@article{MaiwaldJungaLangetal.2019, author = {Maiwald, Lisa Marie and Junga, Yvonne Marie and Lang, Thomas and Montini, Romina and Witth{\"o}ft, Michael and Heider, Jens and Schr{\"o}der, Annette and Weck, Florian}, title = {The role of therapist and patient in-session behavior for treatment outcome in exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy for panic disorder with agoraphobia}, series = {Journal of clinical psychology}, volume = {75}, journal = {Journal of clinical psychology}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0021-9762}, doi = {10.1002/jclp.22738}, pages = {614 -- 626}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Objective There is a very limited amount of research on the relationship between therapist and patient in-session behavior and treatment outcome in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for panic disorder with agoraphobia (PD/AG). Additionally, the findings tend to be inconclusive. This study investigates the association between therapist competence, adherence, patient interpersonal behavior, and therapeutic alliance and outcome in a low-control CBT setting by using comprehensive measures. Methods Twenty-six patients with PD/AG received 12 sessions of exposure-based CBT. With regard to the outcome, treatments were classified either as problematic or nonproblematic by means of distinct criteria. Two raters evaluated the in-session behavior. Results Patient interpersonal behavior was significantly associated with outcome at follow-up (r = 0.49). At posttreatment, the correlation did not reach significance ( r = 0.34). Competence, adherence, and alliance were not outcome associated. Conclusion The findings emphasize the need for therapists to pay particular attention to patients' interpersonal behavior during treatment.}, language = {en} } @article{KuehneLackiMuseetal.2019, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Lacki, Fiona Janina and Muse, Kate and Weck, Florian}, title = {Strengthening competence of therapists-in-training in the treatment of health anxiety (hypochondriasis)}, series = {Clinical psychology \& psychotherapy : an international journal of theory and practice}, volume = {26}, journal = {Clinical psychology \& psychotherapy : an international journal of theory and practice}, number = {3}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {1063-3995}, doi = {10.1002/cpp.2353}, pages = {319 -- 327}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Although the observation and assessment of psychotherapeutic competences are central to training, supervision, patient care, quality control, and life-long practice, structured instruments are used only occasionally. In the current study, an observation-based tool for the Assessment of Core CBT Skills (ACCS) was translated into German and adapted, and its psychometric properties were pilot evaluated. Competence of therapists-in-training was assessed in a random sample of n = 30 videos on cognitive behavioural therapy including patients diagnosed with hypochondriasis. Two of three raters independently assessed the competences demonstrated in the entire, active treatment sessions (n = 60). In our sample, internal consistency was excellent, and interrater reliability was good. Convergent validity (Cognitive Therapy Scale) and discriminant validity (Helping Alliance Questionnaire) were within the expected ranges. The ACCS total score did not significantly predict the reduction of symptoms of hypochondriasis, and a one-factorial structure of the instrument was found. By providing multiple opportunities for feedback, self-reflection, and supervision, the ACCS may complement current tools for the assessment of psychotherapeutic competences and importantly support competence-based training and supervision.}, language = {en} } @misc{KuehneMaasWiesenthaletal.2019, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Maas, Jana and Wiesenthal, Sophia and Weck, Florian}, title = {Empirical research in clinical supervision}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {580}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-43872}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-438721}, pages = {11}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Background: Although clinical supervision is considered to be a major component of the development and maintenance of psychotherapeutic competencies, and despite an increase in supervision research, the empirical evidence on the topic remains sparse. Methods: Because most previous reviews lack methodological rigor, we aimed to review the status and quality of the empirical literature on clinical supervision, and to provide suggestions for future research. MEDLINE, PsycInfo and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched and the review was conducted according to current guidelines. From the review results, we derived suggestions for future research on clinical supervision. Results: The systematic literature search identified 19 publications from 15 empirical studies. Taking into account the review results, the following suggestions for further research emerged: Supervision research would benefit from proper descriptions of how studies are conducted according to current guidelines, more methodologically rigorous empirical studies, the investigation of active supervision interventions, from taking diverse outcome domains into account, and from investigating supervision from a meta-theoretical perspective. Conclusions: In all, the systematic review supported the notion that supervision research often lags behind psychotherapy research in general. Still, the results offer detailed starting points for further supervision research.}, language = {en} } @article{KuehneMeisterMaassetal.2019, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Meister, Ramona and Maass, Ulrike and Paunov, Tatjana and Weck, Florian}, title = {How reliable are therapeutic competence ratings?