fandi{\~n}o, Jorge and Lifschitz, Vladimir and L{\"u}hne, Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H.}, title = {Verifying tight logic programs with Anthem and Vampire}, series = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, volume = {20}, journal = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, number = {5}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {Cambridge [u.a.]}, issn = {1471-0684}, doi = {10.1017/S1471068420000344}, pages = {735 -- 750}, year = {2020}, abstract = {This paper continues the line of research aimed at investigating the relationship between logic programs and first-order theories. We extend the definition of program completion to programs with input and output in a subset of the input language of the ASP grounder gringo, study the relationship between stable models and completion in this context, and describe preliminary experiments with the use of two software tools, anthem and vampire, for verifying the correctness of programs with input and output. Proofs of theorems are based on a lemma that relates the semantics of programs studied in this paper to stable models of first-order formulas.}, language = {en} } @article{GebserJanhunenRintanen2020, author = {Gebser, Martin and Janhunen, Tomi and Rintanen, Jussi}, title = {Declarative encodings of acyclicity properties}, series = {Journal of logic and computation}, volume = {30}, journal = {Journal of logic and computation}, number = {4}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Eynsham, Oxford}, issn = {0955-792X}, doi = {10.1093/logcom/exv063}, pages = {923 -- 952}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Many knowledge representation tasks involve trees or similar structures as abstract datatypes. However, devising compact and efficient declarative representations of such structural properties is non-obvious and can be challenging indeed. In this article, we take a number of acyclicity properties into consideration and investigate various logic-based approaches to encode them. We use answer set programming as the primary representation language but also consider mappings to related formalisms, such as propositional logic, difference logic and linear programming. We study the compactness of encodings and the resulting computational performance on benchmarks involving acyclic or tree structures.}, language = {en} }