@article{DimopoulosGebserLuehneetal.2019, author = {Dimopoulos, Yannis and Gebser, Martin and L{\"u}hne, Patrick and Romero Davila, Javier and Schaub, Torsten}, title = {plasp 3}, series = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, volume = {19}, journal = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, number = {3}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {New York}, issn = {1471-0684}, doi = {10.1017/S1471068418000583}, pages = {477 -- 504}, year = {2019}, abstract = {We describe the new version of the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL)-to-Answer Set Programming (ASP) translator plasp. First, it widens the range of accepted PDDL features. Second, it contains novel planning encodings, some inspired by Satisfiability Testing (SAT) planning and others exploiting ASP features such as well-foundedness. All of them are designed for handling multivalued fluents in order to capture both PDDL as well as SAS planning formats. Third, enabled by multishot ASP solving, it offers advanced planning algorithms also borrowed from SAT planning. As a result, plasp provides us with an ASP-based framework for studying a variety of planning techniques in a uniform setting. Finally, we demonstrate in an empirical analysis that these techniques have a significant impact on the performance of ASP planning.}, language = {en} } @article{DiethelmSyrbe2015, author = {Diethelm, Ira and Syrbe, J{\"o}rn}, title = {Let's talk about CS!}, series = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, journal = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, number = {7}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {1868-0844}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-82983}, pages = {411 -- 414}, year = {2015}, abstract = {To communicate about a science is the most important key competence in education for any science. Without communication we cannot teach, so teachers should reflect about the language they use in class properly. But the language students and teachers use to communicate about their CS courses is very heterogeneous, inconsistent and deeply influenced by tool names. There is a big lack of research and discussion in CS education regarding the terminology and the role of concepts and tools in our science. We don't have a consistent set of terminology that we agree on to be helpful for learning our science. This makes it nearly impossible to do research on CS competencies as long as we have not agreed on the names we use to describe these. This workshop intends to provide room to fill with discussion and first ideas for future research in this field.}, language = {en} } @article{DelgadoKloos2015, author = {Delgado Kloos, Carlos}, title = {What about the Competencies of Educators in the New Era of Digital Education?}, series = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, journal = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, number = {7}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {1868-0844}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-83015}, pages = {435 -- 438}, year = {2015}, abstract = {A lot has been published about the competencies needed by students in the 21st century (Ravenscroft et al., 2012). However, equally important are the competencies needed by educators in the new era of digital education. We review the key competencies for educators in light of the new methods of teaching and learning proposed by Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and their on-campus counterparts, Small Private Online Courses (SPOCs).}, language = {en} } @article{DagieneStupuriene2015, author = {Dagiene, Valentina and Stupuriene, Gabriele}, title = {Informatics Education based on Solving Attractive Tasks through a Contest}, series = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, journal = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, number = {7}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {1868-0844}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-82626}, pages = {97 -- 115}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The paper discusses the issue of supporting informatics (computer science) education through competitions for lower and upper secondary school students (8-19 years old). Competitions play an important role for learners as a source of inspiration, innovation, and attraction. Running contests in informatics for school students for many years, we have noticed that the students consider the contest experience very engaging and exciting as well as a learning experience. A contest is an excellent instrument to involve students in problem solving activities. An overview of infrastructure and development of an informatics contest from international level to the national one (the Bebras contest on informatics and computer fluency, originated in Lithuania) is presented. The performance of Bebras contests in 23 countries during the last 10 years showed an unexpected and unusually high acceptance by school students and teachers. Many thousands of students participated and got a valuable input in addition to their regular informatics lectures at school. In the paper, the main attention is paid to the developed tasks and analysis of students' task solving results in Lithuania.}, language = {en} } @article{Curzon2015, author = {Curzon, Paul}, title = {Unplugged Computational Thinking for Fun}, series = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, journal = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, number = {7}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {1868-0844}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-82575}, pages = {15 -- 27}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Computational thinking is a fundamental skill set that is learned by studying Informatics and ICT. We argue that its core ideas can be introduced in an inspiring and integrated way to both teachers and students using fun and contextually rich cs4fn 'Computer Science for Fun' stories combined with 'unplugged' activities including games and magic tricks. We also argue that understanding people is an important part of computational thinking. Computational thinking can be fun for everyone when taught in kinaesthetic ways away from technology.