@inproceedings{AbdennadherIsmailKhoury2010,
  author    = {Abdennadher, Slim and Ismail, Haythem and Khoury, Frederick},
  title     = {Transforming imperative algorithms to constraint handling rules},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41533},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Different properties of programs, implemented in Constraint Handling Rules (CHR), have already been investigated. Proving these properties in CHR is fairly simpler than proving them in any type of imperative programming language, which triggered the proposal of a methodology to map imperative programs into equivalent CHR. The equivalence of both programs implies that if a property is satisfied for one, then it is satisfied for the other. The mapping methodology could be put to other beneficial uses. One such use is the automatic generation of global constraints, at an attempt to demonstrate the benefits of having a rule-based implementation for constraint solvers.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{BetzRaiserFruehwirth2010,
  author    = {Betz, Hariolf and Raiser, Frank and Fr{\"u}hwirth, Thom},
  title     = {Persistent constraints in constraint handling rules},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41547},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {In the most abstract definition of its operational semantics, the declarative and concurrent programming language CHR is trivially non-terminating for a significant class of programs. Common refinements of this definition, in closing the gap to real-world implementations, compromise on declarativity and/or concurrency. Building on recent work and the notion of persistent constraints, we introduce an operational semantics avoiding trivial non-termination without compromising on its essential features.},
  language  = {en}
}