@phdthesis{Kutter2022,
  author    = {Kutter, Denny},
  title     = {Three essays on misconduct and reporting outcomes},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-55933},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-559333},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {II, 186},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This cumulative doctoral thesis consists of three empirical studies that examine the role of top-level executives in shaping adverse financial reporting outcomes and other forms of corporate misconduct. The first study examines CEO effects on a wide range of offenses. Using data from enforcement actions by more than 50 U.S. federal agencies, regression re-sults show CEO effects on the likelihood, frequency, and severity of corporate misconduct. The findings hold for financial, labor-related, and environmental offenses; however, CEO effects are more pronounced for non-financial misconduct. Further results show a positive relation between CEO ability and non-financial misconduct, but no relation with financial misconduct, suggesting that higher CEO ability can have adverse consequences for employee welfare and society and public health. The second study focuses on CEO and CFO effects on financial misreporting. Using data on restatements and public enforcement actions, regression results show that the incremental effect of CFOs is economically larger than that of CEOs. This greater economic impact of CFOs is particularly pronounced for fraudulent misreporting. The findings remain consistent across different samples, methods, misreporting measures, and specification choices for the underlying conceptual mechanism, highlighting the important role of the CFO as a key player in the beyond-GAAP setting. The third study reexamines the relation between equity incentives and different reporting outcomes. The literature review reveals large variation in the empirical measures for firm size as standard control variable, equity incentives as key explanatory variables, and the reporting outcome of interest. Regres-sion results show that these design choices have a direct bearing on empirical results, with changes in t-statistics that often exceed typical thresholds for statistical significance. The find-ings hold for aggressive accrual management, earnings management through discretionary accruals, and material misstatements, suggesting that common design choices can have a large impact on whether equity incentives effects are considered significant or not.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{LeueBensch2020,
  author    = {Leue-Bensch, Carina},
  title     = {Supporting the expression of entrepreneurial potential},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {XII, 127, XVIII},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The ability of a company to innovate and to launch innovation is a critical competitive edge to remain competitive in the 21st century. Large organizations therefore increasingly recognize employees as a significant factor and critical source of innovation. Several studies assert the fact that every employee has to offer certain skills and knowledge and can contribute to innovation. Hence, every employee has a certain 'entrepreneurial potential'. This potential can be expressed in the form of entrepreneurial behaviour and can occur in many ways, from monopersonal innovation championing to several small scale contributions, where several individuals team up for innovation. To support entrepreneurial behaviour of their employees, large organizations increasingly rely on Corporate Entrepreneurship. They set up organizational structures and venturing units, offer vehicles and tools to their employees to be more entrepreneurial. The evolvement of new tools and technologies thereby allow for new ways of employee involvement, also allowing for more radical innovation to be developed collaboratively. Yet, many of such offerings fail to achieve the desired outcome. While some employees immediately opt-in for innovation, others do not and their entrepreneurial potential remains untapped. This research explores how large organizations can better support their employees to express their entrepreneurial potential, thus moving from non-entrepreneurial behaviour or not wanting to be involved, to actually expressing entrepreneurial behaviour. The underlying research therefore is two-fold. While focusing on the individual level and the entrepreneurial behaviour of employees, this research also takes the organizational perspective into account in order to identify how non-entrepreneurial behaviour can be stimulated towards entrepreneurial behaviour. Using an empirical qualitative research design based on pragmatism and abduction, data is collected by means of qualitative interviews as well as a longitudinal use case setting. Grounded theory is then applied for analysis and sense making. The main outcome is a theoretical model of why employees are expressing or not expressing their entrepreneurial potential and how non-expression can potentially be triggered towards entrepreneurial behaviour. The results indicate that there is no one-size-fits all model of Corporate Entrepreneurship. This research therefore argues that organizations can achieve higher levels of entrepreneurial behaviour when addressing employees differently. By developing a theoretical model as well as suggestions of how this model can be applied in practice, this research contributes to theory and practice alike. This document closes suggesting future research areas around supporting employees to express their entrepreneurial potential.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Kirchner2023,
  author    = {Kirchner, Jan-Robert},