}, language = {en} } @article{ChristensenKnezek2015, author = {Christensen, Rhonda and Knezek, Gerald}, title = {The Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment Questionnaire (TPSA)}, series = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, journal = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, number = {7}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {1868-0844}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-82838}, pages = {311 -- 318}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment (TPSA) questionnaire has been used for 15 years in the USA and other nations as a self-efficacy measure for proficiencies fundamental to effective technology integration in the classroom learning environment. Internal consistency reliabilities for each of the five-item scales have typically ranged from .73 to .88 for preservice or inservice technology-using teachers. Due to changing technologies used in education, researchers sought to renovate partially obsolete items and extend self-efficacy assessment to new areas, such as social media and mobile learning. Analysis of 2014 data gathered on a new, 34 item version of the TPSA indicates that the four established areas of email, World Wide Web (WWW), integrated applications, and teaching with technology continue to form consistent scales with reliabilities ranging from .81 to .93, while the 14 new items gathered to represent emerging technologies and media separate into two scales, each with internal consistency reliabilities greater than .9. The renovated TPSA is deemed to be worthy of continued use in the teaching with technology context.}, language = {en} } @article{ChenLangeAndjelkovicetal.2022, author = {Chen, Junchao and Lange, Thomas and Andjelkovic, Marko and Simevski, Aleksandar and Lu, Li and Krstić, Miloš}, title = {Solar particle event and single event upset prediction from SRAM-based monitor and supervised machine learning}, series = {IEEE transactions on emerging topics in computing / IEEE Computer Society, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers}, volume = {10}, journal = {IEEE transactions on emerging topics in computing / IEEE Computer Society, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers}, number = {2}, publisher = {Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers}, address = {[New York, NY]}, issn = {2168-6750}, doi = {10.1109/TETC.2022.3147376}, pages = {564 -- 580}, year = {2022}, abstract = {The intensity of cosmic radiation may differ over five orders of magnitude within a few hours or days during the Solar Particle Events (SPEs), thus increasing for several orders of magnitude the probability of Single Event Upsets (SEUs) in space-borne electronic systems. Therefore, it is vital to enable the early detection of the SEU rate changes in order to ensure timely activation of dynamic radiation hardening measures. In this paper, an embedded approach for the prediction of SPEs and SRAM SEU rate is presented. The proposed solution combines the real-time SRAM-based SEU monitor, the offline-trained machine learning model and online learning algorithm for the prediction. With respect to the state-of-the-art, our solution brings the following benefits: (1) Use of existing on-chip data storage SRAM as a particle detector, thus minimizing the hardware and power overhead, (2) Prediction of SRAM SEU rate one hour in advance, with the fine-grained hourly tracking of SEU variations during SPEs as well as under normal conditions, (3) Online optimization of the prediction model for enhancing the prediction accuracy during run-time, (4) Negligible cost of hardware accelerator design for the implementation of selected machine learning model and online learning algorithm. The proposed design is intended for a highly dependable and self-adaptive multiprocessing system employed in space applications, allowing to trigger the radiation mitigation mechanisms before the onset of high radiation levels.}, language = {en} } @article{CabalarFandinoFarinasdelCerro2021, author = {Cabalar, Pedro and Fandi{\~n}o, Jorge and Fari{\~n}as del Cerro, Luis}, title = {Splitting epistemic logic programs}, series = {Theory and practice of logic programming / publ. for the Association for Logic Programming}, volume = {21}, journal = {Theory and practice of logic programming / publ. for the Association for Logic Programming}, number = {3}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {Cambridge [u.a.]}, issn = {1471-0684}, doi = {10.1017/S1471068420000058}, pages = {296 -- 316}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Epistemic logic programs constitute an extension of the stable model semantics to deal with new constructs called subjective literals. Informally speaking, a subjective literal allows checking whether some objective literal is true in all or some stable models. As it can be imagined, the associated semantics has proved to be non-trivial, since the truth of subjective literals may interfere with the set of stable models it is supposed to query. As a consequence, no clear agreement has been reached and different semantic proposals have been made in the literature. Unfortunately, comparison among these proposals has been limited to a study of their effect on individual examples, rather than identifying general properties to be checked. In this paper, we propose an extension of the well-known splitting property for logic programs to the epistemic case. We formally define when an arbitrary semantics satisfies the epistemic splitting property and examine some of the consequences that can be derived from that, including its relation to conformant planning and to epistemic constraints. Interestingly, we prove (through counterexamples) that most of the existing approaches fail to fulfill the epistemic splitting property, except the original semantics proposed by Gelfond 1991 and a recent proposal by the authors, called Founded Autoepistemic Equilibrium Logic.}, language = {en} } @article{Buechner2015, author = {B{\"u}chner, Steffen}, title = {Empirical and Normative Research on Fundamental Ideas of Embedded System Development}, series = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, journal = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, number = {7}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {1868-0844}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-82949}, pages = {393 -- 396}, year = {2015}, language = {en} } @article{BroekerKastensMagenheim2015, author = {Br{\"o}ker, Kathrin and Kastens, Uwe and Magenheim, Johannes}, title = {Competences of Undergraduate Computer Science Students}, series = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, journal = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT}, number = {7}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {1868-0844}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-82613}, pages = {77 -- 96}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The paper presents two approaches to the development of a Computer Science Competence Model for the needs of curriculum development and evaluation in Higher Education. A normativetheoretical approach is based on the AKT and ACM/IEEE curriculum and will be used within the recommendations of the German Informatics Society (GI) for the design of CS curricula. An empirically oriented approach refines the categories of the first one with regard to specific subject areas by conducting content analysis on CS curricula of important universities from several countries. The refined model will be used for the needs of students' e-assessment and subsequent affirmative action of the CS departments.}, language = {en} }