@book{NeumannBrandtWardenbergBrodowskyetal.2008,
  author    = {Neumann, Martin and Brandt-Wardenberg, Henriette and Brodowsky, Kristin and Ebert, Daniel and Hose, Susanne and Junge, Katrin and Kappler, Anna and Karges, Melanie and Lehnert, Annette and Richter, Olivia and Schirrmeister, Sebastian and Solich, Raphaela and Thaele, Liisa and Trenkner, Christina and Tsch{\"o}pel, Sebastian and Unger, Katharina and Winkler, Anja and Zimmermann, Steven and Kirschke, Andreas and Ladusch, Manfred},
  title     = {Sorben (Wenden) - Eine Brandenburger Minderheit und ihre Thematisierung im Unterricht : Teil III: Krabat - Aspekte einer sorbischen Sage},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-27315},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Die vorliegende Publikation f{\"a}llt ein wenig aus dem Rahmen der Reihe „Sorben (Wenden) - Eine Brandenburger Minderheit und ihre Thematisierung im Unterricht". Im Gegensatz zu den anderen Teilen widmet sie sich nur einem Gegenstand - dem Stoff der Krabat-Sagen. Damit richtet sie sich haupts{\"a}chlich an Lehrkr{\"a}fte im Fach Deutsch, wobei auch fach{\"u}bergreifende und F{\"a}cher verbindende Aspekte ber{\"u}cksichtigt werden. Die Krabat-Sage z{\"a}hlt vor allem in der Bearbeitung von Preußler zu den bekanntesten sorbischen Stoffen. Diese sorbischen Wurzeln werden allerdings nur selten thematisiert. Daher sind viele der vorliegenden Betrachtungen zu ausgew{\"a}hlten Aspekten auch als Anregungen zu verstehen, unter welchen Gesichtspunkten Krabat behandelt oder gar neu interpretiert und weiterentwickelt werden k{\"o}nnte. Diese Handreichung ist so konzipiert, dass sie je nach Interesse ausschnittweise gelesen werden kann: Auf einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber verschiedene Krabat-Bearbeitungen folgen Betrachtungen sorbischer Aspekte als auch M{\"o}glichkeiten einer Thematisierung {\"u}ber den Deutsch-Unterricht hinaus. Dabei wird auf M{\"o}glichkeiten einer Exkursion in die historische Krabat-Region in der Lausitz eingegangen. Es folgen Texte zu ausgew{\"a}hlten Einzelaspekten. Zudem enth{\"a}lt diese Publikation eine Zusammenstellung von verschiedenen Krabat-Materialien und Hinweise auf Unterrichtsprojekte zur Anregung, weiteren Vertiefung bzw. f{\"u}r den eigenen Unterrichtseinsatz.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KoehlerKoehlerDeckwartetal.2018,
  author    = {Koehler, Friedrich and Koehler, Kerstin and Deckwart, Oliver and Prescher, Sandra and Wegscheider, Karl and Winkler, Sebastian and Vettorazzi, Eik and Polze, Andreas and Stangl, Karl and Hartmann, Oliver and Marx, Almuth and Neuhaus, Petra and Scherf, Michael and Kirwan, Bridget-Anne and Anker, Stefan D.},
  title     = {Telemedical Interventional Management in Heart Failure II (TIM-HF2), a randomised, controlled trial investigating the impact of telemedicine on unplanned cardiovascular hospitalisations and mortality in heart failure patients},
  series = {European Journal of Heart Failure},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {European Journal of Heart Failure},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {1388-9842},
  doi       = {10.1002/ejhf.1300},
  pages     = {1485 -- 1493},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background Heart failure (HF) is a complex, chronic condition that is associated with debilitating symptoms, all of which necessitate close follow-up by health care providers. Lack of disease monitoring may result in increased mortality and more frequent hospital readmissions for decompensated HF. Remote patient management (RPM) in this patient population may help to detect early signs and symptoms of cardiac decompensation, thus enabling a prompt initiation of the appropriate treatment and care before a manifestation of HF decompensation. Objective The objective of the present article is to describe the design of a new trial investigating the impact of RPM on unplanned cardiovascular hospitalisations and mortality in HF patients. Methods The TIM-HF2 trial is designed as a prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, open (with randomisation concealment), multicentre trial with pragmatic elements introduced for data collection. Eligible patients with HF are randomised (1:1) to either RPM + usual care or to usual care only and are followed for 12 months. The primary outcome is the percentage of days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospitalisations or all-cause death. The main secondary outcomes are all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion The TIM-HF2 trial will provide important prospective data on the potential beneficial effect of telemedical monitoring and RPM on unplanned cardiovascular hospitalisations and mortality in HF patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{BorowskiGlowinskiFristeretal.2018,
  author    = {Borowski, Andreas and Glowinski, Ingrid and Frister, Jonas and H{\"o}ttecke, Dietmar and Buth, Katrin and Koenen, Jenna and Masanek, Nicole and Reichwein, Wilko and Scholten, Nina and Sprenger, Sandra and Stender, Peter and W{\"o}hlke, Carina and Komorek, Michael and Freckmann, Janine and Hofmann, Josefine and Niesel, Verena and Richter, Chris and Mehlmann, Nelli and Bikner-Ahsbahs, Angelika and Unverricht, Katja and Schanze, Sascha and Bittorf, Robert Marten and Meier, Monique and Grospietsch, Finja and Mayer, J{\"u}rgen and Gimbel, Katharina and Ziepprecht, Kathrin and Hofmann, Judith and Kramer, Charlotte and M{\"u}ller, Britta-Kornelia and Rohde, Andreas and Z{\"u}hlsdorf, Felix and Winkler, Iris and Laging, Ralf and Peter, Carina and Schween, Michael and H{\"a}rle, Gerhard and Busse, Beatrix and Mahner, Sebastian and K{\"o}stler, Verena and Kufner, Sabrina and M{\"a}gdefrau, Jutta and M{\"u}ller, Christian and Beck, Christina and Kriehuber, Eva and Boch, Florian and Engl, Anna-Teresa and Helzel, Andreas and Pickert, Tina and Reiter, Christian and Blasini, Bettina and Nerdel, Claudia and Lewalter, Doris and Schiffhauer, Silke and Richter-Gebert, J{\"u}rgen and Bannert, Maria and Maahs, Mirjam and Reißner, Maria and Ungar, Patrizia and von Wachter, Jana-Kristin and Hellmann, Katharina and Zaki, Katja and Pohlenz, Philipp},
  title     = {Koh{\"a}renz in der universit{\"a}ren Lehrerbildung},
  editor    = {Glowinski, Ingrid and Borowski, Andreas and Gillen, Julia and Schanze, Sascha and von Meien, Joachim},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-438-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414267},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {One area that is supported by the project "Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung" (funded by BMBF) is the improvement of collaboration and coordination between studies in the discipline, studies in pedagogical content knowledge, and studies in pedagogical knowledge during teacher education at university. Aiming a better coordination among these three parts of teacher education at university, many of the supported projects have designed and realized university-specific approaches. This conference proceedings volume comprises contributions by 15 of these projects. Seven of those were introduced and discussed in workshops on the occasion of two cross-regional project-conferences in Hannover and Potsdam. Overall, the contributions give a theoretically funded as well as a practice-oriented overview of current approaches and concepts to achieve a better connection between study units concerning studies in content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. The volume presents university projects, which take effect on different levels (at the level of curriculum and content, at a collegiate level, at the level of structural conditions of universities). The different approaches are described in a way that they can provide a basis for transfer to other subjects or further universities. The contributions are aimed at teacher educators as well as other actors working in the field of teaching- and quality development at universities. All of them can take transferable ideas and impulses from the described concepts and formats.},
  language  = {de}
}