@article{BlaesiusFriedrichLischeidetal.2022,
  author    = {Bl{\"a}sius, Thomas and Friedrich, Tobias and Lischeid, Julius and Meeks, Kitty and Schirneck, Friedrich Martin},
  title     = {Efficiently enumerating hitting sets of hypergraphs arising in data profiling},
  series = {Journal of computer and system sciences : JCSS},
  volume    = {124},
  journal   = {Journal of computer and system sciences : JCSS},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {San Diego},
  issn      = {0022-0000},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jcss.2021.10.002},
  pages     = {192 -- 213},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The transversal hypergraph problem asks to enumerate the minimal hitting sets of a hypergraph. If the solutions have bounded size, Eiter and Gottlob [SICOMP'95] gave an algorithm running in output-polynomial time, but whose space requirement also scales with the output. We improve this to polynomial delay and space. Central to our approach is the extension problem, deciding for a set X of vertices whether it is contained in any minimal hitting set. We show that this is one of the first natural problems to be W[3]-complete. We give an algorithm for the extension problem running in time O(m(vertical bar X vertical bar+1) n) and prove a SETH-lower bound showing that this is close to optimal. We apply our enumeration method to the discovery problem of minimal unique column combinations from data profiling. Our empirical evaluation suggests that the algorithm outperforms its worst-case guarantees on hypergraphs stemming from real-world databases.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{RanaMohapatraSidorovaetal.2022,
  author    = {Rana, Kaushik and Mohapatra, Durga Prasad and Sidorova, Julia and Lundberg, Lars and Sk{\"o}ld, Lars and Lopes Grim, Lu{\´i}s Fernando and Sampaio Gradvohl, Andr{\´e} Leon and Cremerius, Jonas and Siegert, Simon and Weltzien, Anton von and Baldi, Annika and Klessascheck, Finn and Kalancha, Svitlana and Lichtenstein, Tom and Shaabani, Nuhad and Meinel, Christoph and Friedrich, Tobias and Lenzner, Pascal and Schumann, David and Wiese, Ingmar and Sarna, Nicole and Wiese, Lena and Tashkandi, Araek Sami and van der Walt, Est{\´e}e and Eloff, Jan H. P. and Schmidt, Christopher and H{\"u}gle, Johannes and Horschig, Siegfried and Uflacker, Matthias and Najafi, Pejman and Sapegin, Andrey and Cheng, Feng and Stojanovic, Dragan and Stojnev Ilić, Aleksandra and Djordjevic, Igor and Stojanovic, Natalija and Predic, Bratislav and Gonz{\´a}lez-Jim{\´e}nez, Mario and de Lara, Juan and Mischkewitz, Sven and Kainz, Bernhard and van Hoorn, Andr{\´e} and Ferme, Vincenzo and Schulz, Henning and Knigge, Marlene and Hecht, Sonja and Prifti, Loina and Krcmar, Helmut and Fabian, Benjamin and Ermakova, Tatiana and Kelkel, Stefan and Baumann, Annika and Morgenstern, Laura and Plauth, Max and Eberhard, Felix and Wolff, Felix and Polze, Andreas and Cech, Tim and Danz, Noel and Noack, Nele Sina and Pirl, Lukas and Beilharz, Jossekin Jakob and De Oliveira, Roberto C. L. and Soares, F{\´a}bio Mendes and Juiz, Carlos and Bermejo, Belen and M{\"u}hle, Alexander and Gr{\"u}ner, Andreas and Saxena, Vageesh and Gayvoronskaya, Tatiana and Weyand, Christopher and Krause, Mirko and Frank, Markus and Bischoff, Sebastian and Behrens, Freya and R{\"u}ckin, Julius and Ziegler, Adrian and Vogel, Thomas and Tran, Chinh and Moser, Irene and Grunske, Lars and Sz{\´a}rnyas, G{\´a}bor and Marton, J{\´o}zsef and Maginecz, J{\´a}nos and Varr{\´o}, D{\´a}niel and Antal, J{\´a}nos Benjamin},
  title     = {HPI Future SOC Lab - Proceedings 2018},
  number    = {151},
  editor    = {Meinel, Christoph and Polze, Andreas and Beins, Karsten and Strotmann, Rolf and Seibold, Ulrich and R{\"o}dszus, Kurt and M{\"u}ller, J{\"u}rgen},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-547-7},
  issn      = {1613-5652},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-56371},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-563712},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {x, 277},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The "HPI Future SOC Lab" is a cooperation of the Hasso Plattner Institute (HPI) and industry partners. Its mission is to enable and promote exchange and interaction between the research community and the industry partners. The HPI Future SOC Lab provides researchers with free of charge access to a complete infrastructure of state of the art hard and software. This infrastructure includes components, which might be too expensive for an ordinary research environment, such as servers with up to 64 cores and 2 TB main memory. The offerings address researchers particularly from but not limited to the areas of computer science and business information systems. Main areas of research include cloud computing, parallelization, and In-Memory technologies. This technical report presents results of research projects executed in 2018. Selected projects have presented their results on April 17th and November 14th 2017 at the Future SOC Lab Day events.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RoostapourNeumannNeumannetal.2022,
  author    = {Roostapour, Vahid and Neumann, Aneta and Neumann, Frank and Friedrich, Tobias},
  title     = {Pareto optimization for subset selection with dynamic cost constraints},
  series = {Artificial intelligence},
  volume    = {302},
  journal   = {Artificial intelligence},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0004-3702},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.artint.2021.103597},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {We consider the subset selection problem for function f with constraint bound B that changes over time. Within the area of submodular optimization, various greedy approaches are commonly used. For dynamic environments we observe that the adaptive variants of these greedy approaches are not able to maintain their approximation quality. Investigating the recently introduced POMC Pareto optimization approach, we show that this algorithm efficiently computes a phi=(alpha(f)/2)(1 - 1/e(alpha)f)-approximation, where alpha(f) is the submodularity ratio of f, for each possible constraint bound b <= B. Furthermore, we show that POMC is able to adapt its set of solutions quickly in the case that B increases. Our experimental investigations for the influence maximization in social networks show the advantage of POMC over generalized greedy algorithms. We also consider EAMC, a new evolutionary algorithm with polynomial expected time guarantee to maintain phi approximation ratio, and NSGA-II with two different population sizes as advanced multi-objective optimization algorithm, to demonstrate their challenges in optimizing the maximum coverage problem. Our empirical analysis shows that, within the same number of evaluations, POMC is able to perform as good as NSGA-II under linear constraint, while EAMC performs significantly worse than all considered algorithms in most cases.},
  language  = {en}
}