@phdthesis{Rohloff2021,
  author    = {Rohloff, Tobias},
  title     = {Learning analytics at scale},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-52623},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-526235},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {xvii, 138, lxvii},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Digital technologies are paving the way for innovative educational approaches. The learning format of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) provides a highly accessible path to lifelong learning while being more affordable and flexible than face-to-face courses. Thereby, thousands of learners can enroll in courses mostly without admission restrictions, but this also raises challenges. Individual supervision by teachers is barely feasible, and learning persistence and success depend on students' self-regulatory skills. Here, technology provides the means for support. The use of data for decision-making is already transforming many fields, whereas in education, it is still a young research discipline. Learning Analytics (LA) is defined as the measurement, collection, analysis, and reporting of data about learners and their learning contexts with the purpose of understanding and improving learning and learning environments. The vast amount of data that MOOCs produce on the learning behavior and success of thousands of students provides the opportunity to study human learning and develop approaches addressing the demands of learners and teachers. The overall purpose of this dissertation is to investigate the implementation of LA at the scale of MOOCs and to explore how data-driven technology can support learning and teaching in this context. To this end, several research prototypes have been iteratively developed for the HPI MOOC Platform. Hence, they were tested and evaluated in an authentic real-world learning environment. Most of the results can be applied on a conceptual level to other MOOC platforms as well. The research contribution of this thesis thus provides practical insights beyond what is theoretically possible. In total, four system components were developed and extended: (1) The Learning Analytics Architecture: A technical infrastructure to collect, process, and analyze event-driven learning data based on schema-agnostic pipelining in a service-oriented MOOC platform. (2) The Learning Analytics Dashboard for Learners: A tool for data-driven support of self-regulated learning, in particular to enable learners to evaluate and plan their learning activities, progress, and success by themselves. (3) Personalized Learning Objectives: A set of features to better connect learners' success to their personal intentions based on selected learning objectives to offer guidance and align the provided data-driven insights about their learning progress. (4) The Learning Analytics Dashboard for Teachers: A tool supporting teachers with data-driven insights to enable the monitoring of their courses with thousands of learners, identify potential issues, and take informed action. For all aspects examined in this dissertation, related research is presented, development processes and implementation concepts are explained, and evaluations are conducted in case studies. Among other findings, the usage of the learner dashboard in combination with personalized learning objectives demonstrated improved certification rates of 11.62\% to 12.63\%. Furthermore, it was observed that the teacher dashboard is a key tool and an integral part for teaching in MOOCs. In addition to the results and contributions, general limitations of the work are discussed—which altogether provide a solid foundation for practical implications and future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Seibel2012,
  author    = {Seibel, Andreas},
  title     = {Traceability and model management with executable and dynamic hierarchical megamodels},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-64222},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Nowadays, model-driven engineering (MDE) promises to ease software development by decreasing the inherent complexity of classical software development. In order to deliver on this promise, MDE increases the level of abstraction and automation, through a consideration of domain-specific models (DSMs) and model operations (e.g. model transformations or code generations). DSMs conform to domain-specific modeling languages (DSMLs), which increase the level of abstraction, and model operations are first-class entities of software development because they increase the level of automation. Nevertheless, MDE has to deal with at least two new dimensions of complexity, which are basically caused by the increased linguistic and technological heterogeneity. The first dimension of complexity is setting up an MDE environment, an activity comprised of the implementation or selection of DSMLs and model operations. Setting up an MDE environment is both time-consuming and error-prone because of the implementation or adaptation of model operations. The second dimension of complexity is concerned with applying MDE for actual software development. Applying MDE is challenging because a collection of DSMs, which conform to potentially heterogeneous DSMLs, are required to completely specify a complex software system. A single DSML can only be used to describe a specific aspect of a software system at a certain level of abstraction and from a certain perspective. Additionally, DSMs are usually not independent but instead have inherent interdependencies, reflecting (partial) similar aspects of a software system at different levels of abstraction or from different perspectives. A subset of these dependencies are applications of various model operations, which are necessary to keep the degree of automation high. This becomes even worse when addressing the first dimension of complexity. Due to continuous changes, all kinds of dependencies, including the applications of model operations, must also be managed continuously. This comprises maintaining the existence of these dependencies and the appropriate (re-)application of model operations. The contribution of this thesis is an approach that combines traceability and model management to address the aforementioned challenges of configuring and applying MDE for software development. The approach is considered as a traceability approach because it supports capturing and automatically maintaining dependencies between DSMs. The approach is considered as a model management approach because it supports managing the automated (re-)application of heterogeneous model operations. In addition, the approach is considered as a comprehensive model management. Since the decomposition of model operations is encouraged to alleviate the first dimension of complexity, the subsequent composition of model operations is required to counteract their fragmentation. A significant portion of this thesis concerns itself with providing a method for the specification of decoupled yet still highly cohesive complex compositions of heterogeneous model operations. The approach supports two different kinds of compositions - data-flow compositions and context compositions. Data-flow composition is used to define a network of heterogeneous model operations coupled by sharing input and output DSMs alone. Context composition is related to a concept used in declarative model transformation approaches to compose individual model transformation rules (units) at any level of detail. In this thesis, context composition provides the ability to use a collection of dependencies as context for the composition of other dependencies, including model operations. In addition, the actual implementation of model operations, which are going to be composed, do not need to implement any composition concerns. The approach is realized by means of a formalism called an executable and dynamic hierarchical megamodel, based on the original idea of megamodels. This formalism supports specifying compositions of dependencies (traceability and model operations). On top of this formalism, traceability is realized by means of a localization concept, and model management by means of an execution concept.},
  language  = {en}
}