}, series = {Cognitive therapy and research}, volume = {44}, journal = {Cognitive therapy and research}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York}, issn = {0147-5916}, doi = {10.1007/s10608-019-10056-5}, pages = {241 -- 257}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Assessments of psychotherapeutic competencies play a crucial role in research and training. However, research on the reliability and validity of such assessments is sparse. This study aimed to provide an overview of the current evidence and to provide an average interrater reliability (IRR) of psychotherapeutic competence ratings. A systematic review was conducted, and 20 studies reported in 32 publications were collected. These 20 studies were included in a narrative synthesis, and 20 coefficients were entered into the meta-analysis. Most primary studies referred to cognitive-behavioral therapies and the treatment of depression, used the Cognitive Therapy Scale, based ratings on videos, and trained the raters. Our meta-analysis revealed a pooled ICC of 0.82, but at the same time severe heterogeneity. The evidence map highlighted a variety of variables related to competence assessments. Further aspects influencing the reliability of competence ratings and regarding the considerable heterogeneity are discussed in detail throughout the manuscript.}, language = {en} } @article{KuehneMaasWiesenthaletal.2019, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Maas, Jana and Wiesenthal, Sophia and Weck, Florian}, title = {Empirical research in clinical supervision}, series = {BMC Psychology}, volume = {7}, journal = {BMC Psychology}, publisher = {BioMed Central}, address = {London}, issn = {2050-7283}, doi = {10.1186/s40359-019-0327-7}, pages = {11}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Background: Although clinical supervision is considered to be a major component of the development and maintenance of psychotherapeutic competencies, and despite an increase in supervision research, the empirical evidence on the topic remains sparse. Methods: Because most previous reviews lack methodological rigor, we aimed to review the status and quality of the empirical literature on clinical supervision, and to provide suggestions for future research. MEDLINE, PsycInfo and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched and the review was conducted according to current guidelines. From the review results, we derived suggestions for future research on clinical supervision. Results: The systematic literature search identified 19 publications from 15 empirical studies. Taking into account the review results, the following suggestions for further research emerged: Supervision research would benefit from proper descriptions of how studies are conducted according to current guidelines, more methodologically rigorous empirical studies, the investigation of active supervision interventions, from taking diverse outcome domains into account, and from investigating supervision from a meta-theoretical perspective. Conclusions: In all, the systematic review supported the notion that supervision research often lags behind psychotherapy research in general. Still, the results offer detailed starting points for further supervision research.}, language = {en} } @misc{GropalisBailerWecketal.2018, author = {Gropalis, Maria and Bailer, Josef and Weck, Florian and Witth{\"o}ft, Michael}, title = {Optimierung von Expositionstherapie bei pathologischen Krankheits{\"a}ngsten}, series = {Psychotherapeut}, volume = {63}, journal = {Psychotherapeut}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York}, issn = {0935-6185}, doi = {10.1007/s00278-018-0285-1}, pages = {188 -- 193}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Pathologische Krankheits{\"a}ngste wurden bislang nach ICD und DSM prim{\"a}r als somatoforme St{\"o}rung bzw. als somatische Belastungsst{\"o}rung klassifiziert. Theoretische Erw{\"a}gungen und empirische Befunde legen jedoch nahe, dass es sich bei pathologischen Krankheits{\"a}ngsten eigentlich um eine Angstst{\"o}rung handelt. Innerhalb des vorliegenden Beitrags wird daf{\"u}r argumentiert, dass Defizite in der aktuellen Behandlungspraxis und in der Wahrnehmung von Patienten mit Hypochondrie als „schwierige Patienten" teilweise auf Unklarheit in der Nosologie sowie bez{\"u}glich der entscheidenden Mechanismen der Entstehung und Aufrechterhaltung zur{\"u}ckzuf{\"u}hren sind. Ausgehend von innovativen theoretischen Ans{\"a}tzen zur Erkl{\"a}rung pathologischer Krankheits{\"a}ngste werden Vorschl{\"a}ge f{\"u}r eine verbesserte therapeutische Praxis skizziert. Der Fokus liegt hierbei auf einem verst{\"a}rken Einsatz expositionsbasierter Behandlungselemente, die sich am „Inhibitory-learning"-Ansatz orientieren und sich bei anderen Angstst{\"o}rungen bereits bew{\"a}hrt haben.}, language = {en} } @article{ProbstJakobKaufmannetal.2018, author = {Probst, Thomas and Jakob, Marion and Kaufmann, Yvonne Marie and M{\"u}ller-Neng, Julia M. B. and Bohus, Martin and Weck, Florian}, title = {Patients' and therapists' experiences of general change mechanisms during bug-in-the-eye and delayed video-based supervised cognitive-behavioral therapy}, series = {Journal of clinical psychology}, volume = {74}, journal = {Journal of clinical psychology}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0021-9762}, doi = {10.1002/jclp.22519}, pages = {509 -- 522}, year = {2018}, abstract = {ObjectiveThis secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigated whether bug-in-the-eye (BITE) supervision (live computer-based supervision during a psychotherapy session) affects the manner in which patients and therapists experience general change mechanisms (GCMs) during cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). MethodA total of 23 therapists were randomized either to the BITE condition or the control condition (delayed video-based [DVB] supervision). After each session, both patients (BITE: n=19; DVB: n=23) and therapists (BITE: n=11; DVB: n=12) completed the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Bernese Post Session Report (BPSR). The HAQ total score and the 3 secondary factors of the BPSR (interpersonal experiences, intrapersonal experiences, problem actuation) functioned as GCMs. Multilevel models were performed. ResultsFor patients, GCMs did not develop differently between BITE and DVB during CBT. Therapists rated the alliance as well as interpersonal and intrapersonal experiences not significantly different between BITE and DVB during CBT, but they perceived problem actuation to increase significantly more in BITE than in DVB (p<.05). ConclusionBITE supervision might be helpful in encouraging CBT therapists to apply interventions, which focus on the activation of relevant problems and related emotions.