  title     = {Negotiations in Audit Processes},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-60085},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-600854},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {II, 156},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {This cumulative dissertation consists of three full empirical investigations based on three separate collections of data dealing with the phenomenon of negotiations in audit processes, which are combined in two research articles. In the first study, I examine internal auditors' views on negotiation interactions with auditees. My research is based on 23 semi-structured interviews with internal auditors (14 in-house and 9 external service providers) to gain insight into when and about what (RQ1), why (RQ2), and how (RQ3) they negotiate with auditees. By adapting the Gibbins et al. (2001) negotiation framework to the context of internal auditing, I obtain specific process (negotiation issue, auditor-auditee process, and outcome) and context elements that form the basis of my analyses. Through the additional use of inductive procedures, I conclude that internal auditors negotiate when they face professional and non-professional resistance from auditees during the audit process (RQ1). This resistance occurs in a variety of audit types and audit issues. Internal auditors choose negotiations to overcome this resistance primarily out of functional interest, as they cannot simply instruct auditees to acknowledge the findings and implement the required actions (RQ2). I find that the implementation of the required actions is the main goal of the respondents, which is also an important quality factor for internal auditing. Although few respondents interpret these interactions with auditees as negotiations, all respondents use a variety of negotiation strategies to create value (e.g., cost cutting, logrolling, and bridging) and claim value (e.g. positional commitment and threats) (RQ3). Finally, I contribute to empirical research on internal audit negotiations and internal audit quality by shedding light on the black box of internal auditor-auditee interactions. The second study consists of two experiments that examine the effects of tax auditors' emotion expressions during tax audit negotiations. In the first experiment, we demonstrate that auditors expressing anger obtain more concessions from taxpayers than auditors expressing happiness. This reveals that taxpayers interpret auditors' emotions strategically and do not respond affectively. In the second experiment, we show that the experience with an auditor who expressed either happiness or anger reduces taxpayers' post-audit compliance compared to the experience with an emotionally neutral auditor. Apparently, taxpayers use their experience with an emotional auditor to rationalize later noncompliance. Taken together, both experiments show the potentially detrimental effects of positive and negative emotion expressions by the auditor and point to the benefits of avoiding emotion expressions. We find that when auditors avoid emotion expressions this does not result in fewer concessions from taxpayers than when auditors express anger. However, when auditors avoid emotion expressions this leads to a significantly better evaluation of the taxpayer-auditor relationship and significantly reduces taxpayers' post-audit noncompliance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Hoffmann2023,
  author    = {Hoffmann, Nicole Christiane},
  title     = {Essays on Crisis and Change From a Management-Accounting Perspective},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-60118},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-601185},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {VIII, 192},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {This cumulative doctoral thesis consists of five empirical studies examining various aspects of crisis and change from a management-accounting perspective. Within the first study, a bibliometric analysis is conducted. More precisely, based on publications between the financial crisis (since 2007) and the COVID-19 crisis (starting in 2020), the crisis literature in management accounting is investigated to uncover the most influential aspects of the field and to analyze the theoretical foundations of the literature. Moreover, this investigation also serves to identify future research streams and to provide starting points for future research. Based on a survey, the second study investigates the impact of several management-accounting tools on organizational resilience and its effect on a company's competitive advantage during a crisis. The results show that their target-oriented use positively influences organizational resilience and contributes to the company's competitive advantage during the crisis. The third study provides a more detailed view on the relationship between budgeting and risk management and their benefit for companies in times of crisis. For this purpose, the relationship between the relevance of budgeting functions and risk management in the company and the corresponding impact on company performance are investigated. The results show a positive relationship. However, a crisis can also affect the relationship between the company and its shareholders: Thus, the fourth study - based on publicly available data and a survey - examines the consequences of virtual annual general meetings on shareholder rights. The results show that, temporarily, particularly the right to information was severely restricted. For the following year, this problem was fixed, and ultimately, the virtual option was introduced permanently. The crisis has thus brought about a lasting change. But not only crises cause changes: The fifth study, also based on survey data, investigates the changes in the role of management accountants caused by digitalization. More precisely, it investigates how management accountants deal with tasks that are considered outdated and unattractive. The results of the study show that different types of personalities also act differently as far as the willingness to do those unattractive tasks is concerned, and career ambitions also influence that willingness. In addition to this, the results provide insights into the motivation of management accountants to conduct tasks and thus counteract existing assumptions based on stereotypes and clich{\´e}s circulating within the research community.},
  language  = {en}
}