}, language = {en} } @misc{KuehneLesserPetrietal.2018, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Lesser, Hannah and Petri, Franziska and Weck, Florian}, title = {Do mental health patients learn what their cognitive-behaviour therapists think they do?}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {490}, issn = {1866-8364}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-420607}, pages = {7}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Purpose: The acquisition of skills is essential to the conceptualization of cognitive-behavioural therapy. Yet, what experiences are encountered and what skills actually learned during therapy, and whether patients and therapists have concurrent views hereof, remains poorly understood. Method: An explorative pilot study with semi-structured, corresponding interview guides was conducted. Pilot data from our outpatient unit were transcribed and content-analyzed following current guidelines. Results: The responses of 18 participants (patients and their psychotherapists) were assigned to six main categories. Educational and cognitive aspects were mentioned most frequently and consistently by both groups. Having learned Behavioural alternatives attained the second highest agreement between perspectives. Conclusions: Patients and therapists valued CBT as an opportunity to learn new skills, which is an important prerequisite also for the maintenance of therapeutic change. We discuss limitations to generalizability but also theoretical and therapy implications.}, language = {en} } @misc{KuehneAyOtterbecketal.2018, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Ay, Destina Sevde and Otterbeck, Mara Jasmin and Weck, Florian}, title = {Standardized Patients in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy}, series = {Academic psychiatry}, volume = {42}, journal = {Academic psychiatry}, number = {6}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York}, issn = {1042-9670}, doi = {10.1007/s40596-018-0886-6}, pages = {773 -- 781}, year = {2018}, abstract = {ObjectivesThe use of simulated and standardized patients (SP) is widely accepted in the medical field and, from there, is beginning to disseminate into clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The purpose of this study was therefore to systematically review barriers and facilitators that should be considered in the implementation of SP interventions specific to clinical psychology and psychotherapy.MethodsFollowing current guidelines, a scoping review was conducted. The literature search focused on the MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases, including Dissertation Abstracts International. After screening for titles and abstracts, full texts were screened independently and in duplicate according to our inclusion criteria. For data extraction, a pre-defined form was piloted and used. Units of meaning with respect to barriers and facilitators were extracted and categorized inductively using content-analysis techniques. From the results, a matrix of interconnections and a network graph were compiled.ResultsThe 41 included publications were mainly in the fields of psychiatry and mental health nursing, as well as in training and education. The detailed category system contrasts four supercategories, i.e., which organizational and economic aspects to consider, which persons to include as eligible SPs, how to develop adequate scenarios, and how to authentically and consistently portray mental health patients.ConclusionsPublications focused especially on the interrelation between authenticity and consistency of portrayals, on how to evoke empathy in learners, and on economic and training aspects. A variety of recommendations for implementing SP programs, from planning to training, monitoring, and debriefing, is provided, for example, ethical screening of and ongoing support for SPs.}, language = {en} } @article{KuehneLesserPetrietal.2018, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Lesser, Hannah and Petri, Franziska and Weck, Florian}, title = {Do mental health patients learn what their cognitive-behaviour therapists think they do?}, series = {International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being}, volume = {13}, journal = {International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being}, number = {1}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {London}, issn = {1748-2631}, doi = {10.1080/17482631.2018.1527598}, pages = {6}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Purpose: The acquisition of skills is essential to the conceptualization of cognitive-behavioural therapy. Yet, what experiences are encountered and what skills actually learned during therapy, and whether patients and therapists have concurrent views hereof, remains poorly understood. Method: An explorative pilot study with semi-structured, corresponding interview guides was conducted. Pilot data from our outpatient unit were transcribed and content-analyzed following current guidelines. Results: The responses of 18 participants (patients and their psychotherapists) were assigned to six main categories. Educational and cognitive aspects were mentioned most frequently and consistently by both groups. Having learned Behavioural alternatives attained the second highest agreement between perspectives. Conclusions: Patients and therapists valued CBT as an opportunity to learn new skills, which is an important prerequisite also for the maintenance of therapeutic change. We discuss limitations to generalizability but also theoretical and therapy implications.}, language = {en} }